Direct Contraction Force Measurements of Engineered Cardiac Tissue Constructs With Inotropic Drug Exposure

Contractility is one of the most crucial functions of the heart because it is directly related to the maintenance of blood perfusion throughout the body. Both increase and decrease in contractility may cause fatal consequences. Therefore, drug discovery would benefit greatly from reliable testing of candidate molecule effects on contractility capacity. In this study, we further developed a dual-axis piezoelectric force sensor together with our human cell–based vascularized cardiac tissue constructs for cardiac contraction force measurements. The capability to detect drug-induced inotropic effects was tested with a set of known positive and negative inotropic compounds of isoprenaline, milrinone, omecamtiv mecarbil, propranolol, or verapamil in different concentrations. Both positive and negative inotropic effects were measurable, showing that our cardiac contraction force measurement system including a piezoelectric cantilever sensor and a human cell–based cardiac tissue constructs has the potential to be used for testing of inotropic drug effects.

Impact of subclinical hypothyroidism on outcomes of coronary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is characterized by an elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone and normal free thyroxine. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of SCH on the recovery of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2018, 548 SCH patients and 6718 euthyroid patients who underwent CABG were identified. Propensity score matching was used to create two cohorts with similar baseline characteristics (n = 545 in each group). The early postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

After CABG, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation between the two groups (20.4% in the SCH group and 20.6% in the euthyroidism group; odds ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.33; p = 0.94). Subgroup analyses did not indicate an effect in any category of patients. The proportions of the use of dopamine and noradrenaline in the SCH group were higher than those in the euthyroid patients (76.7% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.003; 56.5% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.01, respectively). The total duration of inotropic support in the SCH group was longer than that in the euthyroid patients (median duration: 4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.002). The incidence of impaired wound healing was higher in the SCH group than in the euthyroid group (3.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with euthyroidism, SCH is not associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG. It is associated with an increased risk of several minor perioperative problems, which should be anticipated and preemptively managed.

Levosimendan for Perioperative Cardioprotection: Myth or Reality?

BACKGROUND

Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer drug causing increased contractility in the myocardium and vasodilation in the vascular system. It is mainly used for the therapy of acute decompensated heart failure. Several studies on animals and humans provided evidence of the cardioprotective properties of levosimendan including preconditioning and anti-apoptotic. In view of these favorable effects, levosimendan has been tested in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for the prevention or treatment of low cardiac output syndrome. However, initial positive results from small studies have not been confirmed in three recent large trials.

AIM

To summarize levosimendan mechanisms of action and clinical use and to review available evidence on its perioperative use in a cardiac surgery setting.

METHODS

We searched two electronic medical databases for randomized controlled trials studying levosimendan in cardiac surgery patients, ranging from January 2000 to August 2017. Metaanalyses, consensus documents and retrospective studies were also reviewed.

RESULTS

In the selected interval of time, 54 studies on the use of levosimendan in heart surgery have been performed. Early small size studies and meta-analyses have suggested that perioperative levosimendan infusion could diminish mortality and other adverse outcomes (i.e. intensive care unit stay and need for inotropic support). Instead, three recent large randomized controlled trials (LEVO-CTS, CHEETAH and LICORN) showed no significant survival benefits from levosimendan. However, in LEVO-CTS trial, prophylactic levosimendan administration significantly reduced the incidence of low cardiac output syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on most recent randomized controlled trials, levosimendan, although effective for the treatment of acute heart failure, can't be recommended as standard therapy for the management of heart surgery patients. Further studies are needed to clarify whether selected subgroups of heart surgery patients may benefit from perioperative levosimendan infusion.

Levosimendan for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Levosimendan has been shown to confer direct renoprotection in renal endotoxemic and ischemia-reperfusion injury and could increase renal blood flow in patients with low-cardiac-output heart failure. Results from clinical trials of levosimendan on acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery are controversial.

STUDY DESIGN

A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted based on evidence from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.

SETTINGS & POPULATION

Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomized controlled trials comparing the renal effect of levosimendan versus placebo or other inotropic drugs during cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTION

Perioperative levosimendan continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1 to 0.2μg/kg/min following a loading dose (6-24μg/kg) for 24 hours or only 1 loading dose (24μg/kg) within 1 hour.

OUTCOMES

AKI, need for renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit stay during hospitalization, and postoperative mortality (in-hospital or within 30 days).

RESULTS

13 trials with a total of 1,345 study patients were selected. Compared with controls, levosimendan reduced the incidence of postoperative AKI (40/460 vs 78/499; OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.76; P=0.001; I(2)=0.0%), renal replacement therapy (22/492 vs 49/491; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.76; P=0.002; I(2)=0.0%), postoperative mortality (35/658 vs 94/657; OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.62; P<0.001; I(2)=0.0%), mechanical ventilation duration (in days; n=235; weighted mean difference, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.09; P=0.007], and intensive care unit stay (in days; n=500; weighted mean difference, -2.2; 95% CI, -4.21 to -0.13; P=0.04).

LIMITATIONS

Different definitions for AKI among studies. Small sample size for some trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative administration of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery may reduce complications. Future trials are needed to determine the dose effect of levosimendan in improving outcomes, especially in patients with decreased baseline kidney function.

Levosimendan improves contractility in vivo and in vitro in a rodent model of post-myocardial infarction heart failure

AIM

As few studies have presented a thorough analysis of the effect of levosimendan (LEV) on contractility, our purpose was to investigate in vivo cardiac function as well as in vitro cardiomyocyte function and calcium (Ca(2+) ) handling following LEV treatment.

METHODS

Rats with post-myocardial infarction heart failure (HF) induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery and sham-operated animals were randomized to the infusion of LEV (2.4 μg kg(-1) min(-1) ) or vehicle for 40 min. Echocardiographic examination was coupled to pressure-volume sampling in the left ventricle before (B) and after (40 min) infusion. Isolated left ventricular cardiomyocytes were studied in an epifluorescence microscope.

RESULTS

HF LEV (n = 6), HF vehicle (n = 7), sham LEV (n = 5) and sham vehicle (n = 6) animals were included. LEV infusion compared to vehicle in HF animals reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure (both P < 0.001) and improved the slope of the preload-recruitable stroke work (P < 0.05). Administrating LEV to HF cardiomyocytes in vitro improved fractional shortening and Ca(2+) sensitivity index ratio, and increased the diastolic Ca(2+) (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In HF animals, LEV improved the contractility by increasing the Ca(2+) sensitivity. Furthermore loading conditions were changed, and LEV could consequently change organ perfusion. An observed increase in diastolic Ca(2+) following LEV treatment and clinical implications of this should be further addressed.