Application of testicular spermatozoa cryopreservation in assisted reproduction.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;
142:354-358. [PMID:
29856069 DOI:
10.1002/ijgo.12537]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficiency of spermatozoa cryopreservation and to compare the clinical pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using fresh versus cryopreserved spermatozoa collected by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA).
METHODS
A retrospective study was performed to compare the outcomes of men who accepted frozen-spermatozoa-based TESA-ICSI with those of men who underwent TESA-ICSI using fresh spermatozoa between January 1, 2015, and December 30, 2016. The groups were matched for age. The rates of fertilization, good-quality embryos, blastocyst formation, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were obtained from clinical records and were compared between the groups.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences between the frozen TESA group (n=79) and the fresh TESA group (n=194) in the rates of fertilization (71.4% vs 73.4%), good-quality embryos (55.3% vs 54.5%), blastocyst formation (60.9% vs 60.1%), clinical pregnancy (61.7% vs 55.1%), and live delivery (51.1% vs 45.7%) (P>0.05 for all comparisons).
CONCLUSION
Freezing low-count sperm collected by TESA with a cryoprotectant was an efficient method in the treatment of male factor infertility.
Collapse