Cyclic loading failed to promote growth in a pig model of midfacial hypoplasia

Yucatan miniature pigs, often used as large animal models in clinical research, are distinguished by a breed-specific midfacial hypoplasia with anterior crossbite. Although this deformity can be corrected by distraction osteogenesis, a less invasive method is desirable. We chose a mechanical cyclic stimulation protocol that has been successful in enhancing sutural growth in small animals and in a pilot study on standard pigs. Yucatan minipigs (n = 14) were obtained in pairs, with one of each pair randomly assigned to sham or loaded groups. All animals had loading implants installed on the right nasal and frontal bones and received labels for cell proliferation and mineral apposition. After a week of healing and under anesthesia, experimental animals received cyclic tensile loads (2.5 Hz, 30 min) delivered to the right nasofrontal suture daily for 5 days. Sutural strains were recorded at the final session for experimental animals. Sham animals received the same treatment except without loading or strain gauge placement. In contrast to pilot results on standard pigs, the treatment did not produce the expected sutural widening and increased growth. Although sutures were not fused and strains were in the normal range, the targeted right nasofrontal suture was narrowed rather than widened, with no statistically significant changes in sutural cell proliferation, mineral apposition, or vascularity. In general, Yucatan minipig sutures were more vascular than those of standard pigs and also tended to have more proliferating cells. In conclusion, either because the sutures themselves are abnormal or because of growth restrictions elsewhere in the skull, this cyclic loading protocol was unable to produce the desired response of sutural widening and growth. This treatment, effective in normal animals, did not improve naturally occurring midfacial hypoplasia in Yucatan minipigs.

New insights on the reparative cells in bone regeneration and repair

Bone possesses a remarkable repair capacity to regenerate completely without scar tissue formation. This unique characteristic, expressed during bone development, maintenance and injury (fracture) healing, is performed by the reparative cells including skeletal stem cells (SSCs) and their descendants. However, the identity and functional roles of SSCs remain controversial due to technological difficulties and the heterogeneity and plasticity of SSCs. Moreover, for many years, there has been a biased view that bone marrow is the main cell source for bone repair. Together, these limitations have greatly hampered our understanding of these important cell populations and their potential applications in the treatment of fractures and skeletal diseases. Here, we reanalyse and summarize current understanding of the reparative cells in bone regeneration and repair and outline recent progress in this area, with a particular emphasis on the temporal and spatial process of fracture healing, the sources of reparative cells, an updated definition of SSCs, and markers of skeletal stem/progenitor cells contributing to the repair of craniofacial and long bones, as well as the debate between SSCs and pericytes. Finally, we also discuss the existing problems, emerging novel technologies and future research directions in this field.

Biomechanics of the rostrum and the role of facial sutures

The rostrum is a large diameter, thin-walled tubular structure that receives loads from the teeth. The rostrum can be conceptualized both as a rigid structure and as an assemblage of several bones that interface at sutures. Using miniature pigs, we measured in vivo strains in rostral bones and sutures to gain a better understanding of how the rostrum behaves biomechanically. Strains in the premaxillary and nasal bones were low but the adjacent maxillary-premaxillary, internasal, and intermaxillary suture strains were larger by an order of magnitude. While this finding emphasizes the composite nature of the rostrum, we also found evidence in the maxillary and nasal bones for rigid structural behavior. Namely, maxillary strain is consistent with a short beam model under shear deformation from molar loading. Strain in the nasal bones is only partially supported by a long beam model; rather, a complex pattern of dorsal bending of the rostrum from incisor contact and lateral compression is suggested. Torsion of the maxilla is ruled out due to the bilateral occlusion of pigs and the similar working and balancing side strains, although it may be important in mammals with a unilateral bite. Torsional loading does appear important in the premaxillae, which demonstrate working and balancing side changes in strain orientation. These differences are attributed to asymmetrical incisor contact occurring at the end of the power stroke.