Microbial Detection and Quantification of Low-Biomass Water Samples Using an International Space Station Smart Sample Concentrator

The pressing need to safeguard the health of astronauts aboard the International Space Station (ISS) necessitates constant and rigorous microbial monitoring. Recognizing the shortcomings of traditional culture-based methods, NASA is deliberating the incorporation of molecular-based techniques. The challenge, however, lies in developing and validating effective methods for concentrating samples to facilitate this transition. This study is dedicated to investigating the potential of an ISS Smart Sample Concentrator (iSSC) as an innovative concentration method. First, the iSSC system and its components were tested and optimized for microgravity, including various testing environments: a drop tower, parabolic flight, and the ISS itself. Upon confirming the system's compatibility with microgravity, we further evaluated its proficiency and reliability in concentrating large volumes (i.e., 1 L) of water samples inoculated with different microbes. The samples carried 102 to 105 colony-forming units (CFUs) of Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Ralstonia pickettii, or Cupriavidus basilensis per liter, aligning with NASA's acceptable limit of 5 × 104 CFU/L. The average retrieved volume post-concentration was ≈450 µL, yielding samples that were ≈2200 times more concentrated for subsequent quantitative PCR (qPCR) and CFU analysis. The average microbial percent recovery, as assessed with CFU counts, demonstrated consistency for C. basilensis and R. pickettii at around 50% and 45%, respectively. For S. paucimobilis, the efficiency oscillated between 40% and 80%. Interestingly, when we examined microbial recovery using qPCR, the results showed more variability across all tested species. The significance of these findings lies not merely in the successful validation of the iSSC but also in the system's proven consistency, as evidenced by its alignment with previous validation-phase results. In conclusion, conducted research underscored the potential of the iSSC in monitoring microbial contamination in potable water aboard the ISS, heralding a paradigm shift from culture-based to molecular-based monitoring methods.

Comparing the Efficacy of MALDI-TOF MS and Sequencing-Based Identification Techniques (Sanger and NGS) to Monitor the Microbial Community of Irrigation Water

In order to intensify and guarantee the agricultural productivity and thereby to be able to feed the world's rapidly growing population, irrigation has become very important. In parallel, the limited water resources lead to an increase in usage of poorly characterized sources of water, which is directly linked to a higher prevalence of foodborne diseases. Therefore, analyzing the microorganisms or even the complete microbiome of irrigation water used for food production can prevent the growing numbers of such cases. In this study, we compared the efficacy of MALDI-TOF Mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF MS) identification to 16S rRNA gene Sanger sequencing of waterborne microorganisms. Furthermore, we analyzed the whole microbial community of irrigation water using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The identification results of MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene Sanger sequencing were almost identical at species level (66.7%; 64.3%). Based on the applied cultivation techniques, Acinetobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Brevundimonas spp. were the most abundant cultivable genera. In addition, the uncultivable part of the microbiome was dominated by Proteobacteria followed by Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota, Patescibacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota. Our findings indicate that MALDI-TOF MS offers a fast, reliable identification method and can act as an alternative to 16S rRNA gene Sanger sequencing of isolates. Moreover, the results suggest that MALDI-TOF MS paired with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing have the potential to support the routine monitoring of the microbiological quality of irrigation water.

A Microbial Monitoring System Demonstrated on the International Space Station Provides a Successful Platform for Detection of Targeted Microorganisms

Closed environments such as the International Space Station (ISS) and spacecraft for other planned interplanetary destinations require sustainable environmental control systems for manned spaceflight and habitation. These systems require monitoring for microbial contaminants and potential pathogens that could foul equipment or affect the health of the crew. Technological advances may help to facilitate this environmental monitoring, but many of the current advances do not function as expected in reduced gravity conditions. The microbial monitoring system (RAZOR^® EX) is a compact, semi-quantitative rugged PCR instrument that was successfully tested on the ISS using station potable water. After a series of technical demonstrations between ISS and ground laboratories, it was determined that the instruments functioned comparably and provided a sample to answer flow in approximately 1 hour without enrichment or sample manipulation. Post-flight, additional advancements were accomplished at Kennedy Space Center, Merritt Island, FL, USA, to expand the instrument’s detections of targeted microorganisms of concern such as water, food-borne, and surface microbes including Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Aeromonas hydrophilia. Early detection of contaminants and bio-fouling microbes will increase crew safety and the ability to make appropriate operational decisions to minimize exposure to these contaminants.

Validating an Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Device for Omics in Space Using Whole Cell Microbial Reference Standards

NASA has made great strides in the past five years to develop a suite of instruments for the International Space Station in order to perform molecular biology in space. However, a key piece of equipment that has been lacking is an instrument that can extract nucleic acids from an array of complex human and environmental samples. The Omics in Space team has developed the μTitan (simulated micro(μ) gravity tested instrument for automated nucleic acid) system capable of automated, streamlined, nucleic acid extraction that is adapted for use under microgravity. The μTitan system was validated using a whole cell microbial reference (WCMR) standard comprised of a suspension of nine bacterial strains, titrated to concentrations that would challenge the performance of the instrument, as well as to determine the detection limits for isolating DNA. Quantitative assessment of system performance was measured by comparing instrument input challenge dose vs recovery by Qubit spectrofluorometry, qPCR, Bioanalyzer, and Next Generation Sequencing. Overall, results indicate that the μTitan system performs equal to or greater than a similar commercially available, earth-based, automated nucleic acid extraction device. The μTitan system was also tested in Yellowstone National Park (YNP) with the WCMR, to mimic a remote setting, with limited resources. The performance of the device at YNP was comparable to that in a laboratory setting. Such a portable, field-deployable, nucleic extraction system will be valuable for environmental microbiology, as well as in health care diagnostics.

Microbial monitoring and methods of sample collection: a GITMO survey (Gruppo Trapianto di Midollo Osseo)

The collection of microbiological samples represents an important aspect of care both for doctors as well as nurses. It is important to recognise and identify some key points, to avoid performing ‘unnecessary’ or ‘incorrect’ sampling, which may give useless or even misleading results, these are: the moment at which the sample is collected, the collection method and timing (if indicated). The comparison between the various nursing members of the Italian National bone marrow transplant group (GITMO), showed diversity of practice across all fields. A formal survey was therefore conducted within GITMO centres looking at the methods of microbiological sample collection. These results were compared with the literature, and in addition to the lack of homogeneity of practice within the centres, a lack of compliance with the recommendations was also observed. To evaluate the effectiveness of this survey in highlighting awareness of this issue and the presence of relevant guidelines, the questionnaire was repeated (with the same centres responding), which demonstrated no major changes in care practices.