Proposal to decrease incidence, morbidity, and associated healthcare costs regarding difficult and traumatic urethral catheterization - a protocol for DMC hospitals: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Difficult and traumatic urethral catheterization is a common reason for urologic consult. Catheter insertion and management is common for patients who are managed in the hospital setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A four-question survey was distributed across three hospitals at a single-institution.

RESULTS

A total of 41 nursing staff responses were recorded. Forty-four percent of the nursing staff reported prior participation in a traumatic catheter insertion. Ninety percent of total responders reported a prior involvement with a difficulty catheter.

CONCLUSION

Patient morbidity and healthcare costs regarding traumatic and difficult catheterization is significant. Utility of protocols and education could potentially reduce these burdens and enhance patient care.

Comparison of Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary With Transcervical Balloon Catheter Plus Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Trial

Aims and Objectives To compare the safety and efficacy of dinoprostone pessary with Foley plus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening. Materials and Methods We randomized 115 women to the pessary or Foley plus misoprostol group. Pessary was inserted for 24 hours, and in the Foley plus misoprostol group, intravaginal misoprostol 25 mcg was administered along with trans-cervical Foley insertion and repeated every six hours to a maximum dose of 100 mcg. Singleton pregnancies requiring labor induction at more than 34 weeks with a Bishop score of <6 were included. Study outcomes included induction-delivery interval (IDI), mode of delivery, change in the Bishop score, need for oxytocin augmentation, and patient discomfort as assessed by visual analog score. Results The IDI was similar between the groups (pessary vs Foley plus misoprostol; 21.27 vs 21.10 hours, p = 0.9). The mean change in the Bishop score and need for augmentation with oxytocin was significantly more in the Foley plus misoprostol group compared to pessary (2.72 vs 1.94, p = 0.001; 89.7% vs 57.9%, p = 0.0001). Pessary was better tolerated compared to Foley plus misoprostol (VAS 7.8 vs 6.68, p = 0.0001). Mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes showed no difference. Conclusion There was no significant difference between pessary and Foley plus misoprostol in the IDI and mode of delivery. Pessary was better tolerated, and augmentation with oxytocin was required less often. Foley plus misoprostol caused a faster change in the Bishop score, but oxytocin augmentation was used more often. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar.

Enhanced fluid drainage using a novel multi-pod drainage catheter: An in vitro evaluation

BACKGROUND

A multi-pod catheter (MPC) is a large drainage catheter that can house multiple smaller retractable (MPC-R) and deployable catheters (MPC-D) within the body.

OBJECTIVE

The drainage capabilities and resistance to clogging of a novel MPC have been assessed.

METHODS

The drainage capabilities are evaluated by placing the MPC in a bag of either a non-clogging (H2O) or clogging medium. The results are then compared to matched-size single-lumen catheters with either a close (CTC) or open tip (OTC). The means of five test runs were used to measure drainage rate, maximum drained volume (MaxDV), and time to drain the first 200 mL (TTD200).

RESULTS

In the non-clogging medium, MPC-D had a slightly higher MaxDV than MPC-R, and higher flow rate than CTC and MPC-R. Moreover, MPC-D needed less TTD200 than MPC-R. In the clogging medium, MPC-D had a higher MaxDV than CTC and OTC, higher flow rate, and faster TTD200 than CTC. However, comparison with MPC-R showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

The novel catheter may offer superior drainage compared to the single-lumen catheter in a clogging medium, implying various clinical applications, particularly when clogging is a potential risk. Further testing may be required to simulate various clinical scenarios.

Labor and Delivery Outcomes with the Sequential Use of Misoprostol Followed by Cervical Foley Catheter

OBJECTIVE

Studies demonstrate shorter time to delivery with concurrent use of misoprostol and cervical Foley catheter. However, concurrent placement may not be feasible. If misoprostol is used to start an induction, little is known regarding the benefit of sequentially using Foley catheter. We examine obstetrical outcomes in women with Foley catheter placed after misoprostol compared with those only requiring misoprostol.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies, intact membranes, and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) undergoing term induction May 2013 to June 2015. We compared obstetrical outcomes between women receiving misoprostol alone versus those that had a Foley catheter placed after misoprostol. Outcomes are mode of delivery, time to delivery, chorioamnionitis, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and maternal morbidity. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables, Mann-Whitney U-tests compared continuous variables.

RESULTS

Among 364 women, 281 began induction with misoprostol alone. A total of 135 (48%) subsequently had a Foley catheter placed. Characteristics were similar between the groups, although nulliparity and cervical dilation <1 cm at start of induction were more likely to have subsequent Foley catheter. Women with Foley catheter placement after misoprostol had a longer median time to delivery (15 vs. 11 hours, p < 0.001), twofold higher rate of cesarean (42 vs. 26%, odds ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-3.44, p = 0.004), and increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (21 vs. 11%, p = 0.024). There was a nonsignificant increased risk of chorioamnionitis (12 vs. 7%, p = 0.1) and maternal morbidity (15 vs. 8%, p = 0.08) in the misoprostol followed by Foley catheter group.

CONCLUSION

In women receiving misoprostol for induction, nulliparas and those with dilation <1 cm are more likely to have subsequent Foley catheter placement. Sequential use of cervical Foley catheter after misoprostol is associated with longer labor, higher cesarean rate, and increased NICU admission. Requirement of Foley catheter after misoprostol confers higher risk and may guide counseling.

KEY POINTS

· Little is known regarding efficacy of misoprostol followed by cervical Foley catheter.. · Nulliparas and dilation <1 cm increases need for Foley after misoprostol.. · Complications were more common in women requiring Foley after misoprostol..

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Participants Undergoing Labor Induction by Cervical Ripening Method

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by method of cervical ripening for labor induction among low-risk nulliparous individuals.

STUDY DESIGN

 This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of labor induction at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous participants. Participants undergoing cervical ripening for labor induction in either group were included. Participants were excluded for preripening membrane rupture, abruption, chorioamnionitis, fetal demise, or cervical dilation ≥3.5 cm. Cervical ripening was defined by the initial method used: prostaglandin only (PGE; referent), Foley with concurrent prostaglandin (Foley-PGE), Foley only (Foley), and Foley with concurrent oxytocin (Foley-oxytocin). Coprimary outcomes were adverse maternal and neonatal composites. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery and length of labor and delivery (L&D) stay. Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

 Of 6,106 participants included in the trial, 2,376 (38.9%) met criteria for this analysis. Of these, 1,247 (52.4%) had cervical ripening with PGE, 290 (12.2%) had Foley-PGE, 385 (16.2%) had Foley, and 454 (19.1%) had Foley-oxytocin. The maternal composite outcome was similar among participants who received Foley-PGE (24.1%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.52), Foley (21.3%, aRR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.92-1.45), or Foley-oxytocin (19.4%, aRR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.83-1.29), compared with PGE (19.7%). The neonatal composite outcome was less frequent in participants who received the Foley-PGE (2.4%, aRR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75) or Foley (3.6%, aRR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89) but did not reach statistical significance for participants who received Foley-oxytocin (4.6%, aRR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40-1.01) compared with PGE only (6.8%). Participants who received Foley-PGE or Foley-oxytocin had a shorter L&D stay (adjusted mean difference = -1.97 hours, 95% CI: -3.45 to -0.49 and -5.92 hours, 95% CI: -7.07 to -4.77, respectively), compared with PGE.

CONCLUSION

 In term low-risk nulliparous participants, Foley alone or concurrent with PGE is associated with a lower risk of adverse neonatal outcomes than with PGE alone. Length of L&D stay was the shortest with concurrent Foley-oxytocin.

KEY POINTS

· Adverse maternal outcomes are similar among different methods of cervical ripening in low-risk women.. · Adverse neonatal outcomes are less frequent with use of Foley alone or in combination with PGE.. · The use of Foley alone, or in combination with other agents, appears to be beneficial..