Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Comparison With Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Detection of the Etiology of Obstructive Jaundice

BACKGROUND

Despite technological advances, obstructive jaundice has significant morbidity and mortality rates. When studying obstructive jaundice, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the "gold standard" for biliary obstruction identification, might be replaced with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), which is a non-invasive procedure.

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in comparison with ERCP for the detection of the etiology of obstructive jaundice.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective, observational study included 102 patients who presented with obstructive jaundice as proven by liver function tests. The MRCP was conducted within 24 to 72 hours before the ERCP. A torso phased-array coil (Siemens, Germany) was used for the MRCP. The duodeno-videoscope and general electric fluoroscopy were used to perform the ERCP. The MRCP was evaluated by a classified radiologist who was blinded to the clinical details. An experienced consultant gastroenterologist who was blinded to the results of the MRCP assessed the cholangiogram of each patient. The hepato-pancreaticobiliary system results from both procedures were compared based on the pathology observed, such as choledocholithiasis, pancreaticobiliary strictures, and dilatation of biliary strictures. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The most commonly reported pathology was choledocholithiasis, and MRCP diagnosed 55 patients, of which 53 were true positive cases when compared with the ERCP results of the same patients. MRCP demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity (respectively) for screening choledocholithiasis (96.2, 91.8), cholelithiasis (100, 75.8), pancreatic duct stricture (100, 100), and hepatic duct mass (100, 100) and showed statistically significant values. The sensitivity of MRCP is lower for identifying benign and malignant strictures, but its specificity was observed to be reliable.

CONCLUSION

When it comes to determining the severity of obstructive jaundice, both in its early and later stages, the MRCP technique is widely regarded as a reliable means of diagnostic imaging. The diagnostic function of ERCP has been significantly reduced as a result of the precision of MRCP as well as its non-invasive nature. In addition to being a helpful non-invasive method to identify biliary diseases and avoid unnecessary ERCPs and their risks, MRCP offers good diagnostic accuracy for obstructive jaundice.

Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients

Background

The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommended that during the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy units perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for obstructive biliary pathologies in an emergency. We assessed the local performance of ERCP during the first wave of COVID-19 at our local endoscopy center, in particular the technique to common bile duct (CBD) cannulation.

Methodology

All ERCP procedures performed from January to June 2020 were retrospectively assessed and compared with procedures performed between January and June 2019 at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary. The indications for ERCP, success rate, and complications were studied separately. Correlation analysis was conducted using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The binary logistic regression model was used to compute the factors associated with successful ERCP. Significance was established when the two-sided P-value < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2017).

Results

A total of 281 ERCP were included in this study, with 169 and 112 performed during the first six months of 2019 and 2020, respectively. A statistically significant (0.0087) higher proportion of cases with liver dysfunction presented for ERCP before the COVID-19 outbreak (152, 89.94%). All patients before COVID-19 underwent wire control-assisted ERCP, while 82 (73.21%) received assisted ERCP during the first wave (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.10) in the number of patients who underwent sphincterotomy before and during the first wave of COVID-19, with 97 (57.39%) and 76 (67.85%), respectively. The success rate of ERCP before COVID-19 was relatively high, accounting for 146 (86.39%) patients in contrast to 87 (77.67%) patients during the first wave (P = 0.074). Sphincterotomy (β = 2.800, P = 0.028) and stent insertion (β = 0.852, P = 0.046) were statistically significant predictors of ERCP outcomes. There was no statistically significant impact of cholangitis on the success of ERCP (β = 1.672, P = 0.109).

Conclusion

The first wave of COVID-19 had a statistically proven negative impact on the expected standards of ERCP performance. Although the complication rate was significantly higher during the first wave case difficulty, the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) status was not assessed on an individual basis. Both ASA status and case difficulty are now included in our endoscopy selection process. We recommend adding the complexity of cases and ASA to the local and national recording databases. This is a rare study on UK-based hospitals.