Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer resection surgery with transvaginal specimen extraction is becoming increasingly accepted and used by surgeons. However, few publications on robotic anterior sigmoid colon and rectal cancer resection with transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) have been reported, and a clinical outcome comparison between conventional robotic minilaparotomy (LAP) and transvaginal specimen extraction in anterior sigmoid colon and rectal cancer resection has not been performed. The current study compared the short- and long-term outcomes of TVSE and LAP for sigmoid colon cancer and rectal cancer in a mono-institution.

METHODS

From December 2014 to October 2018, 45 patients who underwent TVSE and 45 patients who underwent LAP matched by tumor location, tumor stage, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, gender, and age at the same period were included in the current study. The short- and long-term outcomes of TVSE and LAP were discussed.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in patient characteristics. For the short-term outcomes, the operative time in the TVSE group was longer than that in the LAP group, and the postoperative pain and additional analgesia were lower in the TVSE group. Patients in the TVSE group required slightly less time to pass first flatus. There were no significant differences in overall complications, time to regular diet, length of hospital stay after surgery, estimated blood loss, or pathological outcomes. For long-term outcomes, the 3-year overall survival (94.9% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.702) and 3-year disease-free survival (88.4% vs. 86.2%, p = 0.758) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The robotic TVSE is safe and feasible in selected sigmoid/upper rectal cancer patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm. This approach has slightly better short-term outcomes in terms of less postoperative pain and less analgesic requirements without any significant difference in long-term outcomes.

Prospective multicenter study of reduced port surgery combined with transvaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer resection

PURPOSE

The relevance of transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) combined with reduced port surgery (RPS) remains unknown. This study investigated the feasibility of TVSE with RPS according to short-term outcomes and cosmesis.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study enrolled ten patients at three institutions. For the semi-quantification of each parameter, we administered questionnaires to assess pain (visual analogue scale), subjective/objective wound healing esthetics [photo series questionnaires (PSQ)], and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

No operative complications occurred, except one case of urinary tract infection, which was promptly cured with antibiotics. On day 0, pain was rated at 2.3 ± 0.67 at rest and 4.9 ± 0.82 during sneezing; these ratings gradually declined over time. The PSQ showed that the patient ratings of wound esthetics after TVSE were not inferior to ratings from patients after conventional laparoscopy or single incision laparoscopic surgery, and they were significantly higher than the patient ratings of wounds after laparotomy (P < 0.05). The QOL scores showed that, in comparison to before surgery, after surgery, patients reported significant deterioration of their physical function (96.67 ± 1.49 vs. 87.33 ± 2.71), emotional function (93.33 ± 2.72 vs. 86.67 ± 2.22), fatigue (7.78 ± 3.72 vs. 26.67 ± 8.31), and pain (6.67 ± 3.69 vs. 18.33 ± 4.61).

CONCLUSION

TVSE with RPS for colorectal cancer was feasible and was associated with a low degree of postoperative pain.

[Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction]

Objective: To explore the short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction. Methods: A cohort study was carried out. The clinical data of consecutive patients with high rectal cancer who underwent robotic radical resection at the Department of General Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2017 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria: (1) preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer, and distance from tumor to anal margin≥10 cm undercolonoscopy; (2) T1-3 assessed by preoperative imaging examination, and no distant metastasis; (3) female, age≥50 years old, body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m(2); (4) without radiotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery; (5) implementation of robotic radical surgery for high rectal cancer. Fourteen female patients undergoing transvaginal removal of specimen without abdominal incision were included in the no incision group with age of (62.2±9.3) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (12.5±0.9) cm. As the match of 1:2, 28 simultaneous patients of high rectal cancer undergoing traditional robotic surgery (surgery interval <8 months) were enrolled to the control group, with age of (60.6±12.8) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (11.3±3.8) cm. Short-term efficacy and safty were compared between two groups. Follow-up ended in September 2018. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the no incision group had longer operation time [(149.6±15.6) minutes vs. (130.9±12.9) minutes, t=-4.135, P<0.001], shorter time to postoperative flatus [(40.9 ±2.6) hours vs. (51.9±2.9) hours, t=12.049, P<0.001], lower pain score on the operation day and the first day after surgery (using Changhaipainstick) [(3.1±0.4) points vs. (4.6±0.7) points, t=7.458, P<0.001; (2.5±0.3) points vs. (3.3±0.5) points, t=6.142, P<0.001], shorter time to ground activity [(15.6±2.0) hours vs. (24.3±2.5) hours, t=11.102, P=0.030], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(6.1±0.8) days vs. (7.2±1.3) days, t=2.806, P=0.008], whose differences were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, proportion of postoperative analgesia patients, and complication within 30 days after surgery (all P>0.05). In the no incision group and the control group,the tumor size was (3.1±0.4) cm and (3.6±0.9) cm, the proximal margin distance was (9.1±1.5) cm and (9.8±1.5) cm, the distal margin distance was (4.3±0.4) cm and (4.5±0.4) cm, the number of harvested lymph node was 15.8±2.4 and 15.2 ± 2.5, and the number of positive lymph node was 0.6±1.3 and 1.1±2.4, respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The mean followed-up period was 10 months (7-14 months) in the no incision group, and 14 months (10-18 months) in the control group. No local recurrence and distant metastasis were found in both groups. Conclusion: Robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction is safe and feasible with advantages of rapid postoperative recovery, less postoperative pain and short hospital stay.

A case of splenic metastasis of ovarian cancer treated with complete laparoscopic splenectomy and transvaginal specimen extraction

A 61-year-old woman was diagnosed with right inguinal lymph node and splenic metastasis of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. We performed right inguinal lymph node dissection and total laparoscopic splenectomy in the supine position followed by transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE). First, using three ports, we extracted the right inguinal lymph node. We repaired the posterior wall of the inguinal canal using a mesh plug. We added two ports and displaced the spleen from the retroperitoneum and lifted it using a snake retractor, disconnecting the hilum using an automatic suturing device. Next, the posterior wall of the vagina was intraperitoneally incised. And an Alexis® laparoscopic system was inserted into the vagina. The cap maintained aeroperitoneum, a collection bag was inserted in the abdominal cavity via the vagina, and the spleen was collected. When the spleen was removed from the body, partial fragmentation of the organ was required in the bag. Organ fragmentation was performed only within the bag, and we made sure not to tear the bag. The vaginal wound was laparoscopically sutured. The patient had no operative complications and was able to actively ambulate at the first day after surgery due to a slight postoperative pain. Total laparoscopic splenectomy with TVSE in the supine position may be a safe and feasible method for selected female patients. This technique enables minimally invasive surgery for female patients with splenic disease.

Totally laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) techniques, particularly suitable for bowel endometriosis

The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) techniques in 41 patients undergoing bowel resection for treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis. In all patients laparoscopic treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis with bowel resection had been performed. In 32 patients the classic approach was adopted (group 1), and in 9 a NOSE technique was performed (group 2). Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 16.0. When needed, qualitative variables were compared using the χ(2) test or the Fisher exact test. Quantitative variables using the t-test were used. The threshold of statistical significance was set at p = .05. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. Eight complications (19.5%) were observed, 2 minor (4.8%) and 6 major (14.6%). Of major complications, 2 were observed in the NOSE group (n = 2; 22.2%). It was concluded that the NOSE technique is a feasible approach in patients undergoing bowel resection for treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Transvaginal specimen extraction after combined laparoscopic splenectomy and hysterectomy: Introduction to NOSE (Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction) in a community hospital

INTRODUCTION

Developments in the field of minimally invasive surgery have led to interest in NOTES (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery). Even as technologies continue to evolve and develop, interest in some of the advantages of specimen retrieval transvaginally has been roused and we describe a case of combined laparoscopic splenectomy and hysterectomy with transvaginal retrieval of both specimens.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Patient underwent laparoscopic splenectomy and robot-assisted hysterectomy with transvaginal delivery of specimens. Total operative time was 245min with no complications. Closure of the colpotomy was achieved laparoscopically. Post-operative course was unremarkable. Patient has done well clinically at 18 months follow-up except for an episode of post-coital spotting, which resolved spontaneously.

DISCUSSION

We explored the technical feasibility of concurrent laparoscopic splenectomy and hysterectomy along with transvaginal retrieval of both solid organs without morcellation. We wanted to illustrate the fact that transvaginal organ extraction may be performed safely in a community or district hospital with standard instruments without incurring additional cost, morbidity or increased operating time.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal specimen retrieval was technically easy to accomplish. Our patient has not experienced any infectious complications or sexual dysfunction to date. For surgeons exploring an alternative to transabdominal specimen retrieval, transvaginal NOSE is an attractive proposition with several advantages. When combined with a gynecological procedure that involves a colpotomy, this may present a unique opportunity to explore the utility of NOSE.