OPEN Hackathon at the TUM School of Medicine, Germany

The OPEN Hackathon of the Technical University of Munich (TUM) 2020 set out to address challenges and potential solutions for medical education at the School of Medicine to kick off the 2020/21 winter semester. The event lasted 36 hours, during which medical students, teachers and staff members had the opportunity to tackle current problems in education and to develop co-created, customized solutions through creative teamwork for the School of Medicine at the TUM. The resulting solutions are now being realized and implemented in teaching. This paper describes the process and organization of the hackathon. Furthermore, the result of the evaluation of the event are described. In this paper, we aim to present the project as a valuable pioneer in the field of developing medical-educational topics within the framework of innovative methodological formats.

Building collaborative leadership: A qualitative evaluation of the Australian Collaborative Pairs trial

The need to reorient the health system to ensure greater involvement of consumers in healthcare has, in recent years, been highlighted as a priority in both literature and policy. This change requires renegotiating power relations among health organisations, health professionals and health consumers. This study presents findings from a trial of a program designed to foster collaborative relationships between clinicians and consumers of health services in the Australian setting. The King's Fund Collaborative Pairs program is a leadership development program that brings together a consumer, patient or community leader to work together in pairs with a service provider clinician or manager to develop new ways of working together. The trial involved 88 participants paired together undertaking one of seven programs conducted from October 2018 to August 2019. Participants were guided through a series of activities in five face-to-face sessions run by facilitators trained by the King's Fund. A qualitative evaluation was undertaken via semi-structured interviews (n = 40) with organisations involved, facilitators and participants. A brief review of program documentation was also included. Thematic analysis was undertaken to evaluate program acceptability, implementation and to identify program impacts. The evaluation, although limited in scope, found the program changed the way some participants understood the nature of consumer and provider relationships and how collaborative working relationships could be developed. The impact of the program on organisations sponsoring participants was less evident as numbers of participants from each organisation were limited and the time required for cultural change to develop is typically longer than the evaluation period allowed for. We highlight key recommendations addressing program recruitment, facilitation and format to inform future iterations of the program.