Nieuwstadt HA, Geraedts TR, Truijman MTB, Kooi ME, van der Lugt A, van der Steen AFW, Wentzel JJ, Breeuwer M, Gijsen FJH. Numerical simulations of
carotid MRI quantify the accuracy in measuring atherosclerotic plaque components in vivo.
Magn Reson Med 2013;
72:188-201. [PMID:
23943090 DOI:
10.1002/mrm.24905]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2012] [Revised: 06/18/2013] [Accepted: 07/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Atherosclerotic carotid plaques can be quantified in vivo by MRI. However, the accuracy in segmentation and quantification of components such as the thin fibrous cap (FC) and lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) remains unknown due to the lack of a submillimeter scale ground truth.
METHODS
A novel approach was taken by numerically simulating in vivo carotid MRI providing a ground truth comparison. Upon evaluation of a simulated clinical protocol, MR readers segmented simulated images of cross-sectional plaque geometries derived from histological data of 12 patients.
RESULTS
MR readers showed high correlation (R) and intraclass correlation (ICC) in measuring the luminal area (R = 0.996, ICC = 0.99), vessel wall area (R = 0.96, ICC = 0.94) and LRNC area (R = 0.95, ICC = 0.94). LRNC area was underestimated (mean error, -24%). Minimum FC thickness showed a mediocre correlation and intraclass correlation (R = 0.71, ICC = 0.69).
CONCLUSION
Current clinical MRI can quantify carotid plaques but shows limitations for thin FC thickness quantification. These limitations could influence the reliability of carotid MRI for assessing plaque rupture risk associated with FC thickness. Overall, MRI simulations provide a feasible methodology for assessing segmentation and quantification accuracy, as well as for improving scan protocol design.
Collapse