Survival and prognosis of lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Only a few large-scale studies have focused on large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, a rare type of pulmonary malignancy, and uniform diagnostic criteria and standardized treatments are lacking. This study aimed to assess the treatment outcomes and factors influencing patients' prognosis with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

METHODS

The data of 55 patients with pathologically confirmed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, treated at our hospital from January 2013 to January 2018, were collected. Relationships between clinical characteristics, diagnoses, treatment outcomes, and prognoses were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for a median of 18.5 (0.5-41.0) months. Thirty-four patients died before the final follow-up, resulting in a median overall survival of 17.9 (0.5-36.0) months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 69.1%, 23.6%, and 1.8%, respectively. Single-factor analysis identified gender (P=0.036), smoking history (P=0.008), obstructive atelectasis (P=0.032), regional lymph node metastasis (P=0.020), and treatment selection (P=0.000) as factors influencing overall survival. Multifactor analysis identified treatment selection as an independent survival prognostic factor. Particularly, significant differences were observed between the combination therapies (surgery+chemotherapy, surgery+radiotherapy, surgery+radiotherapy+chemotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy) and single-therapy approaches (chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone; P<0.001), but not among the combination therapies (P=0.216).

DISCUSSION

Male patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with a history of smoking, obstructive atelectasis, and regional lymph node metastasis have a particularly poor prognosis. Our observation of the treatment approach as an independent survival prognostic factor suggests that combination therapies may yield survival benefits to patients.

Role of the water-drinking test in medically treated primary open angle glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

The water-drinking test (WDT) has recently re-emerged as a possible way to determine the competency of the trabecular meshwork. We performed a prospective interventional study to test the hypothesis that the WDT could be useful in assessing fluctuations in patients undergoing treatment for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

We included 122 patients; 62 on medical treatment for POAG (n=123 eyes) and 60 controls (n=120 eyes). The study group had been on intraocular pressures (IOP) lowering treatment continuously for at least 3months with stable IOP. The WDT was performed during fasting and was considered positive if it fluctuated ≥6mmHg.

RESULTS

The patients on medical treatment had a mean age of 50.56±18.45 years vs. 51.35±11.22 for the controls (P=0.34); with 71% being female in the study group and 77% in the control group. In the study group; 52% were on beta blockers (n=64), 27% combination of two or more medications (n=33), 19% prostaglandin analogues (n=24) and 2% alpha agonists (n=2). The WDT was positive in 17.07% (n=21) in the study group and 2.5% (n=3) in the control group (P=0.0001). The mean fluctuation was 7.14±2.15mmHg in the study group and 6.00±0mmHg in the controls (P=0.33). A positive WDT was found in 33.33% (n=11) of those on combination therapy; 12.5% (n=3) prostaglandin analogues and 10.94% (n=7) beta blockers (P=0.03). Combination therapy had the highest positive WDT fluctuation (7.54±2.87) followed by prostaglandin analogues (7.00±1.00) and beta blockers (6.57±0.78) with a P value of 0.44.

CONCLUSIONS

The WDT can identify significant fluctuations in eyes with POAG that are medically treated.

[Comparison of early management of central retinal vein occlusion with ranibizumab versus hemodilution]

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of early treatment of CRVO with either hemodilution by erythrocytopheresis or intravitreal (IVT) ranibizumab, or both.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicentric prospective randomized study including patients with CRVO for less than 1 month was designed. Patients were randomized into 3 treatment groups: hemodilution (HD group), 3 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab followed by PRN treatment (IVT group), or combined treatment (IVT+HD group). A monthly evaluation during a 6-month follow-up included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular thickness measurements with OCT. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline, month 2 and month 6. Local and systemic tolerability of the different treatments were also compared.

RESULTS

Forty-four CRVO patients were included between February 2010 and June 2013: 20 in the IVT group, 13 in the HD group and 11 in the HD+IVT group. The mean duration of CRVO at baseline was 10 days and 16 days at the time of treatment without any significant difference between groups. Retinal ischemia was present at baseline in 40% of eyes in each group. After a 6-month follow-up, no difference between the 3 groups was observed in BCVA (10.5 ETDRS letters, 14.6 and 14.1 in the IVT group, HD group and IVT+HD group respectively, P=0.726) or in macular thickness (398 μ, 440 μ and 379 μ respectively, P=0.465). The time until treatment from CRVO onset, ranging from 1 to 35 days, was not correlated to final outcomes. No significant difference in the mean number of IVT (3.2 in the IVT+HD group vs 3.7 in the IVT group) was observed at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

No difference in BCVA nor in macular thickness was seen at M6 between the study groups. The duration of CRVO at the time of the initiation of the treatment was not correlated to better visual outcomes. Therefore, etiologic treatment with HD can still be proposed as a first-line treatment in young patients, which allows delaying or avoiding the IVT treatment and its potential side effects. Anti-VEGF IVT still remains an effective option in every case and can be started one month after the beginning of the CRVO.