Evaluation of radiation detectors for the determination of field output factors in Leksell Gamma Knife dosimetry using 3D printed phantom inserts

The Leksell Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ and Icon™ have a unique geometry, containing 192 60Co sources with collimation for field sizes of 4 mm, 8 mm, and 16 mm. 4 mm and 8 mm collimated fields lack lateral charged particle equilibrium, so accurate field output factors are essential. This study performs field output factor measurements for the microDiamond, microSilicon, and RAZOR™ Nano detectors. 3D printed inserts for the spherical Solid Water® Phantom were fabricated for microDiamond detector, the microSilicon unshielded diode and the RAZOR™ Nano micro-ionisation chamber. Detectors were moved iteratively to identify the peak detector signal for each collimator, representing the effective point of measurement of the chamber. In addition, field output correction factors were calculated for each detector relative to vendor supplied Monte Carlo simulated field output factors and field output factors measured with a W2 scintillator. All field output factors where within 1.1 % for the 4 mm collimator and within 2.3 % for the 8 mm collimator. The 3D printed phantom inserts were suitable for routine measurements if the user identifies the effective point of measurement, and ensures a reproducible setup by marking the rotational alignment of the cylindrical print. Measurements with the microDiamond and microSilicon can be performed faster compared to the RAZOR™ Nano due to differences in the signal to noise ratio. All detectors are suitable for field output factor measurements for the Leksell Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ and Icon™.

Dosimetric Systems in Pre-Treatment QA for Stereotactic Treatments: Correlation Agreements and Target Volume Dependency

AIM

This study comprehensively investigated pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) for 100 cancer patients undergoing stereotactic treatments (SRS/SRT) using various detectors.

METHODS

The study conducted QA for SRS/SRT treatments planned with a 6MV SRS beam at a dose rate of 1,000 MU/min, utilizing Eclipse v13.6 Treatment Planning System (TPS). Point dose measurements employed 0.01cm3 and 0.13cm3 cylindrical ionization chambers, while planar dose verification utilized Gafchromic EBT-XD Film and Portal Imager (aS1000). Plans were categorized by target volume, and a thorough analysis compared point dose agreements, planar dose gamma pass rates, and their correlations with chamber volume mean dose, detector type, and point dose agreement. Additionally, the consistency between different ionization chambers was assessed.

RESULTS

Point dose agreement generally improved with increasing target volume, except for volumes over 10cm3 with 0.01cm3 chambers, showing a contrary trend. Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed between TPS and measured doses for both chambers. Gamma pass rate improved with increasing target volume in EBT XD and aS1000 analyses, except for the >10cm3 group in EBT XD. EBT XD demonstrated better agreement with TPS for target volumes up to 10cm3 compared to aS1000, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the detectors. Strong correlations were found between chamber point dose and chamber volume mean dose agreement, as well as between the two gamma criteria analyses of the same detector type in the planar dose correlation analysis. However, weak correlations were discovered for other analyses.

CONCLUSION

This study found weak correlation between different detector types in pre-treatment QA for point dose and planar dose evaluation. However, within a specific detector type, strong correlation was observed for different point dose evaluation methods and gamma criteria. This highlights the importance of cautious interpretation of QA results, particularly for SRS QA, due to the lack of correlation between detector types.

MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning

PURPOSE

To assess a large panel of MR compatible detectors on the full range of measurements required for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning by using a specific statistical method represented as a continuum of comparison with the Monte Carlo (MC) TPS calculations. This study also describes the commissioning tests and the secondary MC dose calculation validation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plans were created on the Viewray TPS to generate MC reference data. Absolute dose points, PDD, profiles and output factors were extracted and compared to measurements performed with ten different detectors: PTW 31010, 31021, 31022, Markus 34045 and Exradin A28 MR ionization chambers, SN Edge shielded diode, PTW 60019 microdiamond, PTW 60023 unshielded diode, EBT3 radiochromic films and LiF µcubes. Three commissioning steps consisted in comparison between calculated and measured dose: the beam model validation, the output calibration verification in four different phantoms and the commissioning tests recommended by the IAEA-TECDOC-1583.

MAIN RESULTS

The symmetry for the high resolution detectors was higher than the TPS data of about 1%. The angular responses of the PTW 60023 and the SN Edge were - 6.6 and - 11.9% compared to the PTW 31010 at 60°. The X/Y-left and the Y-right penumbras measured by the high resolution detectors were in good agreement with the TPS values except for the PTW 60023 for large field sizes. For the 0.84 × 0.83 cm2 field size, the mean deviation to the TPS of the uncorrected OF was - 1.7 ± 1.6% against - 4.0 ± 0.6% for the corrected OF whereas we found - 4.8 ± 0.8% for passive dosimeters. The mean absolute dose deviations to the TPS in different phantoms were 0 ± 0.4%, - 1.2 ± 0.6% and 0.5 ± 1.1% for the PTW 31010, PTW 31021 and Exradin A28 MR respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnetic field effects on the measurements are considerably reduced at low magnetic field. The PTW 31010 ionization chamber can be used with confidence in different phantoms for commissioning and QA tests requiring absolute dose verifications. For relative measurements, the PTW 60019 presented the best agreement for the full range of field size. For the profile assessment, shielded diodes had a behaviour similar to the PTW 60019 and 60023 while the ionization chambers were the most suitable detectors for the symmetry. The output correction factors published by the IAEA TRS 483 seem to be applicable at low magnetic field pending the publication of new MR specific values.

The effect of geometry dependent Chamber Spatial Response Function in small field profile measurements

The effect of Chamber-Spatial Response Function (CSRF) on beam profile measurements has been studied for Standard Ionization Chamber-Radiation Field Analyzer setup. The Chamber-Spatial Response Function is assumed to be Gaussian and parameterized through the projected geometry of the chamber along the measurement axis. CSRF widths was measured by constructing chamber diameter-FWHM correlation for a set of ionization chambers. The results were analyzed through Geant4 simulations. The geometrical parameters for the chamber, used in Geant4 simulation, have been derived from the CT scan images of the chamber. An excellent agreement between measurement and simulation is obtained. Various factors effecting the CSRF, such as chamber width and Compton current are analyzed. The analysis shows that the Compton current has significant role in broadening the CSRF. Further, it is also observed that a spherical chamber geometry provides better and compact CSRF.

Dose area product primary standards established by graphite calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB for small radiation fields in radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To present primary standards establishment in terms of Dose Area Product (DAP) for small field sizes.

METHODS

A large section graphite calorimeter and two plane-parallel ionization chambers were designed and built in-house. These chambers were calibrated in a 6MV FFF beam at the maximum dose rate of 1400 UM/min for fields defined by specifically designed circular collimators of 5, 7.5, 10, 13 and 15 mm diameter and jaws of 5, 7, 10, 13 and 15 mm side length on a Varian TrueBeam linac.

RESULTS

The two chambers show the same behaviour regardless of field shape and size. From 5 to 15 mm, calibration coefficients slightly increase with the field size with a magnitude of 1.8% and 1.1% respectively for the two chambers, and are independent of the field shape. This tendency was confirmed by Monte Carlo calculations. The average associated uncertainty of the calibration coefficients is around 0.6% at k=1.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, primary standards in terms of DAP were established by graphite calorimetry for an extended range of small field sizes. These promising results open the door for an alternative approach in small fields dosimetry.

PENELOPE simulations and experiment for 6 MV clinac iX accelerator for standard and small static fields

The goal of this work was to produce accurate data for use as a 'gold standard' and a valid tool for measurements in reference dosimetry for standard/small static field sizes from 0.5 × 0.5 to 10 × 10 cm². It is based on the accuracy of the phase space files (PSFs) as a key quantity. Because the IAEA general public database provides few PSFs for the Varian iX, we simulated the head through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and calculated validated PSFs for 12 square field sizes including seven for small static fields. The resulting dosimetric calculations allowed us to reach a good level of agreement in comparison to our relative and absolute dose measurements performed on a Varian iX in water phantom. Measured and MC calculated output factors were investigated for different detectors. Based on the TRS 483 formalism and MC (PENELOPE/penEasy), we calculated output correction factors for the unshielded Diode-E (T60017) and the PinPoint-3D (T31016) micro-chamber according to manufacturers' blueprints. Our MC results were in agreement with the recommended data; they compete with recent measurements and MC simulations and in particular the TRS 483 MC data obtained from similar simulations. Moreover, our MC results provide supplemental data in comparison to TRS 483 data in particular for the PinPoint-3D (T31016). We suggest our MC output correction factors as new datasets for future TRS compilations. The work was substantial, used different robust MC strategies depending on the scoring regions, and led in most cases to uncertainties of less than 1%.

Assessment of skin doses in small field radiotherapy for 6 MV photons and beam spectral analysis at skin surface: an EGSnrc based Monte Carlo study

This study aims at the estimation of skin doses during small field radiotherapy with 6 MV photons and analysis of beam spectra at skin surface. The EGSnrc Monte Carlo code was used for spectral analysis and dose scoring in a water phantom. Percent skin dose (PSD) was calculated at a depth of 70 µm (relative to 10 cm depth), and the effects of field size, collimation, source-to-surface distance, and tissue inhomogeneity (bone/air) below the skin were evaluated. Low-energy photons and contaminant electrons from the machine head or back-scattered from underlying tissue were found to be the major contributors to skin dose. As the field size was reduced, the beam hardened, while the photon and electron fluences at the skin decreased compared to those at the reference depth of 10 cm. This resulted in a PSD reduction for fields smaller than the reference field size. Multi leaf collimators increased the PSD (up to 4%) while variation in source-to-skin dose showed a negligible effect. A substantial increase in PSD has been observed (up to 6%) when high Z material like bone was placed below the skin. In contrast, air as underlying material decreased the skin dose. The skin dose varied considerably with various clinical and geometric parameters. It is concluded that, although the skin doses were low for small fields compared to those for the reference field, skin doses may become substantial when escalated target doses are delivered with multi leaf collimators. Moreover, the presence of high Z materials such as bones or metallic implants below the skin can result in significant enhancement of the skin dose.

A comparative study of three small-field detectors for patient specific stereotactic arc dosimetry

This paper examines the difference in patient specific dosimetry using three different detectors of varying active volume, density and composition, for quality assurance of stereotactic treatments. A PTW 60017 unshielded electron diode, an Exradin W1 scintillator, and a PTW 31014 PinPoint small volume ionisation chamber were setup in a Lucy 3D QA phantom, and were positioned at the isocentre of an Elekta Axesse, with beam modulator collimator, using Exactrac and a HexaPODTM couch. Dose measurements were acquired for 43 stereotactic arcs, and compared to BrainLAB iPlan version 3.0.0 treatment planning system (TPS) calculations using a pencil beam algorithm. It was found that for arcs with field sizes [Formula: see text] mm, the properties of a detector have minimal impact on the measured doses, with all three detectors agreeing with the TPS (to within 5%). However, for field sizes [Formula: see text] mm, only the scintillator was found to yield results to within 5% of the TPS. The dose discrepancies were found to increase with decreasing field size. It is recommended that for field sizes [Formula: see text] mm, a water equivalent dosimeter like the Exradin W1 scintillator be used in order to minimise detector composition perturbations in the measured doses.

Zero field PDD and TMR data for unflattened beams in conventional linacs: A tool for independent dose calculations

PURPOSE

To investigate the applicability of the formalism described in BJR supplement n.25 for Flattening Filter Free (FFF) beams in determining the zero-field tissue maximum ratio (TMR) for an independent calculation method of Percentage Depth Doses (PDDs) and relative dose factors (RDFs) at different experimental setups.

METHODS

Experimental PDDs for field size from 40×40cm² to 2×2cm² with Source Surface Distance (SSD) 100cm were acquired. The normalized peak scatter factor for each square field was obtained by fitting experimental RDFs in water and collimator factors (CFs) in air. Maximum log-likelihood methods were used to extract fit parameters in competing models and the Bayesian Information Criterion was used to select the best one. In different experimental setups additional RDFs and TPR₁₀²⁰s for field sizes other than reference field were measured and Monte Carlo simulations of PDDs at SSD 80cm were carried out to validate the results. PDD agreements were evaluated by gamma analysis.

RESULTS

The BJR formalism allowed to predict the PDDs obtained with MC within 2%/2mm at SSD 80cm from 100% down to 50% of the maximum dose. The agreement between experimental TPR₁₀²⁰s and RDFs values at SSD=90cm and BJR calculations were within 1% for field sizes greater than 5×5cm² while it was within 3% for fields down to 2×2cm².

CONCLUSIONS

BJR formalism can be used for FFF beams to predict PDD and RDF at different SSDs and can be used for independent MU calculations.

Simultaneous production of mixed electron--photon beam in a medical LINAC: A feasibility study

PURPOSE

The electron or photon beams might be used for treatment of tumors. Each beam has its own advantage and disadvantages. Combo beam can increase the advantages. No investigation has been performed for producing simultaneous mixed electron and photon beam. In current study a device has been added to the Medical Linac to produce a mixed photon-electron beam.

METHODS

Firstly a Varian 2300CD head was simulated by MCNP Monte Carlo Code. Two sets of perforated lead sheets with 1 and 2 mm thickness and 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 cm punches then placed at the top of the applicator holder tray. This layer produces bremsstrahlung x-ray upon impinging fraction electrons on it. The remaining fraction of electrons passes through the holes. The simulation was performed for 10 × 10, 6 × 6, and 4 × 4 cm(2) field size.

RESULTS

For 10 × 10 cm(2) field size, among the punched targets, the largest penumbra difference between the depth of 1 and 7 cm was 72%. This difference for photon and electron beams were 31% and 325% respectively. A maximum of 39% photon percentage was produced by 2 mm target with 0.2 cm holes diameter layer. The minimum surface dose value was 4% lesser than pure electron beam. For small fields, unlike the pure electron beam, the PDD, penumbra, and flatness variations were negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of mixing the electron and photon beam is reduction of pure electron's penumbra dependency with the depth, especially for small fields, also decreasing of dramatic changes of PDD curve with irradiation field size.