Clinical and Economic Burden Associated with Prolonged Air Leaks Among Patients Undergoing Thoracic Resection: A Retrospective Database Analysis

Purpose

Prophylactic use of lung sealants among patients undergoing thoracic resection has been reported for the management of intraoperative air leaks and is associated with a lower incidence of prolonged air leak (PAL) and a shorter length of stay (LOS). This study estimated the incremental economic and clinical burden of PAL among patients with lung sealants used during thoracic resection in the United States.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective analysis examined hospital data (Premier Healthcare Database) for adults (age ≥18 years) with inpatient thoracic resection between October 2015 - March 2021 (first admission=index) and lung sealant used during their procedure. Follow-up extended through 90 days post-discharge. Patients were grouped by presence/absence of PAL (ie, diagnosis of post-procedural air leak or post-procedural pneumothorax with associated LOS exceeding 5 days). Outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) days, total index hospital costs, all-cause 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmission, discharge status, and in-hospital mortality. Generalized linear models quantified associations between PAL and outcomes, accounting for hospital-level clustering, and patient, procedure, and hospital/provider characteristics.

Results

Among the 9727 patients included for study (51.0% female, 83.9% white, mean age 66 years), 12.5% had PAL, which was associated with significant incremental increases in ICU days (0.93 days, p<0.001) and total hospital cost ($11,119, p<0.001). PAL also decreased the likelihood of discharge to home (from 91.3% to 88.1%, p<0.001) and increased the risk of readmission within 30, 60, and 90 days by up to 34.0% (from 9.3% to 12.6%;11.7% to 15.4%;13.6% to 17.2%, respectively), all p<0.01. Absolute risk of mortality was low, but two times higher in patients with PAL versus those without PAL (2.4% vs 1.1%, p=0.001).

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates that despite the prophylactic use of lung sealants, PAL continues to put a burden on the healthcare system, highlighting an unmet need for improved sealant technology.

History of lung volume reduction procedures

Lung volume reduction (LVR) procedures for emphysematous patients were firstly introduced in the second half of the twentieth century. Over time, from the first invasive surgical procedures, new less invasive techniques have been conceived. In regards to the surgical approach, the adoption of VATS and the execution, in selected centers, of a non-resectional approach, with folding of less functional lung tissue, reduced mortality and adverse events risks. As regards to the bronchoscopic approach, endobronchial valves (EBV) and intrabronchial valves (IBV) were initially proposed in the early 2000s to obtain segmental or lobar atelectasis of the more compromised lung parenchyma. Despite showing promising results with respect to improvement of pulmonary function tests, particularly forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV₁), and quality of life, and a good safety profile, valves showed disappointing results in presence of collateral ventilation, such as in cases of incomplete fissures. To overcome this technical issue, in the last 10 years, endobronchial coils have been designed and used. Having a compressive effect on the lung parenchyma where they are located, they are not affected by collateral ventilation. Randomized control trials (RCTs) on endobronchial coils showed a significant improvement in FEV₁ and quality of life, however this technique was not immune to side effects, particularly low respiratory tract infections and pneumothoraces. Besides bronchial valves (BV) and coils, airway by-pass stents have also been evaluated in a RCT but without reaching the desired endpoints. Other innovative procedures recently considered and delivered through bronchoscopy regards thermal energy, with vapour therapy, to achieve a scarring reaction of the emphysematous lung parenchyma, and polymeric foams used as lung sealants to achieve absorptive atelectasis. In conclusion, LVR procedures may be considered in carefully selected patients with symptomatic emphysema and severe lung hyperinflation, and might be personalized according to the anatomical characteristics of emphysematous area.