Hypopharyngeal geometry impact on air-induced loads on the supraglottis

Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) describes paradoxical laryngeal closure during inspiration at high-intensity exercise. It is hypothesised that during intense activity, the air-induced loads on supraglottic walls overcome their internal stiffness, leading to the obstruction. Recent investigations have revealed that the air-induced loads on the supraglottic walls vary nonlinearly with increasing flow rate. It is, however, unclear whether certain geometric configurations of the hypopharynx and larynx may contribute to the predisposition to EILO. This study investigates the influence of hypopharyngeal and laryngeal geometry on upper respiratory tract airflow and air-induced forces. A computational fluid dynamics model is developed to study airflow through larynx. Four real, adult upper respiratory tracts with variable configurations are considered. Two steady, uniform inspiratory flow rates of 60 L/min and 180 L/min are considered. The analysis shows that geometries with a space lateral to the epiglottis (EpiS) and piriform fossae (PF) directs the hypopharyngeal and supraglottic pressure field to remain positive and increase with the flow rate. In geometries with EpiS and PF, pressure differential occurs around the aryepiglottic fold producing a net inward force over the region. The three-fold increase in flow rate induces near ten-fold increases in force over the region which may facilitate the closure. It is concluded that hypopharyngeal anatomy, particularly the piriform fossae, play a significant role in the obstruction of the supraglottic airway and should be considered in research and clinical assessment of EILO.

Airflow through the supraglottis during inspiration

Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction is a paradoxical laryngeal closure during inspiration at high-intensity exercise, with supraglottic closure being most common. This study develops a model based on the computational fluid dynamics to investigate airflow velocity and pressure and the air-induced loads on the supraglottis at various inspiratory flow rates. It is found that at high flow rates, positive wall pressure is formed in the hypopharynx localise towards its lower region, while posterior supraglottic wall pressures shift from positive to negative. These findings suggest that high inspiratory flow rates may increase supraglottic pressure differentials, ultimately contributing in the collapse.

The contribution of patients' lung function to the inspiratory airflow rate achievable through a DPIs' simulator reproducing different intrinsic resistance rates

Background

The performance of DPIs depends on several physiological (patient-dependent) and technological (device-dependent) factors. The inspiratory airflow rate is the only active force generated and operating in the system for inducing the required pressure drop and eliciting the resistance-induced turbulence needed to disaggregate the powder through the device. The present study aimed to investigate in the most prevalent respiratory disorders whether and at what extent the inspiratory airflow rate achievable when inhaling through a DPIs’ simulator reproducing different intrinsic resistance regimens (low, mid, and high resistance) is affected by peculiar changes in lung function and/or can be predicted by any specific lung function parameter.

Methods

The inspiratory airflow rate was assessed in randomized order by the In-Check DIAL G16 at low, mid, and high resistance regimens in a sample of consecutive subjects at recruitment. Independent predictors of the probability to achieve the expected inhalation airflow rate were investigated by means of a multivariate logistic regression model, specific to the disease.

Results

A total of 114 subjects were recruited (asthmatics n=30; COPD n=50, restrictive patients n=16, and normal subjects n=18). The mean values of the expected inspiratory airflow rate achieved proved significantly different within the groups (p<0.0001), independently of sex and age. In asthmatics and in COPD patients, the mid-resistance regimen proved highly associated with the highest mean values of airflow rates obtained. Low- and high-resistance regimens were significantly less likely to consent to achieve the expected level of inspiratory airflow rate (OR<1 in all comparisons). Restrictive patients performed the lowest airflow rates at the low-resistance regimen (p<0.01). Unlike FEV¹, RV in asthmatics (OR=1.008); RV and I_Raw in COPD (OR=0.587 and OR=0.901, respectively), and FIF and TLC in restrictive patients (OR=1.041, and OR=0.962, respectively) proved the only sensitive predictors of the inspiratory airflow rate achievable at the different resistive regimens.

Conclusions

The intrinsic resistive regimen of DPIs can play a critical role. The patients’ lung function profile also affects the extent of their inhalation airflow rate. Some specific lung function parameters (such as: FIF; RV; I_Raw; TLC, but not FEV₁) may be regarded as specific predictors in real-life. In order to optimize the DPI choice, further to the device’s technology, also the current patients’ lung function should be properly investigated and carefully assessed.