A Retrospective Analysis of Needle Thoracostomies at a Tertiary Level 2 Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

A tension pneumothorax is a condition that results in elevated pressure within the pleural space. The effective management of tension pneumothorax relies on needle decompression, commonly performed at the second intercostal space (ICS) midclavicular line (MCL). However, some literature suggests that catheters placed in the second intercostal space midclavicular line are prone to higher failure rates compared to the fifth intercostal space midaxillary line (MAL) (42.5% versus 16.7%, respectively). In this study, we aim to identify and scrutinize the prevalence of prehospital needle decompression from one tertiary care center over eight years and examine their trends, efficacies, or pitfalls. It is hypothesized that preclinical providers are performing needle decompression prematurely and unnecessarily.

METHODS

A set of 90 patient records obtained using the trauma registry at Saint Francis Hospital, Tulsa, Oklahoma, were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the management and outcomes of tension pneumothorax, as well as the indications documented for needle decompression. Patient charts were reviewed via Epic Hyperspace (Epic, Madison, WI). The Oklahoma Emergency Medical Service Information System (OKEMSIS) also provided information contributing to the sample population.

RESULTS

The most documented indications for needle decompressions included diminished or absent breath sounds (52.70%), hypoxia (15.54%), hypotension, and hemodynamic instability (6.76%). Emergency medical services (EMS) reported improvements in 51 (56.67%) patients after needle thoracostomy. Improvements in vital signs after needle decompression were sporadic. The most common complication was catheter dislodging, which occurred most in the second intercostal space midclavicular line. Only nine patients had an oxygen saturation (SpO2) below 92% and a systolic blood pressure (SBP) below 100 mm Hg prior to receiving needle decompression.

CONCLUSION

Current practices for tension pneumothorax show little improvement in vital signs before and after needle decompression. Vital signs prior to needle decompression often do not indicate tension pneumothorax physiology. Preclinical providers may be inappropriately performing needle decompressions, an invasive procedure with complications.

The Evolution of Hand Injuries at a State's Only Level I Trauma Center: A Look From the 1980s Through the Global Pandemic

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate any changes to hand trauma in the past three decades and through the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that improved consumer safety regulations, changes in access to care, and the impact of a global pandemic, among other variables, have significantly influenced the mechanisms and treatment of hand injuries between the 1980s, 2010s (pre-COVID-19), and 2020s (post-COVID-19).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center review was performed at the only level I trauma center in Mississippi, identifying all hand trauma consultations between 2012-2019 and 2020-2021, compared to aggregated data from 1989.

RESULTS

Car accidents, gunshots, saw injuries, door injuries, and falls increased in 2012-2019 and 2020-2021 compared to 1989, whereas knife injuries, glass injuries, industrial injuries, and burns decreased. Crush injuries, de-gloving injuries, and lacerations with irregular edges were increased in recent cohorts, corresponding with increased amputations and tissue loss. Skin and subcutaneous injuries decreased in modern cohorts, corresponding with a decreased ability for primary skin repair and the need for more flaps. Additionally, while hospitalizations have increased, patients have improved follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The nature of hand trauma has changed significantly over the past three decades. Increased numbers of cars and greater access to firearms might have led to increased rates of high-energy trauma, whereas burn and industrial injuries have decreased, potentially secondary to improved safety efforts. Despite increased overall hand trauma, time to treatment and follow-up have improved. Through this study, we can be more cognizant of the evolution of hand trauma in the modern era. This can allow improved access to care and further refine management to optimize functionality for hand injuries.

Compartment Syndrome Resulting From Improper Intraosseous Cannulation: A Case Report

Obtaining adequate vascular access is imperative for effective resuscitative, therapeutic, and diagnostic interventions. The intraosseous (IO) route is indicated when immediate vascular access is needed, and standard central or peripheral intravenous (IV) access is unattainable or would delay therapy in a critical patient. We present a rare case of improper IO line placement in the right proximal tibia of a 30-year-old female involved in a motor vehicle collision, resulting in extravasation of blood products into the surrounding tissue and development of acute compartment syndrome. Emergency Medical Services was unable to obtain IV access in a timely manner, thus a right proximal tibia 45mm IO line was placed, and a unit of whole blood was given with a high-pressure infusor in the field. At the trauma center, the patient's right lower extremity was severely tense and edematous with no palpable right lower extremity pulses and no Doppler signals. Computed tomography revealed the IO catheter extending through both the proximal and distal cortices of the right tibia. Medial and lateral fasciotomy of the right lower extremity was performed in which all four compartments of the right lower leg were released and a significant hematoma was evacuated from the superficial posterior compartment. This case highlights the importance of IO access as a life-saving intervention while also underscoring the need to educate and familiarize pre-hospital and hospital healthcare personnel in delivering IO access so as to mitigate risks and improve outcomes for critically ill patients.

The sequence of the treatment of combined fractures of the pelvis, spine, and extremities in polytraumatized patients

'Damage control' is the therapeutic strategy in the treatment of polytraumatized patients and aims at securing vital functions and controlling bleeding with a favorable effect on the post-traumatic immune response. The post-traumatic immune dysfunction is based on a disturbed balance between immunostimulatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. The extent of the immunological 'second hit' can be limited by delaying deferable surgical therapies until organ stabilization has been achieved by the treating surgeon. Pelvic sling is easy to apply and noninvasive with effective pelvic reduction. Pelvic angiography vs pelvic packing are not antagonistic, but rather should be considered as complementary methods. Operating as early as possible on unstable spinal injuries with confirmed or suspected neurological deficits by decompression and stabilization with a dorsal internal fixator. Dislocations, unstable or open fracture, vascular involvement, and compartment syndrome are considered emergency indications. In extremity fracture treatment, primary definitive osteosynthesis is often dispensed with and instead, temporary stabilization with an external fixator is performed.

Utility of an Emergency Department Observation Unit in Providing Care for Patients With Blunt Thoracic Trauma

Background The use of Emergency Department Observation Units (EDOUs) to treat patients with a variety of complaints has grown over recent years. However, the treatment of patients with traumatic injuries in EDOUs is infrequently described. Our study sought to describe the feasibility of treating patients with blunt thoracic trauma in an EDOU in consultation with our trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) team. Together, our Emergency Department (ED) and TACS teams designed a protocol for the treatment of patients with specific blunt thoracic injuries (fewer than three rib fractures, nondisplaced sternal fractures) that we felt would require less than 24 hours of care in a hospital setting. Methods This study is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis comparing two groups before (pre-EDOU) and after (EDOU) the creation of the EDOU protocol, which was implemented in August 2020. Data was collected at a single, Level 1 trauma center with approximately 95,000 annual visits. Similar inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select patients in both groups. We conducted two-sample t-tests and Chi-square testing to assess for significance. Primary outcomes include length of stay and bounce-back rate. Results A total of 81 patients were included in our data set across both groups. Forty-three patients were included in our pre-EDOU group while 38 patients were treated in our EDOU once the protocol was implemented. Patients in both groups were of similar age, gender and had similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS) ranging from 9 to 14. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the EDOU group (31.5 hours) compared to the pre-EDOU group (36.4 hours) although not statistically significant. When risk stratified by ISS, hospital length of stay did reach statistical significance and was found to be shorter for patients with ISS scores greater than or equal to 9 that were treated in the EDOU (29.1 hours vs. 43.8 hours, p = .028). Both groups had one patient each bounce back for repeat evaluation and additional care. Conclusion This study demonstrates the potential use of EDOUs to treat patients with mild to moderate blunt thoracic injuries. The availability of trauma surgeons for consultation along with ED provider experience may be rate-limiting steps in utilizing observation units to care for trauma patients. Additional research with more participants is needed to determine the impact of implementing such a practice at other institutions.

COVID-19-Induced Hypoxia With Accompanying Syncope Event and Traumatic Injury

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified the first case of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on January 21, 2020 in the United States. Since its arrival, the virus has caused widespread havoc on the nation as a whole as well as on all individuals. The coronavirus family is not new to the field of medicine. In fact, the viral pathogenicity dates back to the early 1960s, with more information on the respiratory preference and the ability to cause acute respiratory pathology coming later in 2002. The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, causes a disease commonly referred to as COVID-19, which has a well documented course of severe respiratory pathology along with interesting systemic consequences that often complicate the clinical picture. This case presents an otherwise healthy young 35-year-old male who contracted the novel coronavirus, leading to multi-organ hypoxia and triggering a syncopal episode which resulted in physical trauma to the head leading to a minor subarachnoid hemorrhage.

The Berlin Acute Trauma Care Instrument Set (BATMIN) - A Selected Combination of Surgical Instruments for Damage Control and Hemostasis Surgery in Severe Acute Trauma

A lack of sterile surgical instrument sets for damage control surgeries of severely injured patients became evident in a series of in-hospital mass casualty trainings in the German capital of Berlin. Moreover, the existing instrument trays contained mostly specialized instruments for elective interventions and were not well composed for the treatment of poly-traumatized patients. After a literature search on the most common injury patterns in Mass Casualty Incidents (MCIs), an expert group of surgeons from different disciplines designed an optimized instrument set. A set of 194 instruments was assembled and distributed into two containers. These 2 sets were subjected to a 6-month trial phase in our hospital, and the evaluation of usability was subsequently analyzed through feedback forms administered to the staff. After analysis of the feedback sheets, only minor alterations had to be incorporated. The Berlin Acute Trauma Care Instrument Set (BATMIN) was then made available by the state of Berlin to Berlin Hospitals providing acute trauma care. Out of the need to be prepared for mass casualties, we created an instrument set suitable for the damage control surgery of severely injured patients in individual care and MCIs.

Complex Wound Closure Following Mysterious and Vicious Animal Attack

Animal attacks are a worrisome and dangerous entity that occur at high volumes and are evaluated frequently by ER physicians, primary care physicians, trauma teams, acute care surgeons, and plastic surgeons. The severity of animal attacks can range from a small insect sting to mauling by large animal, and even death. With animal attacks of high intensity, there is often significant scratching, tearing, shearing, with destruction of the skin, subcutaneous tissues, muscles, and bone. Serious attacks frequently lead to infection, sepsis, pain, loss of sensation or mobility, operative interventions, and amputations of affected limbs. We report herein the traumatic mauling of a woman by a reported unknown animal. Though the entity of animal attacks has been reported in the past, this case dictates presentation given the suspicious circumstances surrounding the attack, the involvement of her care requiring a multidisciplinary surgical approach via trauma surgery and plastic surgery, multiple extensive interventions, and the excellent take of the split thickness skin graft (STSG) after the use of a dermal regeneration template (DRT).