Impact of the severity of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage on urinary continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

We assessed whether the severity of anastomotic urinary leakage detected during routine cystourethrography after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) affects urinary continence recovery. Around 302 patients who underwent RALP between August 2013 and May 2019 were included retrospectively. According to routine cystourethrographic findings obtained on the sixth or eighth postoperative day, which indicated leakage severity, patients were divided into three groups: no-leakage, grade 1 (linear shaped leakage, but not spreading), and grade 2 (spreading strip-shaped leakage). The preoperative factors and intraoperative factors were compared between no-leakage and leakage group (grade 1 and grade 2). Continence recovery was compared between the three groups. Continence recovery was defined as no pad used or one security pad used in a day. Cystourethrography revealed anastomotic urinary leakage in 44 patients (14.5%), of which 20 patients (6.6%) had grade 1 leakage and 24 patients (7.9%) had grade 2 leakage. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only significant predictor for urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage on cystourethrography following RALP was intraoperative anastomotic leakage (OR 5.306; 95% CI 1.530-18.398, p = 0.009). Continence recovery rates for no-leakage, grade 1 leakage, and grade 2 leakage groups were 11%, 20%, and 25% after 1 month (P = 0.131); 25%, 25%, and 45.8% after 3 months (P = 0.474); 44.6%, 55%, and 60.8% after 6 months (P = 0.184); and 63.1%, 87.5%, and 78.2% after 12 months (P = 0.095), respectively. In conclusion, urinary leakage in urethrovesical anastomosis, even at its severity, had no negative effects on continence recovery after RALP.

Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study

BACKGROUND

Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) based on real-world data from 12 Dutch hospitals.

METHODS

Data was collected from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2012. A mixed effect model was used to evaluate differences between groups on urinary and sexual functioning (EPIC-26). Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these functional outcomes and, among others, hospital volume.

RESULTS

1370 (65.1%) patients participated, 907 underwent RARP and 463 LRP, with a median follow-up time of 7.08 years (SD = 0.98). The RARP group showed a statistically and clinically significant better urinary functioning compared to the LRP group (p = 0.002). RARP showed also a shorter procedure time (p=<0.001), reduced blood loss (p=<0.001), and a higher chance of neurovascular bundle preservation (39.8% vs 29.1%; p=<0.01).

CONCLUSION

RARP resulted in better long-term urinary function compared to LRP. Based on the results from this study, guidelines concerning the preferred surgery type and the position on reimbursement may change, especially when RARP proves to be cost-effective.

Single-port robot assisted concomitant hemi-nephrectomy, ureterectomy and radical prostatectomy using the da vinci SP platform

A duplicated collecting system is a common congenital anomaly of the urinary tract. However, late symptomatic presentation in adulthood is uncommon. We report the first case of left heminephrectomy, ureterectomy and radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP (single port) surgical system in a 64-year-old patient with localized prostate cancer and duplicated system with ectopic ureteral insertion into the prostatic urethra. The procedure was completed without technical difficulties or intraoperative adverse events. We demonstrate that the da Vinci SP robot allows for efficient performance of concomitant surgeries on the kidney and prostate without the limitations reported with single site surgeries.

Urodynamic assessment of bladder and urethral sphincter function before and after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Affectation of the bladder after open prostatectomy is demonstrated. Decrease in bladder capacity and bladder compliance, detrusor hyper-or hypo-activity and voiding dysfunction are observed. We propose to investigate the effects of robotic surgery on bladder and sphincter function through the comparative study of preoperative and postoperative urodynamic values 3 months after prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective study of 32 consecutive patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. They all underwent urodynamic study one month before the intervention and 3 months after the radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty five percent of patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy showed detrusor hyperactivity accompanied by a decrease in bladder compliance of 30.2 to 21.8 ml/cmH2O. Urethral profile showed diminished functional length of 67 to 44 mm and decreased maximum urethral pressure of 48.5 to 29.3 cmH2O. After robotic prostatectomy 21.8% of patients had detrusor hypoactivity, obstruction decreased between 28.1% to 12.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased bladder compliance, detrusor hypo- or hyperactivity and obstruction improvement observed in the study of the flow pressure have been associated with sphincter involvement. It is part of the complex of lower urinary tract dysfunction that occurs after robotic prostatectomy.

Interval from Prostate Biopsy to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALP): Effects on Surgical Difficulties

Purpose

Traditionally, an interval of 4 to 6 weeks has been recommended after prostate biopsy before open radical prostatectomy. However, such an interval is not explicitly specified in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). This study was designed to determine whether the interval from prostate biopsy to RALP affects surgical difficulties.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2008 and May 2009, a total of 237 men underwent RALP in our institution. The interval from biopsy to RALP was categorized as follows: ≤ 2 weeks, >2 to ≤ 4 weeks, >4 to ≤ 6 weeks, >6 to ≤ 8 weeks, and >8 weeks. Multivariate analysis was used to identify whether the interval from prostate biopsy to RALP was an independent predictor of operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), margin positivity, continence, and potency.

Results

Among the 5 groups, there were no significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, or preoperative International Index of Erectile Dysfunction-5 score (all p>0.05). In the multivariate analysis, operative time was significantly associated with prostate volume. EBL was associated with prostate volume and BMI. Margin positivity was associated with preoperative serum PSA, prostate volume, and biopsy Gleason score. Postoperative continence and potency were significantly associated with age. However, in univariate and multivariate analyses, the interval from biopsy to RALP was not significantly associated with operative time, EBL, margin positivity, postoperative continence, or potency (all p>0.05).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the interval from prostate biopsy to RALP is not related to surgical difficulties.

The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches

New technologies are regularly being used for surgical treatment of prostate cancer, however the cost associated is often a secondary issue. We assessed the operative costs incurred by using the daVinci robot assisted prostatectomy (RAP) method compared to pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). We retrospectively analyzed three techniques of radical prostatectomies: ORP, LRP, and RAP (n = 70, 57, 106, respectively). The mean patient age was 53.6, 57.6, and 60 with a mean preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 7.2, 8.4, and 6.6, respectively. The mean Gleason score was 6. Operative cost was measured for each patient. Charts were reviewed to assess individual patients postoperative requirements, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Intraoperative data show costs to be higher with the RAP and LRP compared to open surgery. Average total operating room (OR) costs per case were $5410, $3876, and $1870 for RAP, LRP, and open prostatectomy, respectively. However when comparisons are made in the postoperative period with regard to LOS, there is a significant advantage of the RAP and LRP groups over open surgery (P < 0.05). Intraoperative costs are highest for RAP. Both LRP and RAP are associated with a shorter hospital stay.