Survival rate of the Hall technique compared with resin composite restoration in multi-surface cavities in primary teeth: a 1-year randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Hall technique (HT) has been indicated for teeth with dentinal caries lesion; however, extensive cavities, with more than two surfaces still seem challenging for restorative treatment in pediatric dentistry, resulting in a higher failure rate and an increased need for retreatment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the survival rate of the Hall technique preformed metal crown (HT) with resin composite restoration (RC) for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary molars.

METHODOLOGY

In this multicenter two-arm randomized clinical trial, children between 4 and 9 years of age with at least one primary molar with cavitated caries lesion involving more than two surfaces, including one buccal or palatal/lingual surface, were selected from 17 Brazilian cities. A total of 364 teeth were allocated into two groups: (1) teeth treated with selective caries removal and RC and (2) treated with the HT. The survival rate was assessed at 6 and 12 months after the interventions. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan‒Meier method. Cox regression was used to determine the influence of explanatory variables on the survival rate (α=5%).

RESULTS

After 12 months, 292 teeth were re-evaluated. A total of 358 teeth were re-evaluated at least once during the study and included in the survival analysis. The HT (87.8%) resulted in a higher survival rate than RC restoration (75.7%) (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

HT has a higher survival rate than RC as a treatment for multi-surface cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02782390.

Outcomes of preformed metal crowns placed with the conventional and Hall techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preformed metal crowns (PMCs) have been used to restore carious primary molars and have a high success and survival rate. There are two methods currently employed for PMC placement - the conventional technique (CT) and Hall technique (HT).

AIM

This systematic review aims to compare the outcomes of PMCs placed using the CT and HT.

DESIGN

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. A literature search of five databases was performed up to 23 August 2022. Clinical studies comparing carious primary molars restored with PMCs using either technique with a minimum 12-month follow-up were included. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment was performed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment tool.

RESULTS

Five articles met the inclusion criteria, and four were included for meta-analysis. The 12- and 24-month success and survival rates were above 85% for both groups, with no significant differences shown at 12 and 24 months. The HT requires a shorter treatment duration, is more cost-effective and has a high level of acceptability among parents when compared to the CT. Four articles were rated fair, and one article was rated good in the RoB assessment.

CONCLUSION

Greater consideration may be given towards using the HT as part of standard treatment procedures in managing carious primary molars. Future studies should standardise reporting of outcomes to facilitate a more homogeneous pool of data for future meta-analysis.

Confidence-level of foundation dentists in the North West of England in the placement of preformed metal crowns using the Hall technique

INTRODUCTION

The Hall technique is a biological caries management approach commonly used within the field of paediatric dentistry. The technique involves the placement of a preformed metal crown (PMC) without local anaesthetic, caries removal or tooth preparation. Despite being widely taught across dental schools in the United Kingdom, evidence from the literature suggests that PMCs are seldom used in general dental practice, even by newly qualified dentists. This study aimed to evaluate the experience and self-reported confidence of Foundation Dentists (FDs) in the North West of England in the placement of preformed metal crowns using the Hall technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to 117 Foundation Dentists in the North West of England.

RESULTS

Forty-six questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 39%. The results revealed that 80.4% of FDs felt "somewhat," "quite" or "extremely" confident with the Hall technique at the point of graduation. This increased to 85.3% upon completion of Dental Foundation Training.

CONCLUSION

Foundation Dentists' self-reported confidence in the Hall technique was reasonably high both at the point of qualification and upon completing Dental Foundation Training. Nevertheless, many of the Foundation Dentists felt that they would benefit from further postgraduate training on the technique.

Comparison of the treatment outcomes of the conventional stainless steel crown restorations and the hall technique in the treatment of carious primary molars

Background

Dental caries is a multifactorial disease that causes reversible decalcification and cavitation of susceptible teeth exposed to sugary substrates over a period of time in the oral cavity. It gives clinical and social burdens to the child patients and their parents/carers. Stainless steel crown (SSC) restoration is one of the restorative treatment options in the management of carious primary molars.

Aims

The Hall technique is a biologic method of managing primary teeth by sealing in the caries with preformed metal crowns (SSCs). The objectives of this study were to assess and compare the primary and secondary treatment outcomes of stainless steel crown restorations using the conventional method and the Hall technique in primary molars immediately after placement and over a 12-month period using both clinical and radiological parameters.

Methods

The study was a randomized control clinical trial using a split mouth approach. A total of 25 stainless steel crown restorations using the conventional method and 25 stainless steel crown restorations using the Hall technique were placed in 25 subjects aged 3-8 years with a pair or pairs of unrestored enamel or dentinal carious primary molars matched for tooth type, dental arch, and extent of caries. All subjects were monitored and reviewed every 3 months for 12 months.

Results

Twenty three subjects returned for follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference (P-value > 0.05) between the conventional SSC restoration and the Hall technique for both the primary outcomes/major failures (irreversible pulpitis, dental abscess, peri-radicular radiolucency, and crown loss with tooth unrestorable) and secondary outcomes/minor failures (crown loss and tooth restorable, crown perforation, secondary/marginal caries, and reversible pulpitis). But, there was a statistical significant difference in the average time taken for the placement of the restorations between the two groups (P-value 0.001).

Conclusion

Both the conventional SSC restorations and the Hall technique can be provided for all the subjects in this study. The Hall Technique compared favorably well with the conventional SSC restoration in clinical and radiological outcomes. The Hall Technique appears to offer an effective treatment option for managing dental caries in primary molar teeth especially in a resource challenged environment where electricity and treatment under general aaesthesia can sometimes be a problem.

Digital occlusal analysis of vertical dimension and maximum intercuspal position after placement of stainless steel crown using hall technique in children

BACKGROUND

The stainless steel crowns (SSCs) placed using the Hall technique disrupt the occlusion, but stabilization appears to occur within a short period post-placement. Negligible understanding and comprehension is presently handy about the changes in overbite and bite force after placement of stainless steel crown using the Hall technique in children.

AIM/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the digital occlusal analysis of vertical dimension and maximum intercuspal position to understand the changes in overbite and bite force after placement of stainless steel crown using the Hall technique.

DESIGN

Twenty children who needed treatment for the carious tooth with decay extending to enamel and dentin and multisurface caries were managed using the Hall technique. Following that, overbite measurement for vertical dimension was carried out clinically using digital vernier calipers. Later, the T-Scan III was used for measuring occlusal load at the maximum intercuspal position. The bite force and occlusal premature contacts were digitally analysed and recorded pre-operatively, immediately after placement of SSC and after 1 month follow-up period.

RESULTS

A significant result in the vertical dimension, bite force on crowned tooth, and significant reduction in the prematurities were seen from baseline to one-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

There was an occlusal re-equilibration attained after 1 month.