Effects of hemodialysis on intraneural blood flow in end-stage kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

We quantified intraneural blood flow (INBF) in 18 patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and examined its relationship with nerve size, neuropathy severity, and nerve excitability parameters.

METHODS

Sonographic measurements of the median nerve were performed at the same site before and after hemodialysis. INBF was quantified by analyzing power Doppler sonograms to obtain the vessel score (VSc) and maximum perfusion intensity (MPI). Corresponding median motor nerve excitability studies were performed. Neuropathy severity was assessed using Total Neuropathy Score.

RESULTS

A total of 39% of ESKD patients had detectable INBF compared with none in the control group (P < 0.0001). Patients with detectable INBF had larger nerves and more severe neuropathy (P < 0.01). INBF parameters were significantly reduced after a session of dialysis (VSc: P < 0.01; MPI: P < 0.01). A significant relationship was found between interdialytic change in INBF and changes in nerve excitability.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased INBF is a potential marker for neuropathy severity in ESKD patients. Muscle Nerve 57: 287-293, 2018.

Utility of maximum perfusion intensity as an ultrasonographic marker of intraneural blood flow

We quantified intraneural blood flow (INBF) using perfusion measurement software (PixelFlux), and compared it with the qualitative method of counting blood vessels (vessel score) in a cohort of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients (67 wrists) with a clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis of CTS, and 20 healthy controls (40 wrists) were enrolled. Median nerve ultrasound (US) was performed at the carpal tunnel inlet to measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) and vessel score. Power Doppler sonograms from nerves with detectable INBF were processed with PixelFlux to obtain the maximum perfusion intensity (MPI).

RESULTS

Forty-nine percent of CTS patients had detectable INBF compared with none in the control group (P < 0.0001). MPI correlated significantly with vessel score (r = 0.945, P < 0.0001), CSA (r = 0.613, P < 0.0001), and electrophysiological severity (r = 0.440, P < 0.0001). MPI had higher intra- or interobserver reliability compared with vessel score (0.95 vs. 0.47).

CONCLUSION

MPI is a better method for quantification of INBF. Muscle Nerve, 2016 Muscle Nerve 55: 77-83, 2017.