Gross total resection of spinal chondrosarcoma is associated with improved locoregional relapse-free survival and overall survival

BACKGROUND

Spinal chondrosarcomas are rare malignant osseous tumors. The low incidence of spinal chondrosarcomas and the complexity of spine anatomy have led to heterogeneous treatment strategies with varying curative and survival rates. The goal of this study is to investigate prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing en bloc vs. piecemeal resection for the management of spinal chondrosarcoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent curative-intent resection of primary and metastatic spinal chondrosarcoma over a 25-year period. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted with LRFS as primary endpoint and OS as secondary endpoint. LRFS and OS were modeled using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

For 72 patients who underwent first resection, the median follow-up time was 5.1 years (95% CI 2.2-7.0). Thirty-three patients (45.8%) had en bloc resection, and 39 (54.2%) had piecemeal resection. Of the 68 patients for whom extent of resection was known, 44 patients had gross total resection (GTR) and 24 patients had subtotal resection. In survival analyses, both LRFS and OS showed statistically significant difference based on the extent of resection (p = 0.001; p = 0.04, respectively). However, only LRFS showed statistically significant difference when assessing the type of resection (p = 0.02). In addition, higher tumor grade and more invasive disease were associated with worse LRFS and OS rates.

CONCLUSION

Although in our study en bloc and GTR were associated with improved survival, heterogenous and complex spinal presentations may limit total resection. Therefore, the surgical management should be tailored individually to ensure the best local control and maximum preservation of function.

Clinical significance of traditional clinical parameters and inflammatory biomarkers for the prognosis of patients with spinal chondrosarcoma: a retrospective study of 150 patients in a single center

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical significance of five inflammatory biomarkers and conventional clinical parameters in prognostic prediction of spinal chondrosarcoma.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate independent prognostic factors for recurrence and death of patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curve, and differences were analyzed by log-rank test. The optimal cutoff values for NLR, PLR, LMR, and CAR were determined by X-tile program.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff value for NLR, PLR, LMR, AGR, and CAR was 2.7, 200, 3.0, 1.5, and 0.2, respectively. Of the 150 patients included, recurrence was detected in 105 patients, and death occurred in 78 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that Tomita I-III, total resection, and CAR < 0.2 were significantly associated with longer DFS. Meanwhile, preoperative Frankel score D-E, total resection, and CAR < 0.2 were favorable prognostic factors for OS. Subtype analysis showed that only total resection was an independent prognostic factor for DFS of recurrent spinal chondrosarcoma.

CONCLUSION

Total resection could significantly reduce the recurrence rate of spinal chondrosarcoma and improve OS of chondrosarcoma patients. Tomita classification I-III was a favorable factor for DFS, and preoperative Frankel score A-C was an adverse prognostic factor for OS. CAR was the most robust prognostic indicator with a discriminatory ability as compared with other inflammatory indicators. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.