Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 100-Week Results from the Phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) require treatment providing durable long-term efficacy in different disease domains as well as safety. We present 100-week efficacy and safety results of risankizumab in patients with active PsA and previous inadequate response/intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR).

METHODS

KEEPsAKE 1 (NCT03675308) is a global phase 3 study, including a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled and ongoing open-label extension periods. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at baseline and weeks 4 and 16. After week 24, all patients received open-label risankizumab every 12 weeks thereafter. Patients were evaluated through 100 weeks. Endpoints included achieving ≥ 20% reduction in American College of Rheumatology criteria for symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20), minimal disease activity (MDA; defined as ≥ 5/7 criteria of low disease activity and extent), and other measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 828/964 (85.9%) patients completed week 100. For patients receiving continuous risankizumab, 57.3%, 70.6%, and 64.3% achieved ACR20 at weeks 24, 52, and 100, respectively. For the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 33.5% achieved ACR20 at week 24 but increased after switching to active treatment at weeks 52 (63.7%) and 100 (62.1%). In ACR20 responders at week 52, 81.2% of both treatment cohorts maintained response at week 100. MDA was achieved by 25.0%, 38.3%, and 38.2% of the continuous risankizumab cohort at weeks 24, 52, and 100. In the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 10.2% achieved MDA at week 24, increasing at weeks 52 (28.0%) and 100 (35.2%). MDA response was maintained at week 100 in week 52 responders in the continuous risankizumab (75.5%) and placebo/risankizumab cohorts (78.2%). Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures. Risankizumab was generally well tolerated through 100 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with active PsA who are csDMARD-IR, risankizumab demonstrated durable long-term efficacy and was generally well tolerated, with a consistent long-term safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03675308.

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 100-Week Results from the KEEPsAKE 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Long-term therapeutic options providing durable response and tolerability are needed for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The ongoing KEEPsAKE 2 trial is evaluating risankizumab treatment in patients with active PsA who previously had inadequate response/intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR) and/or 1-2 biologic DMARDs (bDMARD-IR). Herein, we report results through 100 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

KEEPsAKE 2 is a global phase 3 trial. Patients with active PsA were randomized 1:1 to double-blind subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo (weeks 0, 4, and 16). At week 24, all patients received open-label risankizumab every 12 weeks until end of study. Efficacy endpoints included achieving ≥ 20% improvement in PsA symptoms using American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20), attaining minimal disease activity (MDA; meeting ≥ 5/7 criteria of low disease activity and extent), and improving in other measures.

RESULTS

At the cutoff date, 345/443 (77.9%) patients were ongoing in the study. ACR20 was achieved in 57.1% and 52.5% of the continuous risankizumab and placebo/risankizumab cohorts, respectively, at week 100 and in 60.0% and 55.8%, respectively, at week 52. In week 52 responders, maintenance of ACR20 at week 100 was achieved in 74.8% (continuous risankizumab) and 78.7% (placebo/risankizumab) of patients. In the continuous risankizumab and placebo/risankizumab cohorts, respectively, MDA was achieved by 33.0% and 33.3% of patients at week 100 and by 27.2% and 33.8% at week 52. Among MDA responders at week 52, maintenance of MDA response was achieved by 83.6% and 73.0% of the continuous risankizumab and placebo/risankizumab cohorts, respectively. Risankizumab was well tolerated through week 100.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab demonstrated durable efficacy and tolerability through 100 weeks; most patients who achieved ACR20 and MDA responses at week 52 maintained this achievement through week 100. There were no new safety signals in patients who had csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03671148.

Enthesitis and Dactylitis Resolution with Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Integrated Analysis of the Randomized KEEPsAKE 1 and 2 Trials

INTRODUCTION

The presence (vs absence) of enthesitis/dactylitis is associated with greater psoriatic arthritis (PsA) activity and reduced health-related quality of life. Risankizumab, an interleukin 23 antagonist, demonstrated superior treatment efficacy over placebo in patients with PsA, including enthesitis/dactylitis. Herein, we report the efficacy of risankizumab on complete resolution of enthesitis and/or dactylitis and improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with PsA.

METHODS

This integrated post hoc analysis of data from KEEPsAKE 1 and KEEPsAKE 2 included patients with baseline enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index > 0) and/or dactylitis (Leeds Dactylitis Index > 0). Efficacy outcomes at weeks 24 and 52 included proportion of patients achieving enthesitis and/or dactylitis resolution and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue.

RESULTS

Of 1407 patients, approximately 63%, 28%, and 20% had baseline enthesitis, dactylitis, and both enthesitis/dactylitis, respectively. At week 24, higher response rates were observed for risankizumab vs placebo for resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis, and both enthesitis/dactylitis (differences of 13.9%, 16.9%, and 13.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). By week 52, risankizumab treatment resulted in complete resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis, and both enthesitis and dactylitis in 55.0%, 76.1%, and 52.3% of patients; similar resolution rates occurred among patients who switched from placebo to risankizumab. Among risankizumab-treated patients who achieved resolution of enthesitis and/or dactylitis, MCIDs were also attained in patient-reported pain, disability, and fatigue at week 24 (all p < 0.05; except fatigue in patients with resolution of both enthesitis/dactylitis); responses were sustained through week 52.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher proportions of risankizumab-treated (vs placebo-treated) patients achieved enthesitis and/or dactylitis resolution and meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes at week 24 and generally sustained responses at week 52. Thus, risankizumab may result in sustained alleviation of PsA-related pathognomonic musculoskeletal lesions of enthesitis/dactylitis.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT03675308, and NCT03671148.

Real-World Long-Term Effectiveness of Risankizumab Among Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Analysis from an International Medical Chart Review (RAPID) Study

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on the efficacy of risankizumab (RZB) in clinical moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) are limited. The RAPID study assessed real-world clinical and patient-reported outcomes in RZB-treated PsO patients using data collected from dermatologists in Canada, the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, and Poland.

METHODS

This ongoing, retrospective chart review collected data from medical records of RZB-treated adults with moderate-to-severe PsO (09/2022-06/2023). Eligible patients received RZB, had ≥ 12 months of medical records after RZB initiation (index date), and had Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), or static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) scores ≥ 3 months before and up to 18 months after the index date. The proportion of patients achieving a clear/almost clear PsO (IGA/sPGA = 0/1), PASI ≤ 1, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) = 0/1, and a 90%/100% improvement from baseline in PASI as well as the mean changes in PASI, DLQI, itch, and skin pain scores at 12 and 18 months were reported for patients with non-missing assessments at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

Most patients (66.4%) were male, 74.0% were biologic naïve, and 73.0% had scalp PsO. Mean baseline IGA/sPGA was 3.7 ± 0.5, with a mean PASI of 23.3 ± 11.8. After 12 months, 86.1% of patients reported IGA/sPGA ≤ 1, and 75.7% achieved PASI90; these further increased to 91.1% and 80.5% at 18 months. DLQI, itch, and skin pain scores improved over time.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrated the durable, real-world effectiveness of RZB in patients with moderate-to-severe PsO through continued improvement in disease and symptom severity over 18 months, with most of the patients reporting clear/almost clear skin.

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the cause of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is unknown, and the effectiveness of current drug treatments is unsatisfactory. In March 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, for the treatment of PsA in adults. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe PsA.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search of relevant databases from the establishment of the databases to October 1, 2023. We conducted a meta-analysis using Stata 12.0 and utilized I2 and Egger tests to assess heterogeneity and publication bias among the studies. Bias assessment was performed using the risk bias map and bias risk summary diagram generated by Revman5.4 software. The review protocols were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023451894) and adhered to the preferred reporting item of system evaluation (PRISMA) guideline.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5038 patients with PsA treated with either risankizumab or placebo were included in the analysis. At 24 weeks, the risankizumab group demonstrated a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology-20 (ACR20) response rate compared to the placebo group (RR 1.760, 95% CI 1.568-1.977, P < 0.001). Additionally, the risankizumab group showed a significantly higher Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) response rate compared to the placebo group (RR 1.827, 95% CI 1.048-3.184, P < 0.05). The risankizumab group also exhibited improvement in Short Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) score (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.69, P < 0.001), with significantly lower Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (SMD - 0.27, 95% CI - 0.37 to - 0.17, P < 0.001) and higher Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score (SMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.20-0.35, P < 0.001) compared to the placebo group. Moreover, the risankizumab group had a significantly lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (SMD - 6.12, 95% CI - 10.02 to 2.23, P < 0.001). A study by Mease et al. indicated that patients receiving risankizumab generally demonstrated numerical improvements in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), although the small sample size limits the evidence. Further research is necessary to provide evidence-based guidelines. There were no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE) and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (STEAE) between the risankizumab and placebo groups (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.45-1.28, P = 0.31; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.49-1.99, P = 0.97, respectively), and the overall incidence of adverse events (AE) was not comparable (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.63-1.94, P = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Risankizumab showed superior efficacy across multiple outcome measures compared to placebo, with no significant increase in adverse events. Our findings endorse risankizumab as an excellent treatment option for PsA, offering valuable insights for clinicians and patients when choosing appropriate therapeutic interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered (CRD42023451894, 16 August 2023).

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Psoriatic Patients: A Multicenter, Retrospective, and Not-interventional Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Risankizumab - a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of IL-23 - has been recently approved to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Real-world data based on a representative pool of patients are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the mid- and long-term safety and efficacy profile of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the routine clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective and multicenter study of consecutive psoriatic patients on risankizumab from April 2020 through November 2022. The primary endpoint was the number of patients who achieved a 100% improvement in their Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (PASI100) on week 52.

RESULTS

A total of 510 patients, 198 (38.8%) women and 312 (61.2%) men were included in the study. The mean age was 51.7±14.4 years. A total of 227 (44.5%) study participants were obese (body mass index [BMI] >30kg/m2). The mean baseline PASI score was 11.4±7.2, and the rate of patients who achieved PASI100 on week 52, 67.0%. Throughout the study follow-up, 21%, 50.0%, 59.0%, and 66% of the patients achieved PASI100 on weeks 4, 16, 24, and 40, respectively. The number of patients who achieved a PASI ≤2 was greater in the group with a BMI ≤30kg/m2 on weeks 4 (P=.04), 16 (P=.001), and 52 (P=.002). A statistically significantly greater number of patients achieved PASI100 in the treatment-naïve group on weeks 16 and 52 (P=.001 each, respectively). On week 16 a significantly lower number of participants achieved PASI100 in the group with psoriatic arthropathy (P=.04). Among the overall study sample, 22 (4.3%) patients reported some type of adverse event and 20 (3.9%) discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab proved to be a safe and effective therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the routine clinical practice.

Risankizumab, a therapeutic alternative for psoriasis in people living with HIV

The management of psoriasis in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) presents a unique challenge, marked by a more severe progression and limited efficacy of first- and second-line treatments. Although conventional systemic therapies might be considered, these agents are immunosuppressants, making their use challenging in people living with HIV (PLHIV). Biologic agents are frequently used in individuals with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, but their efficacy and safety data in PLHIV are very limited, as this patient group tends to be excluded from clinical trials. Risankizumab is a selective interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor that has demonstrated a favourable safety profile and high efficacy in long-term studies and clinical practice. This current case report presents two clinical cases of PLHIV with plaque psoriasis who were effectively treated with the biologic agent risankizumab, with no reported safety issues. Although there are limited data on the use of biologics in PLHIV, this case series suggests that IL-23 inhibitors, namely risankizumab, might be a valuable therapeutic option for this population. Additional research and larger studies are needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the long-term safety and efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors in individuals affected by HIV.

Structural Basis for p19 Targeting by Anti-IL-23 Biologics: Correlations with Short- and Long-Term Efficacy in Psoriasis

IL-23 is central to psoriasis pathogenesis. Biologics targeting IL-23 are important therapies against psoriasis. IL-23 inhibitors risankizumab, tildrakizumab, and guselkumab bind the IL-23 p19 subunit, whereas ustekinumab binds p40; however, the structural composition of the IL-23-binding epitopes and how these molecular properties relate to clinical efficacy are not known. Utilizing epitope data derived from hydrogen-deuterium exchange or crystallographic experiments, we mapped inhibitor epitope locations, hydrophobicity, and surface charge onto the IL-23 surface. Molecular properties of each inhibitor epitope, including solvent-accessible surface area, were correlated to binding affinity, kinetic values, and clinical efficacy scores for plaque psoriasis through linear regression analysis. Each IL-23 inhibitor binds an epitope with a unique size, composition, and location except for a 10-residue overlap region outside of the IL-23 receptor epitope. We observed strong correlations between epitope surface area and KD and koff but not kon. Epitope surface area, KD, and koff were further associated with short-term (10-16 weeks) and long-term (44-60 weeks) clinical efficacy according to PASI-90 responses, with risankizumab demonstrating highest efficacy among IL-23 biologics. In contrast, kon, epitope hydrophobicity, polarity, and charge content did not correlate with efficacy. These data exemplify how molecular principles of medications within a therapeutic class can explain their differential clinical responses.

Maintenance Risankizumab Sustains Induction Response in Patients with Crohn's Disease in a Randomized Phase 3 Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Durable clinical remission, endoscopic healing, and biomarker normalization are key treatment goals for Crohn's disease. The selective anti-interleukin-23 p19 inhibitor risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. This post-hoc analysis of data from the pivotal risankizumab maintenance study assessed whether risankizumab maintenance therapy sustained the clinical and endoscopic outcomes achieved with risankizumab induction therapy.

METHODS

We evaluated 462 patients who achieved a clinical response to risankizumab intravenous induction treatment and were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 360 mg, subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg, or placebo [withdrawal] every 8 weeks for 52 weeks in the randomized, controlled FORTIFY maintenance study. Maintenance of clinical, endoscopic, and biomarker endpoints at week 52 among patients who achieved these endpoints after 12 weeks of induction treatment was evaluated.

RESULTS

A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving maintenance treatment with risankizumab 360 or 180 mg compared with placebo [withdrawal] maintained Crohn's Disease Activity Index remission [68.6%, 70.8%, vs 56.3%; p < 0.05], stool frequency/abdominal pain remission [69.2%, 64.1%, vs 50.5%; p < 0.01], endoscopic response [70.2%, 68.2%, vs 38.4%; p < 0.001], endoscopic remission [74.4%, 45.5%, vs 23.9%; p < 0.05], and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease of 0-2 [65.5%, 36.7%, vs 21.9%]. Most patients [56.8-83.3%] who achieved normalized faecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein during induction sustained them with maintenance risankizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous risankizumab maintenance therapy results in durable improvement in clinical and endoscopic outcomes over 1 year in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03105102.

Clinical Bridging From Prefilled Syringe to On-body Injector for Risankizumab in Crohn's Disease

PURPOSE

This article describes the clinical development bridging strategy and key data to support the marketing application of the risankizumab on-body injection (OBI) system for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD), even though the OBI was not evaluated directly in the pivotal Phase III studies in CD.

METHODS

Three studies were conducted as part of the clinical bridging strategy. The pilot pharmacokinetics (PK) study was a Phase I, single-dose, 4-arm, open-label, randomized, parallel-group exploratory PK and tolerability study that assessed the effect of rate and volume of administration on the bioavailability (BA) of risankizumab and the extent of injection site-related pain after subcutaneous (SC) administration in healthy subjects. The pivotal BA/bioequivalence (BE) study was a relative BA/BE bridging study in healthy subjects to assess the relative BA of the to-be-marketed risankizumab OBI compared with the prefilled syringe (PFS) used in the Phase III CD studies. The OBI adhesive study was a randomized, open-label, non-drug interventional study in healthy subjects to assess the OBI adhesive effectiveness and skin tolerability at 2 different locations (abdomen and upper thigh) over different periods of time (5 and 30 minutes).

FINDINGS

The pilot PK study showed that risankizumab exposures were similar across different rates/volumes of SC administration in healthy subjects, thereby supporting further development of the OBI. Second, a pivotal BA/BE study showed comparability between the OBI and Phase III PFS with bioequivalent risankizumab AUCs and no clinically meaningful difference for Cmax based on the wide therapeutic window of risankizumab. In both studies, no new safety risks were identified. No impact of immunogenicity on PK profile or safety was observed for the OBI. Third, an adhesive OBI (without risankizumab) study showed that there were no differences in adhesion/skin tolerability observed over time (up to 30 minutes) or for location of adhesion, and the OBI device adhesion was well tolerated at both the abdomen and thigh locations.

IMPLICATIONS

These results supported the risankizumab OBI presentation approval in CD.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for Crohn's disease in patients from Asian countries: a post hoc subanalysis of the global phase 3 ADVANCE, MOTIVATE, and FORTIFY studies

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The anti-interleukin-23 antibody risankizumab is being investigated as a treatment for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. This post hoc subanalysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of risankizumab therapy in Asian patients.

METHODS

ADVANCE (NCT03105128) and MOTIVATE (NCT03104413) were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 induction studies. Patients with intolerance/inadequate response to biologic (MOTIVATE) and/or conventional therapy (ADVANCE) were randomized to receive intravenous risankizumab (600 or 1200 mg) or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 8. Clinical responders to risankizumab could enter the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance withdrawal study (FORTIFY; NCT03105102). Patients were rerandomized to receive subcutaneous risankizumab (180 or 360 mg) or placebo (withdrawal) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Among 198 Asian patients in the induction studies, clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 12 were achieved by 61.4% and 40.0%, 59.5% and 35.8%, and 27.3% and 9.1% of patients in the risankizumab 600 mg, risankizumab 1200 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Among 67 patients who entered the maintenance study, clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 52 were achieved by 57.1% and 52.4%, 75.0% and 40.0%, and 53.8% and 34.6% of patients in the risankizumab 180 mg, risankizumab 360 mg, and placebo (withdrawal) groups, respectively. Fistula closure was observed with risankizumab treatment in 28.6% (induction) and 57.1% (maintenance) of patients. Efficacy trends and safety profile were similar to those in non-Asian patients.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with non-Asian and global population results, risankizumab was effective and well tolerated in Asian patients with Crohn's disease.

Risankizumab Induction Therapy Achieves Early Symptom Improvements That Are Associated With Future Clinical and Endoscopic Outcomes in Crohn's Disease: Post Hoc Analysis of the ADVANCE, MOTIVATE, and FORTIFY Phase 3 Studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Crohn's disease (CD) symptoms are a main driver for impaired quality of life and fast relief is important for patient care. Stool frequency (SF) and abdominal pain score (APS) are patient reported outcomes (PROs) measuring symptom severity, which are supported as treatment targets by the STRIDE-II consensus. This post hoc analysis examined the efficacy of risankizumab (RZB), a humanised monoclonal antibody with high specificity for interleukin-23 p19, for providing early symptom relief, along with the prognostic value of early symptom relief for achieving future clinical and endoscopic endpoints.

METHODS

Individual and combined measures of SF and AP at weeks 1, 2, and 3 were assessed in patients with moderate to severe CD who received 600 mg intravenous RZB or placebo (PBO) in the ADVANCE or MOTIVATE induction studies. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the predictiveness of early symptom improvement for clinical and endoscopic outcomes following RZB induction and maintenance.

RESULTS

Higher rates of SF/APS clinical remission and enhanced clinical response were observed as early as week 1 with RZB versus PBO. A larger proportion of patients achieved clinical endpoints with RZB versus PBO, irrespective of prior bio-failure status. Early PRO improvement was associated with a greater likelihood of achieving clinical and endoscopic improvement following 12-weeks induction and 52-weeks maintenance RZB dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

After the first intravenous RZB induction dose, significantly greater rates of symptom improvement versus PBO were achieved. Improvements could be observed as early as week 1 and were predictive of week 12 and 52 clinical and endoscopic improvement.

Risankizumab to treat moderately to severely active Crohn's disease in adults: an evaluation of trials and data

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-23. It is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and more recently moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD).

AREAS COVERED

After examining the current landscape of CD management including therapies which are currently approved and those in late stages of development, we will review the interleukin pathway and discuss the specific mechanism of targeted IL-23 inhibition, summarize available clinical trial data on efficacy and safety of Risankizumab, consider future positioning of Risankizumab in the therapeutic armamentarium, and ultimately discuss future needs for the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Risankizumab represents the first and only targeted IL-23 inhibitor approved for the treatment of CD, providing a promising addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for CD, with a favorable safety profile and demonstrated efficacy in both biologic-naïve and exposed populations. It is possible that the targeted nature of Risankizumab may enhance efficacy and safety over combined IL-12/23 inhibition, with trials underway attempting to shed light on that hypothesis.

Successful Treatment of Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris with Risankizumab in Children

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory skin disease that affects men and women of all ages, including children. PRP is characterized by follicular and palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and salmon-colored scaling plaques. The exact pathogenesis of PRP is still unknown; most PRP cases are acquired, but some cases may show a familial occurrence, often associated with a mutation in the CARD14 gene. Due to the rarity of PRP, treatment recommendations are based mainly on case reports, small case series and expert opinions and still represent a major therapeutic challenge, especially in children. A growing number of reports on treatment with biologicals, particularly anti-TNFα, has been published. However, an involvement of the IL-23/Th17 axis in both psoriasis and PRP pathogenesis may suggest that this pathway may be a potential therapeutic target. Here, we present three pediatric patients with PRP successfully treated with risankizumab. All patients exhibited a severe course of PRP and lack of response to conventional therapy, including acitretin, cyclosporine and phototherapy. A single dose of 75 mg risankizumab resulted in almost complete clearance of skin lesions in case 1 and 2 at week 4. In patient 3, clear skin was achieved after the second administration of risankizumab (150 mg). All patients continue the treatment with risankizumab, and no adverse effects have been reported up to the present time. Our study demonstrates that risankizumab, an IL-23 blocker, shows good efficacy and safety among pediatric patients with PRP.

Efficacy and Safety of IL-12/23 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Targeting interleukin-23 (IL-23) is an important therapeutic strategy for Crohn's disease (CD).

AIMS

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of selective IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to May 24, 2023, for randomized, placebo- or active comparator-controlled induction and/or maintenance trials of selective IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors in pediatric and adult patients with CD. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in clinical remission. Secondary outcomes were clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response, and safety. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials (n = 5561) were included. Most studies were rated as low risk of bias. Targeting IL-23 was significantly superior to placebo for inducing clinical (risk ratio [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-2.21) and endoscopic (RR = 3.20, 95%CI 2.17-4.70) remission and maintaining clinical remission (RR = 1.39, 95%CI 1.10-1.77) (GRADE high certainty evidence for all outcomes). Subgroup analysis showed that targeting IL-23 was superior to placebo for inducing clinical remission in biologic-naïve (RR = 2.20, 95%CI 1.46-3.32, I2 = 0%, p = 0.39) and biologic-experienced patients (RR = 1.82, 95%CI 1.27-2.60, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.01). Targeting IL-23 was associated with a decreased risk of serious adverse events in induction (RR = 0.55, 95%CI 0.44-0.73) and maintenance (RR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.53-0.98) trials compared to placebo (high certainty evidence).

CONCLUSION

Targeting IL-23 is effective and safe for inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Between Risankizumab and Ustekinumab for Induction and Maintenance Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab (RZB) and ustekinumab (UST), interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-12/23 inhibitors, respectively, are approved treatments for moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD); direct comparison between the two is ongoing. We indirectly compared efficacy of RZB versus UST using data from phase 3 trials (RZB: NCT03104413; NCT03105128; NCT03105102; UST: NCT01369329; NCT01369342; NCT01369355).

METHODS

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using individual patient-level data from RZB trials and published aggregated data from UST trials. During induction, patients received RZB 600 mg intravenous (IV) at weeks 0, 4, and 8 or a single dose of UST 6 mg/kg IV at week 0. During maintenance, patients received RZB 180 or 360 mg subcutaneous (SC) or UST 90 mg SC every 8 or 12 weeks to 52 weeks. Outcomes included proportion of patients achieving Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) response (decrease of ≥ 100 points or total score < 150) or remission (CDAI ≤ 150) and endoscopic improvement (measured by the Simple Endoscopic Score in CD [SES-CD]; response, ≥ 50% reduction from baseline; remission, SES-CD ≤ 2) following induction/baseline.

RESULTS

Higher proportions of patients achieved clinical and endoscopic outcomes with RZB vs. UST induction treatment, resulting in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater percent differences (95% confidence intervals) between groups for CDAI remission (15% [5%, 25%]) and endoscopic response (26% [13%, 40%]) and remission (9% [0%, 19%]). Following maintenance, rates of CDAI remission were similar (range - 0.3% to - 5.0%) for RZB vs. UST. Differences for endoscopic response and remission ranged from 9.3% to 27.7% and 11.6% to 12.5%, respectively; differences were significant (p < 0.05) for endoscopic response for both doses of RZB compared to UST 12-week dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

This indirect comparison demonstrated higher rates of clinical and endoscopic outcomes during induction for RZB compared to UST; CDAI remission following maintenance was comparable. Direct comparisons of RZB and UST are warranted to validate these findings.

Safety of IL-23 p19 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Narrative Review

The approved biologics targeting interleukin (IL)-23 p19 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, have generally favorable safety profiles. The aim of the current review is to describe in detail the safety of these selective inhibitors. A literature search was performed using PubMed from inception to 1 November 2022, to identify clinical trials and real-world evidence publications using the keywords "guselkumab," "tildrakizumab," and "risankizumab." Overall, the most common adverse events (AEs) associated with IL-23 p19 inhibitors in clinical trials were nasopharyngitis, headache, and upper respiratory tract infections. Rates of serious AEs and AEs of interest, including serious infections, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), malignancies excluding NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular events, and serious hypersensitivity reactions, were not increased with long-term use in clinical trials. Selectively targeting IL-23 p19 was also not associated with elevated risk of opportunistic infections, tuberculosis reactivation, oral candidiasis, or inflammatory bowel disease. Results from real-world studies were similar, supporting the safe long-term use of these biologics in a wider population of patients with psoriasis, including older patients, patients for whom multiple biologics failed, and those with comorbidities such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and psoriatic arthritis. This review is limited by the lack of direct comparisons among therapeutic agents due to differences among study designs and safety data reporting methods. In conclusion, the favorable safety profiles of IL-23 p19 inhibitors support their long-term use in the management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

InflammamiR-146a and -155 Plasma Levels are Associated with Clinical Efficacy of Risankizumab Treatment in Psoriatic Patients: Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

The key role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the pathogenesis of psoriasis has been extensively discussed in the literature. Increasing evidence suggests that the analysis of miRNA levels may constitute an innovative approach for exploring the clinical efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapies in patients with psoriasis. However, so far there have been no published studies evaluating the effects of modulating circulating miRNAs and the efficacy of anti-interleukin-23 (anti-IL-23) therapy. The main objective of the present was to evaluate the diagnostic/prognostic relevance of the levels of five circulating candidate miRNAs (miR-21, miR-146a, miR-155, miR-210, miR-378) in psoriatic patients treated with the anti-IL-23 drug risankizumab.

METHODS

A total of eight psoriatic participants were recruited consecutively from January 2021 to July 2021 at the Dermatology Clinic of Università Politecnica delle Marche (UNIVPM) "Ospedali Riuniti" of Marche. Data on anamnestic, clinical and miRNA evaluations before the initiation of risankizumab therapy and after 1 year (January 2021-July 2022) of risankizumab therapy were available for all patients.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in the signs and symptoms in patients treated with risankizumab was observed after 1 year of treatment, suggesting that the drug is effective for treating psoriasis in a context of real-life clinical evaluation. Plasma levels of the two prototypical inflammamiRs, miR-146a and miR-155, were significantly reduced after 1 year of risankizumab therapy. Also, in patients before treatment, a significant positive correlation was found between circulating levels of miR-210 and miR-378 and disease severity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reinforce the notion that specific circulating miRNAs could have clinical relevance as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers of psoriatic disease and suggest the potential relevance of these miRNAs as biomarkers of treatment response.

Efficacy, Safety, Patient Experience, and Tolerability of Risankizumab Administered by On-Body Injector for Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease

INTRODUCTION

In patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD), intravenous induction and subcutaneous maintenance dosing with risankizumab was efficacious and well tolerated. Long-term management of CD via self-administration of risankizumab using an on-body injector (OBI) may improve treatment adherence through convenience and ease of use.

METHODS

Within the FORTIFY maintenance study, 46 patients from the United States (US) sites participated in an open-label extension Substudy and received 180 mg or 360 mg risankizumab delivered subcutaneously via OBI [360 mg (2.4 mL, 150 mg/mL) or 180 mg (1.2 mL, 150 mg/mL)]. At the Week 0 visit, patients were trained (pre-injection) by site staff, using Instructions for Use (IFU) and a training video, to self-administer risankizumab at Weeks 0 (on site), 8 (at home), and 16 (on site). Key objectives of the Substudy 4 were to assess OBI usability (observer rating of successful self-administration), hazard-free self-injection at Weeks 0 and 16, and patient rating of acceptability using the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ) at Weeks 0, 8, and 16. Additionally, the proportion of patients in clinical remission (CD Activity Index < 150) was collected at Weeks 0 and 16.

RESULTS

All patients successfully self-administered risankizumab via OBI, including two patients who successfully self-administered with a second OBI (i.e., required two injection attempts). Acceptability of self-injection was high. Two patients (n = 2) experienced a use-related hazard. Stable clinical remission was observed with both risankizumab doses. Two patients experienced injection site reactions; neither was related to the OBI per investigator's assessment. Two device-related adverse events related to topical adhesive reactions were reported, both mild and resolved. No new safety risks were observed.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of maintenance risankizumab delivered via OBI and OBI usability support the use of this device in patients with moderate to severe CD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03105102 (FORTIFY).

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, immune-mediated skin condition characterized by inflammatory lesions that can cause pain, impaired physical activity, and reduced quality of life. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits interleukin 23 by binding to its p19 subunit, for the treatment of HS.

METHODS

This phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg; risankizumab 360 mg; or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 12. Patients initially randomized to placebo received blinded risankizumab 360 mg at weeks 16, 17, and 18; patients initially randomized to risankizumab received blinded matching placebo at the same time points. From weeks 20-60, all patients received open-label risankizumab 360 mg every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the achievement of HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients were randomized (risankizumab 180 mg, n = 80; risankizumab 360 mg, n = 81; placebo, n = 82). HiSCR was achieved by 46.8% of patients with risankizumab 180 mg, 43.4% with risankizumab 360 mg, and 41.5% with placebo at week 16. The primary endpoint was not met, and the study was terminated early. Incidence of TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs considered possibly related to study drug, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were generally low and comparable across treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Risankizumab does not appear to be an efficacious treatment for moderate-to-severe HS. Future studies to understand the complex molecular mechanisms underlying HS pathogenesis and develop improved therapies are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03926169.

Risankizumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life and Psychological Wellbeing

Biologic treatments are increasingly being used in the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PSO). Risankizumab (RZB) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks the p19 subunit of interleukin 23, which in turn regulates the activation, differentiation, and survival of Th17. RZB has proved their efficacy and their safety compared to anti-TNF. However, studies that assess and compare the improvement in other secondary PROs such as the patient's quality of life are still scarce. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is the sum of physical health, well-being, and participation; it defines the functional effect of a disease or its treatment and how it is perceived by the patient. The objective of this paper is to analyze the literature on the impact of treatment with RZB on the quality of life of patients with PSO and their psychological well-being. A bibliographic search was carried out to identify all the papers published from July 2015 to June 1, 2022, on RZB treatment in psoriasis and its impact on health-related quality of life and psychological well-being, finally twenty articles have been evaluated in full text, of which 8 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Risankizumab has shown not only to have very relevant data on effectiveness and safety, but all of this is associated with an improvement in quality of life related to health and psychological well-being measured on generic and specific quality of life scales, both in pivotal trials, ad hoc analysis, and data in real clinical practice.

Anti-IL23 biologic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis: real-world experience versus clinical trials data

Nowadays, the biological equipment available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis is plenty. Anti-interleukin-23 represents the latest class of biologic approved for the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Their efficacy and safety have been assessed through two major sources: clinical trials (CTs) and real-world experiences data (RWE). Notably, the two sources differ from one another, but together, they complement information and current knowledge on both efficacy and safety of biological therapy. We carry out a review on CTs and RWE reports on the latest group of biological approved for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: anti-IL23 (guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab).

Risankizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease, with involvement of the T-helper cell (Th) 2, Th22, and potentially Th17 pathways, supporting the use of interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-22 blockade in AD.

METHODS

This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03706040) evaluated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, in patients (≥ 12 years old) with moderate-to-severe AD, defined by an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, affected body surface area ≥ 10%, and a Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) score ≥ 3. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to 16-week treatment with risankizumab 150 mg, risankizumab 300 mg, or placebo in period A; patients receiving placebo were re-randomized 1:1 to risankizumab 150 mg or 300 mg and patients receiving risankizumab continued on their randomized dose in 36-week period B. Study drug was administered at baseline and weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in EASI (EASI 75) at week 16. Safety was analyzed in all randomized patients who received study medication.

RESULTS

Neither the risankizumab 150 mg (n = 69) nor the 300 mg dose group (n = 69) demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving EASI 75 at week 16 compared with the placebo group (n = 34; treatment difference [95% CI] 13.0% [-1.7 to 27.7%; P = 0.084] and 10.0% [-4.6 to 24.6%; P = 0.179], respectively). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity; five patients receiving risankizumab reported serious adverse events, including two patients who reported cellulitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab was generally well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified. The study's primary endpoint was not met, with no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving an EASI 75 response at week 16 with risankizumab 150 mg or 300 mg versus placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03706040.

Rapid Response of Palmoplantar Psoriasis to Risankizumab: A Case Report

Palmoplantar psoriasis, a clinical variant of plaque psoriasis, has a significant impact by causing deterioration in the social and functional aspects of patients' lives. Numerous therapeutic interventions are available for palmoplantar psoriasis. Although emerging biological agents have had an enormous positive impact on chronic plaque psoriasis, studies assessing their effectiveness in the palmoplantar phenotype are limited in the literature. We therefore present a case report of a patient with a 10-year history of palmoplantar psoriasis, which has significantly impacted her occupational life. She was treated with Risankizumab, showing a significant and rapid improvement in her symptoms. We believe that Risankizumab could be one of the most effective therapeutic interventions in the clinical context where rapid clearance of palmoplantar psoriasis is required.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab is an anti-IL23 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This work characterizes the pharmacokinetics of risankizumab in PsA compared with psoriasis and evaluates the efficacy and safety exposure-response relationships in PsA.

METHODS

The population pharmacokinetic analyses included data from 1527 participants that originated from one phase 1 healthy participant study, one phase 2 dose-ranging study in patients with PsA with an open-label extension study, and two pivotal phase 3 studies in patients with PsA, where the clinical regimen of risankizumab 150 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter was compared with placebo. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Simulation analyses using the final model were conducted to evaluate the impact of covariates on exposure. Data from 1407 patients with PsA from the phase 3 studies were included in the exposure-response analyses. Graphical analyses were used to evaluate efficacy and safety exposure-response relationships, and logistic regression was conducted for further assessment of efficacy exposure-response relationships.

RESULTS

Risankizumab pharmacokinetics were well described by a two-compartment model with first-order SC absorption and elimination. None of the evaluated covariates showed clinically relevant impact on exposure. On the basis of the final model, systemic clearance, steady-state volume of distribution, and terminal phase elimination half-life were estimated to be ~ 0.31 L/day, 11.1 L, and 26.3 days, respectively, for a typical 90 kg patient with PsA. Absolute SC bioavailability was estimated to be 83.5%. Exposure-response quartile analyses suggested that exposures associated with the clinical regimen maximized efficacy across the endpoints evaluated. No exposure dependency was observed for key safety endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab exhibited linear and time-independent pharmacokinetics in patients with PsA and was comparable to patients with plaque psoriasis. Efficacy and safety exposure-response analyses support that the clinical regimen achieved robust efficacy with a favorable safety profile for patients with active PsA.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT02596217, NCT02719171, NCT02986373, NCT03671148, and NCT03675308.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT02596217, NCT02719171, NCT02986373, NCT03671148, and NCT03675308.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Risankizumab in 131 Patients Affected by Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A 52-Week Retrospective Study

Introduction

Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-23. It is approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. We conducted a 52-week monocentric retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in a real-life setting.

Methods

Our study included 131 adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis all treated with risankizumab for at least 52 weeks. Patient characteristics and PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) at each visit were recorded. The percentages of patients achieving 75%/90%/100% (PASI 75/90/100) improvement in PASI with respect to baseline were registered.

Results

At week 52, 93.9%, 78.6%, and 61.1% of patients achieved PASI 75/90/100, respectively. An absolute PASI ≤ 2 was reached by 90.8% at week 52. The higher body mass index and the presence of cardio-metabolic comorbidities did not interfere with the odds of reaching PASI 75/90/100 at each time-point. At week 52, comparable percentages of patients achieved PASI 100, regardless of the involvement of difficult-to-treat-areas. No significant safety findings were recorded and none of the patients had to interrupt the treatment because of adverse events.

Conclusions

Our findings confirmed that risankizumab is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of a wide “real-life” cohort of patients with psoriasis.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from a 76-Week Phase 2 Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this work was to assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over 76 weeks.

METHODS

In this double-blind, dose-ranging phase 2 study, adults with active PsA were randomized 2:2:2:1:2 to risankizumab 150 mg at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 (arm 1), 150 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16 (arm 2), 150 mg at weeks 0 and 12 (arm 3), 75 mg at week 0 (arm 4), or placebo (arm 5). Patients completing week 24 could receive risankizumab 150 mg in a 52-week open-label extension study. Efficacy assessments included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) responses, minimal disease activity (MDA), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]).

RESULTS

Of 185 randomized patients, 173 (93.5%) completed week 16 and 145 (78.4%) entered the open-label extension. Significantly more patients in each risankizumab arm achieved ACR20 at week 16 versus placebo (primary endpoint: pooled arms 1 + 2 [59.5%] versus placebo [35.7%]; treatment difference [90% CI] 24.0 [9.3, 38.7]; P = 0.007). Similarly, significantly more patients in most risankizumab arms achieved ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100, MDA, and greater improvements in DAS28(CRP) versus placebo at week 16. These benefits of risankizumab were maintained long term. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable across treatment arms. Risankizumab 150 mg was well tolerated over 76 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab improved joint and skin symptoms versus placebo in patients with active PsA over 16 weeks; improvements were sustained long term. Risankizumab was well tolerated over the long term with no new safety findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT02719171 and NCT02986373.

Risankizumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the Russian Federation

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in phase 3 studies in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This randomized clinical trial assessed the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the Russian Federation.

METHODS

Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized 4:1 to 16 weeks of double-blind treatment with risankizumab 150 mg or placebo (period A; dosing at baseline and week 4) followed by an open-label extension (period B) during which all patients received risankizumab 150 mg at weeks 16, 28, and 40 and were followed up to week 52. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 16, and secondary endpoints included Static Physician's Global Assessment scores and the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored throughout the two study periods.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients who entered period A, 41 were randomized to receive risankizumab and 9 to receive placebo. Forty-eight patients entered period B, and 47 completed the study. A significantly larger proportion of risankizumab-treated patients achieved PASI 90 at week 16 compared with placebo-treated patients [response rate difference: 38.8% (95% CI 7.8-69.7%; P = 0.035)]. Consistently higher proportions of risankizumab-treated patients achieved secondary endpoints compared with the placebo-treated patients. Safety profiles were similar between the treatment groups, and no patients discontinued the study drug owing to adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Risankizumab was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the Russian Federation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03518047.

Efficacy of Risankizumab versus Secukinumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Subgroup Analysis from the IMMerge Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who experience poor clinical outcomes, including patients with obesity or prior treatment, need improved treatment options. Risankizumab specifically inhibits interleukin 23 and has demonstrated superior efficacy in active-comparator studies in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. We compared the efficacy of risankizumab with that of secukinumab across patient subgroups.

METHODS

Subgroup analyses using data from the phase 3 IMMerge study (NCT03478787) were performed. Efficacy in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with risankizumab 150 mg and secukinumab 300 mg was assessed as the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 52 across demographics and disease characteristics. Post hoc analyses evaluated the proportion of patients who achieved PASI 90 and the least-squares mean percent PASI improvement from baseline at week 52 by body weight and body mass index (BMI), PASI 90 by prior treatment, and clinical response [PASI 90, PASI 100, and/or static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of clear (0) or almost clear (1)] at week 16 and maintained particular response at week 52. Logistic regression analyses examined the effect of covariates (age, sex, BMI, baseline PASI, treatment) and potential interactions on PASI 90 at week 52.

RESULTS

More patients who received risankizumab (n = 164) compared with secukinumab (n = 163) achieved PASI 90 at week 52, regardless of demographics and disease characteristics (BMI, prior treatment, disease duration, and maintenance of clinical response at week 52). Improvements in PASI were greater in patients taking risankizumab than those taking secukinumab, regardless of weight or BMI. Results from logistic regression analysis showed treatment type had a significant impact on PASI 90 (risankizumab versus secukinumab, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Risankizumab showed consistently greater efficacy compared with secukinumab across different patient subgroups, and this was maintained through 52 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT03478787.

Impact of Risankizumab on PASI90 and DLQI0/1 Duration in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Four Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Introduction

Novel therapies have allowed psoriasis patients to achieve high levels of skin clearance and meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life measures; however, duration of these outcomes has not been evaluated. This study aimed to estimate the duration of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1 among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving risankizumab and other treatments.

Methods

Pooled data from four phase 3 randomized clinical trials of risankizumab were used to estimate the number and proportion of days with PASI90 and DLQI0/1 during the 1-year post-baseline period with an area-under-the-curve approach. Patients were classified into five cohorts on the basis of their treatment experience during the follow-up period: risankizumab (RISA) only, RISA followed by re-randomization to RISA or placebo (RISA and RISA/PBO), adalimumab (ADA) followed by re-randomization to ADA or RISA (ADA and ADA/RISA), ustekinumab (UST) only, and placebo followed by risankizumab (PBO/RISA).

Results

A total of 2101 patients were included in this analysis. Mean age was 47.5 years, 70% were males, and mean duration since psoriasis diagnosis was 18.6 years. Patients treated with RISA only throughout the study period experienced the longest PASI90 [245.7 days (67% over 1 year)] and DLQI0/1 [213.7 (59%)] duration. Patients treated with PBO/RISA [156.8 (43%)] and UST only [154.2 (42%)] experienced the shortest PASI90 duration. Similarly, patients treated with PBO/RISA experienced the shortest DLQI0/1 duration during the 52-week study period [90.5 (25%)].

Conclusion

Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with risankizumab exhibited longer durations of PASI90 and DLQI0/1 than patients treated with other therapies.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: UltIMMa-1 (NCT02684370), NCT02684357 (UltIMMa-2), IMMvent (NCT02694523), IMMhance (NCT02672852).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00660-3.

Long-Term Benefit-Risk Profiles of Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The long-term benefit-risk profiles of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been fully characterized.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were identified through a systematic literature review through 2 May 2021. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted to compare the efficacy (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 75/90/100 [at least a 75/90/100% reduction in PASI score from baseline] response) and safety outcomes (any adverse event [AE], any serious AE [SAE], and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation) of each treatment evaluated between weeks 48 and 56 after baseline. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were calculated to evaluate the relative ranking of treatments. The benefit-risk profiles of treatments were assessed by bidimensional plots of the NMA-estimated efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

In the efficacy NMA (N = 14 RCTs), the relative rankings for PASI 75/90/100 responses by weeks 48-56 were the highest for risankizumab (SUCRA: 98.5%) and bimekizumab (83.8% for dosing every 4 weeks [Q4W], 72.7% for dosing Q4W then every 8 weeks). The PASI response rates did not differ significantly between risankizumab and the two bimekizumab regimens. Additionally, risankizumab was associated with significantly higher PASI response rates than brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and etanercept. In the safety NMAs (N = 8 RCTs), risankizumab had the highest relative rankings for all three outcomes (SUCRA: 92.1%, 82.0%, and 91.0% for any AE, any SAE, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively). Risankizumab had a significantly lower rate of any AE than bimekizumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab was associated with the most favorable long-term benefit-risk profile for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although ixekizumab and bimekizumab had favorable efficacy profiles, both treatments had lower rankings for safety outcomes.

Risankizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Real-Life Multicenter Experience from the Czech Republic

Introduction

Risankizumab has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis; however, real-life data are limited. Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab and its impact on the quality of life of patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 154 patients from 18 centers in the Czech Republic who had undergone biologic therapy with risankizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Baseline characteristics included data on comorbidities, demographics, previous therapies, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. The proportion of patients achieving a 90% improvement in their PASI score from baseline (PASI 90) and complete resolution (PASI 100) after 16, 28, and 52 weeks was analyzed.

Results

A total of 95 men and 59 women with mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.6 were enrolled in our analysis. The mean age of the patients was 48.5 years and the mean time from diagnosis until initiation of risankizumab therapy was 22.5 years. After 16 weeks, 63.8 and 44.7% patients achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses, respectively. Improvement continued with time, and the proportion of patients with PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses increased to 82.4 and 67.6%, respectively, at week 52. A significant reduction was observed over time in the DLQI. Patients achieving PASI 100 response at week 16 had a higher reduction in the DLQI score than those with PASI 90 response (− 15.9 vs. − 11.8). PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses were independent of the BMI and previous biologic therapy. No new safety issues were identified.

Conclusions

In this patient population, risankizumab was effective and safe in a real-world setting, and a high number of patients achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses. A higher reduction in the DLQI was seen in patients with PASI 100 response, which supports the evidence that this value should be the new therapeutic goal.

Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life After Withdrawal of Risankizumab Treatment in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Machine Learning Predictive Model

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The phase-3 IMMhance trial (NCT02672852) examined the effect of continuing versus withdrawing from risankizumab treatment on psoriasis severity, including the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA). However, the effect of withdrawal on health-related quality of life (HRQL) was not assessed. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the impact of risankizumab withdrawal on HRQL measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Because DLQI was not measured beyond week 16 in IMMhance, a machine learning predictive model for DLQI was developed.

METHODS

A machine learning model for DLQI was fitted using repeated measures data from three phase-3 trials (NCT02684370, NCT02684357, NCT02694523) (pooled N = 1602). An elastic-net algorithm performed automated variable selection among candidate predictors including concurrent PASI and sPGA, demographics, and interaction terms. The machine learning model was used to predict DLQI at weeks 28-104 of IMMhance among patients re-randomized to continue (N = 111) or withdraw from (N = 225) risankizumab after achieving response (sPGA = 0/1) at week 28.

RESULTS

The machine learning predictive model demonstrated good statistical fit during tenfold cross-validation and external validation against observed DLQI at weeks 0-16 of IMMhance (N = 507). Predicted improvements in DLQI from baseline were lower in the withdrawal versus the continuation cohort (mean DLQI change at week 104, -5.9 versus -11.5, difference [95% CI] = 5.6 [4.1, 7.3]). Predicted DLQI deteriorated more extensively than PASI (49.7% versus 36.4%) after treatment withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

The predicted DLQI score deteriorated more rapidly after risankizumab withdrawal than the PASI score, an objective measure of disease. These findings suggest that the deterioration in HRQL reflects more substantial impacts after risankizumab discontinuation than those measured by PASI only.

Efficacy, safety, usability, and acceptability of risankizumab 150 mg formulation administered by prefilled syringe or by an autoinjector for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Risankizumab is approved for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Availability of a patient-controlled single self-injection of risankizumab may improve adherence and long-term management of psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate efficacy, safety, and usability of a new risankizumab 150 mg/mL formulation administered as a single subcutaneous injection via prefilled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI).

METHODS

Efficacy, safety, usability, and acceptability of risankizumab 150 mg/mL PFS or AI were investigated in adults with moderate to severe psoriasis in two phase 3 studies. Study 1 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that investigated 150 mg/mL risankizumab PFS; study 2 was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study that investigated 150 mg/mL risankizumab AI.

RESULTS

At week 16, risankizumab 150 mg/mL demonstrated efficacy vs. placebo (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ≥90% improvement (PASI 90), 62.9% vs. 3.8%; static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1, 78.1% vs. 9.6%; both p< .001) in study 1; in study 2, PASI 90 and sPGA 0/1 were 66.7%, and 81.5%, respectively. All patients successfully self-administered study treatments via PFS or AI. Acceptability of self-injection was high in both studies. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg/mL were comparable with results from previous risankizumab phase 3 studies using the 90 mg/mL formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy, safety, and usability of 150 mg/mL risankizumab delivered as a single PFS or AI injection support use of this new formulation in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT03875482 and NCT0387508.

Risankizumab in real life: preliminary results of efficacy and safety in psoriasis during a 16-week period

No data on real-life experiences of risankizumab efficacy and safety are reported, apart from two isolated case reports. We carried out a single-centre, prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab. Fourteen patients were included (mean age 44.5 ± 14.2 years). Mean PASI decreased from 12.3 ± 5.2 (baseline) to 4.4 ± 2.7 at week 4 (p < 0.01), and to 2.7 ± 1.7 at week 16 (p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for BSA. In patients previously treated with biologics (71.4%, n = 10) versus the naïve ones, mean baseline PASI was similar (12.7 ± 5.8 vs 11.3 ± 3.8). Mean BSA was higher in multifailure (23.5 ± 11.8 vs 15.5 ± 11.8). At 4 and 16 weeks, a significant improvement in PASI and BSA was observed in both groups. An improvement in NAPSI score, mean scalp, and palmo-plantar area reduction was noticed during follow-up. No AEs were reported up to week 16 and few and mild grade laboratory tests were reported. Our initial data confirm the promising results on efficacy and safety of Risankizumab, even in a more challenging and "real" population, composed of a high percentage of multi-failure psoriatic patients who have benefitted from a new class agent.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: Results from a Phase 2 Open-Label Extension Trial

INTRODUCTION

Although many biologic therapies are effective for clearing skin of patients with psoriasis, some lose effectiveness over time. This phase 2 open-label extension (OLE) trial was designed to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab.

METHODS

In the phase 2, double-blind, active comparator, predecessor trial (NCT02054481), patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis were treated for 24 weeks with subcutaneous (SC) risankizumab or ustekinumab, followed by a 24-week follow-up without treatment administration. Patients could enroll in the OLE (NCT02203851) when they experienced loss of treatment response (< 50% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI 50]) during follow-up) or at the end of follow-up if treatment response was ongoing. In the OLE, patients were treated every 12 weeks for at least 48 weeks with SC risankizumab 90 or 180 mg, beginning at week 12 (OLE visit 2), if the patient had not achieved PASI 90. Efficacy endpoints included the proportions of patients who achieved PASI 50/75/90/100 and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of clear or almost clear skin at week 48 (sPGA 0/1; OLE visit 5).

RESULTS

Of the 110 enrolled patients, 99 (90.0%) completed the OLE. No patients discontinued the study because of adverse events. At week 48, 74.1% of patients achieved PASI 90, whereas 98.1, 91.7, 53.7, and 67.6% achieved PASI 50/75/100 and sPGA 0/1, respectively. All efficacy results were consistent or slightly increased at OLE week 48 compared with week 12. No new safety findings were observed.

CONCLUSION

Risankizumab treatment was well tolerated with sustained clinical efficacy for at least 48 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT02203851.

Efficacy and safety of Risankizumab in moderate to severe psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Monoclonal antibodies are explored for their therapeutic potential in Psoriasis. To evaluate Risankizumab in the moderate to severe psoriasis with regard to efficacy, tolerability, and safety PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and clinicaltrials.gov, databases were searched for relevant RCTs. The reference lists of relevant publications were also scanned manually to identify any further studies not indexed in the searched databases. Only RCT aiming to evaluate the role of Risankizumab in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis were considered eligible for this systematic review. Intervention group was patients taking Risankizumab and placebo or other monoclonal antibody was considered as control group. Cochrane review manager 5 (RevMan) version 5.3 was used for data synthesis and meta-analysis. Quality assessment of included randomized controlled trials was done with Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment tool, version 2.0 (ROB-2). Overall Grading of evidence for study objectives was performed with GRADE Pro GDT software. A total of seven studies were included in analysis with total of 1533 and 710 patients in Risankizumab and standard care groups, respectively. Statistically significant increase in percentage of individual achieving PASI90 (OR = 11.01 (95% CI = 8.67-13.99), DLQI-01 (OR = 6.95 (95% CI = 5.53-8.75), sPGA-01 (OR = 14.22 (95% CI = 11.10-18.22); sPGA-0 (OR = 6.39 (95% CI = 4.79-8.54) in risankizumab group as compared with control, with high quality of evidence. Increased risk of infections with risankizumab as compared with placebo (OR = 1.44 [95% CI = 1.13-1.83], high quality evidence), while no difference in SAE among two groups. Analysis of all outcome data from RCTs. In the light of evidence from systematic review on effectiveness of Risankizumab, we propose treatment with risankizumab for psoriasis patients not responding to available treatment.

Emerging role of anti-IL23 in the treatment of psoriasis: When humanized is very promising

Risankizumab is a novel anti-interleukin 23 humanized antibody developed to treat severe psoriasis. In this paper, we analyze the key information about this new drug and the results of phase 3 clinical trials already present in literature in order measure its safety and effectiveness in every day practice. Risankizumab seems to be one of the best performing drugs in the treatment of psoriasis, with a good safety profile and a dosage regimen less frequent than all other biologic agents, although head-to-head randomized clinical trials with other anti-interleukin treatments will be necessary in order to confirm these preliminary results.

Meta-analysis and Indirect Comparisons: on Methods, Paradigms, and Biologic Treatments for Psoriasis

Meta-analysis offers a way to assess the clinical efficacy of a treatment by combining the results of randomized clinical trials while maintaining randomization; the combined effects, with their confidence intervals, can be represented with a forest plot. The efficacy of several different treatment options can be assessed with either direct or indirect comparisons. Indirect comparisons may be placebo-anchored as well as network meta-analyses (NMA) that use either a frequentist or Bayesian approach, depending on the statistical framework and the definition of probability selected. Indirect comparisons may also adjust for covariates or utilize individual participant data. Bayesian NMA are able to establish a rank order of efficacy based on probabilities or credibility intervals, which can be described by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA). Statistical superiority is demonstrated by pairwise comparisons, which are generally presented in league tables. This review provides clinical practitioners with detailed descriptions of these methods, drawing on examples from recently published NMA that rank the relative efficacy of biologic treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis. According to NMA findings, the four most effective treatments in both the short term (10-16 weeks) and the long term (approximately one year) are, in rank order, risankizumab (first in all studies that include it), brodalumab, guselkumab, and ixekizumab. However, the between-treatment differences are not always significant.

Risankizumab-Aggravated Crusted Scabies in a Patient with Down Syndrome

Risankizumab, an interleukin (IL)-23 antagonist, is a highly effective treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. Crusted scabies (CS) is a rare and severe form of scabies, occurring mainly in immunosuppressed patients and/or neurologically or mentally ill patients. A young girl with Down syndrome was diagnosed with a hyperkeratotic form of psoriasis. As treatment with topical dermocorticosteroids, UVB-phototherapy and acitretin for 6 weeks did not improve the lesions, two injections of risankizumab were administered. Following these injections, the lesions became rapidly even more severely crusted, and new lesions appeared on the extremities and the face of the patient. There was histological evidence of a high charge of scabies, leading to a diagnosis of CS. The patient was hospitalized and successfully treated by local permethrine and systemic ivermectine. This case suggests that even though anti-IL23 antagonists display an excellent overall safety profile, a particular caution for infections should still be respected in patients with underlying risk factors.

Treatment of plaque psoriasis with IL-23p19 blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Interleukin(IL)-23 is a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, this meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy and safety of IL-23p19 blockers in patients with plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to collect double-blind randomized controlled trials(RCTs). The pooled relative risk(RR) with 95% confidence interval(CI) was calculated. All analyses were conducted with intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies contained 5155 plaque psoriasis patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that IL-23p19 blockers had better efficacy than placebo for Psoriasis Area Severity Index score reductions from baseline of 75% or more (PASI75) (RR = 11.47, P < 0.001) and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1(sPGA0/1) (RR = 11.32, P < 0.001). IL-23p19 blockers have similar safety with placebo about the incidence of adverse events(AEs) (RR = 1.22, P = 0.096) and serious adverse events(SAEs) (RR = 2.93, P = 0.965), but IL-23p19 blockers carried an increased incidence rate of infections (RR = 1.39, P < 0.001). While compared with adalimumab and ustekinumab, IL-23p19 blockers were more effective and had the similar tolerance. Among three IL-23p19 blockers, guselkumab was the most efficacious treatments, and risankizumab was better tolerated than the others.

CONCLUSION

The IL-23p19 blockers have excellent efficacy and great safety in plaque psoriasis patients, but long-term safety remains to be determined.