Psychometric Properties of the Voice Handicap Index-10 in Kannada

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to derive the 10-item voice handicap index in the Kannada language (VHI-K10) from the existing VHI-30 in Kannada (VHI-K30). We also aimed to examine several psychometric properties of the newly derived VHI-K10, such as internal consistency, reliability, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Initially, VHI-K10 was derived from the existing VHI-K30 through item reduction, consistent with the recommendations for item reduction of the voice handicap index. This newly derived VHI-K10 was administered to 273 individuals (199 individuals with dysphonia and 74 individuals with normal voice quality). We also obtained phonation and reading samples from the participants. The obtained data were subjected to appropriate statistical analysis to determine several psychometric properties.

RESULTS

The newly derived VHI-K10 was found to have a strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.93). We also found strong test-retest reliability for VHI-K10, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.933. There was a strong statistically significant correlation between the VHI-K10 and the existing VHI-K30 for both individuals with dysphonia (ρ = 0.924, P < 0.001) and individuals with normal voice quality (ρ = 0.798, P < 0.001). However, the correlation of VHI-K10 with the auditory-perceptual measure of GRBAS was fair (ρ = 0.353, P < 0.001) for individuals with dysphonia and was not statistically significant for individuals with normal voice quality. Further, the diagnostic accuracy of VHI-K10 was found to be excellent, with an area under the curve (AROC) value of 0.926 with a cut-off point of ≥6.5, which was slightly superior to that of VHI-K30 (AROC = 0.909, cut-off point ≥21.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The shortened 10-item version of the voice handicap index in Kannada is consistent with versions of the VHI-10 in other languages. This version of the VHI-10 in Kannada is found to be a robust tool with strong psychometric properties.

Overestimation of on-road driving performance is associated with reduced driving safety in older drivers

OBJECTIVES

Older drivers often show less precise self-ratings with a tendency to overestimate themselves. It is unclear, however, how overestimators differ from underestimators or drivers with adequate self-ratings.

METHODS

59 healthy older drivers participated in this on-road study. Besides standardized on-road driving assessment, the study protocol included the collection of neuropsychological and driving-related data as well as different self-ratings. Statistical analyses involved correlations between different subjective and objective ratings as well as statistical comparisons between drivers who overestimated and drivers who adequately rated their on-road driving performance (no drivers underestimated their performance).

RESULTS

Despite positive correlations between different self- and expert ratings, our results revealed that 25 % of the participants overestimated their on-road driving skills. Among other things, overestimators showed poorer on-road driving performances, more prospective near and minor at-fault accidents, poorer cognitive performances in specific driving-related domains and reduced annual mileage.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that older drivers who overestimate their driving skills show poorer performances within a broad range of skills that directly reflect or are closely related to driving safety. Against the background that an adequate self-assessment is required by German traffic regulations, our findings suggest that overestimators represent a risk group among the population of older drivers.

Quality of Life Assessment in Older Adults with Dementia: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

In the absence of a cure, dementia is often managed by minimizing risk factors contributing to quality of life (QOL). Attitudes to dementia in older adults may differ from those in relatively younger adults. The aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine how QOL was assessed in adults, 65 years and older with dementia, and identify factors that influence the reported scores.

METHODS

A systematic review of full-text articles addressing QOL in older adults with dementia, published in English from January 1995 to September 2020, was conducted using PubMed and PsycINFO. We included studies that assessed QOL and involved participants 65 years and older. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by 2 independent pairs of reviewers. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist. Study characteristics and findings were summarized. Analysis was by narrative synthesis. We identified social and clinical factors influencing QOL scores.

RESULTS

Of the 1,010 articles identified, 19 met the inclusion criteria. These 19 studies involved 6,279 persons with dementia, with sample sizes from 32 to 1,366. Mean age of participants ranged from 77.1 to 86.6 years. Five measurement tools were identified; Quality of Life in Alzheimer Disease (QOL-AD), Alzheimer Disease-Related Quality of Life (ADRQL), Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID), QUALIDEM (a dementia-specific QOL tool), and DEMQOL (health-related QOL for people with dementia). Self-ratings of QOL were higher than proxy ratings. Factors commonly influencing self-ratings of QOL included depression, functional impairment, and polypharmacy. Common factors that influenced proxy ratings included functional impairment, presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive impairment, and caregiver burden.

CONCLUSION

In evaluating QOL in dementia, self- and proxy reports may complement each other to ensure that all perspectives are addressed.

Intellectual awareness of naming abilities in people with chronic post-stroke aphasia

Anosognosia, or lack of self-awareness, is often present following neurological injury and can result in poor functional outcomes. The specific phenomenon of intellectual awareness, the knowledge that a function is impaired in oneself, has not been widely studied in post-stroke aphasia. We aim to identify behavioral and neural correlates of intellectual awareness by comparing stroke survivors' self-reports of anomia to objective naming performance and examining lesion sites. Fifty-three participants with chronic aphasia without severe comprehension deficits rated their naming ability and completed a battery of behavioral tests. We calculated the reliability and accuracy of participant self-ratings, then examined the relationship of poor intellectual awareness to speech, language, and cognitive measures. We used support vector regression lesion-symptom mapping (SVR-LSM) to determine lesion locations associated with impaired and preserved intellectual awareness. Reliability and accuracy of self-ratings varied across the participants. Poor intellectual awareness was associated with reduced performance on tasks that rely on semantics. Our SVR-LSM results demonstrated that anterior inferior frontal lesions were associated with poor awareness, while mid-superior temporal lesions were associated with preserved awareness. An anterior-posterior gradient was evident in the unthresholded lesion-symptom maps. While many people with chronic aphasia and relatively intact comprehension can accurately and reliably report the severity of their anomia, others overestimate, underestimate, or inconsistently estimate their naming abilities. Clinicians should consider this when administering self-rating scales, particularly when semantic deficits or anterior inferior frontal lesions are present. Administering self-ratings on multiple days may be useful to check the reliability of patient perceptions.

Discrepancies between self-rated depression and observed depression severity: The effects of personality and dysfunctional attitudes

BACKGROUND

Patient self-reports and clinician ratings of depression severity can differ substantially. The aim of the current study was to explore factors associated with discrepancies between depressed patients' Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) self-reports and clinicians' Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) ratings.

METHODS

We first computed discrepancy scores defined as the standardized weighted HAMD-17 total score minus the standardized PHQ-9 total score. To assess correlates of inconsistent scores, results of patients with similar standardized scores were removed (i.e., within ½ standard deviation, n = 270). Positive values indicate underreporting (HAMD-17 > PHQ-9), i.e., the underreporting group (n = 200); and negative discrepancy scores indicate overreporting (PHQ-9 > HAMD-17), i.e., the overreporting group (n = 221). We examined the relationship of demographic, dysfunctional attitudes and personality variables to the discrepancies between self and observer rated depression.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in extraversion, psychoticism, neuroticism, dysfunctional attitudes and occupation between the underreporting group and the overreporting group (all p < .05). When controlling for potential confounding variables, being a working professional and having high neuroticism and dysfunctional attitudes were significantly associated with overestimating symptoms of depression (e.g., professional: OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.67-5.00; p < .001; high neuroticism: OR, 7.08; 95% CI, 1.47-34.08; p < .001;dysfunctional attitudes: OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; p = .030). People with average, or high extraversion tended to underestimate scores (average extraversion: OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.95; high extraversion: OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to use PHQ-9 and HAMD-17 to explore the discrepancies between self and observer rated depression. Discrepancies occurred between the PHQ-9 score and HAMD-17 score, which were related to neuroticism, extraversion, dysfunctional attitudes and being a working professional. Future research should clarify the relationship between these factors and therapeutic effects of treatments, including adverse outcomes.

Self-rated risk as a predictor of suicide attempts among high-risk adolescents

BACKGROUND

Predicting suicide attempts is a challenging task for clinicians and researchers, particularly among high-risk individuals (i.e. adolescents with lifetime suicide attempts). In this study, we examined whether adolescents were able to predict their own risk of attempting suicide in the future and whether borderline personality disorder (BPD) or depressive symptoms impacted the predictive value of self-ratings.

METHODS

Structured clinical assessments were conducted at baseline and after 12 months in a high-risk sample of treatment-seeking adolescents (n = 134; 12-17y.; 90% female) with at least one lifetime suicide attempt.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, n = 51 participants (38%) attempted suicide at least once. Self-rated risk was a significant predictor for the recurrence of a suicide attempt, whereas BPD and depression were not. While there was no significant interaction between self-rated risk and BPD, a negative interaction emerged between self-rated risk and depression in the prediction of a suicide attempt. Greater depression severity diminished the predictive value of self-ratings.

LIMITATIONS

Depression severity was measured using a questionnaire, not a clinical interview. The findings may not be applicable to less burdened samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Asking high-risk adolescents to rate their own risk of attempting suicide appears to be an easy to apply method in improving the prediction of future suicide attempts in the clinical context.

Initial Psychometric Properties of the Korean Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale: Preliminary Validation Study in a Non-Clinical Sample

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (K-ASRM) in a large sample of Korean non-clinical undergraduates.

METHODS

Participants (n=1,091) filled out the K-ASRM with other self-report questionnaires assessing bipolarity, mood symptoms and affect. Reliability test, exploratory factor analysis and correlation analyses were conducted to examine its psychometric properties.

RESULTS

The reliability of the K-ASRM was adequate (Cronbach's α=0.73, item-to-total correlation 0.53-0.78) and the exploratory factor analysis yielded one factor of mania. The K-ASRM demonstrated significant associations with measures of hypomanic personality (r=0.33), lifetime history of hypomanic symptoms (r=0.23). Also, the K-ASRM was significantly correlated with positive affect (r=0.53), negative affect (r=-0.17) and depressive symptoms (r=-0.35).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest preliminary possibility that the K-ASRM can be utilized as self-rating tool for mania in Korea as well as future directions for further validation.

Danish translation and validation of Kessler's 10-item psychological distress scale - K10

BACKGROUND

Psychological distress is a trans-diagnostic feature of mental suffering closely associated with mental disorders. Kessler's 10-item Psychological Distress Scale (K10), a scale with sound psychometric properties, is widely used in epidemiological studies.

AIM

To translate and investigate whether K10 is a reliable and valid rating scale for the measurement of psychological distress in a Danish population.

METHODS

The translation was carried out according to official WHO translation guidelines. A sample of 100 subjects was included, 54 patients from the regional Mental Health Service (MHS) and 46 subjects with no psychiatric history. All participants were assessed with a psychiatric diagnostic interview (MINI) and handed out K10. Concurrent validity was assessed by WHO Well-being Index (WHO-5). Correlation matrix analysis was conducted for the full sample and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for discriminating mental health service affiliation.

RESULTS

Mean K10 scores differed, with decreasing levels, between inpatients and outpatient in MHS and the subjects with no psychiatric history. Factor analysis confirmed a unidimensional structure, and Cronbach's alpha and Omega showed excellent internal reliability. AUC for the K10 ROC curves showed excellent sensitivity (0.947 [0.900-0.995]), accurately differentiating mental health from non-mental health patients.

CONCLUSION

The Danish K10 has the same strong internal reliability as the original English version, and scores differ between psychiatric patients in outpatient and emergency ward settings.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The Danish K10 translation is authorized and freely available for download at https://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/ncs/k6_scales.php . The utility as an instrument for clinical screening in a mental healthcare setting is supported.

Current developments and challenges in the assessment of negative symptoms

Reliable and valid assessment of negative symptoms is crucial to further develop etiological models and improve treatments. Our understanding of the concept of negative symptoms has undergone significant advances since the introduction of quantitative assessments of negative symptoms in the 1980s. These include the conceptualization of cognitive dysfunction as separate from negative symptoms and the distinction of two main negative symptom factors (avolition and diminished expression). In this review we provide an overview of existing negative symptom scales, focusing on both observer-rated and self-rated measurement of negative symptoms. We also distinguish between measures that assess negative symptoms as part of a broader assessment of schizophrenia symptoms, those specifically developed for negative symptoms and those that assess specific domains of negative symptoms within and beyond the context of psychotic disorders. We critically discuss strengths and limitations of these measures in the light of some existing challenges, i.e. observed and subjective symptom experiences, the challenge of distinguishing between primary and secondary negative symptoms, and the overlap between negative symptoms and related factors (e.g. personality traits and premorbid functioning). This review is aimed to inform the ongoing development of negative symptom scales.

Understanding the current state of infection preventionists through competency, role, and activity self-assessment

BACKGROUND

The Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) MegaSurvey, administered in 2015, was completed by approximately 4,079 APIC members. The survey sought to gain a better understanding the current state of 4 components of infection prevention practice: demographic characteristics, compensation, organizational structure, and practice and competency.

METHODS

The data for this analysis come from the APIC MegaSurvey Practice and Competency domain. Descriptive statistics and χ² analyses were conducted to examine differences in infection preventionist (IP) competency, roles, and activity self-assessments.

RESULTS

The majority of IPs self-assessed their competency as Proficient compared with Novice or Expert for each of the 8 IP core competency activities. Forty percent of IPs self-rated their competency as Expert in the Preventing/Controlling the Transmission of Infectious Agents/HAIs component. IPs reported Novice competency in Employee/Occupational Health (29%); Cleaning, Sterilization, Disinfection, and Asepsis (23%); and Education and Research categories (22%). Differences in self-rated competency among IPs by discipline type (public health, nurse, and laboratory) were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in self-rated competency were identified for each of the 8 IP core competency activities. IPs report using various resource types to gain competency. Future research is needed to identify opportunities to increase competency levels in the weakest-rated competency activities.

Concordance of self- and observer-rated motivation and pleasure in patients with negative symptoms and healthy controls

This study examined the validity of using a self-rating scale for assessing the motivation and pleasure domain of negative symptoms in the general population by examining the concordance of self- and observer-rated negative symptoms in a healthy sample and by comparing it with a patient sample. The motivation and pleasure domain of negative symptoms was assessed using the observer-rated Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) and the self-rated Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR). We found 52.9% of the healthy individuals and 46% of the patients to have relatively equal self- and observer-ratings. Despite the absence of extreme discrepancies, 31.4% of the healthy individuals and 14% of the patients rated their negative symptoms as more severe, whereas 15.7% of the healthy individuals and 40% of the patients rated them as less severe than the observers. By using self-ratings in combination with observer-ratings, possible discrepancies can be uncovered, which may be relevant for the successful treatment of negative symptoms.

Reliability of a patient-reported outcome measure in schizophrenia: Results from back-to-back self-ratings

This study aimed to assess patient's capacity to perform a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure (i.e., a self-rating scale) and examine its relationship with clinical characteristics including cognition. Fifty patients with schizophrenia were asked to rate the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics scale - Short form (SWNS) twice; the second rating was started immediately after they completed the first to minimize the gap between ratings. At the same time, the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) and Brief Neurocognitive Assessment (BNA) were administered. The correlations between the two ratings for the SWNS total and each item scores were high (rs=0.94 and rs=0.60-0.84, respectively); however, for 16 (80%) of 20 items, 5 or more patients (i.e., ≥10%) demonstrated a>1 point score difference. There was no significant correlation between the SWNS total score difference and any clinical characteristics including age, education duration, illness duration, antipsychotic dose, psychopathology, and cognition. In contrast, the number of items with a>1 point score difference was significantly correlated with disorganized symptoms and overall severity (rs=0.29 for both), as well as working memory and global cognition (rs=-0.41 and rs=-0.40, respectively). These findings suggest that PROs should be interpreted with caution in patients with schizophrenia with prominent disorganization and cognitive impairment.

The Children's Sleep Comic: Psychometrics of a Self-rating Instrument for Childhood Insomnia

The Children's Sleep Comic is a standardized self-report questionnaire for assessing insomnia in children ages 5-11 years. The goal of the present study is to introduce a revised version of this measure and to present psychometrics and a cut-off score. Therefore, the revised Children's Sleep Comic, the Sleep Self Report, the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, and the Child Behavior Checklist were applied to a sample of 393 children and their parents. Of the parents who participated voluntarily, a subsample (n = 176) was interviewed on the phone to diagnose their children with sleep disorders according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, if applicable. The results indicated that the Children's Sleep Comic is a reliable self-rating instrument for diagnosing childhood insomnia. Internal consistency was α = 0.83; and convergent and divergent validity were adequate. The child-friendly format can foster a good therapeutic relationship, and thus establish the basis for successful intervention.

Prefrontal cortex activation is associated with a discrepancy between self- and observer-rated depression severities of major depressive disorder: a multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study

BACKGROUND

Studies on major depressive disorder (MDD) show that the degree of correlation between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) varies widely. We aimed to determine whether this discrepancy reflects specific functional abnormalities in the frontotemporal cortex.

METHODS

Mildly depressed or euthymic patients with MDD (n=52), including 21 patients with MDD with the discrepancy, i.e., those with low HAMD17 scores (≤13) but high BDI-II scores (>28), and 31 patients without the discrepancy, i.e., those with low HAMD17 scores and low BDI-II scores (≤28), participated in the study along with 48 control subjects. Regional changes of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) levels during a verbal fluency task (VFT) were monitored using a 52-channel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) device.

RESULTS

In the frontotemporal regions, mean oxy-Hb changes induced by the VFT were significantly smaller in patients with MDD than in control subjects. In 5 channels within frontal regions, the increase in mean oxy-Hb levels was significantly greater in MDD patients with the BDI-HAMD discrepancy than in those without the discrepancy. In 6 channels within the frontal region of the patients with MDD, significant positive correlations were observed between mean oxy-Hb changes and BDI total scores (ρ=0.38-0.59; P<0.05, false discovery rate corrected).

LIMITATIONS

Our findings required replication in severely depressed patients, particularly those with melancholia.

CONCLUSIONS

The distinct pattern of activation of the prefrontal cortex suggests that MDD with the BDI-HAMD discrepancy is pathophysiologically different from MDD without the discrepancy.

Self-rated and assessed cognitive functions in epilepsy: impact on quality of life

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the effects of perceived and assessed cognitive functions on quality of life (QoL) in patients with epilepsy (PWE).

METHODS

The study analyzed the data from a series of PWE who compiled the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-89 Inventory (QOLIE-89) and the Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (MASQ) for QoL and perceived cognitive abilities, respectively. The State-Trait Anxiety and Beck Depression inventories were used to assess mood. Neuropsychological tests evaluated abstract reasoning, attention, conceptual-motor tracking, constructional praxis, language, verbal and non-verbal memory, abstraction, category shifting, verbal fluency, and visual-spatial abilities.

RESULTS

The QOLIE-89 overall score was predicted by the Mood and Attention and Executive Functions factors and MASQ scores, explaining 38, 6, and 4% of its variance, while disease duration, seizure frequency, and schooling determined 16%. The QOLIE-89 Psychosocial, Cognitive, and Physical Performance sub-domains related to mood. The Cognitive and Physical Performance factors also related to the MASQ and Attention and Executive Functions factor scores, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In PWE, self-rated and assessed cognitive deficits may influence QoL, explaining 10% of its variance irrespective from mood and clinical variables. Treating cognitive deficits and their perception may help improve QoL.

Discrepancy between self- and observer-rated depression severities as a predictor of vulnerability to suicide in patients with mild depression

BACKGROUND

Discrepancies in depression severity between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) have been reported. However, whether these discrepancies impact vulnerability to suicide in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients with mild MDD (n=161) were enrolled in the study and divided into the following 3 groups: (1) patients with MDD with the discrepancy (n=45), i.e., those with low HAMD17 scores (8-13) and high BDI-II scores (≥29), (2) patients with MDD without the discrepancy (n=46), i.e., those with low HAMD17 scores and low BDI-II scores (≤28), and (3) patients not currently depressed (n=70), i.e., those with HAMD17 scores ≤7 (affective controls). We examined the relationship of demographic, clinical, and neuropsychological variables with any discrepancy between self-rating and observer rating.

RESULTS

Patients with MDD with the discrepancy had significantly higher hopelessness than those without the discrepancy and affective controls. Verbal fluency task performance of patients with MDD with the discrepancy was significantly impaired compared with that of those without the discrepancy and affective controls. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of suicide attempt [odds ratio (OR), 3.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-11.37] and hopelessness (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38) increased odds of the discrepancy.

LIMITATIONS

Results require replication.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should examine discrepancies between self- and observer-rated depression severities, which are associated with vulnerability to suicide in patients with MDD, even if objectively evaluated as mild.

A review of self-rating instruments to identify young people at risk of bipolar spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

Despite 15-25 years being the peak age at onset for bipolar disorder (BD), recognition and introduction of appropriate treatment are typically delayed by 6 or more years. A major reason for these delays is the failure to identify prior mood episodes or risk factors for bipolarity, suggesting that there may be a particular benefit in using screening tools in this age group.

METHODS

We identified papers published between 1980 and 2012 that assessed the validity of measures specifically used to screen for BD, risk factors for bipolarity, or a prior history of depressive, hypomanic or manic episodes. From these, we identified those studies that included sufficient information about participants aged 15-25 years.

RESULTS

Searches yielded only eleven independent studies with available data on the target age group. The studies employed seven separate scales that demonstrated quite different screening properties. The cut-off scores for optimal sensitivity and specificity often differed from those reported for adult samples and varied according to sample characteristics.

LIMITATIONS

Our findings may be undermined by the small sample sizes and low number of individuals in the specified age range included in the studies identified. Although we explored all available methods for detecting studies and data sets, we cannot exclude the likelihood that other relevant studies on this age range exist.

CONCLUSIONS

Available screening tools for BD have mainly been validated in middle-aged adult samples with established mood disorders, and the instruments reviewed show sub-optimal screening properties when applied to adolescents and young adults. Overall, those measures that examine personality traits or temperament appear to perform better than those assessing discrete symptoms or episodes. However, all the measures need further testing and/or modification. In the interim, to improve screening for BD in those in the peak age range for onset of this disorder, it may be appropriate to combine a measure with high sensitivity with one that demonstrates high specificity for a given sampling frame.