Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the clinical effects and imaging data of patients who underwent endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) with those who received unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 69 patients presenting with typical intermittent claudication and signs and symptoms indicative of unilateral lower extremity nerve root compression, meeting inclusion criteria between April 2022 and June 2022. Among the cohort, 35 patients underwent ULIF group, while 34 patients underwent Endo-TLIF group. We compared perioperative parameters, including intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and operation time between the two groups. Pre-operative and post-operative changes in the height and cross-sectional area of the target intervertebral space were also compared between the groups. Finally, we evaluated bone graft size and interbody fusion rates at 6 and 12 months post-surgery using the Brantigan scoring system.

RESULTS

The ULIF group had significantly shorter operative times compared to the Endo-TLIF group (P < 0.05). Conversely, the Endo-TLIF group exhibited significantly shorter hospital stays compared to the ULIF group (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, both groups exhibited postoperative increases in vertebral canal volume compared to baseline (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in the change in the cross-sectional area of the target intervertebral space between the two surgical methods (P > 0.05). Interbody fusion rates were comparable between the two groups at both 6 and 12 months after surgery (P > 0.05). Lastly, the ULIF group had a significantly larger area of bone graft than the Endo-TLIF group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In summary, the ULIF technique, as a novel spinal endoscopy approach, is a safer and more effective minimally invasive surgical method for addressing lumbar spinal stenosis and intervertebral disc herniation in patients. Both surgical methods have their own advantages and drawbacks. With the development of technology and related instruments, the limitations of both techniques can be mitigated for to a certain extent, and they can be applied by more doctors in diverse medical fields in the future.

Computerized Three-Dimensional Analysis: A Novel Method to Assess the Effect of Open-Door Laminoplasty

INTRODUCTION

The three-dimensional elaboration of morphological data derived from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans generates virtual anatomical reconstructions. Here, we propose a novel protocol to analyze the postoperative results of open-door laminoplasty to evaluate differences in the volume of the spinal canal. The protocol uses geometric models in patients with cervical degenerative myelopathy before versus after cervical laminoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mimics and 3-Matic software (Materialise, Leuven, BE) programs were used to segment anatomical structures and create polygon meshes of spines. Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were enrolled. The models obtained before and after laminoplasty were superimposed by using a global registration function. The magnitude of divergence was quantified by using the root-mean-square error (RMSE).

RESULTS

Using this novel protocol, we were able to map the differences in the volume of the spinal canal before laminoplasty and after laminoplasty and to quantify its magnitude and calculate the volumes.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The development of a procedure to measure the space within the cervical bone walls using geometric parameters represents a new, powerful method to verify the results obtained by cervical laminoplasty. Further research horizons may include the routine use of virtual models in surgical planning for this procedure.

Surgical consideration for thoracolumbar burst fractures with spinal canal compromise without neurological deficit

Background

For thoracolumbar burst fractures with spinal canal compromise but no neurological deficit, is it necessary to perform additional laminectomy decompression after the currently accepted posterior pedicle-screw internal fixation?

Methods

Patients were divided into two groups: decompression group (Group A) and nondecompression group (Group B). A retrospective analysis of the posterior vertebral body height of the fractured vertebral body, the ratio of the volume of the spinal canal, and the change of the Cobb angle, relative to the corresponding preoperative values, was conducted to analyse the reasons for choosing different surgical methods.

Results

Compared the intraoperative findings after fixation with the preoperative data, in Group A, the posterior vertebral body height of the fractured vertebral body was not significantly restored, the volume ratio of the spinal canal was not significantly improved, and the Cobb angle was not significantly reduced (p ​> ​0.05). In comparison, in Group B, the posterior vertebral body height of the fractured vertebral body was significantly restored, the volume ratio of spinal canal was significantly increased, and the Cobb angle was significantly reduced (p ​< ​0.001).

Conclusion

For patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures with spinal canal compromise but no neurological deficit, if when the posterior intraoperative fixation is performed, the spinal canal fracture is partially recovered, the posterior vertebral body height of the injured vertebrae is significantly restored, the spinal canal volume ratio is significantly increased, and the large kyphosis is corrected, then the indirect decompression without the posterior laminectomy can be performed.

The translational potential of this article

This study contributes to offer treatment ​consideration for ​patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological symptoms.

Impact of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on spinal canal volume and neural foramen size in three types of lumbar spinal stenosis

Objectives

Pedicle-lengthening osteotomy is a novel surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), which achieves substantial enlargement of the spinal canal by expansion of the bilateral pedicle osteotomy sites. Few studies have evaluated the impact of this new surgery on spinal canal volume (SCV) and neural foramen dimension (NFD) in three different types of LSS patients.

Methods

CT scans were performed on 36 LSS patients (12 central canal stenosis (CCS), 12 lateral recess stenosis (LRS), and 12 foraminal stenosis (FS)) at L4-L5, and on 12 normal (control) subjects. Mimics 14.01 workstation was used to reconstruct 3D models of the L4-L5 vertebrae and discs. SCV and NFD were measured after 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, or 5 mm pedicle-lengthening osteotomies at L4 and/or L5. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine between-group differences.

Results

In the intact state, SVC and NFD were significantly larger in the control group compared with the LSS groups (P<0.05). After lengthening at L4, the percentage increase in SCV (per millimetre) was LRS>CCS>FS>Control. After lengthening at L5 and L4-L5, the percentage increase in SCV (per millimetre) was LRS>FS>CCS>Control. After lengthening at L4 and L4-L5, the percentage increase in NFD (per millimetre) was FS>CCS>LRS>Control. After lengthening at L5, the percentage increase in NFD (per millimetre) was CCS>LRS>control>FS.

Conclusions

LRS patients are the most suitable candidates for treatment with pedicle-lengthening osteotomy. Lengthening L4 pedicles produced larger percentage increases in NFD than lengthening L5 pedicles (p < 0.05). Lengthening L4 pedicles may be the most effective option for relieving foraminal compression in LSS patients.

Cite this article: P. Li, L. Qian, W. D. Wu, C. F. Wu, J. Ouyang. Impact of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on spinal canal volume and neural foramen size in three types of lumbar spinal stenosis. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:239–246. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.2000469.