Diagnosis and treatment of refractory pituitary adenomas: a narrative review

Although aggressive pituitary adenomas (PAs) have been proposed and widely discussed for more than a decade, there is no general agreement regarding their definition, diagnosis or management. As one of the largest pituitary centers in China, we have diagnosed and treated more than fifty cases of aggressive PA and 3 pituitary carcinomas in the past 5 years and proposed a new term, i.e., refractory PAs, to define these adenomas. The definitions of aggressive and refractory PAs overlap with each other, though there are some differences between them. We interpret the definition for refractory PA in this review, emphasizing that more attention and early identification of these adenomas are needed. Although temozolomide (TMZ) has been used to treat pituitary carcinomas and refractory PA since 2006, which has significantly improved the prognosis of these patients, treatment of refractory PA is a tremendous challenge for endocrinologists and neurosurgeons. Overall, refractory PA is defined as PA with a Ki-67 labeling index ≥3%, a faster growth rate than that of normal PA, infiltration of surrounding tissues, recurrence or regrowth in the early postoperative period, and continued growth and/or secretion of excessive hormones despite attempts to control it. These criteria for refractory PA are stricter than for aggressive PA. The diagnosis and treatment of refractory PA requires the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team to achieve the best results.

Early Initiation of Temozolomide Therapy May Improve Response in Aggressive Pituitary Adenomas

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive pituitary adenomas (APAs) are, by definition, resistant to optimal multimodality therapy. The challenge lies in their early recognition and timely management. Temozolomide is increasingly being used in patients with APAs, but evidence supporting a favorable response with early initiation is lacking.

METHODS

This was a single-center study of all patients with APAs who received at least 3 cycles of temozolomide (150-200 mg/m²). Their baseline clinico-biochemical and radiological profiles were recorded. Immunohistochemical evaluation for cell-cycle markers O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), MutS homolog 2 (MSH2), MutS homolog 6 (MSH6), MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), and postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2) was performed, and h-scores (product of the number of positive cells and staining intensity) were calculated. Response was assessed in terms of radiological response using the RECIST criteria. Patients with controlled disease (≥30% reduction in tumor volume) were classified as responders.

RESULTS

The study comprised 35 patients (48.6% acromegaly, 37.1% prolactinomas, and 14.3% non-functioning pituitary adenomas). The median number of temozolomide (TMZ) cycles was 9 (IQR 6-14). Responders constituted 68.6% of the cohort and were more likely to have functional tumors, a lower percentage of MGMT-positive staining cells, and lower MGMT h-scores. There was a significantly longer lag period in the initiation of TMZ therapy in non-responders as compared with responders (median 36 vs. 15 months, p = 0.01). ROC-derived cutoffs of 31 months for the duration between diagnosis and TMZ initiation, low-to-intermediate MGMT positivity (40% tumor cells), and MGMT h-score of 80 all had a sensitivity exceeding 80% and a specificity exceeding 70% to predict response.

CONCLUSION

Early initiation of TMZ therapy, functional tumors, and low MGMT h-score predict a favorable response to TMZ in APAs.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for aggressive pituitary tumors: a monocentric experience

In aggressive pituitary tumors (PT) showing local invasion or growth/recurrence despite multimodal conventional treatment, temozolomide (TMZ) is considered a further therapeutic option, while little data are available on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). We analyzed PRRT effectiveness, safety and long-term outcome in three patients with aggressive PT, also reviewing the current literature. Patient #1 (F, giant prolactinoma) received five cycles (total dose 37 GBq) of 111In-DTPA-octreotide over 23 months, after unsuccessful surgery and long-term dopamine-agonist treatment. Patient #2 (M, giant prolactinoma) underwent two cycles (12.6 GBq) of 177Lu-DOTATOC after multiple surgeries, radiosurgery and TMZ. In patient #3 (F, non-functioning PT), five cycles (29.8 GBq) of 177Lu-DOTATOC followed five surgeries, radiotherapy and TMZ. Eleven more cases of PRRT-treated aggressive PT emerged from literature. Patient #1 showed tumor shrinkage and visual/neurological amelioration over 8-year follow-up, while the other PTs continued to grow causing blindness and neuro-cognitive disorders (patient #2) or monolateral amaurosis (patient #3). No adverse effects were reported. Including the patients from literature, 4/13 presented tumor shrinkage and clinical/biochemical improvement after PRRT. Response did not correlate with patients' gender or age, neither with used radionuclide/peptide, but PRRT failure was significantly associated with previous TMZ treatment. Overall, adverse effects occurred only in two patients. PRRT was successful in 1/3 of patients with aggressive PT, and in 4/5 of those not previously treated with TMZ, representing a safe option after unsuccessful multimodal treatment. However, at present, considering the few data, PRRT should be considered only in an experimental setting.