Exploring definitions and predictors of response to biologics for severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Biologic effectiveness is often assessed as 'response', a term which eludes consistent definition. Identifying those most likely to respond in real-life has proven challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To explore definitions of biologic responders in adults with severe asthma and investigate patient characteristics associated with biologic response.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal cohort study using data from 21 countries, which shared data with the International Severe Asthma Registry. Changes in 4 asthma outcome domains were assessed in the 1-year period pre- and post-biologic-initiation in patients with predefined level of pre-biologic impairment. Responder cut-offs were: ≥50% reduction in exacerbation rate, ≥50% reduction in long-term oral corticosteroid [LTOCS] daily dose, ≥1 category improvement in asthma control, and ≥100mL improvement in FEV1. Responders were defined using single- and multiple-domains. The association between pre-biologic characteristics and post-biologic-initiation response were examined by multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

2,210 patients were included. Responder rate ranged from 80.7% (n=566/701) for exacerbation-response to 10.6% (n=9/85) for 4-domain-response. Many responders still exhibited significant impairment post-biologic-initiation: 46.7% (n=206/441) of asthma control-responders with uncontrolled asthma pre-biologic still had incompletely-controlled disease post-biologic-initiation. Predictors of response were outcome-dependent. Lung function-responders were more likely to have higher pre-biologic FeNO (OR:1.20 for every 25ppb increase), and shorter asthma duration (OR:0.81, for every 10-year increase in duration). Higher BEC and presence of T2-related comorbidities were positively associated with higher odds of meeting LTOCS-, control- and lung function-responder criteria.

CONCLUSION

Our findings underscore the multi-modal nature of 'response', show that many responders experience residual symptoms post-biologic-initiation, and that predictors of response vary according to outcome assessed.

Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission Post-Biologic in Adults

RATIONALE

There is no consensus on criteria to include in an asthma remission definition in real-life. Factors associated with achieving remission post-biologic-initiation remain poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the proportion of adults with severe asthma achieving multi-domain-defined remission post-biologic-initiation and identify pre-biologic characteristics associated with achieving remission which may be used to predict it.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal cohort study using data from 23 countries from the International Severe Asthma Registry. Four asthma outcome domains were assessed in the 1-year pre- and post-biologic-initiation. A priori-defined remission cut-offs were: 0 exacerbations/year, no long-term oral corticosteroid (LTOCS), partly/well-controlled asthma, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second ≥80%. Remission was defined using 2 (exacerbations + LTOCS), 3 (+control or +lung function) and 4 of these domains. The association between pre-biologic characteristics and post-biologic remission was assessed by multivariable analysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

50.2%, 33.5%, 25.8% and 20.3% of patients met criteria for 2, 3 (+control), 3 (+lung function) and 4-domain-remission, respectively. The odds of achieving 4-domain remission decreased by 15% for every additional 10-years asthma duration (odds ratio: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.00). The odds of remission increased in those with fewer exacerbations/year, lower LTOCS daily dose, better control and better lung function pre-biologic-initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 5 patients achieved 4-domain remission within 1-year of biologic-initiation. Patients with less severe impairment and shorter asthma duration at initiation had a greater chance of achieving remission post-biologic, indicating that biologic treatment should not be delayed if remission is the goal. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

A practical guide for implementing omalizumab therapy for food allergy

The recent approval of omalizumab for the treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy is an important step forward for the millions of food allergy patients in the United States. Through the depletion of circulating IgE and the subsequent reduction of FcεR1 on key effector cells, patients increase their tolerance to food allergens. However, omalizumab does not permit patients to eat foods that they are allergic to with impunity. Rather, it protects them from most accidental exposures. In addition, omalizumab does not cure food allergy and has not demonstrated true immunomodulation. Thus, omalizumab might be a lifelong therapy for some patients. Furthermore, there are many important questions and issues surrounding the appropriate administration of omalizumab to treat food allergy, which we discuss. Managing treatment of patients with disease that falls outside the dosing range, assessing treatment response or nonresponse, addressing its appropriateness for patients older than 55, and determining whether immunotherapy plus omalizumab provides any advantage over omalizumab alone all need to be examined. Identifying appropriate patients for this therapy is critical given the cost of biologics. Indeed, not all food allergy patients are good candidates for this therapy. Also, when and how to stop omalizumab therapy in patients who may have outgrown their food allergy needs to be elucidated. Thus, although this therapy provides a good option for patients with food allergies, much information is needed to determine how best to use this therapy. Despite many unanswered questions and issues, we provide clinicians with some practical guidance on implementing this therapy in their patients.

Omalizumab in the treatment of Morbihan syndrome in an adolescent girl - case report and literature review

Morbihan syndrome (MS) is characterized by solid facial edema, usually related to rosacea or acne vulgaris. The facial edema deforms the patient's features, can impair peripheral vision, and affects quality of life. Its pathophysiology remains unclear. The disease usually has a slow and chronic course. MS most commonly affects middle-aged Caucasian men with rosacea and is rare in people below 20 years of age. MS is a diagnosis of exclusion. There is no standard treatment for MS, though systemic isotretinoin and antihistamines are mainly used. We present the case of an adolescent girl with MS nonresponding to 19 months of isotretinoin treatment with add-on antihistamines. Therapy with monthly administration of omalizumab (anti-IgE) for 6 months was an effective therapeutic option, improving the quality of life. Our case is the second description of omalizumab use in Morbihan syndrome, the first in an adolescent.

A robust mRNA signature obtained via recursive ensemble feature selection predicts the responsiveness of omalizumab in moderate-to-severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Not being well controlled by therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonist bronchodilators is a major concern for severe-asthma patients. The current treatment option for these patients is the use of biologicals such as anti-IgE treatment, omalizumab, as an add-on therapy. Despite the accepted use of omalizumab, patients do not always benefit from it. Therefore, there is a need to identify reliable biomarkers as predictors of omalizumab response.

METHODS

Two novel computational algorithms, machine-learning based Recursive Ensemble Feature Selection (REFS) and rule-based algorithm Logic Explainable Networks (LEN), were used on open accessible mRNA expression data from moderate-to-severe asthma patients to identify genes as predictors of omalizumab response.

RESULTS

With REFS, the number of features was reduced from 28,402 genes to 5 genes while obtaining a cross-validated accuracy of 0.975. The 5 responsiveness predictive genes encode the following proteins: Coiled-coil domain- containing protein 113 (CCDC113), Solute Carrier Family 26 Member 8 (SLC26A), Protein Phosphatase 1 Regulatory Subunit 3D (PPP1R3D), C-Type lectin Domain Family 4 member C (CLEC4C) and LOC100131780 (not annotated). The LEN algorithm found 4 identical genes with REFS: CCDC113, SLC26A8 PPP1R3D and LOC100131780. Literature research showed that the 4 identified responsiveness predicting genes are associated with mucosal immunity, cell metabolism, and airway remodeling.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both computational methods show 4 identical genes as predictors of omalizumab response in moderate-to-severe asthma patients. The obtained high accuracy indicates that our approach has potential in clinical settings. Future studies in relevant cohort data should validate our computational approach.

Comprehensive Assessment of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Ligelizumab in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria to Optimize Its Subcutaneous Delivery System

Ligelizumab is a highly potent, humanized IgG1, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. To explore its optimal subcutaneous delivery, the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and tolerability of ligelizumab from two Phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers (HVs) and four Phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) were assessed. Using different injection volumes or durations of a liquid-in-vial (LIVI) formulation or different formulations (LIVI vs. prefilled syringe (PFS)), single-dose ligelizumab showed comparable PK exposure in HVs. Steady-state exposure of ligelizumab was also comparable between LIVI and PFS following multiple dosing in CSU patients. The total IgE level (a PD marker) and tolerability were similar between the two formulations in both HVs and patients. Furthermore, the PK, total IgE, and tolerability were comparable for PFS administered either by patients or healthcare providers (HCPs). Collective evidence demonstrated that the injection duration or volume, formulation, or administrator had no apparent impact on the PK, PD, and tolerability of ligelizumab, supporting no clinically relevant difference between LIVI and PFS, and that PFS can be administered by patients or HCPs. This report provides a comprehensive assessment based on data of multiple clinical endpoints from both HVs and patients to inform formulation development and commercial use of a monoclonal antibody.

Biomarkers for Monitoring Treatment Response of Omalizumab in Patients with Chronic Urticaria

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a debilitating skin disease affecting around 1% of the population. CU can be subdivided into chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU). Different pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed to play a role in the development of CU, and these are also being investigated as potential biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of the disease. As of now the only assessment tools available for treatment response are patient reported outcomes (PROs). Although these tools are both validated and widely used, they leave a desire for more objective measurements. A biomarker is a broad subcategory of observations that can be used as an accurate, reproducible, and objective indicator of clinically relevant outcomes. This could be normal biological or pathogenic processes, or a response to an intervention or exposure, e.g., treatment response. Herein we provide an overview of biomarkers for CU, with a focus on prognostic biomarkers for treatment response to omalizumab, thereby potentially aiding physicians in personalizing treatments.

Ligelizumab in adolescents with chronic spontaneous urticaria: Results of a dedicated phase 2b randomized clinical trial supported with pharmacometric analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), a long-lasting disease in children, impacts their quality of life. We report the results of a phase 2b dose-finding trial of ligelizumab (NCT03437278) and a high-affinity humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, in adolescents with CSU, supported by modeling and simulation analyses, mitigating challenges in pediatric drug development.

METHODS

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, randomized H1-antihistamine-refractory adolescent CSU patients (12-18 years) 2:1:1 to ligelizumab 24 mg, 120 mg, or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Patients on placebo transitioned to ligelizumab 120 mg at week 12. Integrating data from the previous adult and present adolescent trial of ligelizumab, a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling described the longitudinal changes in ligelizumab pharmacokinetics, and its effect on weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7).

RESULTS

Baseline UAS7 (mean ± SD) was 30.5 ± 7.3 (n = 24), 29.3 ± 7.7 (n = 13), and 32.5 ± 9.0 (n = 12) for patients (median age, 15 years) on ligelizumab 24 mg, 120 mg, and placebo, respectively. Change from baseline in UAS7 at week 12 with ligelizumab 24 mg, 120 mg, and placebo was -15.7 ± 10.9, -18.4 ± 12.3, and -13.0 ± 13.0, respectively. Ligelizumab was well-tolerated. The modeling analysis showed that body weight, but not age, affected ligelizumab's apparent clearance. No significant differences between adolescents and adults were detected on the model-estimated maximum effect and potency.

CONCLUSIONS

Ligelizumab exhibited efficacy and safety in adolescent CSU patients, consistent with that in adults. The PK and potency of ligelizumab were not impacted by age, and the same dose of ligelizumab can be used for treating adolescents and adults with CSU. Our study shows how modeling and simulation can complement pediatric drug development.

Self-reactive IgE and anti-IgE therapy in autoimmune diseases

Growing evidence indicates the pathogenic role of autoreactive IgE in autoimmune diseases. Incidence of autoimmune and allergic diseases in the industrialized countries is consistently icreasing, thus leading to concerted efforts to comprehend the regulation of IgE-mediated mechanisms. The first reports of a presence of IgE autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune diseases have been published a long time ago, and it is now recognized that self-reactive IgE can mediate inflammatory response in bullous pemhigoid, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic urticaria, and atopic dermatitis. The advances in understanding the pathomechanisms of these disorders brought to a successful use of anti-IgE strategies in their management. The present review discusses the current state of knowledge on the IgE-mediated autoimmunity and anti-IgE treatment, and pave the way for further exploration of the subject.

Successful treatment of dupilumab in Kimura disease independent of IgE: A case report with literature review

Kimura disease (KD) is a rare and benign chronic inflammatory disease of unknown cause. It is characterized by subcutaneous granuloma of soft tissues in the head and neck region, increased eosinophil count, and elevated serum IgE. Currently, no definitive treatments are recommended. A 57-year-old Chinese man was diagnosed with KD after 7 years of slow subcutaneous masses growth. The patient underwent treatment of oral glucocorticoids for 1 year, but the masses recurred as the dosage was tapered down. Subsequent anti-IgE therapy of omalizumab administered subcutaneously at 450 mg/day at a 4-week interval did not show improvement. The size of masses and serum IgE and circulating eosinophils did not decrease significantly after 19 cycles of continuous treatment. Ultimately, switched strategy of dupilumab was applied at an initial dose of 600 mg, followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks for 4 months. This treatment demonstrated dramatical effects with reduced masses in each area and fast dropdown of eosinophil counts, while the high level of serum IgE remained without changes. Recently, different biologics including anti-IgE, anti-IL-5, and anti-IL-4/IL-13 have been applied to treat KD with satisfied results and help to explore the pathogenesis of this rare disease. To our knowledge, this is the first report that demonstrates the effects of two different biologics in the same patient and reveals the impressive clinical efficacy of dupilumab to treat KD independent of IgE. Therefore, further investigation of the underlying mechanism and the development of diagnosis and treatment of KD is valuable.

Regulatory T cells and immunoglobulin E: A new therapeutic link for autoimmunity?

Autoimmune diseases have a prevalence of approximately 7 to 9% and are classified as either organ-specific diseases, including type I diabetes, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease and myasthenia gravis, or systemic diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome. While many advancements have been made in understanding of the mechanisms of autoimmune disease, including the nature of self-tolerance and its breakdown, there remain unmet needs in terms of effective and highly targeted treatments. T regulatory cells (Tregs) are key mediators of peripheral tolerance and are implicated in many autoimmune diseases, either as a result of reduced numbers or altered function. Tregs may be broadly divided into those generated in the thymus (tTregs) and those generated in the periphery (pTregs). Tregs target many different immune cell subsets and tissues to suppress excessive inflammation and to support tissue repair and homeostasis: there is a fine balance between Treg cell stability and the plasticity that is required to adjust Tregs' regulatory purposes to particular immune responses. The central role of immunoglobulin E (IgE) in allergic disease is well recognized, and it is becoming increasingly apparent that this immunoglobulin also has a wider role encompassing other diseases including autoimmune disease. Anti-IgE treatment restores the capacity of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) impaired by IgE- high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεR1) cross-linking to induce Tregs in vitro in atopic patients. The finding that anti-IgE therapy restores Treg cell homeostasis, and that this mechanism is associated with clinical improvement in asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria suggests that anti-IgE therapy may also have a potential role in the treatment of autoimmune diseases in which Tregs are involved.

The Role of Omalizumab in NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: A Narrative Review

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is a condition characterized by the triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, bronchial asthma, and hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This article explores the current knowledge on the various pathological mechanism(s) of N-ERD-such as arachidonic acid metabolism, cysteinyl leukotrienes, prostaglandins, platelets, IgE, mast cells, eosinophils, basophils, and innate immune system-and the role of omalizumab in its management. The authors dive deep into the role of IgE in N-ERD and its potential as a therapeutic target. IgE plays a significant role in mediating allergic reactions, is intricately linked with mast cells, interacts with multiple immunopathological pathways involved in N-ERD, and tends to be elevated in patients with N-ERD. Multiple real-world studies, observational studies, and case series, as well as 2 phase III trials, have demonstrated the effectiveness of omalizumab in the management of N-ERD. For a disease with such a well-documented history, the pathophysiology of N-ERD and the most effective ways to manage it remain a mystery. With this background, the authors ask-is IgE a missing piece of the N-ERD puzzle, thus explaining the efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of the disease?

IgG Autoantibodies Against IgE from Atopic Dermatitis Can Induce the Release of Cytokines and Proinflammatory Mediators from Basophils and Mast Cells

IgE-mediated release of proinflammatory mediators and cytokines from basophils and mast cells is a central event in allergic disorders. Several groups of investigators have demonstrated the presence of autoantibodies against IgE and/or FcεRI in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. By contrast, the prevalence and functional activity of anti-IgE autoantibodies in atopic dermatitis (AD) are largely unknown. We evaluated the ability of IgG anti-IgE from patients with AD to induce the in vitro IgE-dependent activation of human basophils and skin and lung mast cells. Different preparations of IgG anti-IgE purified from patients with AD and rabbit IgG anti-IgE were compared for their triggering effects on the in vitro release of histamine and type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-13) from basophils and of histamine and lipid mediators (prostaglandin D₂ and cysteinyl leukotriene C₄) from human skin and lung mast cells. One preparation of human IgG anti-IgE out of six patients with AD induced histamine release from basophils, skin and lung mast cells. This preparation of human IgG anti-IgE induced the secretion of cytokines and eicosanoids from basophils and mast cells, respectively. Human monoclonal IgE was a competitive antagonist of both human and rabbit IgG anti-IgE. Human anti-IgE was more potent than rabbit anti-IgE for IL-4 and IL-13 production by basophils and histamine, prostaglandin D₂ and leukotriene C₄ release from mast cells. Functional anti-IgE autoantibodies rarely occur in patients with AD. When present, they induce the release of proinflammatory mediators and cytokines from basophils and mast cells, thereby possibly contributing to sustained IgE-dependent inflammation in at least a subset of patients with this disorder.

Long-term outcome of omalizumab-assisted desensitisation to cow's milk and eggs in patients refractory to conventional oral immunotherapy: real-life study

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach to cow's milk and egg allergies, but reactions are frequent and some patients cannot be desensitized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term OIT outcomes with omalizumab (OMZ) in paediatric patients with severe egg and/or milk allergies.

METHODS

This retrospective real-life study analysed findings in children with Immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy to cow's milk and/or hen eggs refractory to conventional OIT, who underwent OIT with OMZ in our department between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015.

RESULTS

In all, 41 patients were included (median age: 7 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 5.5-9.5); 26/41 (63.4%) underwent OIT for milk, 8/41 (19.5%) for egg and 7/41 (17.1%) for both. The median time between initiation of OMZ and OIT was 27 weeks (IQR: 22-33). Forty (97.56%) patients reached the maintenance phase (200 mL of cow's milk and 30 mL of raw egg or 1 cooked egg) in a median time of 27 weeks (IQR: 18-37). The median total time with OMZ was 117 weeks (IQR: 88-144). During the OMZ period, 2.44% (1/41) of patients presented anaphylaxis. After discontinuation of OMZ, 29.3% (12/41) presented anaphylaxis, 50% of them had a poor adherence to daily ingestion. One patient (2.44%) was diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis after 2 years of discontinuation of OMZ. Currently, after a median time of 9 years (IQR: 7-10) since the initiation of OMZ, 75.6% (31/41) are desensitized (27/31 without OMZ).

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab allows desensitisation of children with severe allergies to cow's milk and/or egg without developing severe reactions while receiving this treatment. However, discontinuation of OMZ leads to severe allergic reactions, and hence must be monitored carefully.

Emerging treatments for chronic urticaria

INTRODUCTION

Across the globe, chronic urticaria (CU), i.e. chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU), is common, long-persisting and difficult to manage. Still, at least one-fifth is not sufficiently controlled by guideline-recommended treatment with H1-antihistamines and add-on therapy with the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab.

AREAS COVERED

Using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Congress websites, and websites of the manufacturers, this review explored the pipeline, namely anti-IgE-, anti-cytokine-, anti-receptor biologics, and small molecules, in clinical development for CU.

EXPERT OPINION

The CU pipeline is promising. While three omalizumab biosimilars are investigated, the assumed early approval of ligelizumab will expand the effective and safe anti-IgE approach observed with omalizumab. For other anti-IgEs like UB-221, the development is behind. Data are too limited so far to clearly define the role of anti-cytokine and anti-cytokine receptor biologics such as dupilumab, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and CDX-0159, of which only dupilumab is actually investigated in phase 3. Among three selective oral BTK inhibitors, remibrutinib, rilzabrutinib, and fenebrutinib, the development of remibrutinib is most advanced (phase 3). As the pipeline addresses different targets, study results will give deeper insights into the pathomechanisms of CU. Hopefully, in the next future additional approved and also more targeted approaches will be available.

Sex differences in the efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

Omalizumab is shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), a disease with high personal and social impact. Sex differences in CSU are recognized with women more frequently affected. Scarce is the knowledge about response to omalizumab between sex groups. We sought to identify any differences based on the sex of patients receiving omalizumab.

Methods

We evaluated data of patients diagnosed with CSU refractory to high-dose second-generation H1 antihistamines and treated with 300 mg omalizumab every 4 weeks for 6 months and then at relapse.

Results

Discussion: All patients, regardless of sex, age, or any other factor, achieved the clinical remission of the disease after the first 3 doses with a reduction of the disease activity indices and impact on the quality of life. Recurrences predominate in men, two months after the suspension of the drug. Respect to sex and recurrence we did not find any correlation with age, body mass index, peripheral eosinophil counts, total IgE levels, D-dimer, plasma prothrombine level or C-reactive protein. We found no sex differences in tolerability and safety. CSU in girls may persist longer and have worse prognosis, but no one has so far noted sex differences in response to omalizumab.

Conclusions

Although there are no certainties on the mechanism of action of omalizumab in CSU, the noticeable difference in response between males and females lead us to suppose a role of the hormonal balance both on the pathogenesis of the CSU and on the efficacy of OmAb.

Predictors of a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Omalizumab Treatment in Adult Patients With Severe Allergic Asthma

Several factors have been found to be predictors of a good response following omalizumab treatment in patients with severe allergic asthma (SAA). However, it remains unclear whether clinical characteristics can predict a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following omalizumab treatment in this population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the features associated with an MCID following omalizumab treatment in adult patients with SAA. Of the 124 participants enrolled in this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 94, 103, 20 and 53 achieved the MCID following treatment with omalizumab and were considered to be responders of exacerbation reduction (no exacerbation during the 1-year follow-up period or ≧50% reduction in exacerbations from baseline), oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing (no use of OCS to control asthma during the study period or a reduction of the monthly OCS maintenance dose to <50% of baseline), lung function (an increase of ≧230 ml in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline) and asthma control (an increase of ≧3 points in the asthma control test score from baseline), respectively. Normal weight [<25 vs. ≧30 kg/m², odds ratio (OR) = 3.86, p = 0.024] was predictive of a responder of reduction in exacerbations following omalizumab treatment while subjects with a blood eosinophil level of <300 cells/μL (<300 vs. ≧300 cells/μL, OR = 5.81, p = 0.001) were more likely to exhibit an MCID in OCS sparing. No factor was found to be a predictor of lung function or asthma control. When choosing treatment for adult patients with SAA, our findings may help to select those who may benefit the most from omalizumab treatment.

Severe pediatric asthma therapy: Omalizumab-A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety profile

Background

Omalizumab is the first biological therapy used to treat moderate-to-severe asthma and certainly the one with the highest number of publications.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to examine two critical outcomes of omalizumab therapy, asthma exacerbation rate, the reduction of the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and the improvement of the lung function as a secondary outcome using the following keywords in the MEDLINE database: "anti-IgE, severe asthma, children, and randomized controlled trial." We specifically selected papers that included moderate-to-severe asthma patients and collected data on children and adolescents.

Results

Four RCT studies (total number of patients = 1,239) were included in the analysis. The reported data on exacerbations showed an overall improvement in the exacerbation rate with a decreased use of inhaled steroids and some other minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Conclusions

Our systematic review confirms the known findings that omalizumab therapy decreases asthma exacerbation rate and reduces background therapy inhaled steroid dose. Therefore, add-on therapy with omalizumab shows a good efficacy and safety profile, thus proving to be a useful additional therapeutic option.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42023396785.

Safety of biological therapy in elderly patients with severe asthma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of biological therapy for severe T2 asthma (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and reslizumab) under real-life conditions in elderly patients older than 70 years.

METHODS

Retrospective data collection including clinical characteristics, comorbidities, treatment, disease control and adverse events (AE) of all patients with severe asthma on biological therapy older than 70 years seen in the Severe Asthma Unit of our hospital.

RESULTS

Of 147 patients with severe asthma being treated with biologics, 21 patients older than 70 years were included. The median age of these patients was 76.3 years (range 71-86) and the majority were women (n = 18, 85.7%). There were 9 patients (42.9%) who experienced an AE related to biological treatment. Four (44.4%) were in treatment with omalizumab, two (22.2%) with mepolizumab, two patients (22.2%) with reslizumab and one (11.1%) with benralizumab. The median FEV₁ (%) was 66%. These patients had a considerably higher body mass index (BMI). No significant differences were found for any other variable. Most of the AE reported were considered mild with the exception of one case of systemic AE (anaphylaxis) associated with omalizumab.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the prescription of biological therapy in elderly patients with severe asthma seems to be safe. More evidence is needed in this particular population.

Clinical Experience with Anti-IgE Monoclonal Antibody (Omalizumab) in Pediatric Severe Allergic Asthma-A Romanian Perspective

Background: Asthma is the most common chronic disease affecting children, with a negative impact on their quality of life. Asthma is often associated with comorbid allergic diseases, and its severity may be modulated by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergen sensitization. Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, the first biological therapy approved to treat patients aged ≥6 years with severe allergic asthma. The primary objective of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of Omalizumab in Romanian children with severe allergic asthma. Methods: In this observational real-life study, 12 children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years (mean 12.4 years) with severe allergic asthma received Omalizumab as an add-on treatment. Asthma control, exacerbations, lung function, and adverse events were evaluated at baseline and after the first year of treatment. Results: We observed general improvement in total asthma symptom scores and reduction in the rate of exacerbation of severe asthma. Omalizumab treatment was associated with improvement in the measures of lung function, and no serious adverse reactions were reported. FEV1 improved significantly after one year of treatment with Omalizumab [ΔFEV1 (% pred.) = 18.3], and [similarly, ΔMEF50 (%) = 25.8]. The mean severe exacerbation rate of asthma decreased from 4.1 ± 2.8 to 1.15 ± 0.78 (p < 0.0001) during the year of treatment with Omalizumab. Conclusions: This study showed that Omalizumab can be an effective and safe therapeutic option for Romanian children and adolescents with severe allergic asthma, providing clinically relevant information on asthma control and exacerbation rate in children and adolescents. The results demonstrated the positive effect of Omalizumab in young patients with asthma, starting from the first year of treatment.

Exploring Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Response to Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Background: Omalizumab is the best treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Machine learning (ML) approaches can be used to predict response to therapy and the effectiveness of a treatment. No studies are available on the use of ML techniques to predict the response to Omalizumab in CSU. Methods: Data from 132 CSU outpatients were analyzed. Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) and treatment efficacy were assessed. Clinical and demographic characteristics were used for training and validating ML models to predict the response to treatment. Two methodologies were used to label the data based on the response to treatment (UAS7 ≥ 6): (A) at 1, 3 and 5 months; (B) classifying the patients as early responders (ER), late responders (LR) or non-responders (NR) (ER: UAS 7 ≥ 6 at first month, LR: UAS 7 ≥ 6 at third month, NR: if none of the previous conditions occurred). Results: ER were predominantly characterized by hypertension, while LR mainly suffered from asthma and hypothyroidism. A slight positive correlation (R² = 0.21) was found between total IgE levels and UAS7 at 1 month. Variable Importance Analysis (VIA) reported D-dimer and C-reactive proteins as the key blood tests for the performance of learning techniques. Using methodology (A), SVM (specificity of 0.81) and k-NN (sensitivity of 0.8) are the best models to predict LR at the third month. Conclusion: k-NN plus the SVM model could be used to identify the response to treatment. D-dimer and C-reactive proteins have greater predictive power in training ML models.

The clinical efficacy and safety of anti-IgE therapy in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

The treatment of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) remains challenging. Elevated IgE levels have previously been reported in several RDEB patients. In this prospective, single-centre, open intervention study, elevated IgE levels were seen in 11 out of 12 patients with intense pruritus, and the patients with elevated IgE levels received anti-IgE therapy every 4 weeks for at least three cycles. Compared with the baseline, 10 patients with RDEB had good clinical outcomes with enhanced wound healing, a reduction in Birmingham (epidermolysis bullosa) EB severity score by 15%, a reduction in affected body surface area by 23.3%, amelioration of skin inflammation, and an increase in type VII collagen deposition by 13.1-fold. All the patients had a good tolerance to anti-IgE therapy. Furthermore, patients with higher IgE levels tended to have higher disease severity and more favorable clinical outcomes. Our report also suggested the potential role of IgE in the pathogenesis of inflammatory conditions associated with RDEB. (ChiCTR1900021437).

Oral immunotherapy in severe cow's milk allergic patients treated with omalizumab: Real life survey from a Spanish registry

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy is a frequent treatment for the management of food allergies, but adverse events (AE) are common. This study assessed the outcome of cow's milk oral immunotherapy (MOIT) in severe cow`s milk-allergic patients treated with omalizumab in a real-life setting.

METHODS

OmaBASE was a national, multicenter, open, and observational registry that collected clinical, immunologic, and treatment from patients with food allergy receiving omalizumab.

RESULTS

Data derived from 58 patients aged 10.3 years (IQR 6.3-13.2) and median milk-specific IgE 100 kU_A /L at the start of omalizumab treatment. Most had experienced anaphylaxis by accidental exposures (70.7%) and had asthma (81.0%). Omalizumab in monotherapy induced tolerance to ≥6000 mg of cow's milk protein (CMP) to 34.8% of patients tested by oral food challenge. Omalizumab combined with MOIT conferred desensitization to ≥6000 mg of CMP to 83.0% of patients. Omalizumab withdrawal triggered more AE (P = .013) and anaphylaxis (P = .001) than no discontinuation. Anaphylaxis was observed in 36.4% of patients who discontinued omalizumab, and more in those with sudden (50.0%) rather than progressive (12.5%) discontinuation. At database closure, 40.5% of patients who had completed follow-up tolerated CMP without omalizumab (7.2% 1500-4500 mg; 33.3% ≥6000 mg).

CONCLUSION

Milk oral immunotherapy initiated under omalizumab allows the desensitization of subjects with severe cow's milk allergy even after omalizumab discontinuation. However, discontinuation of omalizumab can lead to severe AE and should be carefully monitored.

What is the contribution of IgE to nasal polyposis?

Taking a novel approach, this narrative review collates knowledge about nasal polyposis and the biological functions of IgE in several diseases (allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-exacerbated respiratory disease, and chronic spontaneous urticaria) to consider which IgE-mediated mechanisms are relevant to nasal polyposis pathology. A type 2 eosinophil-dominated inflammatory signature is typical in nasal polyp tissue of European patients with nasal polyposis, with a shift toward this endotype observed in Asian populations in recent years. Elevated polyclonal IgE is present in the nasal tissue of patients with and without allergy. It is derived from many different B-cell clones and, importantly, is functional (proinflammatory). Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins are thought to act as superantigens, inducing production of polyclonal IgE via B-cell and T-cell activation, and triggering release of inflammatory mediators. In some patients, exposure to antigens/triggers leads to production of high levels of antigen-specific IgE, which mediates cross-linking of the high-affinity IgE receptor on various cells, causing release of inflammatory mediators. The efficacy of omalizumab confirms IgE as an important inflammatory mediator in nasal polyposis. By blocking IgE, omalizumab targets the T2 inflammation in nasal polyposis, reduces nasal polyp score and improves symptoms.

Use of biologics in food allergy management

Food allergies are a common medical problem, with children being the most affected patient group. The standard of care of food allergy consists of the acute treatment in case of a reaction and food avoidance in the long term, which influences the quality of life of patients. In this article, current developments for the causal treatment of food allergy including specific immunotherapy and biologics will be discussed. Epicutaneous and oral immunotherapy are currently in clinical development for the treatment of food allergy, and the results demonstrate good tolerability and efficacy with an increase in the oral threshold level. Biologics and, in particular, anti-IgE are currently investigated for their therapeutic use in food allergies. The results are promising, suggesting efficacy and tolerability.

Anti-IgE: A treatment option in allergic rhinitis?

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common IgE-mediated allergic disease. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated promising results on the AR treatment with biologics, in particular with the use of omalizumab – an anti-IgE antibody. Omalizumab has also been established in the routine management of allergic asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria. However, currently there is no approved license for the use of biologics in AR in Germany. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review has been completed including randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and reviews on the treatment of AR with omalizumab. Results: The systematic review demonstrates strong evidence supporting the use of omalizumab in the treatment of AR with regard to symptom control, safety profile, and management of comorbidities. Conclusion: Omalizumab is a good and safe option in the treatment of AR in terms of symptom control and the management of pre-existing comorbidities. Further clinical trials with other biologics in the management of AR are needed and are expected to follow soon.

Clinical Determinants of Successful Omalizumab Therapy in Severe Allergic Asthma Patients: 4-Year-Long, Real-Life Observation

Introduction

Omalizumab is a high-cost therapy recommended for the treatment of severe allergic asthma.

Objective

To find clinical parameters that are related to the sustained response to omalizumab.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective, real-life, 4-year follow-up was provided in Poland between March 2013 and May 2019. The success of omalizumab was assessed based on composed subjective and objective criteria. Simple/multiple regression analyses were performed to search for predictors of the response to omalizumab.

Results

A total of 989 severe allergic asthma patients were referred for omalizumab therapy, of whom 854 patients were considered eligible for treatment. At weeks 16 and 52, omalizumab was successful in 84% and 91% of patients, respectively. Treatment effectiveness was maintained up to the 4-year follow-up. Four predictors of the response to omalizumab were found at week 16 and two at week 52. The results at week 16 may be used as predictors of success at week 52 based on the model including baseline FEV1% and change in ACQ-7 and miniAQLQ score at week 16: the area under the ROC curve equals 0.746 [95% CI: 0.672–0.820].

Conclusion

Omalizumab therapy is very effective, with this efficacy sustained after 4 years of treatment. Success of the therapy can be predicted from the baseline FEV1% and clinical improvement (based on ACQ-7 and miniAQLQ scores) at week 16.

Targeted Molecular Therapies in Allergy and Rhinology

Biologic agents, monoclonal antibodies that target highly-specific molecular pathways of inflammation, are becoming integrated into care pathways for multiple disorders that are relevant in otolaryngology and allergy. These conditions share common inflammatory mechanisms of so-called Type 2 inflammation with dysregulation of immunoglobulin E production and eosinophil and mast cell degranulation leading to tissue damage. Biologic agents are now available for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), atopic dermatitis (AD), and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). This paper summarizes the diagnosis and management of these conditions and critically reviews the clinical trial data that has led to regulatory approval of biologic agents for these conditions.

Past, present, and future of anti-IgE biologics

About 20 years after the identification of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and its key role in allergic hypersensitivity reactions against normally harmless substances, scientists have started inventing strategies to block its pathophysiological activity in 1986. The initial concept of specific IgE targeting through the use of anti-IgE antibodies has gained a lot of momentum and within a few years independent research groups have reported successful generation of first murine monoclonal anti-IgE antibodies. Subsequent generation of optimized chimeric and humanized versions of these antibodies has paved the way for the development of therapeutic anti-IgE biologicals as we know them today. With omalizumab, there is currently still only one therapeutic anti-IgE antibody approved for the treatment of allergic conditions. Since its application is limited to the treatment of moderate-to-severe persistent asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria, major efforts have been undertaken to develop alternative anti-IgE biologicals that could potentially be used in a broader spectrum of allergic diseases. Several new drug candidates have been generated and are currently assessed in pre-clinical studies or clinical trials. In this review, we highlight the molecular properties of past and present anti-IgE biologicals and suggest concepts that might improve treatment efficacy of future drug candidates.

Whole blood transcriptional variations between responders and non-responders in asthma patients receiving omalizumab

BACKGROUND

Anti-IgE (omalizumab) has been used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma that is not controlled by inhaled steroids. Despite its success, it does not always provide patients with significant clinical benefits.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the transcriptional variations between omalizumab responders and non-responders and to study the mechanisms of action of omalizumab.

METHODS

The whole blood transcriptomes of moderate-to-severe adult asthma patients (N = 45:34 responders and 11 non-responders) were analysed over the course of omalizumab treatment. Non-asthmatic healthy controls (N = 17) were used as controls.

RESULTS

Transcriptome variations between responders and non-responders were identified using the genes significant (FDR < 0.05) in at least one comparison of each patient response status and time point compared with control subjects. Using gene ontology and network analysis, eight clusters of genes were identified. Longitudinal analyses of individual clusters revealed that responders could maintain changes induced with omalizumab treatment and become more similar to the control subjects, while non-responders tend to remain more similar to their pre-treatment baseline. Further analysis of an inflammatory gene cluster revealed that genes associated with neutrophil/eosinophil activities were up-regulated in non-responders and, more importantly, omalizumab did not significantly alter their expression levels. The application of modular analysis supported our findings and further revealed variations between responders and non-responders.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides not only transcriptional variations between omalizumab responders and non-responders, but also molecular insights for controlling asthma by omalizumab.

Omalizumab for cholinergic urticaria: 6 months prospective study and systematic review of the literature

To examine the effectiveness of omalizumab on disease activity and quality of life in patients with cholinergic urticaria (CholU). Further, a systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all studies of use of omalizumab in CholU. A total of 23 patients (63.9%) were refractory to updosed non-sedating antihistamines and initiated omalizumab in the observation period. Among these, an improvement of 10.8 UAS7 points (4.6-17.0), P = .002, was seen at 6 months follow up. DLQI and disease bother score VAS also improved significantly from before initiating treatment with omalizumab to follow-up; 7.0 points (3.6-10.3), P < .001 and 3.1 points (1.5-4.8), P = .001, respectively. The overall mean drug survival time for omalizumab (discontinued due to any cause) was 30.6 months (22.2-39.0). A total of five patients (21.7%) reported suspected side effects (headache, muscle pain, fatigue and injection site reactions) during treatment with omalizumab until 6 months follow-up. The systematic literature review identified 58 additional antihistamine refractory patients with CholU treated with omalizumab. The available studies reported that omalizumab is effective in patients with CholU and improves their disease-related quality of life. Omalizumab is safe, reduces disease activity and improves disease-related quality of life in patients with CholU.

An Allosteric Anti-tryptase Antibody for the Treatment of Mast Cell-Mediated Severe Asthma

Severe asthma patients with low type 2 inflammation derive less clinical benefit from therapies targeting type 2 cytokines and represent an unmet need. We show that mast cell tryptase is elevated in severe asthma patients independent of type 2 biomarker status. Active β-tryptase allele count correlates with blood tryptase levels, and asthma patients carrying more active alleles benefit less from anti-IgE treatment. We generated a noncompetitive inhibitory antibody against human β-tryptase, which dissociates active tetramers into inactive monomers. A 2.15 Å crystal structure of a β-tryptase/antibody complex coupled with biochemical studies reveal the molecular basis for allosteric destabilization of small and large interfaces required for tetramerization. This anti-tryptase antibody potently blocks tryptase enzymatic activity in a humanized mouse model, reducing IgE-mediated systemic anaphylaxis, and inhibits airway tryptase in Ascaris-sensitized cynomolgus monkeys with favorable pharmacokinetics. These data provide a foundation for developing anti-tryptase as a clinical therapy for severe asthma.

Human TH1 and TH2 cells targeting rhinovirus and allergen coordinately promote allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

Allergic asthmatic subjects are uniquely susceptible to acute wheezing episodes provoked by rhinovirus. However, the underlying immune mechanisms and interaction between rhinovirus and allergy remain enigmatic, and current paradigms are controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to perform a comprehensive analysis of type 1 and type 2 innate and adaptive responses in allergic asthmatic subjects infected with rhinovirus.

METHODS

Circulating virus-specific T_H1 cells and allergen-specific T_H2 cells were precisely monitored before and after rhinovirus challenge in allergic asthmatic subjects (total IgE, 133-4692 IU/mL; n = 28) and healthy nonallergic controls (n = 12) using peptide/MHCII tetramers. T cells were sampled for up to 11 weeks to capture steady-state and postinfection phases. T-cell responses were analyzed in parallel with 18 cytokines in the nose, upper and lower airway symptoms, and lung function. The influence of in vivo IgE blockade was also examined.

RESULTS

In uninfected asthmatic subjects, higher numbers of circulating virus-specific PD-1⁺ T_H1 cells, but not allergen-specific T_H2 cells, were linked to worse lung function. Rhinovirus infection induced an amplified antiviral T_H1 response in asthmatic subjects versus controls, with synchronized allergen-specific T_H2 expansion, and production of type 1 and 2 cytokines in the nose. In contrast, T_H2 responses were absent in infected asthmatic subjects who had normal lung function, and in those receiving anti-IgE. Across all subjects, early induction of a minimal set of nasal cytokines that discriminated high responders (G-CSF, IFN-γ, TNF-α) correlated with both egress of circulating virus-specific T_H1 cells and worse symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Rhinovirus induces robust T_H1 responses in allergic asthmatic subjects that may promote disease, even after the infection resolves.

Severe asthma in children: Current goals and unmet needs

Severe asthma in children is considered a complex and heterogeneous disease. A multidisciplinary assessment is required to correctly identify and manage these children because they potentially need close monitoring and additional treatment with advanced targeted therapies. Recent research efforts focused on the identification of epidemiologic, clinical, and functional characteristics of the disease in the pediatric age. Novel findings on the molecular mechanisms underlying severe asthma have led to the recognition of different endotypes and related biomarkers able to predict the response to advanced biologic therapies. Progress in our knowledge of severe asthma has occurred with the introduction of biologic therapies. Future goals in asthma care include the identification of the links between phenotypes and endotypes, as well as the identification of novel predictive biomarkers. They will help to select candidates for innovative biologic therapies and ultimately improve outcomes in children with severe asthma.

Understanding the asthmatic response to an experimental rhinovirus infection: Exploring the effects of blocking IgE

BACKGROUND

Rhinovirus frequently causes asthma exacerbations among children and young adults who are allergic. The interaction between allergen and rhinovirus-induced symptoms and inflammation over time is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the response to an experimental inoculation with rhinovirus-16 in allergic asthmatics with the response in healthy controls and to evaluate the effects of administrating omalizumab before and during the infection.

METHODS

Two clinical trials were run in parallel. In one of these trials, the response to an experimental inoculation with rhinovirus-16 among asthmatics with high levels of total IgE was compared to the response in healthy controls. The other trial compared the effects of administering omalizumab versus placebo to asthmatics in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled investigation. The primary outcome for both trials compared lower respiratory tract symptoms (LRTSs) between study groups over the first 4 days of infection.

RESULTS

Frequent comparisons of symptoms, lung function, and blood eosinophil counts revealed differences that were more pronounced among allergic asthmatics than among controls by days 2 and 3 after virus inoculation. Additionally, an augmentation of upper respiratory tract symptom scores and LRTS scores occurred among the atopic asthmatics versus the controls during the resolution of symptoms (P < .01 for upper respiratory symptom tract scores and P < .001 for LRTS scores). The beneficial effects of administering omalizumab on reducing LRTSs and improving lung function were strongest over the first 4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

LRTSs and blood eosinophil counts were augmented and lung function was reduced among allergic asthmatics early after rhinovirus inoculation but increased late in the infection during symptom resolution. The effect of administering omalizumab on the response to rhinovirus was most pronounced during the early/innate phase of the infection.

Effectiveness and safety of Omalizumab in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects approximately 1% of the population, affecting both children and adults. Omalizumab (Oma) is a therapeutic option for patients with refractory forms of CSU.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of Oma in the treatment of CSU.

METHODS

Systematic review (Cochrane Collaboration methodology) of randomized clinical trials comparing Oma to placebo in refractory CSU treatment. The search is based on MEDLINE; EMBASE, Central Cochrane Library, and LILACS. The outcomes evaluated were: control of the illness, adverse events, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Of the 848 identified studies 13 were selected for further review and six were included in the meta-analysis. For all outcomes, high-quality evidence has confirmed that Oma is effective in the treatment of CSU. The dosage of 300mg/month achieved better results; namely a significant reduction in pruritus, papules, and urticaria activity, as well as an increase in the number of patients with a controlled condition, improvement in the quality of life and no differences in adverse events compared to the placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality evidence demonstrates that Oma is effective and safe in the treatment of CSU refractory to therapy with H1 antihistamines.

Refractory asthma phenotyping based on immunoglobulin E levels and eosinophilic counts: A real life study

BACKGROUND

Asthma is an inflammatory heterogeneous disease with variable severity. The serum IgE level and Eosinophilic count have been used as biomarkers to define treatment strategies with biological agents in severe refractory asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the concurrence of high eosinophil count and elevated serum IgE levels in patients with severe refractory asthma.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional real-life study was conducted on patients attending adult refractory asthma outpatient clinic between 2015 and 2018. Serum total IgE level and blood EOS count on matched dates with spirometry and Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores were collected. All data were obtained while patients were not on biological agents.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients with severe refractory asthma were included. The mean age was 43 years, mean eosinophilic count 564 cells/μL and mean serum IgE levels of 520 IU/ml. There was a significant correlation between serum IgE level and eosinophilic count. Serum IgE and eosinophilic count were concurrently elevated in 110 patients (78%). The patients were further categorized into four subgroups. Group A: IgE 30-100 IU/mL and EOS 150-300 cells/μL (7.3%), Group B: IgE >100 IU/mL and EOS 150-300 cells/μL (19.1%), Group C: IgE 30-100 IU/mL and EOS >300 cells/μL (14.5%) and Group D: IgE >100 IU/mL, EOS >300 cells/μL (59.1%).

CONCLUSION

The majority of severe refractory asthma patients exhibits both elevated serum IgE level and eosinophilic counts.

In search of clinically relevant parameters to monitor successful omalizumab therapy in allergic asthma

Background: Omalizumab is approved as add-on therapy for the treatment of severe uncontrolled allergic asthma. Increase in quality of life and decrease of exacerbations and hospital admission, as well as immunmodulatory effects have been described with omalizumab therapy. However, to date there are few parameters to monitor success and to evaluate the individual advantage of this therapy for the patient. Furthermore, no reliable parameter to predict response to treatment exists so far. The aim of this study was to define an easily applicable parameter for response to treatment with omalizumab. Method: 43 patients with allergic asthma were treated with omalizumab at a dose of at least 0,016 mg/kg/IgE every 4 weeks. Before, and 12 weeks after initiation of therapy, bodyplethysmography including airway resistance was performed. Efficacy of treatment was judged by the attending physician on the basis of a five point chart. Furthermore, a differential blood count was performed before, and 12 weeks after initiation of treatment. Total and specific IgE against all relevant antigens were determined before start of therapy. Results: Airway resistance in patients with response to treatment with omalizumab (responders) was significantly decreased in comparison to patients without clinical benefit (non-responder). The number of eosinophil granulocytes in the peripheral blood was decreased in both groups without significant difference. Response to therapy was associated with younger age and lower levels of specific IgE against the allergen with the highest sIgE-level (seasonal and perennial), but not with the sIgE level of the perennial allergens in general. Conclusion: Measurement of airway resistance might be an additional parameter for monitoring response to therapy with omalizumab. High specific IgE levels, for both perennial and concomitant seasonal allergens as well as increasing age, seem to predict less favorable treatment outcomes.

Influence of prolonged treatment with omalizumab on the development of solid epithelial cancer in patients with atopic asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether prolonged treatment with omalizumab influences development or progression of solid epithelial cancer in patients with atopic asthma or chronic idiopathic urticaria.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention and observational studies. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, comparative observational studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and non-comparative observational studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and grey literature for eligible studies to November 2017. All searches were updated in January 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR INCLUDED STUDIES

Randomized, quasi-randomized, controlled clinical trials and observational studies were included if they involved patients ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma or chronic idiopathic urticaria treated with omalizumab for ≥ 40 weeks. Eligible comparators included standard of care, placebo, cromoglycate or no treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty seven unique studies were eligible for inclusion; however, only twelve (7.2%, n = 11 758) reported any outcome of interest, none of which involved patients with urticaria. 195 cancer events were reported. We found no statistically significant increase in the odds of study-emergent solid epithelial cancer in patients randomized to long-term treatment with omalizumab compared to standard of care (Peto OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.11, 3.74, I²  = 41%). Less than one per cent of participants of non-comparative observational studies (n = 2350) were diagnosed with a solid epithelial tumour (meta-proportion: 0.86% [95% CI: 0.24, 1.86%, I²  = 56%]). In the only comparative observational study reporting on cancer, the proportion of study-emergent solid epithelial tumour events was nearly identical in both study groups (omalizumab: 2.3%, standard of care: 2.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to determine whether long-term treatment with omalizumab influences development or progression of solid epithelial cancer in these patient populations. PROSPERO registration # CRD 42018082211.

Autoimmune Theories of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Urticaria (hives) is a highly prevalent skin disorder that can occur with or without associated angioedema. Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a condition which persists for more than 6 weeks in duration and occurs in the absence of an identifiable provoking factor. CSU results from pathogenic activation of mast cells and basophils, which gives rise to the release of proinflammatory mediators that support the generation of urticaria. Several theories have been put forth regarding the pathogenesis of CSU with much evidence pointing toward a potential autoimmune etiology in up to 50% of patients with this condition. In this review, we highlight the evidence surrounding the autoimmune pathogenesis of chronic urticaria including recent data which suggests that CSU may involve contributions from both immunoglobin G (IgG)-specific and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-specific autoantibodies against a vast array of antigens that can span beyond those found on the surface of mast cells and basophils.

Biologic Agents for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a complex inflammatory disorder, which is often recalcitrant to medical and surgical management. Recently, biologic agents have been studied as an adjunct treatment for this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine the role of biologic agents for chronic rhinosinusitis patients by reviewing literature and clinical trials.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of literature and clinical trials-both recently completed and ongoing-was undertaken to examine up-to-date evidence of current biologic therapy and its role in chronic rhinosinusitis patients-including anti-IgE, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-13, and GATA-3 DNAzyme.

RESULTS

Specific biologic agents discussed include omalizumab, reslizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and Hgd40/SB010. Risks, side effects, and administration information are also reviewed. An algorithm for the use of biologics in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is proposed.

CONCLUSION

These treatments have promising results and may prove to be an important adjunct for patients with recalcitrant sinus disease.

Endotypes of severe allergic asthma patients who clinically benefit from anti-IgE therapy

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, a recombinant monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, was developed for the treatment of severe allergic asthma. Not all these patients respond to omalizumab.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether the proinflammatory cytokine profiles in the severe allergic asthma patients were different between who responded and nonresponded to omalizumab therapy.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted to examine type 2 cytokines and epithelium-derived cytokines in the bronchial tissues by immunohistochemistry, Western blot and PCR analysis among patients with severe allergic asthma before and after omalizumab therapy.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 23 patients with unstable severe allergic asthma improved their asthma control after 4 months of omalizumab treatment (Responders), while nine failed to improve (Non-Responders). Most of Responders were type 2-high endotype (12/14) with upregulated expression of IL-33, IL-25 and TSLP in their bronchial tissues, while most of Non-Responders were type 2-low endotype (8/9). Repeated bronchoscopic biopsy was done in nine responders after omalizumab treatment and showed a decline in IL-13, IL-33, IL-25 and TSLP expression in the bronchial tissues. Among 14 Responders who continued omalizuamb treatments to a total 12 months, six patients achieved a well control of asthma (ACT ≥ 23), while eight patients required additional treatment for asthma symptoms and had more rhinosinusitis comorbidities and a mixed eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation in their bronchial tissues.

CONCLUSION

Most of the severe allergic asthma patients who benefited from omalizumab treatment were IL-33, IL-25 and TSLP aggravated type 2-high endotype. Rhinosinusitis or with a mixed eosinophilic and neutrophilic airway inflammation should be evaluated in patients who partially responded to omalizumab treatment.

Monitoring of omalizumab therapy in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is a successfully implemented supplementary therapy for improving asthma control in children aged 6 years and older with severe persistent allergic asthma. The dosage of omalizumab depends on body weight and IgE level, yet no parameter has been established to guide dosage changes during therapy. Clinical studies in patients with allergic asthma or allergic rhinitis revealed a clinically relevant improvement by using omalizumab leading to concentrations of free serum IgE reported to be lower than 50 ng/ml. Therefore, only the question concerning the concentrations of free IgE used in a therapy with omalizumab is regarded of clinical importance, while total IgE (free and omalizumab-bound IgE) increases during treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients, 8 to 17 years of age, received therapy with omalizumab due to severe allergic asthma. In addition, the patients had pronounced rhinoconjunctivitis, food allergy, insect sting allergy, and/or neurodermitis. The total IgE in the serum was measured in the patients 3 - 6 months before each omalizumab injection as a potential progress parameter (Sandwich-Immunoassay ADVIA Centaur).

RESULTS

Six months after beginning of the therapy with omalizumab, a significant decrease of the total IgE concentration was found, in comparison to the baseline values (p < 0.003). In all patients the tolerability of omalizumab was very good: there was a reduction in the frequency of the asthma exacerbations and rescue medications. All patients reported a clearly improved quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

A general increase in IgE was not observed in any of the children we treated with omalizumab. Apart from the development of routine assays to determine free serum IgE levels, the significance of the total serum IgE as a suitable control of an omalizumab therapy should be further investigated in controlled studies with regard to sensitivity and specificity. In order to only administer the lowest necessary dose of omalizumab especially in children and adolescents, the establishment of laboratory parameters (free IgE and/or total IgE) to adequately monitor the therapy is urgently needed. Patients undergoing an omalizumab therapy require medical supervision at close intervals.

Impact of omalizumab in children from a middle-income country with severe therapy-resistant asthma: A real-life study

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma in children is a global health problem. Severe therapy-resistant asthma (STRA) in children is a major clinical challenge due to persistent symptoms despite high doses of corticosteroids and results in high public health costs. Omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) has been described as an effective add-on therapy in these patients. The characteristics of children with STRA from low- and middle-income countries have scarcely been reported, and no real-life study has been published on the effects of omalizumab in this group of patients. The aim of our study is to report the first clinical real-life experiences with omalizumab in Brazilian children with STRA.

METHODS

Children (6-18 years old) from a referral center who were diagnosed with STRA were included in this retrospective study based on our clinical databases. The included children had undergone at least 6 months of omalizumab treatment and fulfilled the following initial criteria: 1) >6 years old; 2) a positive skin-prick test for at least one aeroallergen; and 3) a serum total IgE level between 30 and 1500 IU/mL. Clinical and lung function variables were analyzed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Fourteen children (mean age: 11.9 years; percentage female: 72%) were included in this study. Omalizumab treatment significantly increased control of the disease according to a standardized questionnaire administered at every visit (P < 0.0001), ceased hospitalizations in 70% (P = 0.02) of patients, and allowed 8/9 (89%) patients to be weaned off oral steroids (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective report, the use of omalizumab in Brazilian children with STRA significantly improved disease control, decreased hospitalizations, and allowed suspension of continuous oral corticosteroids.

Combining anti-IgE with oral immunotherapy

Food allergy is a significant medical problem that affects up to 8% of children in developed countries. At present, there are no curative therapies available in routine practice and management of food allergy involves strict allergen avoidance, education, and prompt treatment upon accidental exposure. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an efficacious experimental approach to food allergy and has been shown to provide a substantial benefit in terms of allergen desensitization. However, OIT is associated with high rates of allergic reactions, and the period of protection offered by OIT appears to be limited and highly variable. Recurrence of allergen sensitivity after a period of treatment discontinuation is commonly observed. With the aim of overcoming these limitations of OIT, several trials have studied omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) as an adjuvant treatment for patients undergoing OIT. Results from these trials have shown that the addition of omalizumab to OIT leads to a significant decrease in the frequency and severity of reactions, which allows for an increase in the threshold of tolerance to food allergens. This review provides a summary of the current literature and addresses some of the key questions that remain regarding the use of omalizumab in conjunction with OIT.

Omalizumab in Children with Severe Allergic Asthma: The Italian Real-Life Experience

Background:

Anti-IgE treatment represents a major breakthrough in the therapeutic management of severe allergic asthma. To date, omalizumab is the only biological drug currently licensed as add-on therapy in children aged > 6 years with moderate-to-severe and severe allergic asthma uncontrolled after treatment with high dose of inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting inhaled beta2-agonist. The clinical efficacy and safety of omalizumab treatment in the pediatric population has been extensively documented in specific trials and consistently expanded from real-life studies. Our aim is to describe the impact of omalizumab on asthma management, by reporting the results of the first Italian multicenter observational study conducted in children and adolescents with severe allergic asthma.

Methods:

The study was a 1-year real-life multicenter survey conducted in 13 pediatric allergy and pulmonology tertiary centers in Italy. All patients with confirmed severe allergic asthma from whom Omalizumab add-on treatment was initiated between 2007 and 2015 were included in the study.

Results:

Forty-seven patients with severe allergic asthma were included in the study. A significant reduction in the number of asthma exacerbations was observed during treatment with omalizumab, when compared with the previous year (1.03 vs 7.2 after 6 months (p<0.001) and 0.8 after 12 months (p<0.001), respectively). Hospital admissions were reduced by 96%. At 12 months, forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved and a corticosteroid sparing effect was observed.

No serious adverse events were reported during the follow-up period of 12 months.

Conclusion:

The results of the first Italian multicenter observational study confirmed that omalizumab is an effective and safe add-on therapy in uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in children.

Overcoming severe adverse reactions to venom immunotherapy using anti-IgE antibodies in combination with a high maintenance dose

BACKGROUND

An omalizumab treatment and a high maintenance venom dose may both help to prevent recurrent systemic allergic reactions (SAR) to venom immunotherapy (VIT). The effectiveness of this combination therapy, however, is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to explore the possibility whether a temporary treatment with the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab combined with a VIT using an elevated maintenance dose of >100 μg venom may establish a permanent tolerance of maintenance VIT.

METHODS

For this retrospective case series, we scoured our institutional data base for patients who had had an insect venom allergy, and in whom it had not been possible to continue VIT because of repeated unstoppable SAR during maintenance VIT. Patients were divided into those who had received the combination therapy (omalizumab group) and those who had not received omalizumab because its costs could not be covered (controls). Guided by the total IgE level and by body weight, omalizumab had been given subcutaneously 5, 3 and 1 weeks before VIT had been restarted. Three to 6 months after an elevated maintenance dose (200-300 μg venom) had been reached, omalizumab had been stopped.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2011, 15 patients had qualified for an off-label use of omalizumab: 10 patients had received the combination therapy, and 5 patients had remained without such a therapy. The combination therapy leads to a durable tolerance of VIT in all patients even after omalizumab had been discontinued (median of follow-up time 5.8 years, IQR 2.7-8.6 years). Sting challenge tests were tolerated by all of the re-stung omalizumab patients (n = 8). In all controls, VIT had to be stopped permanently due to repeated SARs (P < .001 vs omalizumab group).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Combining a temporary omalizumab therapy with an elevated maintenance dose seems a promising approach to achieve a tolerance of treatment in patients with a recurrent SAR to VIT.