1
|
Dash C, Mills MG, Jones TD, Nwabukwu IA, Beale JY, Hamilton RN, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, O’Neill SC. Design and pilot implementation of the Achieving Cancer Equity through Identification, Testing, and Screening (ACE-ITS) program in an urban underresourced population. Cancer 2023; 129:3141-3151. [PMID: 37691526 PMCID: PMC10502953 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Achieving Cancer Equity through Identification, Testing, and Screening (ACE-ITS) program is a community-engaged framework to improve mammography maintenance and rates of genetic risk assessment, counseling, and testing using a multilevel approach that enhances patient navigation through mobile health and community education. METHODS The ACE-ITS program is based on the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities research framework focused on the individual (genetic testing, screening navigation) and community (community-based breast health education) levels and targeted to the biological- (genetic risk), behavioral- (mammography screening), sociocultural- (underserved Black and Hispanic women), and the health care system (patient navigation, automated text messages)-related domains. We further integrate the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model to describe our program implementation. RESULTS In collaboration with genetic counselors and community partners, we created educational modules on mammography maintenance and genetic counseling/testing that have been incorporated into the navigator-led community education sessions. We also implemented a universal genetic risk assessment tool and automated text message reminders for repeat mammograms into our mammography navigation workflow. Through the ACE-ITS program implementation, we have collaboratively conducted 22 educational sessions and navigated 585 women to mammography screening over the 2020-2021 calendar years. From January to December 2021, we have also conducted genetic risk assessment on 292 women, of whom 7 have received genetic counseling/testing. CONCLUSIONS We describe a multilevel, community-engaged quality improvement program designed to reduce screening-related disparities in Black and Hispanic women in our catchment area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiranjeev Dash
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Mary G. Mills
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Thelma D. Jones
- Thelma D. Jones Breast Cancer Fund, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Ify A. Nwabukwu
- African Women’s Cancer Awareness Association, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | - Jacqueline Y. Beale
- Cancer to Jasmine and Butterflies Consulting, Glenn Dale, Maryland
- American Cancer Society, Cancer Action Network, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Rhonda N. Hamilton
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Suzanne C. O’Neill
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peeler A, Doran A, Winter-Dean L, Ijaz M, Brittain M, Hansford L, Wyatt K, Sallnow L, Harding R. Public health palliative care interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers: a scoping review of studies that assess person-centered outcomes. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1180571. [PMID: 37564426 PMCID: PMC10410270 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Public health palliative care views communities as an integral part of care delivery at the end of life. This community-provider partnership approach has the potential to improve end-of-life care for people who are dying and their carers. Objective To identify and appraise the current literature related to public health interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers. Methods A scoping review was conducted, applying Arksey and O'Malley's methods. Data was extracted and synthesized using narrative techniques, and results are reported using PRISMA guidelines. Results The search yielded 2,902 results. Eighteen met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Interventions were categorized according to their target population: people with life-limiting illness (ex. facilitated social interaction, helplines and guided discussions about death and dying); carers (ex. social support mapping, psychoeducation, and community resource identification and facilitation); or dyads (ex. reminiscence activities, practical and emotional support from volunteers, online modules to bolster coping mechanisms). Public health palliative care approaches were delivered by key community stakeholders such as community health workers, volunteers, peer mentors, and pre-established support groups. Despite reported challenges in identifying appropriate tools to measure effectiveness, studies report improvement in quality of life, loneliness, social support, stress and self-efficacy. Conclusion We found that community-engaged palliative care interventions can lead to appreciable changes in various outcomes, though it was difficult to determine in which contexts this approach works best because of the dearth of contextual information reported. Based on the varied design and implementation strategies, it is clear that no one method for enhancing end of life care will benefit all communities and it is crucial to engage community members at all stages of the design and implementation process. Future research should be grounded in appropriate theory, describe contextual differences in these communities, and should specifically examine how demographics, resource availability, and social capital might impact the design, implementation, and results of public health palliative care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Peeler
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Doran
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lee Winter-Dean
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mueed Ijaz
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Molly Brittain
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine Hansford
- Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Wyatt
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Libby Sallnow
- St Christopher's Hospice, London, United Kingdom
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Harding
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eder M(M. Aligning clinical research ethics with community-engaged and participatory research in the United States. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1122479. [PMID: 37213625 PMCID: PMC10192870 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1122479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The professional role in ethical review of research in which boards review proposed research involving human beings continues to evolve. The scholarly literature on institutional review boards in academic centers of the United States, at which a majority of the community engaged and participatory research emanates and is reviewed, suggests the need to implement changes in board education, the infrastructure supporting review, and the accountability of review. The recommendations for change advanced in this perspective involve enhancing reviewer knowledge of local community contexts and developing an infrastructure that supports engagement in and dialogue among individuals involved in community-academic research to inform ethical review and the assessment of review outcomes. Additionally, recommendations regarding putting an institutional infrastructure in place are advanced in order to sustain community engaged and participatory research. The infrastructure can also support the collection and review of outcome data as the foundation of accountability. The recommendations outlined intend to improve clinical research ethics reviews of community-engaged and participatory research.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Aging well is a priority in Canada and globally, particularly for older Indigenous adults experiencing an increased risk of chronic conditions. Little is known about health promotion interventions for older Indigenous adults and most literature is framed within Eurocentric paradigms that are not always relevant to Indigenous populations. This scoping review, guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, explores the literature on Indigenous health promoting interventions across the lifespan, with specific attention to Indigenous worldview and the role of older Indigenous adults within these interventions. To ensure respectful and meaningful engagement of Indigenous peoples, articles were included in the Collaborate or Shared Leadership categories on the Continuum of Engagement. Fifteen articles used Indigenous theories and frameworks in the study design. Several articles highlighted engaging Elders as advisors in the design and/or delivery of programs however only five indicated Elders were active participants. In this scoping review, we suggest integrating a high level of community engagement and augmenting intergenerational approaches are essential to promoting health among Indigenous populations and communities. Indigenous older adults are keepers of essential knowledge and must be engaged (as advisors and participants) in intergenerational health promotion interventions to support the health of all generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Oosman
- School of Rehabilitation, College of Medicine Researcher, Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit (SPHERU), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Christine Nisbet
- School of Rehabilitation, College of Medicine Researcher, Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit (SPHERU), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Liris Smith
- School of Rehabilitation, College of Medicine Researcher, Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit (SPHERU), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Sylvia Abonyi
- School of Rehabilitation, College of Medicine Researcher, Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit (SPHERU), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Min E, Gruen D, Banerjee D, Echeverria T, Freelander L, Schmeltz M, Saganić E, Piazza M, Galaviz VE, Yost M, Seto EYW. The Washington State Environmental Health Disparities Map: Development of a Community-Responsive Cumulative Impacts Assessment Tool. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16:E4470. [PMID: 31766307 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Communities across Washington State have expressed the need for neighborhood-level information on the cumulative impact of environmental hazards and social conditions to illuminate disparities and address environmental justice issues. Many existing mapping tools have not explicitly integrated community voice and lived experience as an integral part of their development. The goals of this project were to create a new community–academic–government partnership to collect and summarize community concerns and to develop a publicly available mapping tool that ranks relative environmental health disparities for populations across Washington State. Using a community-driven framework, we developed the Washington Environmental Health Disparities Map, a cumulative environmental health impacts assessment tool. Nineteen regularly updated environmental and population indicators were integrated into the geospatial tool that allows for comparisons of the cumulative impacts between census tracts. This interactive map provides critical information for the public, agencies, policymakers, and community-based organizations to make informed decisions. The unique community–academic–government partnership and the community-driven framework can be used as a template for other environmental and social justice mapping endeavors.
Collapse
|
6
|
Krishnaswami J, Sardana J, Daxini A. Community-Engaged Lifestyle Medicine as a Framework for Health Equity: Principles for Lifestyle Medicine in Low-Resource Settings. Am J Lifestyle Med 2019; 13:443-450. [PMID: 31523209 DOI: 10.1177/1559827619838469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Lifestyle risk factors, including tobacco and alcohol use, poor nutrition, and inactivity, comprise the leading actual causes of death and disproportionately affect diverse, lower-income and vulnerable populations. Fundamentally influenced by social determinants of health (including poverty, social linkages, food access, and built environment), these "unhealthy lifestyle" exposures perpetuate and sustain disparities in health outcomes, stealing years of healthy and productive life for minority, vulnerable groups. The authors call for implementation of a health equity framework within lifestyle medicine (LM). Community-engaged lifestyle medicine (CELM) is an evidence-based, participatory framework capable of addressing health disparities through LM, targeting health equity in addition to better health. CELM was developed in 2015 by the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV) Preventive Medicine Residency program to address lifestyle-related health disparities within marginalized border communities. The framework includes the following evidence-based principles: community engagement, cultural competency, and application of multilevel and intersectoral approaches. The rationale for each of these components and the growth of CELM within the American College of Lifestyle Medicine is described. Finally, illustrative examples are provided for how CELM can be instituted at micro and macro levels by LM practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janani Krishnaswami
- Internal Medicine / Preventive Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (JK).,Internal Medicine / Preventive Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Fulton, MD (JS).,Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (AD)
| | - Jasmol Sardana
- Internal Medicine / Preventive Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (JK).,Internal Medicine / Preventive Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Fulton, MD (JS).,Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (AD)
| | - Anisha Daxini
- Internal Medicine / Preventive Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (JK).,Internal Medicine / Preventive Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Fulton, MD (JS).,Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (AD)
| |
Collapse
|