The α5 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subunit Differentially Modulates α4β2* and α3β4* Receptors

Nicotine, the principal reinforcing compound in tobacco, acts in the brain by activating neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). This review summarizes our current knowledge regarding how the α5 accessory nAChR subunit, encoded by the CHRNA5 gene, differentially modulates α4β2^* and α3β4^* receptors at the cellular level. Genome-wide association studies have linked a gene cluster in chromosomal region 15q25 to increased susceptibility to nicotine addiction, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Interestingly, this gene cluster contains a non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the human CHRNA5 gene, causing an aspartic acid (D) to asparagine (N) substitution at amino acid position 398 in the α5 nAChR subunit. Although other SNPs have been associated with tobacco smoking behavior, efforts have focused predominantly on the D398 and N398 variants in the α5 subunit. In recent years, significant progress has been made toward understanding the role that the α5 nAChR subunit—and the role of the D398 and N398 variants—plays on nAChR function at the cellular level. These insights stem primarily from a wide range of experimental models, including receptors expressed heterologously in Xenopus oocytes, various cell lines, and neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), as well as endogenous receptors in genetically engineered mice and—more recently—rats. Despite providing a wealth of available data, however, these studies have yielded conflicting results, and our understanding of the modulatory role that the α5 subunit plays remains incomplete. Here, we review these reports and the various techniques used for expression and analysis in order to examine how the α5 subunit modulates key functions in α4β2^* and α3β4^* receptors, including receptor trafficking, sensitivity, efficacy, and desensitization. In addition, we highlight the strikingly different role that the α5 subunit plays in Ca²⁺ signaling between α4β2^* and α3β4^* receptors, and we discuss whether the N398 α5 subunit variant can partially replace the D398 variant.

Approaches to Assess Functional Selectivity in GPCRs: Evaluating G Protein Signaling in an Endogenous Environment

Ligand-directed signaling, biased agonism, and functional selectivity are terms that describe the propensity of a ligand to drive signaling toward one GPCR pathway over another. Most of the early examples demonstrated to date examine the divergence between GPCR signaling to G protein coupling and βarrestin2 recruitment. As biased agonists begin to become available based on cell-based screening criteria, a need arises to determine if G protein signaling biases will be maintained in the endogenous setting, wherein receptors are functioning to control relevant biological responses. This report presents our method and offers tips for evaluating G protein signaling in endogenous tissues. Predominately, brain tissues are discussed here; optimization points that can be applied to any tissues are highlighted.

Characterization of human recombinant alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors expressed in Chinese hamster lung cells using intracellular Ca(2+) changes: evidence for cross-talk between recombinant alpha(2A)- and native alpha(1)-adrenoceptors

1. Human alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors expressed in Chinese hamster lung (CHL) fibroblasts have been pharmacologically characterized by measuring intracellular calcium (Ca(2+)(i)) changes using the Ca(2+)-sensitive dye Fluo3-AM, in conjunction with a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR). 2. Several alpha-adrenoceptor agonists were examined including the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists UK-14304, B-HT 920, dexmedetomidine and A-54741, the selective alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine and the non-selective adrenergic agonist noradrenaline. Of these only noradrenaline (mean pEC(50)=6.49) and A-54741 (6.90) evoked changes in Ca(2+)(i); A-54741 was a partial agonist relative to noradrenaline, achieving only 33% of the noradrenaline maximum. 3. Ca(2+)(i) changes induced by noradrenaline and A-54741 were antagonized by the alpha(2)-selective antagonist rauwolscine (10 nM) and by the alpha(1)-selective antagonists prazosin (0.1 nM) and doxazosin (1.0 nM). 4. Phenylephrine (100 microM) and UK-14304 (10 microM) alone were ineffective in causing Ca(2+)(i) increase. In the presence of a fixed concentration of UK-14304 (3.0 microM), phenylephrine induced concentration-dependent increases in Ca(2+)(i) (mean pEC(50)=5.33). In the presence of phenylephrine (30.0 microM) UK-14304 induced Ca(2+)(i) release (pEC(50)=6.92). The effects of phenylephrine were abolished by prazosin (1.0 nM) or rauwolscine (100 nM). 5. In saturation radioligand binding experiments using membranes of parental (non-transfected) CHL cells there was a small, specific binding of [(3)H]-prazosin (B(max)=24 fmol mg protein(-1); pK(D)=10. 24). 6. Collectively, these data suggest that alpha-adrenoceptor agonist-induced Ca(2+)(i) release in CHL fibroblasts transfected with the human alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor is dependent upon co-activation of the recombinant receptor and a native alpha(1)-adrenoceptor.