The impact of the extent of surgery on late adverse effects following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

AIM

To investigate the impact of the surgical extent on late adverse effects (LAE) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHOD

A prospective cohort study including patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC due to peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal tumour origin. From 2006 through 2019, consecutive patients treated with CRS + HIPEC were followed at 3, 6 and 12 months, and LAEs were assessed using the symptom scales and items from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Surgical extent was categorized into three groups (major, intermediate, minor) based on peritonectomy procedures and colorectal resections performed as part of CRS. EORTC data were analysed using a linear mixed effects regression model adjusted for age, gender, origin of tumour and comorbidity.

RESULTS

In total, 257 patients who responded to at least one questionnaire during the follow-ups were included. Only diarrhoea symptoms were positively associated with surgical extent (mean differences: major vs. minor: 8.4 (-0.5; 17.2) (p = 0.06) and major vs. intermediate: 10.9 (3.8; 18.0) (p = 0.00)). Additionally, diarrhoea symptoms persisted throughout the study period and did not change over time (mean difference 12-3 months: -3.6 (-9.1; 1.7) (p-value = 0.18)). Overall, the levels of different symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, and appetite loss) significantly decreased from 3 to 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing extensive CRS suffer from persistent impaired gastrointestinal function in terms of diarrhoea compared patients undergoing to less extensive surgery. Attention should be directed at detecting such LAE and to guide patients accordingly.

Surgical Extent for Ground Glass Nodules

As diagnoses of small ground glass nodule (GGN)-type lung adenocarcinoma are increasing due to the increasing frequency of computed tomography (CT) screening, surgical treatment for GGN-type lung adenocarcinoma has rapidly become more common. However, the appropriate surgical extent for these lesions remains unclear; therefore, several retrospective studies have been published and prospectively randomized controlled trials are being undertaken. This article takes a closer look at each clinical study. Convincing evidence must be published on 2 issues for sublobar resection to be accepted as a standard surgical option for GGN lung adenocarcinoma. In the absence of such evidence, it is better to perform lobar resection as long as the patient has sufficient lung function. The first issue is the definition of a sufficient resection margin, and the second is whether lymph node metastasis is conclusively ruled out before surgery. An additional issue is the need for an accurate calculation of the total size and solid size on CT. Given the results of clinical studies so far, wedge resection or segmentectomy shows a good prognosis for GGNs with a total size of 2 cm or less. Therefore, sublobar resection will play a key role even in patients who can tolerate lobectomy.

Risk group-adapted adjuvant radiotherapy for WHO grade I and II skull base meningioma

PURPOSE

Salvage treatment including surgery and radiotherapy (RT) for recurrent or progressive meningioma is not an easy task, especially for the skull base location. And yet, criteria for adjuvant radiotherapy after initial surgery are not clearly defined for WHO grade I/II meningioma. We determined prognostic factors for recurrence and evaluated the benefit of risk group-adapted adjuvant RT for WHO grade I/II meningioma in the skull base.

METHODS

We reviewed 272 patients who underwent surgery and were pathologically confirmed with WHO grade I or II skull base meningioma between January 2000 and July 2017. Subgroup analyses were performed for WHO grade I (259 patients) and WHO grade II (13 patients) meningiomas to evaluate the benefit of RT in each subgroup.

RESULTS

Patients with WHO grade II meningiomas tended to present more neurologic symptoms and to receive RT more frequently. In prognostic factor analysis, tumor size (p = 0.039), surgical extent (p < 0.001), and RT (p = 0.005) were associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). In subgroup analysis of WHO grade I, RFS was significantly better in RT group after matching other variables. The risk stratification was performed using three risk factors (petroclival location, tumor size, Simpson grade) in WHO grade I patients, and significantly different RFS was observed according to the risk group in non-RT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size, Simpson grade, and adjuvant RT were prognostic factors. The risk group-adapted approach can facilitate the selection of patients who may benefit from adjuvant RT for WHO grade I/II skull base meningiomas.