Exploring omissions in nursing care using retrospective chart review: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Omissions in nursing care can compromise patient safety. To date, this phenomenon has been investigated almost exclusively via nurse surveys. However, such surveys restrict the range of activities which can be assessed for omissions, and patient level analysis. As an alternative, retrospective chart review methodology has been used successfully in other research fields, but not yet for omitted nursing care.

OBJECTIVES

To describe characteristics and frequency of omitted nursing care using a retrospective chart review methodology.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Observational single center study in two German neurological inpatient units. A random sample of 100 patient admissions was used.

METHODS

A structured chart review protocol to detect nursing omissions was developed and applied. The full range of expected nursing care activities were assessed regarding the importance of documenting them and whether they had been fully or partially omitted. Vital sign measurements were assessed regarding both the measurement target number and the number of measurements recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 1885 activities-a mean of 19 per patient-were identified. Of the reviewed activities, 52% (n = 971) were fully or partially omitted. Patients experienced between one and 22 omitted nursing care activities during their hospital stay (8-84% of expected care activities). Ranging from 6% to 100% some activities were more commonly omitted than others during admission. The most frequently omitted nursing activity was giving emotional care (88%, n = 66); the least frequently omitted was teaching (10%, n = 29). Vital signs were recorded only 50% (n = 141) of the targeted number of times.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a retrospective chart review protocol to identify omissions in nursing care allows the assessment of a broad range of nursing activities. Additionally, this is the first-time patient-level data on a broad range of activities have been analyzed. The newly developed chart review methodology can complement established survey methods and provide a new perspective on the phenomenon of omitted nursing care.

GDPR: an impediment to research?

BACKGROUND

The recent introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation and Health Research Regulations has been an area of significant concern for those engaged in clinical research. These European regulations, following subsequent interpretation by Ireland's Department of Health, now place Ireland in a unique position which differs substantially from other European countries and may prove a significant impediment to Irish clinical research, depriving Irish patients of timely access to potentially life-saving treatments and making Ireland less attractive to pharmaceutical companies engaged in this area. At the very least, the regulations, as applied in Ireland, will place a significant extra burden of work on Ireland's clinical researchers and at their worst will force individuals and institutions out of the clinical research field, which will result in significant loss to the Irish knowledge economy and lead to the detriment of patient care.

AIM

In this article, we explore what exactly is proposed by Europe's GDPR and by Ireland's Health Research Regulations. We look at the challenges presented to clinical researchers, and we highlight those areas, which need clarification by the Department of Health and by the Data Protection Commissioner.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose five recommendations, which would ameliorate some of the more restrictive impositions of these regulations. This review was commissioned by the Irish Academy of Medical Science.