How dignity-related distress interact with quality of life in young adult patients with cancer during the active treatment stage: A network analysis

OBJECTIVE

Young adult patients with cancer are a growing concern. By means of network analysis, this study aimed to explore the interplay between dignity-related distress and quality of life (QoL) in young adult patients with cancer when they undergo active treatments.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 309 young adults aged 18-39 and diagnosed with malignant tumors were recruited from an oncology center in China between September 2020 and August 2021. Participants completed the Patient Dignity Inventory and SF-36 questionnaires. Network analysis was applied to examine the network structure.

RESULTS

Overall, the core facets of dignity-related distress were negatively related to QoL and its corresponding domains, either directly or indirectly. Developmental distress played a central role among estimated networks and strongly interplayed with most QoL domains, especially the mental domains. Symptom distress was the only facet consistently interplayed with the physical domains of QoL (i.e., physical function and bodily pain). The social aspects were also revealed in the association between limited social support and vitality.

CONCLUSIONS

Early attention must be paid to guarantee the need of preserving dignity and enhancing QoL for young adult patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Dignity Therapy Helps Terminally Ill Patients Maintain a Sense of Peace: Early Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Dignity Therapy (DT) is a brief, individualized, narrative psychotherapy developed to reduce psychosocial and existential distress, and promote dignity, meaning, and hope in end of life patients. Previous studies have shown that DT was effective in reducing anxiety and depression, and improving dignity-related distress. However, less is known about its efficacy on spiritual well-being. The aim of this study is to contribute to the existing literature by investigating the effects of DT on specific dimensions of spiritual well-being, demoralization and dignity-related distress in a sample of terminally ill patients. Methods: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted with 64 terminally ill patients who were randomly assigned to the intervention group (DT + standard palliative care) or the control group (standard palliative care alone). The primary outcome measures were Meaning, Peace, and Faith whereas the secondary outcome measures were (loss of) Meaning and purpose, Distress and coping ability, Existential distress, Psychological distress, and Physical distress. All measures were assessed at baseline (before the intervention), 7-10 and 15-20 days after the baseline assessment. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Protocol Record NCT04256239). Results: The MANOVA yielded a significant effect for the Group X Time interaction. ANOVA with repeated measures showed a significant effect of time on peace and a significant Group X Time interaction effect on peace. Post hoc comparisons revealed that, while there was a decrease in peace from pre-treatment to follow-up and from post-treatment to follow-up in the control group, there was no such trend in the intervention group. Discussion: This study provides initial evidence that patients in the DT intervention maintained similar levels of peace from pre-test to follow-up, whereas patients in the control group showed a decrease in peace during the same time period. We did not find significant longitudinal changes in measures of meaning, faith, loss of meaning and purpose, distress and coping ability, existential, psychological and physical distress. The findings of our study are of relevance in palliative care and suggest the potential clinical utility of DT, since they offer evidence for the importance of this intervention in maintaining peace of mind for terminally ill patients.

Different Sources of Dignity-Related Distress in Women Receiving Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Background: Identification of different sources of dignity-related distress experienced by people nearing the end of life may help nurses to provide better care services. This study was conducted to determine sources of dignity-related distress from the perspective of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional study, the participants comprised 207 women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy in chemotherapy clinics in hospitals of Tehran, Iran. The Cronbach’s coefficient alpha for the PDI was 0.76. Validity of PDI by confirmatory factor analysis shows that the comparative Fit Index of this instrument is 0.96 and so it is appropriate for application in different setting. Data were analyzed by Stata version 13. Results: Patients were mostly concerned about the distress caused by disease symptoms (mean; 2.4061, S.D.; 0.96), followed by existential distress (mean; 1.8784, S.D.; 0.75), peace of mind (mean; 1.871, S.D.; 0.77), dependence (mean; 1.8647, S.D.; 0.98), and social support (mean; 1.4097, S.D.; 0.99), respectively, in order of highest scores. Conclusion: Considering that the patients were mostly concerned about the distress caused by disease symptoms, followed by existential distress, peace of mind, dependency, and social support, it seems necessary to take further measures toward addressing these issues.

Relationship between symptom burden, distress, and sense of dignity in terminally ill cancer patients

CONTEXT

Maintaining a sense of dignity in terminally ill patients and enabling a dignified dying are important aims of palliative care.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of symptom burden, distress, overall condition, and individual patient characteristics on self-perceived dignity in terminally ill cancer patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 61 patients were recruited through a palliative care inpatient ward within 48 hours after admission. Patients completed the Patient Dignity Inventory, a modified version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer, and a single-item scale rating subjective of overall condition. Sociodemographic parameters and performance status were taken from the patients' records.

RESULTS

Dignity total score correlated highest with lack of energy (P<0.001), anxiety (P<0.001), sadness (P=0.002), pain (P=0.009), shortness of breath (P=0.019), irritability (P=0.023), thirst (P=0.029), and tiredness (P=0.041). Psychological symptoms showed more consistent associations with the different dignity dimensions than physical symptoms except for the dependency dimension. Psychological distress correlated with all dignity dimensions: symptom distress (P<0.001), existential distress (P<0.001), dependency (P=0.020), peace of mind (P<0.001), and social support (P=0.024). Overall condition was significantly associated with existential distress (P=0.013), but not with symptom distress, dependency, peace of mind, or social support. Performance status showed significant association with dependency (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Self-perceived dignity in terminally ill cancer patients is significantly associated with physical as well as psychological symptoms, distress, overall condition, performance status, and comorbidities. Knowledge of these specific interactions is essential for adequate, comprehensive palliative care.