Surgical Force: Initial Study and Clinical Implications in the Assessment of Ureteral Access Sheath Induced Injury

Purpose: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) pose the risk of severe ureteral injury. Our prior studies revealed forces ≤6 Newtons (N) prevent ureteral injury. Accordingly, we sought to define the force urologists and residents in training typically use when placing a UAS. Materials and Methods: Among urologists and urology residents attending two annual urological conferences in 2022, 121 individuals were recruited for the study. Participants inserted 12F, 14F, and 16F UAS into a male genitourinary model containing a concealed force sensor; they also provided demographic information. Analysis was completed using t-tests and Chi-square tests to identify group differences when passing a 16F sheath UAS. Participant traits associated with surpassing or remaining below a minimal force threshold were also explored through polychotomous logistic regression. Results: Participant force distributions were as follows: ≤4N (29%), >6N (45%), and >8N (32%). More years of practice were significantly associated with exerting >6N relative to forces between 4N and 6N; results for >8N relative to 4N and 8N were similar. Compared to high-volume ureteroscopists (those performing >20 ureteroscopies/month), physicians performing ≤20 ureteroscopies/month were significantly less likely to exert forces ≤4N (p = 0.017 and p = 0.041). Of those surpassing 6N and 8N, 15% and 18%, respectively, were high-volume ureteroscopists. Conclusions: Despite years of practice or volume of monthly ureteroscopic cases performed, most urologists failed to pass 16F access sheaths within the ideal range of 4N to 6N (74% of participants) or within a predefined safe range of 4N to 8N (61% of participants).

Demographics and Comorbidities of United States Service Members with Combat-Related Lower Extremity Limb Salvage

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study describes the demographics and injury characteristics of a recently identified cohort of US Service members with combat-related lower extremity limb salvage (LS).

METHODS

US Service members with combat trauma were identified from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database and Military Health System Data Repository and stratified into primary amputation (PA), LS, and non-threatened limb trauma (NTLT) cohorts based on ICD-9 codes. Disparities in demographic factors and injury characteristics were investigated across cohorts and within the LS cohort based on limb retention outcome.

RESULTS

Cohort demographics varied by age but not by sex, branch, or rank. The mechanism of injury and injury characteristics were found to be different between the cohorts, with the LS cohort exhibiting more blast injuries and greater injury burden than their peers with NTLT. A sub-analysis of the LS population revealed more blast injuries and fewer gunshot wounds in those that underwent secondary amputation. Neither demographic factors nor total injury burden varied with limb retention outcome, despite slight disparities in AIS distribution within the LS cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In accordance with historic dogma, the LS population presents high injury severity. Demographics and injury characteristics are largely invariant with respect to limb retention outcomes, despite secondary amputation being moderately more prevalent in LS patients with blast-induced injuries. Further study of this population is necessary to better understand the factors that impact the outcomes of LS in the Military Health System.

Concurrent Spinal Trauma in Patients with Traumatic Head Injury: A Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND Assessing spinal injuries in patients with traumatic head injuries is crucial due to their potential to alter functionality and increase mortality rates. This single-center retrospective study was conducted to understand the prevalence and characteristics of concurrent spinal injuries in adults with traumatic head injury from April 2015 to April 2022. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study incorporated demographic, clinical, traumatological, and hemodynamic data from 1,501 adult patients presenting with traumatic head injuries. Spinal injuries were identified through symptoms, physical signs, and radiological findings. RESULTS During the study period, 179 patients (12%) were reported with associated spinal injuries. These patients were predominantly male (p=0.0012), aged 65 years or above (p=0.0452), had thoracic injuries (p=0.0004), and arrived at the emergency department more than three hours post-trauma (p=0.0004). Most injuries were caused by motor vehicle accidents (p=0.0412) or falls from heights greater than 3 meters (p=0.0481). In addition, these patients had higher Abbreviated Injury Scale scores (≥2, p=0.0391), Eppendorf-Cologne Scale scores (≥2, p=0.0412), and lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings (p=0.0481, p=0.0412) along with lower heart rates (p=0.0482). However, no correlation was found between systolic and diastolic pressures and age among patients with spinal injuries. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals that the prevalence and severity of spinal injuries in patients with traumatic head injuries are influenced not only by demographic and clinical parameters, but also by the degree and extent of head trauma.

Understanding the factors of road crash severity in Benin: a matched case-control study

Background

In Benin, due to the unavailability of comprehensive data on road crashes, road safety policies are mainly based on partial statistics provided by the police. These remain unreliable in terms of injury severity and risk factors. This study aims to determine the factors influencing the severity of injuries after a road crash in Benin.

Methods

The present nested case-control study, matched for age and sex, was based on a hospital cohort of road crash victims set up in five hospitals in Benin between July 2019 and January 2020. A sample of severely injured patients according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (cases) was compared to non-severely injured patients (controls).

Results

The severe crash occurred mainly during the night between 8 p.m. and midnight (36.2% of cases vs. 24.4% of controls) and on main roads (57.8% of cases vs. 34.7% of controls). Factors associated with injury severity were the time of the crash: night between 8 p.m. and midnight [Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR): 2.1; CI 95%: 1.4-3.2], major roads (national interstate roads and national roads) (AOR: 2.8; CI 95%: 2.0-4.0) and non-work-related travel (AOR: 1.8; CI 95%: 1.2-2.7).

Conclusions

Factors associated with road crash severity in Benin were night-time, main roads, and non-work related travel. Raising user awareness about compliance with traffic rules and improving public lighting, especially along main roads could help reduce the number of serious injuries.

Risks in the Management of Polytrauma Patients: Clinical Insights

Polytrauma, a patient's condition with multiple injuries that involve multiple organs or systems, is the leading cause of mortality in young adults. Trauma-related injuries are a major public health concern due to their associated morbidity, high disability, associated death, and socioeconomic consequences. Management of polytrauma patients has evolved over the last few decades due to the development of trauma systems, improved pre-hospital assessment, transport and in-hospital care supported by complementary investigations. Recognising the mortality patterns in trauma has led to significant changes in the approach to managing these patients. A structured approach with application of advanced trauma life support (ATLS) algorithms and optimisation of care based on clinical and physiological parameters has led to the development of early appropriate care (EAC) guidelines to treat these patients, with subsequent improved outcomes in such patients. The journey of a polytrauma patient through the stages of pre-hospital care, emergency resuscitation, in-hospital stabilization and rehabilitation pathway can be associated with risks at any of these phases. We describe the various risks that can be anticipated during the management of polytrauma patients at different stages and provide clinical insights into early recognition and effective treatment of these to improve clinical outcomes.

The use of machine learning for investigating the role of plastic surgeons in anatomical injuries: A retrospective observational study

While plastic surgeons have been historically indispensable in the reconstruction of posttraumatic defects, their role in trauma centers worldwide has not been clearly defined. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the contribution of plastic surgeons in trauma care using machine learning from an anatomic injury viewpoint. We conducted a retrospective study reviewing the data for all trauma patients of our hospital from March 2019 to February 2021. In total, 4809 patients were classified in duplicate according to the 17 trauma-related departments while conducting the initial treatment. We evaluated several covariates, including age, sex, cause of trauma, treatment outcomes, surgical data, and severity indices, such as the Injury Severity Score and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). A random forest algorithm was used to rank the relevance of 17 trauma-related departments in each category for the AIS and outcomes. Additionally, t test and chi-square test were performed to compare two groups, which were based on whether the patients had received initial treatment in the trauma bay from the plastic surgery department (PS group) or not (non-PS group), in each AIS category. The department of PS was ranked first in the face and external categories after analyzing the relevance of the 17 trauma-related departments in six categories of AIS, through the random forest algorithm. Of the 1108 patients in the face category of AIS, the PS group was not correlated with all outcomes, except for the rate of discharge to home (P < .0001). Upon re-verifying the results using random forest, we found that PS did not affect the outcomes. In the external category in AIS, there were 30 patients in the PS group and 56 patients in the non-PS group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups when comparing the outcomes. PS has contributed considerably to the face and external regions among the six AIS categories; however, there was no correlation between plastic surgical treatment and the outcome of trauma patients. We investigated the plastic surgeons' role based on anatomical injury, using machine learning for the first time in the field of trauma care.

Association between spine injury and opioid misuse in a prospective cohort of Level I trauma patients

Objective

To explore patient and treatment factors explaining the association between spine injury and opioid misuse.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Level I trauma center in a Midwestern city.

Participants

English speaking patients aged 18 to 75 on Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Services receiving opioids during hospitalization and prescribed at discharge.

Exposure

Spine injury on the Abbreviated Injury Scale.

Main outcome measures

Opioid misuse was defined by using opioids: in a larger dose, more often, or longer than prescribed; via a non-prescribed route; from someone other than a prescriber; and/or use of heroin or opium. Exploratory factor groups included demographic, psychiatric, pain, and treatment factors. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between spine injury and opioid misuse when adjusting for each factor group.

Results

Two hundred eighty-five eligible participants consented of which 258 had baseline injury location data and 224 had follow up opioid misuse data. Most participants were male (67.8%), white (85.3%) and on average 43.1 years old. One-quarter had a spine injury (25.2%). Of those completing follow-up measures, 14 (6.3%) developed misuse. Treatment factors (injury severity, intubation, and hospital length of stay) were significantly associated with spine injury. Spine injury significantly predicted opioid misuse [odds ratio [OR] 3.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.05, 9.78)]. In multivariable models, adjusting for treatment factors attenuated the association between spine injury and opioid misuse, primarily explained by length of stay.

Conclusion

Spine injury exhibits a complex association with opioid misuse that predominantly operates through treatment factors. Spine injury patients may represent a subpopulation requiring early intervention to prevent opioid misuse.

Pattern of oral and maxillofacial trauma and associated factors: An 8-year prospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Oral and maxillofacial trauma (OMFT) is a public health problem due to its high occurrence and demand for resources for its management and the financial and social impact of OMFT victims on the health system. The aim of this study was to conduct an 8-year prospective analysis of OMFT cases from an emergency service.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A hospital-based 8-year prospective study on OMFT and associated factors was performed on data from December 2011 to December 2019. Data regarding sociodemographic (gender, age, and skin color) and socio-economic profiles (educational level, family income, and occupation), OMFT profile (etiology, OMFT type, and treatment), associated factors [alcohol consumption and personal protective equipment (PPE) use], OMFT occurrence (injury day and hour), length of hospital stay, and cost were collected. Descriptive and inferential analyses of data were performed.

RESULTS

Most OMFT cases involved men with low schooling and family income, resulting from traffic accidents. OMFT severity was associated with longer hospital stay, higher hospital costs and nonuse of PPE, midface fractures (mainly orbital-zygomatic fractures), closed reduction, and open reduction/internal fixation. Traffic accidents were the main cause of longer hospital stays for victims aged 41-60 years with better socio-economic status compared with cases that had higher hospital costs. In general, higher hospital costs were associated with victims of violence under 40 years of age, with low schooling and farmers. Alcohol consumption and non-use of PPE also contributed to increasing the length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Oral and maxillofacial trauma severity was associated with longer hospital stay and higher hospital costs. Associated factors such as alcohol consumption and non-use of PPE contributed to increase the length of hospital stay and OMFT severity.

Accuracy and reliability of injury coding in the national Dutch Trauma Registry

OBJECTIVE

Injury coding is well known for lack of completeness and accuracy. The objective of this study was to perform a nationwide assessment of accuracy and reliability on Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) coding by Dutch Trauma Registry (DTR) coders and to determine the effect on Injury Severity Score (ISS). Additionally, the coders' characteristics were surveyed.

METHODS

Three fictional trauma cases were presented to all Dutch trauma coders in a nationwide survey (response rate 69%). The coders were asked to extract and code the cases' injuries according to the AIS manual (version 2005, update 2008). Reference standard was set by three highly experienced coders. Summary statistics were used to describe the registered AIS codes and ISS distribution. The primary outcome measures were accuracy of injury coding and inter-rater agreement on AIS codes. Secondary outcome measures were characteristics of coders: profession, work setting, experience in injury coding and training level in injury coding.

RESULTS

The total number of different AIS codes used to describe 14 separate injuries in the three cases was 89. Mean accuracy per AIS code was 42.2% (range 2.4-92.7%). Mean accuracy on number of AIS codes was 23%. Overall inter-rater agreement per AIS code was 49.1% (range 2.4-92.7%). The number of assigned AIS codes varied between 0 and 18 per injury. Twenty-seven percentage of injuries were overlooked. ISS was correctly scored in 42.4%. In 31.7%, the AIS coding of the two more complex cases led to incorrect classification of the patient as ISS < 16 or ISS ≥ 16. Half (47%) of the coders had no (para)medical degree, 26% were working in level I trauma centers, 37% had less than 2 years of experience and 40% had no training in AIS coding.

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of and inter-rater agreement on AIS injury scoring by DTR coders is limited. This may in part be due to the heterogeneous backgrounds and training levels of the coders. As a result of the inconsistent coding, the number of major trauma patients in the DTR may be over- or underestimated. Conclusions based on DTR data should therefore be drawn with caution.

Evidence of Prolonged Monitoring of Trauma Patients Admitted via Trauma Resuscitation Unit without Primary Proof of Severe Injuries

Introductio: Although management of severely injured patients in the Trauma Resuscitation Unit (TRU) follows evidence-based guidelines, algorithms for treatment of the slightly injured are limited. Methods: All trauma patients in a period of eight months in a Level I trauma center were followed. Retrospective analysis was performed only in patients ≥18 years with primary TRU admission, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≤ 1, Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) ≤ 1 and Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≤3 after treatment completion and ≥24 h monitoring in the units. Cochran’s Q-test was used for the statistical evaluation of AIS and ISS changes in units. Results: One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-one patients (18.75%) reported new complaints after treatment completion in the TRU. AIS rose from the Intermediate Care Unit (IMC) to Normal Care Unit (NCU) 6.2% and ISS 6.9%. MAIS did not increase >2, and no intervention was necessary for any patient. No correlation was found between computed tomography (CT) diagnostics in TRU and AIS change. Conclusions: The data suggest that AIS, MAIS and ISS did not increase significantly in patients without a severe injury during inpatient treatment, regardless of the type of CT diagnostics performed in the TRU, suggesting that monitoring of these patients may be unnecessary.

[Evaluation of educational computer program for applying ISS and AIS scales in the emergency room for Orthopedic Residents of the Secretary of Health from Mexico City]

INTRODUCTION

The HAISS (Herramienta de Aprendizaje ISS) program was created to enhance the feasibility and learning of trauma severity scores AIS (Abbreviated Injury Score) and ISS (Injury Severity Score).

OBJECTIVE

Get a computer tool that promotes learning and facilitate proper use of AIS and ISS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A sample of 40 orthopedic residents from 1st to 4th grade from 4 hospitals of the Ministry of Health was taken. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted with analytical statistics. 10 clinical cases for obtaining ISS by AIS score were delivered, this was done with the AIS Manual 2005 update 2008, two questions were conducted to evaluate the feasibility and ease of use, the time to perform was measured. The process was repeated a month later with the HAISS program.

RESULTS

Using the HAISS program reduced the time to resolve the 10 cases by more than 50%, acceptance by the user of the AIS scale also improved. Reliability to obtain the codification of lesions with AIS did not improve, but it did not affected ISS.

CONCLUSIONS

The HAISS computer program is useful for orthopedic residents to accept the AIS score and ISS score mainly because it improved the ease of use and makes it more user-friendly, it also takes less time to use it.

Comparison of revised Functional Capacity Index scores with Abbreviated Injury Scale 2008 scores in predicting 12-month severe trauma outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Anatomical injury as measured by the AIS often accounts for only a small proportion of variability in outcomes after injury. The predictive Functional Capacity Index (FCI) appended to the 2008 AIS claims to provide a widely available method of predicting 12-month function following injury.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent to which AIS-based and FCI-based scoring is able to add to a simple predictive model of 12-month function following severe injury.

METHODS

Adult trauma patients were drawn from the population-based Victorian State Trauma Registry. Major trauma and severely injured orthopaedic trauma patients were followed up via telephone interview including Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, the EQ-5D-3L and return to work status. A battery of AIS-based and FCI-based scores, and a simple count of AIS-coded injuries were added in turn to a base model using age and gender.

RESULTS

A total of 20 813 patients survived to 12 months and had at least one functional outcome recorded, representing 85% follow-up. Predictions using the base model varied substantially across outcome measures. Irrespective of the method used to classify the severity of injury, adding injury severity to the model significantly, but only slightly improved model fit. Across the outcomes evaluated, no method of injury severity assessment consistently outperformed any other.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical injury is a predictor of trauma outcome. However, injury severity as described by the FCI does not consistently improve discrimination, or even provide the best discrimination compared with AIS-based severity scores or a simple injury count.

An injury mortality prediction based on the anatomic injury scale

To determine whether the injury mortality prediction (IMP) statistically outperforms the trauma mortality prediction model (TMPM) as a predictor of mortality.The TMPM is currently the best trauma score method, which is based on the anatomic injury. Its ability of mortality prediction is superior to the injury severity score (ISS) and to the new injury severity score (NISS). However, despite its statistical significance, the predictive power of TMPM needs to be further improved.Retrospective cohort study is based on the data of 1,148,359 injured patients in the National Trauma Data Bank hospitalized from 2010 to 2011. Sixty percent of the data was used to derive an empiric measure of severity of different Abbreviated Injury Scale predot codes by taking the weighted average death probabilities of trauma patients. Twenty percent of the data was used to create computing method of the IMP model. The remaining 20% of the data was used to evaluate the statistical performance of IMP and then be compared with the TMPM and the single worst injury by examining area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) statistic, and the Akaike information criterion.IMP exhibits significantly both better discrimination (ROC-IMP, 0.903 [0.899-0.907] and ROC-TMPM, 0.890 [0.886-0.895]) and calibration (HL-IMP, 9.9 [4.4-14.7] and HL-TMPM, 197 [143-248]) compared with TMPM. All models show slight changes after the extension of age, gender, and mechanism of injury, but the extended IMP still dominated TMPM in every performance.The IMP has slight improvement in discrimination and calibration compared with the TMPM and can accurately predict mortality. Therefore, we consider it as a new feasible scoring method in trauma research.

Using injury severity to improve occupational injury trend estimates

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization-based estimates of trends in injury incidence are also affected by trends in health care practices and payer coverage that may differentially impact minor injuries. This study assessed whether implementing a severity threshold would improve occupational injury surveillance.

METHODS

Hospital discharge data from four states and a national survey were used to identify traumatic injuries (1998-2009). Negative binomial regression was used to model injury trends with/without severity restriction, and to test trend divergence by severity.

RESULTS

Trend estimates were generally biased downward in the absence of severity restriction, more so for occupational than non-occupational injuries. Restriction to severe injuries provided a markedly different overall picture of trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity restriction may improve occupational injury trend estimates by reducing temporal biases such as increasingly restrictive hospital admission practices, constricting workers' compensation coverage, and decreasing identification/reporting of minor work-related injuries. Injury severity measures should be developed for occupational injury surveillance systems.

Studying patients of severe traumatic brain injury with severe abdominal injury in Japan

Background:

Characteristics of extracranial injury in patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI) have not been clarified.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective study reviewed medical records from January 2003 to December 2007. Subjects comprised 35 patients meeting the following criteria: 1) head injury without mass lesion; 2) Glasgow coma scale (GCS) on arrival <15; and 3) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination including T2*-weighted imaging. Subjects were divided into two groups: severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) group (patients with GCS ≤8, n=19) and moderate TBI group (patients with GCS >8, n=16).

Results:

Shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) was significantly higher in the severe TBI group than in the moderate TBI group, while base excess on arrival was significantly lower in the severe TBI group than in the moderate TBI group. The abbreviated injury scale (AIS) for the face, thorax, extremities and external structures showed no significant differences between the severe TBI group, but AIS for the abdomen and the sum of extracranial AIS was greater in the severe TBI group than in the moderate TBI group. Duration of hospitalization was longer and outcomes were worse in the severe TBI group than in the moderate TBI group.

Conclusion:

Because patients with severe TBI are more likely to have abdominal injury than patients with moderate TBI, physicians should be aware of the potential for such complications when treating severe TBI.