Will repeat resection after initial transurethral en bloc resection benefit patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer? A propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of repeat transurethral resection on restaging, preventing tumor recurrence and progression in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients who received initial en bloc resection.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We reviewed retrospectively the clinical records of 330 consecutive patients who received en bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Eligible patients with and without repeat transurethral resection were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Important covariates were balanced between the two groups. We compared the recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, recurrence rate, and progression rate between groups. And the perioperative results regarding residual tumors and the safety of the repeat resection were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Finally, there are 245 patients included in our analysis with a median follow-up duration of 19 months (range 3-50). Detrusor muscle presented in 244 (99.6%) specimens at initial en bloc resection. And among them, 30 (12.2%) patients had undergone a repeat resection and 215 (87.8%) did not. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 30 pairs were further analyzed.No case of upstaging was identified in repeat resection. During the follow-up, recurrence was observed in 5 (16.7%) and 7 (23.3%) patients in reresection group and non-reresection group, respectively. And progression was found only in 1 (3.3%) patient in each group. The 1-year recurrence-free survival estimates were comparable (86.7% vs 83.3%, p = 0.86) between groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that repeat resection after initial transurethral en bloc resection for bladder tumor appears not to improve staging accuracy, recurrence, and progression.

The probability of residual tumor detection in the second transurethral resection of pT1 urothelial bladder cancer according to the risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the predictive factors for residual tumors in the second resection after the initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT) in patients with pT1 tumors and to develop a simple method to predict the probability of residual tumor detection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with pT1 bladder cancer who underwent a second resection within two to six weeks after the initial TUR-BT were included in our retrospective study. The patients' demographics and the tumor characteristics of the initial and second resections were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included in our analysis with a 53-month follow-up. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, tumor grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), macroscopic appearance of the tumor (solid vs papillary), and presence of a variant histology, were significant risk factors for residual tumor. In the multivariate analysis, tumor grade was the only independent predictor of residual tumor at second TUR (OR: 5.62, 95% CI: 1.228-25.708, p = 0.026). According to our findings, the patients with the highest risk have a 90.9% residual tumor detection probability at the second resection, and the patients with the lowest risk have 25.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor grade, macroscopic appearance of the tumor (solid vs papillary), and concomitant CIS, were important predictors of residual tumors at second resection of primary pT1 NMIBC patients. We were able to calculate the probability of residual tumor which helped us determine risk adapted strategies according to these probabilities.

Can a second resection be avoided after initial thulium laser endoscopic en bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer? A retrospective single-center study of 251 patients

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transurethral thulium laser en bloc resection of the bladder tumor (TmLRBT) in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and to investigate whether a second resection can be avoided.

Methods

From June 2012 to June 2018, 251 newly diagnosed patients with NMIBC were enrolled in this retrospective study; all patients received regular administration of pirarubicin after the initial resection. A second transurethral resection (TUR) was performed in patients within 2–6 weeks after the initial TmLRBT in group 1. Patients in group 2 only underwent cystoscopy at 3 months.

Results

Second surgery results indicate that recurrence was detected histopathologically in 6/108 and 11/143 patients in group 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.52); Progression was observed in 2 patients in each group (P = 0.34). The mean follow-up duration was 40.1 months, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.32). Recurrence was observed in 23 (21.3%) and 39 (27.3%) patients in groups 1 and 2 during the follow-up, respectively (P = 0.34); disease progression occurred in 4 (3.8%) patients in group 1 compared with 7 (4.0%) in group 2 (P = 0.20).

Conclusion

Complete removal of tumors can be achieved by TmLRBT. This technique may decrease the number of second TURs.

Significance of second transurethral resection on patient outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with bladder-preserving multimodal therapy

PURPOSE

Although the role of second transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB) is well established in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study regarding the role of a second transurethral resection (TUR) after a complete first TURB in multimodal therapy (MMT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of a second TUR on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients who were treated with MMT.

METHODS

We assessed the data of 90 patients (stage T2-4, N0-1, M0 urothelial cancer) who were treated with MMT at our clinic between January 2000 and June 2014. Patients with incomplete initial TURB were excluded. A total of 43 patients had a second TUR before starting radiochemotherapy of MMT (group 1), and 47 patients (group 2) were treated with MMT without having a second TUR. The impact of second TUR on DSS and OS rates was the primary outcome measure of the study.

RESULTS

Mean (SD, range) age and mean follow-up of the patients were 65.1 (7.1, 52-81) years and 60.3 (38.3, 6-159) months, respectively. The two groups were similar with regard to sex, age, presence of hydronephrosis, lymph node involvement and stage. The 5-year DSS rate was better in group 1 compared to group 2 (68 vs. 41 %) (p = 0.046). The 5-year OS rates of the patients were 63.7 and 40.1 % in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.054). Multivariate analysis revealed that second TUR, lymph node involvement, presence of hydronephrosis and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Second TUR should be performed in patients with MIBC who are going to be treated with bladder-preserving MMT protocols.