Right Atrial Remodeling and Outcome in Patients with Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

In patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR), right atrial remodeling (RAR) is a proven marker of disease progression. However, the prognostic value of RAR, assessed by indexed right atrial volume (RAVi) and reservoir strain (RAS), remains to be clarified. Accordingly, the aim of our study is to investigate the association with outcome of RAR in patients with STR.

METHODS

We enrolled 397 patients (44% men, 72.7 ± 13 years old) with mild to severe STR. Complete two-dimensional and speckle-tracking echocardiography analysis of right atrial and right ventricular (RV) size and function were obtained in all patients. The primary end point was the composite of death from any cause and heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 15 months (interquartile range, 6-23), the end point was reached by 158 patients (39%). Patients with RAS <13% and RAVi >48 mL/m2 had significantly lower survival rates compared to patients with RAS ≥13% and RAVi ≤48 mL/m2 (log-rank P < .001). On multivariable analysis, RAS <13% (hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.43-3.11; P < .001) and RAVi > 48 mL/m2 (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.18; P = .04) remained associated with the combined end point, even after adjusting for RV free-wall longitudinal strain, significant chronic kidney disease, and New York Heart Association class. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation excess mortality increased exponentially with values of 18.2% and 51.3 mL/m2 for RAS and RAVi, respectively. In nested models, the addition of RAS and RAVi provided incremental prognostic value over clinical, conventional echocardiographic parameters of RV size and function and RV free-wall longitudinal strain.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with STR, RAR was independently associated with mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Assessment of RAR could improve risk stratification of patients with STR, potentially identifying those who may benefit from optimization of medical therapy and a closer follow-up.

Atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation: pathophysiology, definition, diagnosis, and treatment

Atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation (A-STR) is a distinct phenotype of secondary tricuspid regurgitation with predominant dilation of the right atrium and normal right and left ventricular function. Atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation occurs most commonly in elderly women with atrial fibrillation and in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm. In A-STR, the main mechanism of leaflet malcoaptation is related to the presence of a significant dilation of the tricuspid annulus secondary to right atrial enlargement. In addition, there is an insufficient adaptive growth of tricuspid valve leaflets that become unable to cover the enlarged annular area. As opposed to the ventricular phenotype, in A-STR, the tricuspid valve leaflet tethering is typically trivial. The A-STR phenotype accounts for 10%-15% of clinically relevant tricuspid regurgitation and has better outcomes compared with the more prevalent ventricular phenotype. Recent data suggest that patients with A-STR may benefit from more aggressive rhythm control and timely valve interventions. However, little is mentioned in current guidelines on how to identify, evaluate, and manage these patients due to the lack of consistent evidence and variable definitions of this entity in recent investigations. This interdisciplinary expert opinion document focusing on A-STR is intended to help physicians understand this complex and rapidly evolving topic by reviewing its distinct pathophysiology, diagnosis, and multi-modality imaging characteristics. It first defines A-STR by proposing specific quantitative criteria for defining the atrial phenotype and for discriminating it from the ventricular phenotype, in order to facilitate standardization and consistency in research.

Contemporary insights into the epidemiology, impact and treatment of secondary tricuspid regurgitation across the heart failure spectrum

AIM

Tricuspid regurgitation secondary to heart failure (HF) is common with considerable impact on survival and hospitalization rates. Currently, insights into epidemiology, impact, and treatment of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) across the entire HF spectrum are lacking, yet are necessary for healthcare decision-making.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This population-based study included data from 13 469 patients with HF and sTR from the Viennese community over a 10-year period. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Overall, HF with preserved ejection fraction was the most frequent (57%, n = 7733) HF subtype and the burden of comorbidities was high. Severe sTR was present in 1514 patients (11%), most common among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (20%, n = 496). Mortality of patients with sTR was higher than expected survival of sex- and age-matched community and independent of HF subtype (moderate sTR: hazard ratio [HR] 6.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.88-6.80, p < 0.001; severe sTR: HR 9.04; 95% CI 8.27-9.87, p < 0.001). In comparison to HF and no/mild sTR patients, mortality increased for moderate sTR (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.48-1.69, p < 0.001) and for severe sTR (HR 2.19, 95% CI 2.01-2.38, p < 0.001). This effect prevailed after multivariate adjustment and was similar across all HF subtypes. In subgroup analysis, severe sTR mortality risk was more pronounced in younger patients (<70 years). Moderate and severe sTR were rarely treated (3%, n = 147), despite availability of state-of-the-art facilities and universal health care.

CONCLUSION

Secondary tricuspid regurgitation is frequent, increasing with age and associated with excess mortality independent of HF subtype. Nevertheless, sTR is rarely treated surgically or percutaneously. With the projected increase in HF prevalence and population ageing, the data suggest a major burden for healthcare systems that needs to be adequately addressed. Low-risk transcatheter treatment options may provide a suitable alternative.

Long-term outcomes of pericardial strip versus prosthetic ring annuloplasty for secondary tricuspid regurgitation by a minimally invasive approach

Background

This study was conducted to compare the outcomes of prosthetic ring versus autologous pericardial strip for the treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation during left-sided valve surgery by minimally invasive approach.

Methods

From January 2008 and July 2016, autologous pericardial strip (group P-TAP) was used in 109 patients, and prosthetic ring (group R-TAP) in 115 patients. The primary outcomes were long-term overall survival, development of patch degeneration, and significant tricuspid regurgitation recurrence. The second outcome was the assessment of right ventricular functional parameters.

Results

Operative mortality was 1 case (0.9%) in the R-TAP group. At the time of hospital discharge only one patient (0.9%) in the R-TAP group had grade III+ tricuspid regurgitation, and none had grade IV+. Mean follow-up was 94.1 ± 24.5 months. Mild and moderate tricuspid regurgitation recurrence was 3.7% and 4.5% (P-TAP vs. R-TAP groups, p = 0.99). Severe regurgitation was observed in 1.8% of cases only in the R-TAP group (p = 0.49). There were no reoperations. Late mortality was 3.7% and 5.4% (P-TAP vs. R-TAP groups, p = 0.75). Freedom from death, all causes, were comparable among groups (log-rank p = 0.45). There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in TAPSE, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left atrial diameter.

Conclusions

Tricuspid annuloplasty using an autologous pericardial strip in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery is associated to similar long results (survival, late tricuspid regurgitation, and functional echocardiographic parameters) than annuloplasty with a prosthetic ring. In particular, the pericardial strip over time does not develop any degeneration or retraction.

Clinical performance and exercise hemodynamics in patients with severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation and chronic atrial fibrillation

Objective

The study aimed to investigate the functional capacity and hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and severe functional symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (AF-FTR).

Background

Symptoms and clinical performance of severe AF-FTR mimic the population of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Severe AF-FTR is known to be associated with an adverse prognosis whereas less is reported about the clinical performance including exercise capacity and hemodynamics in patients symptomatic AF-FTR.

Methods

Right heart catheterization (RHC) at rest and during exercise was conducted in a group of patients with stable chronic AF-TR and compared with a group of patients with HFpEF diagnosed with cardiac amyloid cardiomyopathy (CA). All patients had preserved ejection fraction and no significant left-sided disease.

Results

Patients with AF-FTR demonstrated a low exercise capacity that was comparable to CA patients (TR 4.9 ± 1.2 METS vs. CA 4. 7 ± 1.5 METS; P = 0.78) with an average peak maximal oxygen consumption of 15 mL/min/kg. Right atrium pressure increased significantly more in the AF-FTR patients as compared to CA patients at peak exercise (25 ± 8 vs 19 ± 9, p < 0.01) whereas PCWP increased significantly to a similar extent in both groups (31 ± 4 vs 31 ± 8 mmHg, p = 0.88). Cardiac output (CO) was significantly lower among AF-FTR at rest as compared to CA patients (3.6 ± 0.9 vs 4.4 ± 1.3 l/min; p < 0.05) whereas both groups demonstrated a poor but comparable CO reserve at peak exercise (7.3 ± 2.9 vs 7.9 ± 3.8 l/min, p = 0.59).

Conclusions

AF-FTR contributes to the development of advanced heart failure symptoms and poor exercise capacity reflected in increased atrial filling pressures, reduced cardiac output at rest and during exercise sharing common features seen in HFpEF patients with other etiologies.

Secondary valve regurgitation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Secondary mitral regurgitation and secondary tricuspid regurgitation due to heart failure (HF) remain challenging in almost every aspect: increasing prevalence, poor prognosis, notoriously elusive in diagnosis, and complexity of therapeutic management. Recently, defined HF subgroups according to three ejection fraction (EF) ranges (reduced, mid-range, and preserved) have stimulated a structured understanding of the HF syndrome but the role of secondary valve regurgitation (SVR) across the spectrum of EF remains undefined. This review expands this structured understanding by consolidating the underlying phenotype of myocardial impairment with each type of SVR. Specifically, the current understanding, epidemiological considerations, impact, public health burden, mechanisms, and treatment options of SVR are discussed separately for each lesion across the HF spectrum. Furthermore, this review identifies important gaps in knowledge, future directions for research, and provides potential solutions for diagnosis and treatment. Mastering the challenge of SVR requires a multidisciplinary collaborative effort, both, in clinical practice and scientific approach to optimize patient outcomes.

Case report: Transcatheter valve repair with Cardioband: a new treatment option for secondary tricuspid regurgitation in cardiac transplant patients

Background

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is the most frequent valvular complication after cardiac transplantation. As in native hearts, the role of surgical therapy particularly in secondary TR is unclear due to high procedural risk and unsatisfying results. Currently, percutaneous techniques are under development for TR repair with less procedural risk and promising preliminary results.

Case summary

We present a 67-year-old man who underwent heart transplantation (biatrial anastomosis) because of ischaemic heart disease 15 years ago and aortic valve replacement in 2010. Because of progressive severe dyspnoea (New York Heart Association Class III) in 2018 and signs of right heart failure with ascites he underwent transthoracic echocardiography which showed normal graft function, but massive TR of functional aetiology. The heart team decision was an interventional approach using the Cardioband System (Edwards Lifesciences) to treat TR based on the high risk associated with a third cardiac surgery and impaired right ventricular function. The procedure was performed in general anaesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopic guidance. Tricuspid regurgitation improved from massive to mild with a mean pressure gradient of 2.9 mmHg.

Discussion

This is the first case report of Cardioband implantation in tricuspid position in a heart transplant patient with the good technical and clinical result, suggesting that this technique might offer a treatment option to highly selected post-transplant patients with secondary severe TR and high surgical risk.

Natural Course of Nonsevere Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) is frequent in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and is associated with adverse outcomes despite guideline-directed therapy. However, little is known about the natural course of nonsevere sTR and its relation to cardiac remodeling and outcomes. The aims of this study were therefore to investigate the natural course of sTR progression using quantitative measurements, to assess the prognostic impact on long-term mortality, and to identify risk factors associated with progressive sTR.

METHODS

A total of 216 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receiving guideline-directed therapy were included in this long-term observational study. Progression of sTR was quantitatively defined as an increase of 0.2 cm² in effective regurgitant orifice area or 15 mL in regurgitant volume, with transition to at least moderate sTR. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied to assess survival during a 5-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Among patients with nonsevere sTR at baseline, 62 (29%) experienced sTR progression. Progressive sTR was accompanied by larger left and right atrial volumes (P = .02 and P < .02, respectively) and a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (P < .04). During a median follow-up period of 60 months (interquartile range, 37-60 months), 82 patients died. Progression of sTR conveyed a higher risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.1-2.83; P < .02), even after multivariate adjustment for bootstrap-selected (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.06-2.74; P < .03) and clinical confounder (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.07-3.05; P < .03) models.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of progressive sTR despite guideline-directed therapy is associated with adverse cardiac and valvular remodeling as well as a significantly higher long-term mortality. Biatrial enlargement as well as atrial fibrillation are associated with the development of subsequent progressive sTR and may help identify patients at risk for sTR progression, potentially creating a window of opportunity for closer follow-up and newly arising minimally invasive transcatheter repair therapies.

Valve Disease in Heart Failure: Secondary but Not Irrelevant

Secondary regurgitation caused by the remodeling and dysfunction of the left or right heart chamber may complicate heart failure, worsening both symptoms and prognosis. Outcome studies have shown that patients' prognosis worsened as the severity of secondary regurgitation increases. Imaging and more specifically echocardiography plays a central role for diagnosis and serial assessment of secondary regurgitation as well as for timing the intervention and guiding the procedure.