Evolution and impact of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) for determining vitamin D metabolites

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (NIH ODS), introduced the first Standard Reference Material® (SRM) for determining vitamin D metabolites in 2009 motivated by significant concerns about the comparability and accuracy of different assays to assess vitamin D status. After 14 years, a suite of five serum matrix SRMs and three calibration solution SRMs are available. Values were also assigned for vitamin D metabolites in five additional SRMs intended primarily to support measurements of other clinical diagnostic markers. Both the SRMs and the certification approach have evolved from significant exogenous serum content to primarily endogenous content and from value assignment by combining the results of multiple analytical methods to the use of measurements exclusively from reference measurement procedures (RMPs). The impact of the availability of these SRMs can be assessed by both the distribution information (sales) and by reports in the scientific literature describing their use for method validation, quality control, and research. In this review, we describe the development of these SRMs, the evolution in design and value assignment, the expansion of information reported, and SRM use in validating analytical methods and providing quality assurance within the vitamin D measurement community.

Determination of 24,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 [24,25(OH)2D3] in Archived Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) Samples using a Reference Measurement Procedure with Comparison to DEQAS Participant Results and Assessment of Contribution of 24,25(OH)2D3 to DEQAS Assay Results

Ninety archived human serum samples from the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) were analyzed using a reference measurement procedure (RMP) based on isotope dilution liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) for the determination of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ [24,25(OH)₂D₃]. These 24,25(OH)₂D₃ results, in conjunction with concentration values assigned using RMPs for 25-hydroxyvitamin D₂ [25(OH)D₂] and 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ [25(OH)D₃], provide a valuable resource for assessing the accuracy of measurements for 24,25(OH)₂D₃ and for investigating the relationship between 24,25(OH)₂D₃ and 25(OH)D₃. Results for 24,25(OH)₂D₃ using the RMP were compared to DEQAS consensus values demonstrating that the consensus values were not sufficient to assess the accuracy of measurements among different laboratories and methods. A multivariable regression analysis approach using historical DEQAS consensus values for various total 25(OH)D assays was used to assess the contribution of 24,25(OH)₂D₃ concentration on the assay response. The response of several ligand binding assays for total 25(OH)D was shown to be impacted by the presence of 24,25(OH)₂D₃.

Assessment of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays for Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) materials distributed at ambient and frozen conditions

The Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) distributes human serum samples four times per year to over 1000 participants worldwide for the determination of total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D)]. These samples are stored at -40 °C prior to distribution and the participants are instructed to store the samples frozen at -20 °C or lower after receipt; however, the samples are shipped to participants at ambient conditions (i.e., no temperature control). To address the question of whether shipment at ambient conditions is sufficient for reliable performance of various 25(OH)D assays, the equivalence of DEQAS human serum samples shipped under frozen and ambient conditions was assessed. As part of a Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) commutability study, two sets of the same nine DEQAS samples were shipped to participants at ambient temperature and frozen on dry ice. Twenty-eight laboratories participated in this study and provided 34 sets of results for the measurement of 25(OH)D using 20 ligand binding assays and 14 liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. Equivalence of the assay response for the frozen versus ambient DEQAS samples for each assay was evaluated using multi-level modeling, paired t-tests including a false discovery rate (FDR) approach, and ordinary least squares linear regression analysis of frozen versus ambient results. Using the paired t-test and confirmed by FDR testing, differences in the results for the ambient and frozen samples were found to be statistically significant at p < 0.05 for four assays (DiaSorin, DIAsource, Siemens, and SNIBE prototype). For all 14 LC-MS/MS assays, the differences in the results for the ambient- and frozen-shipped samples were not found to be significant at p < 0.05 indicating that these analytes were stable during shipment at ambient conditions. Even though assay results have been shown to vary considerably among different 25(OH)D assays in other studies, the results of this study also indicate that sample handling/transport conditions may influence 25(OH)D assay response for several assays.

Assessment of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay commutability of Standard Reference Materials and College of American Pathologists Accuracy-Based Vitamin D (ABVD) Scheme and Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) materials: Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) Commutability Study 2

An interlaboratory study was conducted through the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) to assess commutability of Standard Reference Materials® (SRMs) and proficiency testing/external quality assessment (PT/EQA) samples for determination of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] using ligand binding assays and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A set of 50 single-donor serum samples were assigned target values for 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [25(OH)D2] and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] using reference measurement procedures (RMPs). SRM and PT/EQA samples evaluated included SRM 972a (four levels), SRM 2973, six College of American Pathologists (CAP) Accuracy-Based Vitamin D (ABVD) samples, and nine Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) samples. Results were received from 28 different laboratories using 20 ligand binding assays and 14 LC-MS/MS methods. Using the test assay results for total serum 25(OH)D (i.e., the sum of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3) determined for the single-donor samples and the RMP target values, the linear regression and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated. Using a subset of 42 samples that had concentrations of 25(OH)D2 below 30 nmol/L, one or more of the SRM and PT/EQA samples with high concentrations of 25(OH)D2 were deemed non-commutable using 5 of 11 unique ligand binding assays. SRM 972a (level 4), which has high exogenous concentration of 3-epi-25(OH)D3, was deemed non-commutable for 50% of the LC-MS/MS assays.

Reference values for free 25-hydroxy-vitamin D based on established total 25-hydroxy-vitamin D reference values

Measurements of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (t25(OH)D) are currently primarily used to assess the vitamin D status. The lipophilic cell membrane can only be passed by the un-bound form of 25-hydroxyvitamin D: free 25-hydroxyvitamin D (f25(OH)D). It is thought that f25(OH)D does reflect its biological actions better than t25(OH)D. However, as of today, there are no established guidelines for the clinical use of f25(OH)D. We analysed 5060 patients with simultaneous measurements of free and total 25(OH). Linear regression was used to study the relationship between free 25(OH)D and total 25(OH)D. We reviewed and used the established t25(OH)D reference values and determined the slope of the relationship between them to calculate reference values for f25(OH)D. F25(OH)D and t25(OH)D showed a strong positive linear (r = 0.8395, p < 0.0001) correlation. The slope of the relationship was 0.2833 ± 0.00257. The recommended threshold level of f25(OH)D is 8.499 pg/mL, corresponding to a target concentration for t25(OH)D of at least 30 ng/mL considered as sufficient in most of the international vitamin D guidelines. The upper limit for vitamin D is less clear in the guidelines. Most experts favour an upper limit for t25(OH)D of 100 ng/mL. This is equivalent to 28.330 pg/mL f25OHD. We established based on international guidelines for t25(OH)D reference values for f25(OH)D that are urgently needed for clinical use of f25(OH)D. However, clinical studies with f25(OH)D to confirm our suggestions are needed but will take time.

Comparison of free and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D in normal human pregnancy

Vitamin D status correct monitoring during pregnancy is critically important for both maternal and fetal health. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) - a prohormone of a biologically active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)₂D), despite the lack of biological activity, during the past decades has been routinely used as a main biomarker characterizing vitamin D status. About 85% of 25(OH)D in the bloodstream is bound to its specific carrier - vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), the remaining 15% are loosely bound to albumin, and only less than 0.1% are free in the circulation ("free 25(OH)D"). Total 25(OH)D is the sum of DBP-bound, albumin-bound and free 25(OH)D. According to a "free hormone hypothesis", only free 25(OH)D is able to induce a biological effect. Normal pregnancy is characterized by elevated serum DBP levels, and due to this fact the diagnostic strength of serum total 25(OH)D has been questioned. Free 25(OH)D might be a better characteristic of vitamin D status in this settings. We aimed to compare the diagnostic strength of a routine total 25(OH)D with directly measured free 25(OH)D in normal pregnancy by comparing the association strength between free and total 25(OH)D with biomarkers of bone health (PTH, calcium, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP)), lipid metabolism (adiponectin, LDL, HDL), kidney function (urea), endocrine parameters (T4, T3, TSH), and group B water-soluble vitamins. The study was conducted in 368 healthy white pregnant women - residents of north-east Germany. Free 25(OH)D showed an overall better associations with gestational age, markers of bone metabolism (calcium (rho = 0.141, p = 0.007 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.060, p = 0.251 with total 25(OH)D) and BSAP (rho = -0.203, p < 0.001 with free 25(OH)D; rho = -0.108, p = 0.038 with total 25(OH)D), lipid metabolism parameters (adiponectin (rho = 0.142, p = 0.008 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.054, p = 0.307 with total 25(OH)D), LDL cholesterol (rho = -0.191, p < 0.001 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.033, p = 0.539 with total 25(OH)D)) and a kidney function marker (urea (rho = 0.114, p = 0.032 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.008, p = 0.887 with total 25(OH)D)) than total 25(OH)D. In conclusion, the current study revealed that free 25(OH)D is a more precise determinant of the vitamin D status during normal human pregnancy than total 25(OH)D. In the settings of normal pregnancy, free 25(OH)D revealed better associations with markers of bone metabolism (calcium, BSAP), lipid metabolism (adiponectin, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio) and kidney function (urea) than total 25(OH)D.