A Study to Analyze Impact of Treatment Couch and Immobilization Devices on Surface Dose for Megavoltage Photon Beams

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of treatment couch and immobilization devices on surface dose for megavoltage photon beams.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Percentage surface dose (PSD) measurement was carried out in Elekta Synergy™ Linear accelerator using PTW Markus® Parallel plate ionization chamber of volume 0.05cm3 with water equivalent RW3 Slab phantom (PTW, Germany). The measurement depth was considered at 0.07mm. The reference PSD was measured at 0° gantry angle with 10×10cm2, 20×20cm2 and 30×30cm2 field sizes and 100cm SSD for 4MV, 6MV and 15MV photon beams. For comparison, PSD measurement was carried out at 180° gantry angle inclusion of treatment couch (TC), All in One positioning system (AIO - PS) and Vac lok Cushions (VLC).

RESULTS

Beam angle at 0°, for field sizes 10×10cm2, 20×20cm2 and 30×30cm2, the PSD was observed as 30.9%, 40.5%, 48.7% for 4MV; 23.7%, 33.8%, 42.2% for 6MV; and 17.0%, 29.6%, 38.6% for 15MV respectively. Beam angle at 180° with TC, an increase in PSD by maximum of 65.0% for 4MV, 64.9% for 6MV and 55.9% for 15MV as compared to 0° angle. The PSD increased when beam angle was 180° with TC and AIO - PS were 65.0% for 4MV, 67.4% for 6MV, and 60.9% for 15MV than 0° angle. Similarly, increased PSD for beam angle at 180° with TC and VLC were 66.8% for 4MV, 66.8% for 6MV and 61.3% for 15MV as compared to 0° angle.

CONCLUSION

For all three-photon energies, at 180° gantry angle, the PSD increased significantly in case of TC, VLC, and AIO - PS for all the field sizes as compared to gantry angle at 0°. It is necessary to consider TC, AIO - PS and VLC during dose calculation to ensure accuracy of patient treatment delivery.

Performance of a linear accelerator couch positioning quality control task using an electronic portal imaging device

Short and semi-automated quality assurance (QA) programs are becoming one of the most popular and highly demanding tasks in radiotherapy. The current research investigates the accuracy of a four degrees of freedom (4DoF) medical linear accelerator couch positioning with a fast and accurate method based on images acquired using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). An accurate EPID QA phantom and a proper in-house code were used. A Siemens medical linear accelerator equipped with an a-Si EPID was used to acquire portal images. For verifying the mechanical performance of the EPID positioning, EPID sensitivity, and accuracy of the code response from the image processing point of view were investigated. To characterize the results, three deviations in the phantom positioning were deliberately created. The translational and rotational displacements of the treatment couch were then evaluated. The loading effect on the treatment couch was then investigated. The results of prerequisite tests, including the mechanical performance of the EPID, and the sensitivity and accuracy of the recognition codes, were assessed. The results were found to be within the tolerance range reported at AAPM TG-142. The mean deviations of the tests between expected and measured displacements by 4DoF treatment couch were found to be 0.13° ± 0.11°, 0.12 ± 0.17 mm, 0.17 ± 0.13 mm, and 0.04 ± 0.09 mm for rotational, longitudinal, lateral, and vertical shifts, respectively. The results showed that the proposed method is a reliable and fast approach to find the uncertainties occurring intreatment couch positioning.

A practical method of modeling a treatment couch using cone-beam computed tomography for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and RapidArc treatment delivery

The effect of a treatment couch on dose perturbation is not always fully considered in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In the course of inverse planning radiotherapy techniques, beam parameter optimization may change in the absence of the couch, causing errors in the calculated dose distributions. Although modern treatment planning systems (TPS) include data for the treatment couch components, they are not manufactured identically. Thus, variations in their Hounsfield unit (HU) values may exist. Moreover, a radiotherapy facility may wish to have a third-party custom tabletop installed that is not included by the TPS vendor. This study demonstrates a practical and simple method of acquiring reliable computed tomography (CT) data for the treatment couch and shows how the absorbed dose calculated with the modeled treatment couch can differ from that with the default treatment couch found in the TPS. We also experimentally verified that neglecting to incorporate the treatment couch completely in the treatment planning process might result in dose differences of up to 9.5% and 7.3% for 4-MV and 10-MV photon beams, respectively. Furthermore, 20 RapidArc and IMRT cases were used to quantify the change in calculated dose distributions caused by using either the default or modeled couch. From 2-dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array measurements, we observed large dose distribution differences between the measurements and calculations when the couch was omitted that varied according to the planning technique and anatomic site. Thus, incorporating the treatment couch in the dose calculation phase of treatment planning significantly decreases dose calculation errors.