Hip Fracture Post-operative Mortality and Polypharmacy: A New Risk Predictor?

Introduction Hip fractures include intra- and extracapsular fractures with hip hemiarthroplasty, intramedullary (IM nailing), dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation and cannulated cancellous screws being the main treatment options. The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) is used to predict the risk of 30-day mortality with some studies investigating its use for one-year mortality. This study aims to investigate the impact of polypharmacy on post-operative hip fracture mortality and the correlation with NHFS predicted mortality. Methods A retrospective single-centre analysis was carried out on hip fracture patients aged 65 years and over who underwent operative management. Primary outcome measures were 30-day and one-year mortality along with the presence of polypharmacy. Secondary outcome measures were mortality based on procedure type, NHFSs for polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups, number of medications, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, age and gender. Polypharmacy was defined as five or more long-term medications from a selected list of drug classes. Results Thirty-day mortality was 19.3% for the polypharmacy group and 2.4% for the non-polypharmacy group (P≤0.00001), while one year mortality was 50.9% for the polypharmacy group and 2.4% for the non-polypharmacy group (P≤0.00001), the NHFS was 5.16 (±1.38) on average for the polypharmacy group and 5.07 (±1.47) for the non-polypharmacy group. Thirty-day mortality was 10/116 (8.6%) for the hemiarthroplasty patients, 3/66 (4.5%) for the DHS fixation patients and 1/32 (4.5%) for the IM nailing patients. One-year mortality was 33/116 (28.4%) for the hemiarthroplasty patients, 11/66 (16.7%) for the DHS fixation patients and 4/32 (12.6%) for the IM nailing patients. Conclusion Polypharmacy correlated with a significantly higher one-year and 30-day postoperative mortality after hip fractures with the NHFS predicting no difference in mortality. This finding could assist in decision making and help facilitate discussions with patients and family members regarding post-operative mortality risks. The NHFS may also benefit from integrating polypharmacy possibly leading to more accurate risk predictions. The IM nailing and DHS fixation patients were found to have a lower 30-day and one-year mortality than the hemiarthroplasty patients.

Management of Femoral Shaft Fractures: The Significance of Traction or Operative Position

Background and objective Intramedullary femoral nailing (IMN) is the gold standard for managing femoral shaft fractures (FSFs). Though good clinical outcomes and union rates have been reported following this procedure, it has also been commonly associated with perioperative complications. Positioning the patient in lateral decubitus, avoiding a fracture table, or using manual traction have been touted as possible techniques to reduce perioperative complications in IMN. However, given the scarce availability of comparative research, the decision to employ any of the techniques mentioned above is often guided by surgeon preference alone. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of free-leg draping using either supine or direct lateral positioning with manual traction reduces perioperative complications among trauma patients undergoing an anterograde femoral nailing surgery when compared to using a fracture table. Methods Consecutive adult patients from a level-one trauma center undergoing unilateral antegrade femoral fixation surgeries between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated for possible inclusion in the study. Relevant perioperative and postoperative data, including length of hospital or ICU stay and perioperative complications, were included in the analysis. This study received research ethics board approval before data collection began. Results A total of 91 patients were ultimately included in the final analysis: 61 patients were included in the free-leg draping with manual traction group (FL) and 30 patients were included in the traction table group (TT). Patients in the FL group had a similar operative and fluoroscopy time, blood loss, length of stay, and time on the ventilator. Subgroup analysis comparing positioning within the FL group revealed non-significant differences in fluoroscopy time (p=0.59) and length of stay (p=0.20) between the lateral and supine groups. Moreover, no differences in operative time, blood loss, and time on the ventilator were observed between lateral and supine groups. Conclusion Based on our findings, there were no significant differences in terms of operative or fluoroscopy time, perioperative complications, or length of time in the hospital or on the ventilator between the groups. Our study was limited by its small sample size and incomplete data. Further prospective randomized research is required to reach definitive conclusions on the appropriate manner to treat patients with these complex and morbid injuries.