An Algorithm for Treatment of Symptomatic Chronic Subdural Hematomas

INTRODUCTION

Although chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical disease, there is a lack of algorithms for the treatment of asymptomatic and symptomatic CSDH. The purpose of this article is to describe an algorithm developed using our institutional experience for the treatment of symptomatic CSDH that aims to decrease symptoms and/or hematoma size or to completely resolve both. Our algorithm for treatment of symptomatic CSDH includes subdural drain (SDD) placement via twist-drill craniostomy (TDC) as the first-line treatment, followed by supplemental tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) as second-line treatment, with possible middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE), followed by craniotomy as the last therapeutic option. This study investigated the efficacy of our institution's algorithm in treating symptomatic CSDH.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from 2019 to 2023 identifying patients with CSDH treated with TDC. Electronic medical records were used to gather patient demographics, clinical presentation, radiographic findings, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

There were a total of 109 patients with 128 SDD placements. All 109 patients underwent TDC; among them, 37 patients received tPA instillation with three patients requiring craniotomy. Factors including age, gender, race, mechanism of injury, blood thinner usage, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), neurologic exam, thickness of CSDH, and midline shift were comparable for all patients regardless of treatment received. The mean number of neomembranes was higher in patients who eventually required craniotomy (4.5) compared to those treated with TDC only (1.8) and TDC+tPA (2.1) (p=0.0035). There was a greater mean hematoma drainage in patients who received tPA instillation without craniotomy (586.7 mL) than those treated with TDC only (293.0 mL) (p<0.0001). Clinical improvement was found in 52/72 patients (72.2%) treated with TDC only, 23/34 patients (67.6%) treated with TDC+tPA only, and 0/3 patients (0.0%) treated with TDC+tPA+craniotomy. Radiographic improvement in mean thickness of CSDH and midline shift, respectively, was found in patients treated with TDC only (p<0.0001; p<0.0001) and TDC+tPA (p<0.0001; p<0.0001) but not in TDC+tPA+craniotomy (p=0.1494; p=0.0762). There were also fewer neomembranes after TDC+tPA treatment only (2.1 vs. 0.5, p<0.0001). Seven patients were readmitted that did not follow the algorithm and only patients treated following the algorithm showed clinical and radiographic improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Using our institutional algorithm, our study demonstrates successful clinical outcomes in treating symptomatic CSDH and recurrent CSDH with minimally invasive therapeutic interventions including SDD via TDC and tPA, thereby minimizing the utilization of more invasive interventions including craniotomy.

Accuracy of routine external ventricular drain placement following a mixed reality-guided twist-drill craniostomy

OBJECTIVE

The traditional freehand placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) relies on empirical craniometric landmarks to guide the craniostomy and subsequent passage of the EVD catheter. The diameter and trajectory of the craniostomy physically limit the possible trajectories that can be achieved during the passage of the catheter. In this study, the authors implemented a mixed reality-guided craniostomy procedure to evaluate the benefit of an optimally drilled craniostomy to the accurate placement of the catheter.

METHODS

Optical marker-based tracking using an OptiTrack system was used to register the brain ventricular hologram and drilling guidance for craniostomy using a HoloLens 2 mixed reality headset. A patient-specific 3D-printed skull phantom embedded with intracranial camera sensors was developed to automatically calculate the EVD accuracy for evaluation. User trials consisted of one blind and one mixed reality-assisted craniostomy followed by a routine, unguided EVD catheter placement for each of two different drill bit sizes.

RESULTS

A total of 49 participants were included in the study (mean age 23.4 years, 59.2% female). The mean distance from the catheter target improved from 18.6 ± 12.5 mm to 12.7 ± 11.3 mm (p = 0.0008) using mixed reality guidance for trials with a large drill bit and from 19.3 ± 12.7 mm to 10.1 ± 8.4 mm with a small drill bit (p < 0.0001). Accuracy using mixed reality was improved using a smaller diameter drill bit compared with a larger bit (p = 0.039). Overall, the majority of the participants were positive about the helpfulness of mixed reality guidance and the overall mixed reality experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate indications and use cases for the application of mixed reality guidance to neurosurgical procedures remain an area of active inquiry. While prior studies have demonstrated the benefit of mixed reality-guided catheter placement using predrilled craniostomies, the authors demonstrate that real-time quantitative and visual feedback of a mixed reality-guided craniostomy procedure can independently improve procedural accuracy and represents an important tool for trainee education and eventual clinical implementation.

Safety Analysis of a New Portable Electrical Drill With a Smart Autostop Mechanism for Bedside Cranial Procedures

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bedside procedures are often helpful for neurosurgical patients, especially in neurocritical care. Portable drills with technological advancements may bring more safety and efficiency to the bedside. In this study, we compared the safety and efficiency of a new cordless electric drill with smart autostop ("HD"-Hubly Cranial Drill, Hubly Surgical) with those of a well-established standard traditional electrical neurosurgical perforator ("ST").

METHODS

A cadaveric study was conducted using both drills to perform several burr holes in the fronto-temporo-parietal region of the skull. An evaluation was performed on the number of dura plunges, and complete burr hole success rates were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 174 craniotomies using the HD and 36 burr holes using the ST perforator were performed. Despite significantly exceeding intended drill bit tolerance by multiple uses of a single-use disposable HD, autostop engaged in 100% of the 174 craniotomies and before violating dura in 99.4% of the 174 craniotomies, with the single dura penetration occurring on craniotomy no. 128 after the single-use drill bit had significantly dulled beyond its single-use tolerance. Autostop engaged before dura penetration for 100% of the 36 burr holes drilled with the ST perforator ( P = .610). All the perforations were complete using the HD after resuming drilling. An autostop mechanism in a cranial drill is not commonly available for portable bedside perforators. In the operating room, most use a mechanical method to stop the rotation after losing bone resistance. This new drill uses an electrical mechanism (smart autostop) to stop drilling, making it a single-use cranial drill with advanced features for safety and efficiency at the bedside.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the safety and efficacy of the new cordless electric drill with smart autostop when performing craniotomies compared with a traditional well-established electric cranial perforator with mechanical autostop on a cadaveric model.

Power Drill Craniostomy for Bedside Intracranial Access in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Invasive neuromonitoring is a bedrock procedure in neurosurgery and neurocritical care. Intracranial hypertension is a recognized emergency that can potentially lead to herniation, ischemia, and neurological decline. Over 50,000 external ventricular drains (EVDs) are performed in the United States annually for traumatic brain injuries (TBI), tumors, cerebrovascular hemorrhaging, and other causes. The technical challenge of a bedside ventriculostomy and/or parenchymal monitor placement may be increased by complex craniofacial trauma or brain swelling, which will decrease the tolerance of brain parenchyma to applied procedural force during a craniostomy. Herein, we report on the implementation and safety of a disposable power drill for bedside neurosurgical practices compared with the manual twist drill that is the current gold standard. Mechanical testing of the drill's stop extension (n = 8) was conducted through a calibrated tensile tester, simulating an axial plunging of 22.68 kilogram (kg) or 50 pounds of force (lbf) and measuring the strength-responsive displacement. The mean displacement following compression was 0.18 ± 0.11 mm (range of 0.03 mm to 0.34 mm). An overall cost analysis was calculated based on the annual institutional pricing, with an estimated $64.90 per unit increase in the cost of the disposable electric drill. Power drill craniostomies were utilized in a total of 34 adult patients, with a median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of six. Twenty-seven patients were male, with a mean age of 50.7 years old. The two most common injury mechanisms were falls and motor vehicle/motorcycle accidents. EVDs were placed in all subjects, and additional quad-lumen neuromonitoring was applied to 23 patients, with no incidents of plunging events or malfunctions. One patient developed an intracranial infection and another had intraparenchymal tract hemorrhaging. Two illustrative TBI cases with concomitant craniofacial trauma were provided. The disposable power drill was successfully implemented as an option for bedside ventriculostomies and had an acceptable safety profile.

Predictors and Outcomes of Subdural Hematomas Managed via Subdural Evacuation Port System

Background

Subacute subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common pathology most frequently affecting older patients and may be treated operatively through burr holes versus craniotomy or minimally invasively with bedside twist drill craniostomy. Less invasive intervention is favored when possible given a frequently comorbid population. The subdural evacuation port system (SEPS) is a popular treatment option that warrants investigation and reporting of its use and outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing SEPS drain placement for chronic or mixed density SDH between 2010 and 2021 was conducted. Outcomes of SDH recurrence, need for operating room procedure after SEPS placement, discharge disposition other than home, and modified Rankin Scale score <3 at discharge were modeled with logistic regression using multiple demographic, clinical, and radiographic features.

Results

Ultimately, 86 patients (mean age 68) were included in the analysis with 66 (78%) presenting with mixed-density SDHs. Radiographic factors such as hematoma thickness and midline shift were not associated with the need for an operating room procedure after SEPS placement or discharge disposition. However, the presence of septations and mixed-density SDH versus chronic SDH was significantly associated with increased odds of requiring an operative intervention after SEPS placement.

Conclusions

Subacute SDHs are a frequent neurosurgical issue in patient populations where less invasive measures are favored. SEPS drainage continues to be an effective treatment option. However, the presence of septations and mixed-density SDHs has a significantly increased odds of requiring surgical intervention that must be considered in the decision to pursue SEPS drainage.

Evaluating the optimal number of burr-holes for treating chronic subdural haematomas: good results from a single burr-hole?

INTRODUCTION

Chronic subdural haematomas (cSDH) are one of the most common types of traumatic intracranial lesion. Burr-hole craniostomy followed by closed-system drainage has become the treatment of choice. However, there is no definitive indication as to the number of burr-holes needed. Our aim was to to assess clinical and radiological outcomes taking into account the number of burr-holes made.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective single-centre-study was performed including patients treated for cSDH by performing burr-hole craniostomy from 2012 to 2018. After collecting data regarding demographics, comorbidities, and clinical and radiological records, haematomas were grouped depending on the number of burr-holes made (Group 1: single burr-hole; Group 2: double burr-holes). Clinical and radiological outcomes were statistically compared between groups, as well as the main complications.

RESULTS

After collecting 171 patients, 205 cSDHs were analysed. 173 were treated with a single burr-hole (we called these Group 1) and 32 with double burr-holes (Group 2). No differences in preoperative characteristics were found between the groups, except for diabetes mellitus and previous antiplatelet/anticoagulation treatment. No radiological differences were found regarding haematoma volume (p = 0.7) or thickness (p = 0.3). Surgical site infection (p = 0.13), recurrence (p = 0.6), acute rebleeding (p = 0.25) and mortality (p = 0.94) were assessed without evidencing statistically significant differences. At the time of hospital discharge, most patients showed a remarkable clinical improvement, regardless of the number of burr-holes made (p = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that cSDH can be efficiently evacuated by a single burr-hole craniostomy, a less invasive and shorter surgical procedure with quite good clinical outcomes and a low rate of complications.

Risk of Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematomas After Surgery: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

Background: Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is a common condition in the elderly population. Recurrence rates after surgical evacuation range from 5 to 30%. Factors predicting recurrence remain debated and unclear.

Objective: To identify factors associated with increased risk of recurrence.

Methods: Cases of CSDHs that underwent surgical treatment between 2005 and 2018 in the Neurosurgery Units of two major Italian hospitals were reviewed. Data extracted from a prospectively maintained database included demographics, laterality, antithrombotic therapy, history of trauma, corticosteroid therapy, preoperative and postoperative symptoms, type of surgical intervention, use of surgical drain, and clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 1313 patients was analyzed. The overall recurrence rate was 10.1%. The risk of recurrence was not significantly different between patients with unilateral or bilateral CSDH (10.4 vs. 8.8%, p = 0.39). The risk of recurrence was higher in patients that underwent surgical procedure without postoperative drainage (16.1 vs. 5.4%, p < 0.01). No relationship was found between recurrence rates and therapy with antithrombotic drugs (p = 0.97). The risk of recurrence was increasingly higher considering craniostomy, craniectomy, and craniotomy (9.3, 11.3, and 18.9%, respectively, p = 0.013). Lower recurrence rates following Dexamethasone therapy were recorded (p = 0.013).

Conclusion: No association was found between the risk of recurrence of CSDH after surgical evacuation and age, use of antithrombotic medication, or laterality. Burr-hole craniostomy was found to be associated with lower recurrence rates, when compared to other surgical procedures. Placement of surgical drain and Dexamethasone therapy were significantly associated with reduced risk of recurrence of CSDHs.

Outcomes of chronic subdural hematoma in patients with liver cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: Burr hole craniostomy is an effective and simple procedure for treating chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). However, the surgical outcomes and recurrence of CSDH in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) remain unknown. METHODS: A nationwide population-based cohort study was retrospectively conducted using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The study included 29,163 patients who underwent first-time craniostomy for CSDH removal between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013. In total, 1223 patients with LC and 2446 matched non-LC control patients were eligible for analysis. All-cause mortality, surgical complications, repeat craniostomy, extended craniotomy, and long-term medical costs were analyzed. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate (8.7% vs 3.1% for patients with LC and non-LC patients, respectively), frequency of hospital admission, length of ICU stay, number of blood transfusions, and medical expenditures of patients with LC who underwent craniostomy for CSDH were considerably higher than those of non-LC control patients. Patients with LC tended to require an extended craniotomy to remove subdural hematomas in the hospital or during long-term follow-up. The surgical outcome worsened with an increase in the severity of LC. CONCLUSIONS: Even for simple procedures following minor head trauma, LC remains a serious comorbidity with a poor prognosis.