The S-Factor, a New Measure of Disease Severity in Spinocerebellar Ataxia: Findings and Implications

Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are progressive neurodegenerative disorders, but there is no metric that predicts disease severity over time. We hypothesized that by developing a new metric, the Severity Factor (S-Factor) using immutable disease parameters, it would be possible to capture disease severity independent of clinical rating scales. Extracting data from the CRC-SCA and READISCA natural history studies, we calculated the S-Factor for 438 participants with symptomatic SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, or SCA6, as follows: ((length of CAG repeat expansion - maximum normal repeat length) /maximum normal repeat length) × (current age - age at disease onset) × 10). Within each SCA type, the S-Factor at the first Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) visit (baseline) was correlated against scores on SARA and other motor and cognitive assessments. In 281 participants with longitudinal data, the slope of the S-Factor over time was correlated against slopes of scores on SARA and other motor rating scales. At baseline, the S-Factor showed moderate-to-strong correlations with SARA and other motor rating scales at the group level, but not with cognitive performance. Longitudinally the S-Factor slope showed no consistent association with the slope of performance on motor scales. Approximately 30% of SARA slopes reflected a trend of non-progression in motor symptoms. The S-Factor is an observer-independent metric of disease burden in SCAs. It may be useful at the group level to compare cohorts at baseline in clinical studies. Derivation and examination of the S-factor highlighted challenges in the use of clinical rating scales in this population.

Analysis and hierarchical clustering of infratentorial morphological MRI identifies SCAs phenogroups

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision-making in spinocerebellar ataxia spectrum diseases (SCAs) has mainly been based on genetic tests, not considering the SCAs' imaging and clinical heterogenicity.

OBJECTIVE

To identify SCAs phenogroups by analysis and hierarchical clustering of infratentorial morphological MRI for unveiling pathophysiological differences among common SCA subtypes.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 119 (62 women; mean age 37 years) genetically diagnosed SCAs (SCA1 n = 21, SCA2 n = 10, symptomatic SCA3 n = 59, presymptomatic SCA3 n = 22, SCA6 n = 7) and 35 healthy controls (HCs). All patients underwent MRI and detailed neurological and neuropsychology examinations. The width of each cerebellar peduncle (CP) and anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord and pontine were measured. Twenty-five SCAs patients (15 women; mean age 35 years) were followed for at least a year (17 (15, 24) months), whose MRI and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) were collected.

RESULTS

Infratentorial morphological MRI measurements could significantly discriminate SCAs from HCs, even among SCA subtypes. Two mutually exclusive and clinically distinct phenogroups were identified. Despite similar (CAG)n, phenogroup 1 (n = 66, 55.5%) presented more atrophied infratentorial brain structures and more severe clinical symptoms with older age and earlier age of onset when compared with phenogroup 2. More importantly, all SCA2, most of SCA1 (76%), and symptomatic SCA3 (68%) were classified into phenogroup 1, whereas all SCA6 and all presymptomatic SCA3 were in phenogroup 2. The right middle CP had the highest diagnostic value in predicting phenogroup 2 (AUC = 0.99; P < 0.01) with high specificity (95%). Consistent with the significantly increased SARA (7.5 vs 10, P = 0.021), the bilateral inferior CP, spinal cord, and pontine tegmentum were more atrophy during the follow-up (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SCAs were with significant infratentorial brain atrophy than HCs. We identified two different SCAs phenogroups associated with substantial differences in infratentorial brain atrophy, clinical presentation, and may reflect the underlying molecular profiles to some extent, paving the way for a more personalized diagnostic and treatment approach.

Temporal Dynamics of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Spinocerebellar Ataxias

BACKGROUND

The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is the reference clinical scale to assess the severity of cerebellar ataxia. In the context of upcoming therapeutic trials, a reliable clinical outcome is needed to assess the efficiency of treatments.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to precisely assess and compare temporal dynamics of SARA and a new f-SARA.

METHODS

We analyzed data from four cohorts (EUROSCA, RISCA, CRC-SCA, and SPATAX) comprising 1210 participants and 4092 visits. The linearity of the progression and the variability were assessed using an ordinal Bayesian mixed-effect model (Leaspy). We performed sample size calculations for therapeutic trials with different scenarios to improve the responsiveness of the scale.

RESULTS

Seven of the eight different items had a nonlinear progression. The speed of progression was different between most of the items, with an average time for a one-point increase from 3.5 years [3.4; 3.6] (median, 95% credible interval) for the fastest item to 11.4 [10.9; 12.0] years. The total SARA score had a linear progression with an average time for a one-point increase of 0.95 [0.92; 0.98] years. After removing the four last items and rescaling all items from 0 to 4, variability increased and progression was slower and thus would require a larger sample size in a future therapeutic trial.

CONCLUSION

Despite a heterogeneous temporal dynamics at the item level, the global progression of SARA was linear. Changing the initial scale deteriorates the responsiveness. This new information about the temporal dynamics of the scale should help design the outcome of future clinical trials. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Differential Temporal Dynamics of Axial and Appendicular Ataxia in SCA3

Background

Disease severity in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is commonly defined by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) sum score, but little is known about the contributions and progression patterns of individual items.

Objectives

To investigate the temporal dynamics of SARA item scores in SCA3 patients and evaluate if clinical and demographic factors are differentially associated with evolution of axial and appendicular ataxia.

Methods

In a prospective, multinational cohort study involving 11 European and 2 US sites, SARA scores were determined longitudinally in 223 SCA3 patients with a follow‐up assessment after 1 year.

Results

An increase in SARA score from 10 to 20 points was mainly driven by axial and speech items, with a markedly smaller contribution of appendicular items. Finger chase and nose‐finger test scores not only showed the lowest variability at baseline, but also the least deterioration at follow‐up. Compared with the full set of SARA items, omission of both tests would result in lower sample size requirements for therapeutic trials. Sex was associated with change in SARA sum score and appendicular, but not axial, subscore, with a significantly faster progression in men. Despite considerable interindividual variability, the average annual progression rate of SARA score was approximately three times higher in subjects with a disease duration over 10 years than in those within 10 years from onset.

Conclusion

Our findings provide evidence for a difference in temporal dynamics between axial and appendicular ataxia in SCA3 patients, which will help inform the design of clinical trials and development of new (etiology‐specific) outcome measures. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

Repeated sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been suggested to modulate cerebellar-motor cortex (M1) connectivity and decrease ataxia severity. However, therapeutic trials involving etiologically homogeneous groups of ataxia patients are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate if a two-week regimen of daily cerebellar tDCS sessions diminishes ataxia and non-motor symptom severity and alters cerebellar-M1 connectivity in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in which twenty mildly to moderately affected SCA3 patients received ten sessions of real or sham cerebellar tDCS (i.e., five days per week for two consecutive weeks). Effects were evaluated after two weeks, three months, six months, and twelve months. Change in Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score after two weeks was defined as the primary endpoint. Static posturography, SCA Functional Index tests, various patient-reported outcome measures, the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale, and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) served as secondary endpoints. Absolute change in SARA score did not differ between both trial arms at any of the time points. We observed significant short-term improvements in several motor, cognitive, and patient-reported outcomes after the last stimulation session in both groups but no treatment effects in favor of real tDCS. Nonetheless, some of the patients in the intervention arm showed a sustained reduction in SARA score lasting six or even twelve months, indicating interindividual variability in treatment response. CBI, which reflects the functional integrity of the cerebellothalamocortical tract, remained unchanged after ten tDCS sessions. Albeit exploratory, there was some indication for between-group differences in SARA speech score after six and twelve months and in the number of extracerebellar signs after three and six months. Taken together, our study does not provide evidence that a two-week treatment with daily cerebellar tDCS sessions reduces ataxia severity or restores cerebellar-M1 connectivity in early-to-middle-stage SCA3 patients at the group level. In order to potentially increase therapeutic efficacy, further research is warranted to identify individual predictors of symptomatic improvement.

Exploring the clinical meaningfulness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia: A comparison of patient and physician perspectives at the item level

BACKGROUND

The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is commonly used as the primary outcome measure in therapeutic trials. Driven by spontaneous comments from ataxia patients participating in a trial, we aimed to examine the clinical meaningfulness of the SARA from their perspective.

METHODS

Twenty mildly to moderately affected individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SARA score 11.3 ± 4.1) completed a custom-designed survey. SARA item scores were compared with self-reported complaints in everyday life. Discrepancies between SARA ratings and patients' daily life experiences were reported as "overestimation" (i.e., a SARA item score more than 0, but no corresponding complaints) or "underestimation" (i.e., a SARA item score of 0, yet accompanying complaints).

RESULTS

Patient-physician discrepancies were present in essentially all SARA items except for gait. The mean number of overestimated SARA points per patient was 3.1 ± 2.1. Underestimation occurred less frequently, but was relatively common in stance and fast alternating hand movements. Three quarters of patients marked gait as the most valuable SARA item, while the remaining 25% selected stance.

CONCLUSION

On average, a quarter of total SARA score does not reflect meaningful impairments from a patient's perspective. Our data suggest that it is doubtful whether potential improvements at some of the items will be perceived as comparably important by mildly to moderately affected ataxia patients. These observations question the utility of delta SARA score as the most appropriate primary endpoint in clinical trials and call for the addition of outcome measures, such as the Patient Global Impression of Change scale and validated ataxia-specific patient-reported outcome measures.

Inverse associations between cerebellar inhibition and motor impairment in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3

BACKGROUND

Cerebellar ataxia generally results from a lesion disrupting the corticopontocerebellar or cerebellothalamocortical tract. The cerebellar inhibition (CBI) paradigm represents a dual-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol that interrogates the integrity of the latter pathway. Whether CBI has clinical relevance in ataxia patients remains largely unknown because associations with pertinent disease severity measures in etiologically homogeneous cohorts have not been previously examined.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if CBI correlates with clinical and functional indices of disease severity in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3).

METHODS

CBI was assessed in fourteen SCA3 patients by paired-pulse cerebellar-motor cortex (M1) stimulation using interstimulus intervals of 3, 5, and 10 ms. Correlation coefficients were determined between CBI and ataxia severity, manual dexterity, and walking speed.

RESULTS

Suppression of M1 excitability occurred 5 ms following a contralateral cerebellar conditioning stimulus in SCA3 patients, but, on average, CBI was significantly reduced as compared to a healthy control group from the literature (p < 0.001). A significant association was found between decreased CBI levels and higher Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) scores (r = -0.62, p = 0.019). CBI was negatively correlated with axial, appendicular, and speech subscores, as well as with nine-hole peg test performance (r = -0.69, p = 0.006). No association was observed between CBI and walking speed. As expected, there were no significant clinical-neurophysiological correlations at 3 and 10 ms interstimulus intervals.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide the first neurophysiological evidence for an inverse association between cerebellothalamocortical tract integrity, as reflected by reduced levels of CBI, and ataxia severity in SCA3 patients. Longitudinal studies are required to evaluate if CBI could serve as a marker of disease progression.

Evaluation of the use of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in healthy volunteers and patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a semi-quantitative assessment used to evaluate ataxia. The goal of these studies was to assess and evaluate the utility of this instrument in a Healthy Volunteer (HV) group and subjects with Schizophrenia (SCZ).

METHODS

Two studies were completed to collect SARA data, in a HV group and in a stable SCZ group. 177 HVs (18-65 years) and 16 SCZs (18-58 years) provided written consent and were assessed using the SARA. Of 177 HV subjects, 88 had 2 SARA assessments (within 2 days of initial visit) while all 16 SCZ had 3 SARA assessments (within 14 days of initial visit).

RESULTS

For the HV group, the mean score ± Std for the SARA on visit-1 was 0.39 ± 0.72, and 0.34 ± 0.64 for visit-2. The Pearson correlation coefficient between visit-1 and visit-2 was 0.7486 and an ICC of 0.743. For the SCZ group, the mean score for the SARA was 0.63 ± 0.65 on visit-1, 0.84 ± 1.19 on visit-2, and 0.84 ± 0.94 on visit-3. The Pearson correlation coefficient between visit-1 and visit-2 was 0.6545, between visit-1 and visit-3 was 0.6635 and between visit-2 and visit-3 was 0.7613 and an ICC of 0.650. There was no significant difference in baseline SARA scores between the HV and SCZ group p = .063. A statistically significant positive association between age and total SARA scores was observed in HV (r = 0.345) and SCZ (r = 0.676).

CONCLUSIONS

A strong association was observed in both the HV and SCZ groups in the reassessment of signs of ataxia using the SARA scale. Both groups demonstrated minimal signs of ataxia, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups in their visit-1 scores.

Evaluation of Ataxia in Mild Ischemic Stroke Patients Using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

Objective

To demonstrate the utility of Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) for evaluation of posterior circulation-related features in patients with mild stroke.

Methods

Forty-five subjects, diagnosed with acute infarction in the cerebellum, basis pontis, thalamus, corona radiata, posterior limb of internal capsule, and their National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ≤5 were enrolled. SARA scores were graded by the cut-off value of severity in dependency of activities of daily living (ADL). SARA, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up-and-Go (TUG), and Trunk Control Test (TCT) were correlated in regression analysis with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge. Correlation between SARA and other tools was analyzed. Patients were divided based on mRS at admission (group A, mRS 0–2; group B, mRS 3–5). Scores between the two groups were compared.

Results

Among the subjects, 48.9% (22/45) scored above 5.5 on SARA, and even 11.1% (5/45) scored higher than 14.25, which is the cut-off value of ‘severe dependency’ in ADL. SARA showed significant value for prediction of mRS at discharge. SARA was correlated with BBS (r=-0.946, p<0.001), TUG (r=-0.584, p<0.001), and TCT (r=-0.799, p<0.001). The SARA, BBS, TUG, and TCT scores between were lower in group B than in group A patients. SARA as well as BBS, TUG, and TCT reflect the functional severity of all patients.

Conclusion

SARA is a complementary tool for evaluation of the severity of ataxia in mild stroke patients with features of posterior circulation.

Clinical characteristics of combined cases of spinocerebellar ataxia types 6 and 31

This study reports the first family in which spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6) and spinocerebellar ataxia type 31 (SCA31) mutations were seen. An index patient first presented to our hospital due to gait and speech disturbances. Subsequent clinical investigation of this patient and her family members revealed consistent pure cerebellar ataxia transmitted in an autosomal-dominant manner. Genetic examination unexpectedly demonstrated that two of the five affected individuals had expansions of SCA6 and SCA31, while two others had SCA31 alone and the remaining had SCA6. Clinical manifestations were more severe in individuals with combined mutations relative to those with single mutation, suggesting that the SCA6 and SCA31 mutations have a cumulative pathogenic effect.