Fetal Growth Diagnosis and Management among Perinatal Medical Professionals: A Survey of Practice and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

This paper aimed to assess the knowledge of healthcare professionals (obstetric and gynecology residents, specialists, and midwives) in the field of perinatal medicine regarding fetal growth diagnosis and management.

METHODS

A questionnaire was created consisting of a set of questions regarding demographic data, methods of growth assessment, and management. It was a handout survey. The results were analyzed with the use of descriptive statistics and χ2 analysis using the program Statistica.

RESULTS

190 medical professionals have participated in the questionnaire. 86.3% of respondents agreed that pregnancy dating should be modified based on first-trimester ultrasound. 90.9% agreed that III trimester ultrasound has a ±15% margin of error. When asked which growth charts are best fit for assessing growth in a studied population, 10.7% marked standard, 37.4% reference, 26.2% customized, and 26.2% did not know the difference between the three choices. 60.3% stated that they use a growth chart to assess growth and qualify fetuses for monitoring. 70.2% used the 10th centile as a cutoff, 20.1% 5th centile, and 9.7% 3rd centile. Only 40.9% would diagnose fetal growth restriction based on fetal weight only. 28.7% using the 10th centile cutoff, 16.1% 5th centile, and 54.0% 3rd centile. Only a quarter of the respondents were able to name the growth chart or tool that they use for assessment. The most common responses were Yudkin, Hadlock, and online calculators of Fetal Medicina Barcelona and the Fetal Medicine Foundation.

DISCUSSION

A lot of confusion is observed primarily in the aspect of cutoff values for identification, subsequent monitoring, and management of fetal growth restriction. There is a need for extensive training and education in this field and uniform national recommendations.

[Risk factors for preterm birth, low birth weight and small for gestational age: a prospective cohort study]

Objective: To study the relationship between exposure factors in early pregnancy and preterm birth (PB), low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) of neonates. Methods: A total of 3 172 pregnant women who were enrolled in the project of Chinese Pregnant Women Cohort Study-Peking Union Medical College (CPWCS-PUMC) from July 25, 2017 to July 24, 2018 and delivered before December 31, 2018 were selected as subjects in this study. The relationship between exposure factors in early pregnancy and adverse outcomes of neonatal delivery was analyzed by using binary logistic regression analysis. Results: The incidence rates of PB, LBW and SGA were 4.76%, 3.53% and 5.74%, respectively. In terms of PB, the analysis results showed that the gestational weight gain (GWG) and living in northern China were protective factors, while premature rupture of membranes, gestational hypertension, dental examination or treatment within 1-3 years and family with 3-4 members were risk factors. In the respect of LBW, GWG and daily consumption of milk and dairy products were the protective factors, while premature rupture of membranes, gestational hypertension, sedentary working time more than 6 hours, dental examination or treatment within 1-3 years and passive smoking were risk factors. For SGA, baby girl, passive smoking, peanut oil consumption and unsalted taste were risk factors, while folic acid supplementation was protective factor. Conclusion: The risk factors for PB, LBW and SGA were multifactorial, and relevant specific measures should be taken to reduce the occurrence of adverse neonatal outcomes.

Of pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age babies at term, what proportions have placental findings with implications for future pregnancies or neonatal outcomes?

Background: Small for gestational age (SGA) is a term to define any baby born with birth weight <10th centile. SGA can be associated with a number of placental pathology findings, which may influence maternal outcomes, neonatal neurodevelopment, and future pregnancies.Aims: To identify the proportion of term pregnancies complicated by SGA with placental findings that may have implications for future pregnancies or neonatal outcomes.Method: A retrospective review between 2011 and 2015 of babies and placentas born at term with SGA histopathological findings were categorized as to whether they had a high recurrence rate and where the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome may affect the neonate.Results: Six hundred and ninety-eight babies were identified as SGA. Only 335 (47.8%) placentas were sent for histopathological assessment. Of these, 60 (17.9%) had histopathological findings associated with high recurrence rates and 68 (20.2%) had findings associated with potential adverse neonatal outcomes.Conclusions: Of those placentas sent for examination between 17.9% and 20.2% had findings associated with either high recurrence rates or findings that may benefit from neonatal follow-up. Under 50% of pregnancies complicated by SGA at term had a placental examination, resulting in a significant number of potential important clinical consequences being missed.