A nomogram for intraoperatively predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastases in early breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes

Background

Individualized decisions are required in early-stage breast cancer patients. We aimed to establish a novel model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases in patients with positive SLNs, using preoperative and intraoperative characteristics and inflammatory indicators.

Methods

The data of 489 patients with invasive breast cancer were retrospectively collected from Xuanwu Hospital between 2014 and 2021. Among them, 96 patients with at least one positive SLN were used to build the predictive model. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of non-SLN metastases. A nomogram was developed using these risk factors and was validated by calibration curves. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and decision curve analyses (DCA) were used to compare our novel nomogram with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram. Cross-validation was performed for further internal validation of the predictive model. External validation was conducted using another treatment group (n=46 patients) in Xuanwu Hospital.

Results

Non-SLN metastases occurred in 42 of the 83 patients with positive SLNs (50.6%). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression indicated that the risk factors were age (P=0.032), number of positive SLNs (P=0.020), number of negative SLNs (P=0.011), resected tumor size (P=0.038), and monocyte count (P=0.012). A predictive model was developed and virtualized by nomogram using these five risk factors. The AUC of our nomogram was 0.867, which was significantly higher than that of the MSKCC model. DCA also showed a superior clinical value for our novel nomogram. After 10-fold cross-validation with 400 times repetitions, the AUC of our model was still 0.830. External validation of our model showed an AUC of 0.727. The model was well-calibrated in the internal and external validation series.

Conclusions

A five-factor nomogram was developed for predicting non-SLN metastases in early-stage breast cancer patients. This novel tool exhibited good accuracy and could assist clinicians with intraoperative decisions in breast cancer patients with positive SLNs.

Assessment of Hindfoot Alignment: Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Standing Radiograph

Few intraoperative assessments are available for hindfoot alignment. In the current study, we demonstrated the feasibility of hindfoot alignment via intraoperative fluoroscopy. We retrospectively compared measurements of heel alignment obtained via intraoperative fluoroscopy with those acquired using standard radiographs. Two observers compared the heel alignment ratios and angles derived from 100 pairs of images. The effects of age, sex, laterality, and body mass index on the discrepancy between fluoroscopic images and radiographs were analyzed. The heel alignment ratio revealed a strong correlation between standing radiograph and intraoperative fluoroscopy, based on a correlation coefficient of 0.844 (p < .001). The heel alignment angle also showed significant correlation based on a correlation coefficient value of 0.667 (p < .001). None of the demographic factors showed any significant effect on the discrepancy between the 2 sets of images. Our study showed that the heel alignment determined via intraoperative fluoroscopy was comparable to that of a standard standing radiograph without any significant association with demographic factors.

Morphology of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture by Intraoperative Evaluation

The purpose of this study was to clarify the morphology of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) according to intraoperative evaluation. The morphology of 220 cases was evaluated retrospectively from intraoperative findings from June 2014 to December 2015. We noted 3 characteristics of rupture. First, we divided the ruptures into complete or partial type. Second, according to the level of rupture, we classified them into muscle-tendon junctional type, mid-substantial type, or calcaneal insertional avulsion type. Lastly, on the basis of the pattern of rupture, we divided them into transverse pattern, double-layer pattern, or Z-shaped pattern. All ruptured tendons were repaired with surgical procedures on the basis of the classification of rupture type or pattern. Of the total of 220 cases, 217 were complete ruptures (98.7%) and 3 partial ruptures (1.3%). Regarding the level of rupture, 5 cases were of the muscle-tendon junctional type (2.3%), 209 cases of the mid-substantial type (95%), and 6 cases of the calcaneal insertional avulsion type (2.7%). In terms of the pattern of rupture, there were 198 cases of the transverse pattern (90%), 10 cases of the double-layer pattern (4.5%), and 12 cases of the Z-shaped pattern (5.5%). There was significant gender difference only in the mid-substantial type. Although the morphology of a typical acute ATR was complete, of mid-substance type, and with transverse pattern, other types of ATR were recognized from the intraoperative investigation.

Role of Clinical Neuropsychologists in Awake-Craniotomy

Background

Awake craniotomy encompasses surgical resection of focal zone of neurological impairment, using intraoperative functional zone mapping. The strength of the procedure is maximum retention of functionally significant zones to ensure better function and quality of life outcomes in patients. A clinical neuropsychologist plays a vital role in profiling the patient’s cognitive and psychosocial functioning as well as increasing the efficacy of functional zone mapping procedures.

Objective

Aim of this article is to summarize the literature on the role of clinical neuropsychologists in awake craniotomy and underscoring the need for establishing standardized operating procedures for neuropsychologists in awake craniotomy highlighting experiential anecdotes from a tertiary care facility.

Materials and Methods

A review of articles that elucidate the role of clinical neuropsychologists was done and summarized to highlight the role of clinical neuropsychologists. An attempt was made to explain the implementation of this role in regular clinical practice at a tertiary care facility.

Results

The role of a clinical neuropsychologist is highly crucial at pre-/during and postawake craniotomy, and has a significant bearing on the overall psychological outcome of the individual. The need for a standardized protocol to unify practice and increase the efficacy of the awake-craniotomy procedure is put forth. Recommendations for future directions in research to increase the scope of neuropsychologists in awake craniotomy have also been made.

The Role of Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Functioning in Enhancing Resident Operative Autonomy

INTRODUCTION

Autonomy, both operative and nonoperative, is one of the most critical aspects of successful surgical training. Both surgeon and resident share the responsibility of achieving this goal. We hypothesize that operative autonomy is distinct and depends, for the most part, on the resident's manual dexterity, knowledge of, and preparation for the procedure.

METHODS

Over a period of 4 academic years, between July 2014 and June 2018, a total of 958 Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance evaluations were completed by 32 general and subspecialty faculty surgeons for 35 residents. Elective procedures were evaluated, including 165 (17.2%) by postgraduate year (PGY)1 residents, 253 (26.4%) by PGY2, 199 (20.8%) by PGY3, 147 (15.3%) by PGY4, and 194 (20.3%) by PGY5. The procedures evaluated were: 261 (27.2%) hernia repairs; 178 (18.6%) cholecystectomies; 102 (10.6%) colorectal and anal procedures; 73 (7.6%) vascular procedures; 56 (5.8%) thyroid and parathyroidectomies; 39 (4.1%) foregut (esophagus and stomach) procedures; 38 (4%) skin, soft tissue, and breast; 92 (10%) hepatopancreatic; 20 (2.1%) pediatric procedures; and 99 (10.3%) other procedures including amputations, cardiothoracic, and solid organs procedures. Each resident was scored from 1 to 5 (1 lowest, 5 highest) in each of the following categories of Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance: respect for tissue (RT), time and motion (T&M), instrument handling (IH), knowledge of the instrument (KI), flow of operation (FO) and resident's preparation for the procedure (RP). Resident operative autonomy (ROA) was assessed using the Zwisch scale, a 4-point scale describing faculty supervision behaviors associated with different degrees of resident autonomy (1: Show and Tell, 2: Active Help, 3: Passive Help, and 4: Supervision Only).

RESULTS

Correlation and ordinal regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between ROA and manual dexterity (RT, T&M, IH, and FO), and cognitive functioning (knowledge of instruments and resident preparation). Results indicated a positive correlation between ROA and RT (r = 0.528, p < 0.001), T&M (r = 0.630, p < 0.001), IH (r = 0.597, p < 0.001), KI (r = 0.490, p < 0.001), FO (r = 0.637, p < 0.001), and RP (r = 0.525, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a weak inverse correlation between ROA and the number of years the surgeon had been in practice (r = -0.127, p = 0.001). The significant predictors of resident autonomy found by the ordinal logistic regression include time and motion (p < 0.001), flow of operation (p < 0.001), and resident's preparation for the procedure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Resident operative autonomy is a product of shared responsibility between the faculty and resident. However, residents' inherent and/or acquired skills and preparation for the operative procedures play a critical role. Residents should be advised to use available resources such as simulation to augment their skills preoperatively and to enhance their autonomy in the operating room.

Case Reporting, Competence, and Confidence: A Discrepancy in the Numbers

PURPOSE

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) continues to play an integral role in accreditation of surgical programs. The institution of case logs to demonstrate competency of graduating residents is a key component of evaluation. This study compared the number of vascular cases a surgical resident has completed according to the ACGME operative log to their operative proficiency, quality of anastomosis, operative experience, and confidence in both a simulation and operative setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

General surgery residents ranging from PGY 1 to 5 participated in a simulation laboratory in which they completed an end-to-side vascular anastomosis. Each participant was given a weighted score based on technical proficiency and anastomosis quality using a previously validated Global Rating Scale (Duran et al, 2014). These scores were correlated to the General Surgery Milestones. Participants completed preoperative and postoperative surveys assessing resident operative experience using the 4-level Zwisch scale (DaRosa et al., 2013), confidence with vascular procedures and confidence performing simulated anastomoses. Confidence was assessed on a scale from 1 to 9 (not confident to extremely confident). Case logs were recorded for each participant. An IRB approved questionnaire was distributed to assess preoperative and postoperative roles of both the resident physician and faculty, with a defined goal. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one general surgery residents were evaluated in the simulation laboratory and 8 residents were assessed intraoperatively. The residents were evenly distributed throughout clinical years. Groups of residents were divided into quartiles based upon the number of vascular cases recorded in the ACGME database. No correlation was found between number of cases, Milestones score and the weighted score (p = 0.94). No statistical significance was found between confidence and quality of anastomosis (p = 0.1). Resident operative experience per the Zwisch scale was categorized most commonly as "Smart Help" by both the trainee and attending surgeon, despite mean resident confidence ratings of 6.67 (± 1.61) with vascular procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

ACGME case logs, which are utilized to assess readiness for completion of general surgery residency, may not be indicative of a resident's operative competency and technical proficiency. Confidence is not correlated with technical ability. Faculty and resident insight as to their role in a procedure differ, as faculty feel that they are providing less help than the resident perceives. Careful examination of resident operative technique is the best measure of competency.