Partial vena cava occlusion (VCO) to counteract refractory heart failure: A new era in interventional heart failure strategy

Background

Patients with acute decompensated heart failure are prone to recurrent exacerbation leading to poor quality of life when they do not respond to an optimal medical regimen. Due to the lack of linear positive inotropy response to increasing preload in heart failure patients, increasing preload is associated with poor outcomes. Partial occlusion of either IVC or SVC is a proposed novel treatment that can improve cardiac function or quality of life by altering preload/pressure in heart failure (HF) patients unresponsive to diuretics.

Methods

PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), and Cochrane database we searched using the MeSH terms including “Superior vena cava occlusion,” “Inferior vena cava occlusion,” “Heart failure exacerbation.” The inclusion criteria included studies that enrolled patients > 18 years with diagnosed NYHA II-IV HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on optimal medical treatment (OMT).

Results

The analysis involved two studies with 14 patients; the mean age was 64.4 ± 10 and 100% males. The difference in the mean pulmonary pressures between pre-and-post VCO devices were 1.56 (95% CI 0.66–2.46, p-value = 0.006). There was no heterogeneity among the study of mean pulmonary pressures. With the use of VC occlusion devices, the mean difference in pulmonary artery systolic pressure decreased by 1.70 (95% CI 0.68–2.71, p-value = 0.001) (Fig. 1B). The heterogeneity of mean pressure was minimal 14%.

Conclusion

In conclusion, VCO can help decrease pulmonary pressure that can indirectly prevent heart failure exacerbations and possibly hospitalization in this cohort of patients.

•

Patients with acute decompensated heart failure are prone to recurrent exacerbation when they do not respond to an optimal medical regimen.

•

Partial occlusion of either IVC or SVC is a proposed novel treatment that can improve cardiac function or quality of life by altering preload/pressure in heart failure (HF) patients.

•

The choice of vena cava for device implantation is also essential. However, it is not well discussed in the literature.

•

This meta-analysis aims to bridge the gap in literature that precludes the uptake of partial VCO as a routine treatment modality for refractory heart failure.

Characteristics and outcome of primary Budd-Chiari syndrome due to Behçet's syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Behçet's syndrome (BS) is a known cause of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). We aimed at identifying the prevalence of BS in patients with BCS, analyzing different clinical presentations, treatment modalities and outcome of these patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, in which all medical records of patients who were presented to Tropical Medicine Department, Ain Shams University with a confirmed diagnosis of primary BCS from May 2005 to December 2016 were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 271 patients had a confirmed diagnosis of primary BCS, included Group I: 232 (85.6%) patients with BCS without BS and Group II: 39 patients (14.4%) with BCS due to BS. Male gender (P=0.000), oral ulcers, genital ulcers, Prominent abdominal veins, lower limb swellings, lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (P=0.000) and jaundice (P=0.003) were more frequent in group II patients. The presence of intrahepatic collaterals (P=0.004) and IVC thrombosis (P=0.000) was significant in group II. Medical treatment alone in the form of immunosuppressive drugs and anticoagulation (66.7% vs. 24.1%)±IVC stenting (23% vs. 1.3%) (P=0.000) were the main treatment modalities for BCS related to BS. The frequency of HCC in BS was significantly higher (10.26% vs. 2.59%) (P=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of BS in Egyptian patients with BCS is considerably high. The clinical presentation of these patients was different from those without BS. Besides, the incidence of HCC was higher in patients with BS, whereas the mortality did not differ between the two groups.

Pattern of Vascular Involvement in Egyptian Patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Relation to Etiology and Impact on Clinical Presentation

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is caused by hepatic venous outflow obstruction. This work aims to analyze the pattern of vascular involvement in Egyptian patients with BCS, demonstrates its relation to etiology and shows its impact on clinical presentation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current retrospective study was conducted at The Tropical Medicine Department, Ain Shams University on one hundred Egyptian patients with confirmed diagnosis of primary BCS who were presented to the Budd-Chiari Study Group (BCSG) from April 2014 to May 2016 by collecting clinical, laboratory and radiological data from their medical records.

RESULTS

Isolated hepatic vein occlusion (HVO) was the most common pattern of vascular involvement (43%), followed by combined HVO and inferior vena cava (IVC) compression by enlarged caudate lobe (32%), then combined HVO and IVC stenosis/webs (21%), and lastly isolated IVC occlusion (4%). Ascites was more significantly encountered in BCS patients with HVO than in those with isolated inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion and patent HVs (P = 0.005). Abdominal pain was significantly encountered in patients with occluded three major HVs (P = 0.044). Behcet's disease was significantly detected in isolated IVC occlusion. Protein C deficiency was significantly detected in patients with combined HVO and IVC compression.

CONCLUSION

Isolated HVs occlusion was the most common pattern of vascular involvement in Egyptian patients with primary BCS. Vascular pattern of involvement affected the clinical presentation and was related to the underlying thrombophilia in those patients.