A phase II pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of the "supra-marginal" surgical resection of malignant glioma (G-SUMIT: Glioma supra marginal incision trial) study protocol

Background

High-grade gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults having a median survival of only 13–16 months. This is despite the current standard of maximal safe surgical resection followed by fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Extending the tumor resection limit beyond the gadolinium (GAD)-enhancing margin (i.e., supra-marginal resection) could in principle provide an added survival benefit as it has been shown that > 80% of post-operative tumor recurrence is within a 2-cm region surrounding the original GAD-enhancing margin. However, this must be weighed against the risk of potential damage to functional brain tissue.

Methods

In this phase II pilot randomized control trial (RCT), we aim to assess the feasibility of “supra-marginal” resection extending 1 cm beyond the enhancing tumor in adults with radiographic evidence of GAD-enhancing intra-axial tumor consistent with high-grade glioma in a safe anatomical location and a Karnofsky Performance Score > 60. With six academic institutions with established neurosurgical oncology practices in participation, we aim to enroll 72 patients over 2 years. Primary outcomes include evaluating the feasibility of performing a large-scale trial with regard to recruitment, allocation, and outcome documentation as well as safety data. Secondary outcomes include determining if there is an increased survival benefit with supra-marginal resection and impact on quality of life (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), EuroQol-5D (ED-5D), 30-day all-cause mortality).

Discussion

Recent studies have revealed survival advantages comparing supra-marginal resection to standard attempt at gross total resection (GTR) with no additional perioperative surgical risk; however, the current quality of evidence is low and under-powered. Therefore, there are no current practice guidelines, and the philosophy of surgical resection is guided by individual surgeon preferences on an individual patient basis. This creates additional uncertainty and is potentially detrimental to our patients. This clinical equipoise supports the need for an adequately powered RCT to determine whether a supra-marginal resection can have a positive impact on survival for patients with HGGs. Our pilot RCT will test the feasibility of comparing the standard gross total resection of GAD-enhancing tumors and supra-marginal resection to prepare for a larger definitive multicenter RCT.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04737577. Registered on February 4, 2021

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01104-1.

Seizure outcome in temporal glioblastoma surgery: lobectomy as a supratotal resection regime outclasses conventional gross-total resection

Introduction

The postoperative seizure freedom represents an important secondary outcome measure in glioblastoma surgery. Recently, supra-total glioblastoma resection in terms of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) has gained growing attention with regard to superior long-term disease control for temporal-located glioblastoma compared to conventional gross-total resections (GTR). However, the impact of ATL on seizure outcome in these patients is unknown. We therefore analyzed ATL and GTR as differing extents of resection in regard of postoperative seizure control in patients with temporal glioblastoma and preoperative symptomatic seizures.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2018, 33 patients with preoperative seizures underwent GTR or ATL for temporal glioblastoma at the authors’ institution. Seizure outcome was assessed postoperatively and 6 months after tumor resection according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification and stratified into favorable (ILAE class 1) versus unfavorable (ILAE class 2–6).

Results

Overall, 23 out of 33 patients (70%) with preoperative seizures achieved favorable seizure outcome following resection of temporal located glioblastoma. For the ATL group, postoperative seizure freedom was present in 13 out of 13 patients (100%). In comparison, respective rates for the GTR group were 10 out of 20 patients (50%) (p = 0.002; OR 27; 95% CI 1.4–515.9).

Conclusions

ATL in terms of a supra-total resection strategy was associated with superior favorable seizure outcome following temporal glioblastoma resection compared to GTR. Regarding above mentioned survival benefit following ATL compared to GTR, ATL as an aggressive supra-total resection regime might constitute the surgical modality of choice for temporal-located glioblastoma.