Transverse Relaxation Anisotropy of the Achilles and Patellar Tendon Studied by MR Microscopy

Background

T₂* anisotropy affects the clinical assessment of tendons (magic‐angle artifact) and may be a source of T₂*‐misinterpretation.

Purpose

To analyze T₂*‐anisotropy and T₂*‐decay of Achilles and patellar tendons in vitro at microscopic resolution using a variable‐echo‐time (vTE) sequence.

Study Type

Prospective.

Specimen

Four human Achilles and four patellar tendons.

Field Strength/Sequence

A 7 T MR‐microscopy; 3D‐vTE spoiled‐gradient‐echo‐sequence (T₂*‐mapping).

Assessment

All tendons were measured at 0° and 55° relative to B₀. Additional angles were measured for one Achilles and one patellar tendon for a total of 11 angles ranging from 0° to 90°. T₂*‐decay was analyzed with mono‐ and bi‐exponential signal fitting. Mono‐exponential T₂*‐values (T₂*_m), short and long T₂*‐components (T₂*_s, T₂*_l), and the fraction of the short component F_s of the bi‐exponential T₂*‐fit were calculated. T₂*‐decay characteristics were compared with morphological MRI and histologic findings based on a region‐of‐interest analysis.

Statistical Tests

Akaike information criterion (AIC_C), F‐test, and paired t‐test. A P value smaller than the α‐level of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

T₂*_m‐values between fiber‐to‐field angles of 0° and 55° were increased on average from T₂*_m (0°) = 1.92 msec to T₂*_m (55°) = 29.86 msec (15.5‐fold) in the Achilles and T₂*_m (0°) = 1.46 msec to T₂*_m (55°) = 23.33 msec (16.0‐fold) in the patellar tendons. The changes in T₂*_m‐values were statistically significant. For the whole tendon, according to F‐test and AIC_C, a bi‐exponential model was preferred for angles close to 0°, while the mono‐exponential model tended to be preferred at angles close to 55°.

Conclusion

MR‐microscopy provides a deeper insight into the relationship between T₂*‐decay (mono‐ vs. bi‐exponential model) and tendon heterogeneity. Changes in fiber‐to‐field angle result in significant changes in T₂*‐values. Thus, we conclude that awareness of T₂*‐anisotropy should be noted in quantitative T₂*‐mapping of tendons to avoid T₂*‐misinterpretation such as a false positive detection of degeneration due to large fiber‐to‐field angles.

Evidence Level

2

Technical Efficacy

Stage 2