Evaluation of urinary extravasation after non-operative management of traumatic renal injury: a multi-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Urinary extravasation is one of the major complications after non-operative management of traumatic renal injury and may lead to urinary tract infection and sepsis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these factors in patients with traumatic renal injury.

METHODS

This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational study performed at three tertiary referral hospitals in Osaka prefecture. We included patients with traumatic renal injury transported to the centers between January 2008 and December 2018. We excluded patients who either died or underwent nephrectomy within 24 h after admission. We investigated the occurrence of urinary extravasation and the related factors after traumatic renal injury using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 146 patients were eligible for analysis. Their median age was 44 years and 68.5% were male. Their median Injury Severity Score was 17. Renal injuries were graded as American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade I in 33 (22.6%), II in 27 (18.5%), III in 38 (26.0%), IV in 28 (19.2%), and V in 20 (13.7%) patients. Urinary extravasation was diagnosed in 26 patients (17.8%) and was statistically significantly associated with AAST grades IV-V (adjusted odds ratio, 33.8 [95% confidence interval 7.12-160], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We observed urinary extravasation in 17.8% of patients with non-operative management of traumatic renal injury and the diagnosed was made in mostly within 7 days after admission. In this study, the patients with AAST grade IV-V injury were associated with having urinary extravasation.

Successful management of Wilms tumor accompanied by traumatic renal injury: a case report

When a tumor and trauma coexist, the treatment strategy must be established while considering their interaction. We herein report a 5-month-old girl with Wilms tumor complicated by blunt renal trauma. She was involved in a traffic accident and had hemorrhagic shock due to renal bleeding. We performed hemostasis by transcatheter arterial embolization. Ten days later, we extirpated the potential malignant tumor and left kidney. We were able to complete the surgery without rupture or major bleeding. Postoperative histopathology confirmed Wilms tumor. In the year since she received postoperative chemotherapy, there has been no recurrence. When we were deciding the treatment strategy, we first had to determine how much the renal trauma had affected the tumor staging. The second issue was when to extirpate the tumor after managing the trauma. There are no standard criteria for such situations at present, so we referred to the criteria concerning the bed rest period in cases of traumatic kidney injury and previous case reports and decided to wait over a week from the injury treatment to perform surgery. As a result, we were able to remove the tumor completely without any rupture or major bleeding.

Traumatic renal injury: Five-year experience at a major trauma centre in South Africa

BACKGROUND

This study is intended to assess the current optimal management of traumatic renal injuries (TRIs), with a focus on high-grade and penetrating injuries.

METHODS

The Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service registry was interrogated retrospectively for patients managed for TRI between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016.

RESULTS

Of 13,315 inured patients treated by the PMTS, 223 (1.7%) had TRIs with an incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 population per year. The majority were males between 20 and 39 years of age. The distribution of mechanism of injury was 56.1% (n = 125) blunt and 43.9% (n = 98) penetrating trauma with no association between mechanism and grade of injury. Penetrating trauma was associated with hollow viscus and diaphragm injuries and blunt trauma with solid organ injuries. A total of 118 patients (52.9%) were managed non-operatively, 60 (26.9%) were not explored at operation, 27 (12.1%) underwent initial nephrectomy and 8 (3.6%) underwent renorraphy. Low-grade injuries (AAST I and II) and high-grade injuries (AAST III-V) were managed without renal intervention (non-operatively or not explored at laparotomy for associated injuries) in 88.7% (n = 87) and 72.0% (n = 91) of cases respectively. Blunt and penetrating injuries were managed without renal intervention in 87.9% (n = 109) and 70% (n = 69) of cases respectively. The initial nephrectomy rate was 1% (n = 1) and 20.6% (n = 26) for low- and high-grade injuries respectively, and 6.5% (n = 8) and 19% (n = 19) for blunt and penetrating injuries respectively. High grade (AAST III-V) injury (OR 14.94; 95% CI 3.36 - 66.34; p<0.001), penetrating mechanism (OR 4.99; 95% CI 1.98 - 12.52; p = 0.001) and metabolic acidosis (OR 2.73; 95% CI 1.04 - 7.20; p = 0.042) were significant risk factors for nephrectomy. Four patients (1.8%) underwent ureteral stent insertion and 2 (0.9%) underwent embolisation. The failure rate of initial non-operative management was 1.1%. The mortality rate was 8.1% (n = 18), but no patients with solitary renal injuries died.

CONCLUSION

Even in high-grade injuries and penetrating trauma, the majority of patients with TRI can be managed non-operatively or with the assistance of endourological or endovascular techniques, with good outcomes. Risk factors for nephrectomy include the presence of high-grade injuries, penetrating trauma and metabolic acidosis on presentation.

The utility of initial and follow-up ultrasound reevaluation for blunt renal trauma in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To discover if renal ultrasound (RUS) can be utilized as the primary follow-up imaging modality in the management of blunt renal injuries in children and adolescents.

METHODS

We initiated a protocol utilizing RUS reevaluations for children and adolescents treated for blunt renal injuries. Patients following this protocol (Post) had initial computerized tomography (CT) with RUS reevaluation at day 2 and 2 weeks. We retrospectively compared this group to a 2-year cohort treated between 2007 and 2009 (Pre).

RESULTS

In our study, 28 Post protocol patients were retrospectively compared with 22 Pre cohort patients. No significant differences were observed in age, length of stay (LOS), injury severity score (ISS), and utilization of CT reevaluation. Follow-up reevaluation was obtained in 13 Pre patients versus 21 Post patients (p = 0.231). No patients had any evidence of long-term complications in either cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that RUS can be utilized as the primary surveillance imaging modality in the management of blunt renal injuries in children and adolescents. The lack of benefit of usage of RUS demonstrated in the acute post-injury surveillance period calls into question the benefit of RUS immediately following the blunt trauma.