Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Survey on the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections With Innovative Antibiotics: Focus on Ceftazidime-Avibactam

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health dilemma and a chief health concern globally. The rising incidence of resistance against carbapenems, which are considered most effective against gram-negative bacteria, has added to the concern and has limited the number of available treatment options. Newer antibiotic options may be required to tackle the mounting concern of antibiotic resistance. However, only a few antimicrobials are in the pipeline for managing infections instigated by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria. This justifies the prudent application of already available antibiotics. Among newer antibiotics available to healthcare professionals (HCPs), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has shown good efficacy in the management of MDR gram-negative infections.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey on the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) among HCPs was carried out using a questionnaire comprising 21 parameters related to AMR patterns on the need for innovative antibiotics to manage MDR gram-negative infections and the usage of CAZ-AVI by HCPs while managing such infections. The KAP scores were calculated to rank respondents' KAP levels.

RESULT

Out of the 204 study respondents, the majority (~80%) (n=160) believed that renewed efforts should be made to seek antimicrobial agents that will add to the armamentarium of treatment options for MDR gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI is an important treatment alternative for managing MDR gram-negative infections (n=90, 45%). Further, it can be the first choice of definitive therapy for oxacillinases (OXA)-48-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (n=84, 42%). HCPs also believed that the use of CAZ-AVI in clinical practice will require high levels of antimicrobial stewardship (n=100, 49%).

CONCLUSION

Novel and innovative antibiotics are the need of the hour in the management of MDR gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI has established its effectiveness in treating these infections; however, the molecule must be utilized prudently while keeping stewardship principles in mind.

Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Clinical Syndromes With Limited Treatment Options: A Retrospective Study

Background With rising trends of multi-drug organism infections and the limited availability of new antimicrobials, management of such cases has become a hassle for the clinician. Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CEF-AVI) is evolving as an effective alternative to polymyxins in the management of Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms (CRO) infections. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved CEF-AVI in a restricted group of clinical syndromes where the drug could have potential use. Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in terms of 14-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure at seven days in patients on CEF-AVI. Methodology A retrospective study was conducted on patients who received CEF-AVI in a period of one year in our hospital. Patients were included in the study if they have received CEF-AVI for more than one day of therapy (DOT) and samples from relevant sites have been sent for culture and sensitivity. Variables and outcomes were collected from the hospital information system and medical records. Results A total of 78 patients were included, 52 (66.7%) were started empirically on CEF-AVI while 26 (33.3%) were on targeted therapy. Out of the 78 patients, 43 patients had positive cultures among which 32 patients had Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)/Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection. The most common clinical syndrome in which the drug was used was occult sepsis (27/78; 34.6%) followed by primary bacteremia (20/78; 25.6%) and neutropenic sepsis (11/78; 14.1%). The clinical efficacy which was primarily assessed in terms of clinical cure was met for 55 (70.5%) patients. The 14-day mortality for the studies group was found to be 18 (23%). Conclusion The analysis of results shows encouraging clinical cure rates and 14-day mortality rates in a subset of severe infections which has limited treatment options.

The "Old" and the "New" Antibiotics for MDR Gram-Negative Pathogens: For Whom, When, and How

The recent expansion of multidrug resistant and pan-drug-resistant pathogens poses significant challenges in the treatment of healthcare associated infections. An important advancement, is a handful of recently launched new antibiotics targeting some of the current most problematic Gram-negative pathogens, namely carbapenem-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA). Less options are available against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and strains producing metallo-beta lactamases (MBL). Ceftazidime-avibactam signaled a turning point in the treatment of KPC and partly OXA- type carbapenemases, whereas meropenem-vaborbactam was added as a potent combination against KPC-producers. Ceftolozane-tazobactam could be seen as an ideal beta-lactam backbone for the treatment of CRPA. Plazomicin, an aminoglycoside with better pharmacokinetics and less toxicity compared to other class members, will cover important proportions of multi-drug resistant pathogens. Eravacycline holds promise in the treatment of infections by CRAB, with a broad spectrum of activity similar to tigecycline, and improved pharmacokinetics. Novel drugs and combinations are not to be considered "panacea" for the ongoing crisis in the therapy of XDR Gram-negative bacteria and colistin will continue to be considered as a fundamental companion drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (particularly in areas where MBL predominate), for the treatment of CRPA (in many cases being the only in vitro active drug) as well as CRAB. Aminoglycosides are still important companion antibiotics. Finally, fosfomycin as part of combination treatment for CRE infections and P. aeruginosa, deserves a greater attention. Optimal conditions for monotherapy and the "when and how" of combination treatments integrating the novel agents will be discussed.