Do some levator avulsions improve over time?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the sonographic appearance of levator avulsion after vaginal childbirth can improve significantly over the first few years postpartum.

METHODS

Retrospective study of women seen in the context of two prospective perinatal imaging studies. All subjects had undergone an interview, clinical examination and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS) on average 4.3 months and 3.1 years post-partum. Volume data sets were analysed at a later date blinded against all other data. The number of abnormal slices at both time points was compared using Mann- Whitney U Test. Patients in whom findings had changed over time were reviewed separately in parallel in order to reduce the impact of differences in slice location and imaging settings. The symmetry test was used to analyse changes between the two postnatal visits.

RESULTS

Of 1148 women originally recruited, 315 had had at least two postnatal visits. 42 were excluded, leaving 273 women for analysis. They were first seen on average 4.3 (2.6-9.8) months after childbirth and the last time 3.1 (1.4-8) years postpartum. Cohen's kappa for the two assessments was 0.89, with agreement in 97% (264/273) of cases. At the first visit, complete avulsion was diagnosed in 20, partial avulsion in 32, and no avulsion in 221. While seven partial avulsions appeared sonographically normal at the second visit, there were no statistically significant changes in avulsion category between visits (P=0.4).

CONCLUSION

Tomographic pelvic floor imaging obtained 2.5-10 months after childbirth may be used as a proxy for long- term outcomes. Findings at a mean of 3.1 years showed 97% agreement with imaging obtained at an average of 4.3 months. There was a non-significant reduction in abnormal slices affecting at most 3/12 slices. This may be explained by compensatory hypertrophy of remaining intact muscle. Sonographic normalisation of complete avulsion was not observed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Levator muscle avulsion and subsequent vaginal delivery: longitudinal 8-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the evolution of levator avulsion from 1 year to 8 years after first delivery in women with subsequent vaginal deliveries compared to women without subsequent vaginal deliveries. Further, we aim to assess whether women with full and partial avulsion 8 years after first delivery have larger levator hiatus area and more symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal levator insertion.

METHODS

In this single center longitudinal study 195 initially primiparous women were included and underwent transperineal ultrasound 1 year and 8 years after first delivery. Muscle insertion was assessed by tomographic ultrasound imaging in the axial plane. Full levator avulsion was defined as abnormal muscle insertion in all three central slices. Partial levator avulsion was defined as abnormal muscle insertion in one but less than three central slices. Eight years after first delivery levator hiatus area was assessed at rest, during maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction, and maximum Valsalva maneuver. To assess symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse the vaginal symptoms module from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire was used.

RESULTS

At 1 year follow-up, 25 women (12.8%) showed signs of avulsion, 20 women fulfilled sonographic criteria for full avulsion and 5 women fulfilled sonographic criteria for partial avulsion. Eight years after first delivery, 35 (17.9%) women were diagnosed with avulsion, of them 25 women were diagnosed with full avulsion and 10 women were diagnosed with partial avulsion. No women with partial and full avulsion at 1 year improved on their avulsion status at 8-year follow-up. In the subsequent vaginal delivery group, 21 women (14%) were diagnosed with partial and full levator avulsion 1 year after first delivery, and 31 women (20.7%) were diagnosed with partial and full avulsion 8 years after first delivery. Of the 45 women without subsequent vaginal delivery, one woman with partial avulsion 1 year after first delivery was diagnosed as full avulsion at 8-year follow-up. All women with full avulsion at 1-year follow-up were diagnosed as full avulsion at 8 years regardless of subsequent vaginal delivery. At 8-year follow-up women with full avulsion had statistically significant larger levator hiatus area compared to women with normal muscle insertion. Vaginal symptoms scores ranged between 5.5 (SD 5.7) and 6.0 (SD 4.0) and vaginal symptom quality of life scores ranged between 0.9 (SD 1.4) and 1.5 (SD 2.2) and did not differ statistically significantly between women with normal muscle insertion and women with partial and full avulsion at 8-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

More avulsions 8 years after first delivery compared to one year after first delivery were found in women with subsequent vaginal delivery. Except one primipara, none of the women without subsequent vaginal delivery changed on their levator status from 1 to 8 years after first delivery. Larger levator hiatus area was found in women with full avulsion compared to women with normal muscle insertion at 8-year follow-up. Vaginal symptoms scores were low and did not differ between women with normal muscle insertion, partial and full avulsion at 8-year follow-up. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Which factors are associated with anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury?

OBJECTIVES

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is an important factor in the etiology of anal incontinence. This study aimed to evaluate whether anal sphincter defects, levator avulsion or levator ballooning after OASI are associated with severity of anal incontinence. Furthermore, we evaluated whether factors such as constipation and altered stool consistency are associated with symptoms of incontinence after OASI.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective observational cohort study, women with OASI were invited to participate at least 3 months after primary repair. All women completed validated questionnaires, including St Mark's incontinence score, Bristol stool scale (BSS) and Cleveland clinic constipation score (CCCS), and underwent four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound for assessment of the levator ani muscle and anal sphincter.

RESULTS

In total, 220 women were included. Median follow-up was 4 months (range, 3-98 months). Univariate linear regression analysis showed an association of St Mark's incontinence score with a residual defect of the external anal sphincter (EAS) (β, 1.55 (95% CI, 0.04-3.07); P = 0.045), higher parity (β, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.02-1.67); P = 0.046), BSS (β, 1.28 (95% CI, 0.67-1.89); P < 0.001) and CCCS (β, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.18-0.54); P < 0.001). However, multivariate linear regression found an association of St Mark's incontinence score only with BSS (β, 1.50 (95% CI, 0.90-2.11); P < 0.001) and CCCS (β, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29-0.63); P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Residual defects of the EAS, detected on 4D transperineal ultrasound, are associated with severity of anal incontinence symptoms measured using St Mark's incontinence score 4 months after OASI repair. Furthermore, clinical factors such as constipation and altered stool consistency appear to influence this association and may therefore play a more important role in clinical management. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Is pelvic floor muscle contractility an important factor in anal incontinence?

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic floor muscle contractility (PFMC) may contribute to anal continence. The aim of this study was to assess the association between clinical and sonographic measures of PFMC and anal incontinence (AI) symptoms, after controlling for anal sphincter and levator ani muscle (LAM) trauma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 1383 women assessed at a tertiary center between 2013 and 2016. All patients underwent an interview, including the St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS) in those who reported AI symptoms, a clinical examination, including assessment of PFMC using the modified Oxford scale (MOS), and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (TLUS). Sonographic measures of PFMC, i.e. cranioventral shift of the bladder neck (BN) and reduction of anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the levator hiatus, were measured offline using ultrasound volumes obtained at rest and on maximum pelvic floor contraction. The reviewer was blinded to all clinical data.

RESULTS

Of the 1383 patients assessed during the study period, seven were excluded due to missing imaging data, leaving 1376 for analysis. Mean age of the participating women was 55 years and mean body mass index was 29 kg/m² . AI was reported by 221 (16.1%) women, with a mean SMIS of 11.8. Mean MOS grade was 2.3. On TLUS, mean BN cranioventral shift was 5.9 mm and mean AP diameter reduction was 8.1 mm. LAM avulsion and significant external anal sphincter (EAS) defect were diagnosed in 24.8% and 8.7% patients, respectively. On univariate analysis, sonographic measures of PFMC were not associated with AI. Lower MOS grade was associated with symptoms of AI; however, statistical significance was lost on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and sonographic measures of PFMC were not significantly associated with AI symptoms after controlling for EAS and LAM trauma. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Levator ani muscle avulsion: Digital palpation versus tomographic ultrasound imaging

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic performance of digital palpation of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion compared with translabial tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study, incorporating 195 women involved in a longitudinal cohort study. Palpation for levator integrity was performed, followed by a four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. LAM avulsion defects were diagnosed in the presence of puborectalis muscle detachment from its insertion. Post-processing analysis of ultrasound volumes for LAM integrity on TUI was performed blinded against palpation findings. Agreement between methods was assessed using Cohen's κ.

RESULTS

In all, 388 paired assessments of LAM bilaterally, were available. Sixteen (8.2%) unilateral avulsion defects were detected on palpation. Sonographically, 31 (16%) were diagnosed with avulsions: 4.6% bilateral and 11.3% unilateral. An overall agreement of 91% was observed between digital palpation and TUI, yielding a Cohen's κ of 0.32 (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.48) demonstrating "fair agreement": and implying 25% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 63% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value. Analysis of the first and last 20 palpations showed no change in performance during the 13-day study period.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of LAM avulsion defects by digital palpation is feasible but may require substantial training. Confirmation by imaging is crucial, especially if the diagnosis of avulsion may influence clinical management.

Is levator trauma an independent risk factor for anal incontinence?

AIM

To determine the role of levator ani trauma in anal incontinence (AI), whilst controlling for anal sphincter injury.

METHODS

The records of 1273 patients who had attended a tertiary urogynaecology unit between 1st of January to 31st December 2016 were reviewed. AI was assessed using St Mark's score and visual analogue scale (VAS). Levator muscle and anal sphincter trauma were examined by translabial ultrasound using tomographic imaging, with archived data sets investigated blinded against all clinical data. A complete avulsion was diagnosed if at least three central tomographic slices showed an abnormal muscle insertion, rated separately for each side. A significant anal sphincter defect was diagnosed if at least four out of six slices showed a defect of ≥ 30°.

RESULTS

Avulsion was associated with St Mark's score (P = 0.005) and VAS bother of AI (P = 0.022) both on univariate analysis and when controlling for external anal sphincter (EAS) trauma on translabial imaging, forceps, body mass index (BMI) and age (P = 0.011 and P = 0.04, respectively). AI expressed as a binary variable was significantly associated with avulsion on univariate analysis (P = 0.011), although the association became nonsignificant after controlling for anal sphincter trauma, age, BMI and forceps delivery (P = 0.084).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective observational study, we found a weak association between levator ani avulsion and measures of AI, which largely remained significant when controlling for anal sphincter trauma. However, given the large data set, any clinical effect of levator trauma on AI is likely to be minor.

Association of levator injury and urogynecological complaints in women after their first vaginal birth with and without mediolateral episiotomy

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health problem in women and has a negative influence on quality of life. A major cause of pelvic organ prolapse is levator injury.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the association of mediolateral episiotomy with levator injury (levator avulsion, ballooning, or combined) and urogynecological complaints.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational cohort study was performed in 204 primiparous women with a spontaneous vaginal delivery without anal sphincter tear in a general hospital between 2012 and 2015. One hundred three of these women had had a mediolateral episiotomy. Validated urogynecological questionnaires and transperineal 3-dimensional/4-dimensional ultrasound were completed after delivery. Outcome measures were levator avulsion, ballooning (hiatal area of more than 25 cm²), and urogynecological questionnaire scores. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median time at investigation after vaginal delivery was 13 months (range 6-33). Levator injury (avulsion, ballooning, or combined) was identified in 35 of the 103 women who had undergone mediolateral episiotomy (40.0%) and 33 of the 101 women without episiotomy (32.7%) (P = .69). No differences were found in the incidence of levator avulsion 27 (26.7%) vs 23 (22.8%) (P = .53) or in levator ballooning (20 [19.4%] vs 23 [22.8%] (P = .58) between both groups. There was an association between longer duration of the second stage of labor and the incidence of levator avulsion (odds ratio, 1.24 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.52]). Nonocciput anterior fetal position increased the risk of levator ballooning and levator injury (odds ratio, 10.19 [95% confidence interval, 1.89-54.91] and odds ratio, 12.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.41-104.38], respectively). No differences in urogynecological complaints were found.

CONCLUSION

Mediolateral episiotomy is not associated with the occurrence of levator injury or urogynecological complaints in women with a spontaneous vaginal delivery who did not obtain an anal sphincter injury. Levator injury was associated with a prolonged second stage of labor and a nonocciput anterior fetal position.

Levator Avulsion Is Associated With Pelvic Organ Prolapse 23 Years After the First Childbirth

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to ascertain the association between levator avulsion and pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving 195 women enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study and seen 20 years after an index birth. All had a standardized patient-administered questionnaire, the International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessment and 4D translabial ultrasound. Main outcome measures were objective POP clinically and on translabial ultrasound. Postimaging assessment of levator integrity and sonographically determined pelvic organ descent was done blinded against other data.

RESULTS

Of 195 women who were seen a mean of 23 (range, 19.4-46.2) years after their first birth, one declined ultrasound assessment and was excluded, leaving 194. Mean age was 50.2 (range 36.9-66.5) years with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.6 (range, 18.3-54.3) kg/m² . Median parity was 3 (range 1-14). Ninety-one percent (n = 176) had delivered vaginally. Eighteen percent (n = 34) were symptomatic of prolapse. Clinically, 36% (n = 69) had significant POP. Levator avulsion was diagnosed in 16% (n = 31). Mean levator avulsion defect score was 2.2 (range, 0-12). On univariate analysis, levator avulsion and levator avulsion defect score were associated with clinically and sonographically significant POP, that is, odds ratio 2.6 (1.2-5.7), P = .01; and odds ratio 3.3 (1.4-7.7); P = .003, respectively; Ba (P < .001); bladder (P < .001); uterine (P < .001) and rectal ampulla (P = .009) descent, but not POP symptoms, C, and Bp. Multivariate analysis controlling for potential confounders confirmed our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Levator avulsion is associated with female pelvic organ prolapse, especially of the anterior and central compartments. This association may become stronger with aging.

Prevalence of Maternal Birth Trauma in Nepali Women

OBJECTIVES

Pelvic organ prolapse is very common among women in Nepal, especially uterine prolapse. This would suggest a high rate of levator trauma, which is a strong predictor of such prolapse in the Western world. Hence, we decided to study the prevalence of maternal birth trauma in Nepali women.

METHODS

In November 2016, we offered an interview, clinical examination, and 4-dimensional translabial sonography to women attending a gynecology clinic. Of 129 women seen, 5 were excluded due to previous pelvic surgery. Translabial sonography volume data sets were obtained and analyzed by tomographic imaging for levator ani and anal sphincter trauma at a later date, blinded against all clinical data.

RESULTS

Mean age was 39 (21-74) years, median vaginal parity was 2 (0-9), mean age at first delivery 21 (14-40). Seventeen (14%) had not given birth vaginally; of these, 14 (11%) delivered by cesarean only, and 3 (2%) were nulliparous. Tomographic assessment for levator avulsion and anal sphincter trauma was possible in 124 women and performed as previously described. We found 2 (2%) unilateral avulsions and significant external anal sphincter defects in another 2 women.

CONCLUSIONS

Levator and anal sphincter trauma are significantly less prevalent in Nepali women in comparison to Western populations. This is intriguing, especially in view of the high prevalence of prolapse in Nepali women.

Atraumatic normal vaginal delivery: how many women get what they want?

BACKGROUND

Trauma to the perineum, levator ani complex, and anal sphincter is common during vaginal childbirth, but often clinically underdiagnosed, and many women are unaware of the potential for long-term damage.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we use transperineal ultrasound to identify how many women will achieve a normal vaginal delivery without substantial damage to the levator ani or anal sphincter muscles, and to create a model to predict patient characteristics associated with successful atraumatic normal vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, secondary analysis of data sets gathered in the context of an interventional perinatal imaging study. A total of 660 primiparas, carrying an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy, underwent an antepartum and postpartum interview, vaginal exam (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification), and 4-dimensional translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound data were analyzed for levator trauma and/or overdistention and residual sphincter defects. Postprocessing analysis of ultrasound volumes was performed blinded against clinical data and analyzed against obstetric data retrieved from the local maternity database. Levator avulsion was diagnosed if the muscle insertion at the inferior pubic ramus at the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions and within 5 mm above this plane on tomographic ultrasound imaging was abnormal, ie the muscle was disconnected from the inferior pubic ramus. Hiatal overdistensibility (microtrauma) was diagnosed if there was a peripartum increase in hiatal area on Valsalva by >20% with the resultant area ≥25 cm². A sphincter defect was diagnosed if a gap of >30 degrees was seen in ≥4 of 6 tomographic ultrasound imaging slices bracketing the external anal sphincter. Two models were tested: a first model that defines severe pelvic floor trauma as either obstetric anal sphincter injury or levator avulsion, and a second, more conservative model, that also included microtrauma.

RESULTS

A total of 504/660 women (76%) returned for postpartum follow-up as described previously. In all, 21 patients were excluded due to inadequate data or intercurrent pregnancy, leaving 483 women for analysis. Model 1 defined nontraumatic vaginal delivery as excluding operative delivery, obstetric anal sphincter injuries, and sonographic evidence of levator avulsion or residual sphincter defect. Model 2 also excluded microtrauma. Of 483 women, 112 (23%) had a cesarean delivery, 103 (21%) had an operative vaginal delivery, and 17 (4%) had a third-/fourth-degree tear, leaving 251 women who could be said to have had a normal vaginal delivery. On ultrasound, in model 1, 27 women (6%) had an avulsion and 31 (6%) had a residual defect, leaving 193/483 (40%) who met the criteria for atraumatic normal vaginal delivery. In model 2, an additional 33 women (7%) had microtrauma, leaving only 160/483 (33%) women who met the criteria for atraumatic normal vaginal delivery. On multivariate analysis, younger age and earlier gestation at time of delivery remained highly significant as predictors of atraumatic normal vaginal delivery in both models, with increased hiatal area on Valsalva also significant in model 2 (all P ≤ .035).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of significant pelvic floor trauma after vaginal child birth is much higher than generally assumed. Rates of obstetric anal sphincter injury are often underestimated and levator avulsion is not included as a consequence of vaginal birth in most obstetric text books. In this study less than half (33-40%) of primiparous women achieved an atraumatic normal vaginal delivery.

Forceps delivery is associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse and muscle trauma: a cross-sectional study 16-24 years after first delivery

OBJECTIVES

To study possible associations between mode of delivery and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor muscle trauma 16-24 years after first delivery and, in particular, to identify differences between forceps and vacuum delivery.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study including 608 women who delivered their first child in 1990-1997 and were examined with POP quantification (POP-Q) and pelvic floor ultrasound in 2013-2014. Outcome measures were POP ≥ Stage 2 or previous prolapse surgery, levator avulsion and levator hiatal area on Valsalva. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses and ANCOVA were applied to identify outcome variables associated with mode of delivery.

RESULTS

Comparing forceps to vacuum delivery, the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were 1.72 (95% CI, 1.06-2.79; P = 0.03) for POP ≥ Stage 2 or previous prolapse surgery and 4.16 (95% CI, 2.28-7.59; P < 0.01) for levator avulsion. Hiatal area on Valsalva was larger, with adjusted mean difference (aMD) of 4.75 cm(2) (95% CI, 2.46-7.03; P < 0.01). Comparing forceps with normal vaginal delivery, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 1.74 (95% CI, 1.12-2.68; P = 0.01) for POP ≥ Stage 2 or surgery and 4.35 (95% CI, 2.56-7.40; P < 0.01) for levator avulsion; hiatal area on Valsalva was larger, with an aMD of 3.84 cm(2) (95% CI, 1.78-5.90; P < 0.01). Comparing Cesarean delivery with normal vaginal delivery, aOR was 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.14; P < 0.01) for POP ≥ Stage 2 or surgery and crude OR was 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00-0.30; P < 0.01) for levator avulsion; hiatal area on Valsalva was smaller, with an aMD of -8.35 cm(2) (95% CI, -10.87 to -5.84; P < 0.01). No differences were found between vacuum and normal vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that mode of delivery was associated with POP and pelvic floor muscle trauma in women from a general population, 16-24 years after their first delivery. Forceps was associated with significantly more POP, levator avulsion and larger hiatal areas than were vacuum and normal vaginal deliveries. There were no statistically significant differences between vacuum and normal vaginal deliveries. Cesarean delivery was associated with significantly less POP and pelvic floor muscle trauma than were normal or operative vaginal delivery.

Residual defects of the external anal sphincter following primary repair: an observational study using transperineal ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

Obstetric anal sphincter tears are common and an important factor in the etiology of anal incontinence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of residual defects of the external anal sphincter (EAS) after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury using four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound and to correlate sonographic findings of residual defects and levator avulsion with significant symptoms of anal incontinence, defined as St Mark's fecal incontinence score (SMIS) of ≥ 5.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study. One-hundred and forty women were seen after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears in a dedicated perineal clinic at a tertiary hospital in Australia. They all underwent a standardized interview, and physical and 4D transperineal ultrasound examination.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up interval was 1.9 months after delivery. Eighty-nine (64%) women had a 3a/3b tear, 28 (20%) a 3c/4(th) degree tear and 23 (16%) an unclassified 3(rd) degree tear. Thirty-five (25%) patients reported symptoms of anal incontinence. Nine had an SMIS of ≥ 5. A residual defect was found in 56 (40%) cases and levator avulsion in 27 (19%). On multivariate logistic regression, residual defects (P = 0.03; odds ratio (OR) = 6.38; 95% CI, 1.23-33.0) and levator avulsion (P = 0.047; OR = 4.38; 95% CI, 1.02-18.77) were found to be independent risk factors for anal incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual defects of the EAS were found on transperineal ultrasound in 40% of women after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Although most were asymptomatic, residual anal sphincter defects and levator avulsion were associated with significant symptoms of anal incontinence as quantified using the SMIS.

Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of two standard surgical procedures for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse in patients with levator ani avulsion.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized interventional trial, of two standard surgical procedures for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: Prolift Total vs unilateral vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy with native tissue vaginal repair (sacrospinous fixation, SSF), during the period from 2008 to 2011. Entry criteria included at least two-compartment prolapse, as well as complete unilateral or bilateral levator ani avulsion injury. The primary outcome was anatomical failure based on clinical and ultrasound assessment. Failure was defined clinically, according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, as Ba, C or Bp at the hymen or below, and on translabial ultrasound as bladder descent to 10 mm or more below the lower margin of the symphysis pubis on maximum Valsalva maneuver. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of continence, sexual function and prolapse symptoms based on validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

During the study period, 142 patients who were post-hysterectomy underwent surgery for prolapse in our unit; 72 of these were diagnosed with an avulsion injury and were offered participation in the study. Seventy patients were randomized into two groups: 36 in the Prolift group and 34 in the SSF group. On clinical examination at 1-year follow-up, we observed one (3%) case of anatomical failure in the Prolift group and 22 (65%) in the SSF group (P < 0.001). Using ultrasound criteria, there was one (2.8%) failure in the Prolift group compared with 21 (61.8%) in the SSF group (P < 0.001). The postoperative POPDI (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory) score for subjective outcome was 15.3 in the Prolift group vs 21.7 in the SSF group (P = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

In patients with prolapse after hysterectomy and levator ani avulsion injury, SSF has a higher anatomical failure rate than does the Prolift Total procedure at 1-year follow-up.

The use of 3-dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor to predict recurrence risk after pelvic reconstructive surgery

AIMS

Female pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition. Prolapse recurrence following surgical treatment is a significant clinical issue. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for recurrence, attempting to improve clinical practice by allowing better patient selection prior to surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study utilising patient records and ultrasound volume imaging data sets obtained in four clinical audits following anterior colporrhaphy ± mesh. Prolapse recurrence was diagnosed clinically and by ultrasound; findings were analysed against potential predictors.

RESULTS

Symptomatic prolapse recurrence was demonstrated in 86 (26%), on clinical examination in 141 (42%) and on ultrasound in 113/334 women (34%). None of the tested predictors were predictive of recurrent symptoms, likely due to a lack of power. However, both levator avulsion and hiatal area on Valsalva were shown to be highly significant predictors of objective prolapse recurrence on clinical examination and ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolapse recurrence following surgery is a common complaint. The state of the patient's pelvic floor muscle seems to be the strongest determinant.

Is levator avulsion a predictor of cystocele recurrence following anterior vaginal mesh placement?

OBJECTIVE

Levator avulsion has been shown to be a predictor of cystocele recurrence following anterior colporrhaphy. The aim of this study was to determine if levator avulsion is a risk factor for prolapse recurrence following anterior colporrhaphy with mesh.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of data obtained from three surgical audits for subjective and objective outcomes following anterior colporrhaphy with mesh. Recurrence was defined as cystocele ≥ Stage 2 on the prolapse quantification system of the International Continence Society; symptoms of vaginal lump/bulge; or cystocele on ultrasound, defined as maximum bladder descent to ≥ 10 mm below the symphysis pubis. Levator avulsion was diagnosed using tomographic ultrasound imaging.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nine patients were followed up at a mean of 2.2 years (range, 3 months to 5.6 years) after anterior vaginal mesh placement. 24% (51/209) had recurrent prolapse symptoms, 33% (68/209) clinical cystocele recurrence ≥ Stage 2, and 26% (54/209) a recurrent cystocele on ultrasound. Twenty-eight out of 80 (35%) women with levator avulsion had significant sonographic cystocele recurrence (odds ratio (OR), 2.24 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13-4.43)). This finding was confirmed after adjusting for potential predictors of prolapse recurrence on multivariate logistic regression (OR, 2.13 (95% CI, 1.04-4.39); P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Levator avulsion doubles the risk of cystocele recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy with transobturator mesh.