Feedforward- and motor effort-dependent increase in prefrontal oxygenation during voluntary one-armed cranking

KEY POINTS

Some cortical areas are believed to transmit a descending signal in association with motor intention and/or effort that regulates the cardiovascular system during exercise (termed central command). However, there was no evidence for the specific cortical area responding prior to arbitrary motor execution and in proportion to the motor effort. Using a multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy system, we found that the oxygenation of the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices on the right side increases in a feedforward- and motor effort-dependent manner during voluntary one-armed cranking with the right arm. This finding may suggest a role of the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices in triggering off central command and may help us to understand impaired regulation of the cardiovascular system in association with lesion of the prefrontal cortex.

ABSTRACT

Output from higher brain centres (termed central command) regulates the cardiovascular system during exercise in a feedforward- and motor effort-dependent manner. This study aimed to determine a cortical area responding prior to arbitrarily started exercise and in proportion to the effort during exercise. The oxygenation responses in the frontal and frontoparietal areas during one-armed cranking with the right arm were measured using multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy, as indexes of regional blood flow responses, in 20 subjects. The intensity of voluntary exercise was 30% and 60% of the maximal voluntary effort (MVE). At the start period of both voluntary cranking tasks, the oxygenation increased (P < 0.05) only in the lateral and dorsal part of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and sensorimotor cortices. Then, the oxygenation increased gradually in all cortical areas during cranking at 60% MVE, while oxygenation increased only in the frontoparietal area and some of the frontal area during cranking at 30% MVE. The rating of perceived exertion to the cranking tasks correlated (P < 0.05) with the oxygenation responses on the right side of the lateral-DLPFC (r = 0.46) and VLPFC (r = 0.48) and the frontopolar areas (r = 0.47-0.49). Motor-driven passive one-armed cranking decreased the oxygenation in most cortical areas, except the contralateral frontoparietal areas. Accordingly, the lateral-DLPFC and VLPFC on the right side would respond in a feedforward- and motor effort-dependent manner during voluntary exercise with the right arm. Afferent inputs from mechanosensitive afferents may decrease the cortical oxygenation.

Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice

How do humans choose one arm or the other to reach single targets in front of the body? Current theories of reward-driven decisionmaking predict that choice results from a comparison of "action values," which are the expected rewards for possible actions in a given state. In addition, current theories of motor control predict that in planning arm movements, humans minimize an expected motor cost that balances motor effort and endpoint accuracy. Here, we test the hypotheses that arm choice is determined by comparison of action values comprising expected effort and expected task success for each arm, as well as a handedness bias. Right-handed subjects, in either a large or small target condition, were first instructed to use each hand in turn to shoot through an array of targets and then to choose either hand to shoot through the same targets. Effort was estimated via inverse kinematics and dynamics. A mixed-effects logistic-regression analysis showed that, as predicted, both expected effort and expected success predicted choice, as did arm use in the preceding trial. Finally, individual parameter estimation showed that the handedness bias correlated with mean difference between right- and left-arm success, leading to overall lower use of the left arm. We discuss our results in light of arm nonuse in individuals' poststroke.

Subthalamic nucleus local field potential activity helps encode motor effort rather than force in parkinsonism

Local field potential (LFP) recordings from patients with deep brain stimulation electrodes in the basal ganglia have suggested that frequency-specific activities correlate with force or effort, but previous studies have not been able to disambiguate the two. Here, we dissociated effort from actual force generated by contrasting the force generation of different fingers while recording LFP activity from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with Parkinson's disease who had undergone functional surgery. Patients were studied while on their normal dopaminergic medication. We investigated the relationship between frequency-specific oscillatory activity in the STN and voluntary flexion of either the index or little finger at different effort levels. At each tested effort level (10%, 25%, and 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force of each individual finger), the index finger generated larger force than the little finger. Movement-related suppression of beta-band power in the STN LFP was significantly modulated by effort, but not by which finger was used, suggesting that the beta suppression in the STN LFP during sustained contraction serves as a proxy for effort. The absolute force scaled with beta power suppression, but with the scaling determined by the maximal voluntary contraction force of the motor effector. Our results argue against the hypothesis that the basal ganglia are directly involved in the parameterization of force during movement and support a role of the STN in the control of motor effort to be attributed to a response.

Sensory motor mechanisms unify psychology: the embodiment of culture

Sensorimotor mechanisms can unify explanations at cognitive, social, and cultural levels. As an example, we review how anticipated motor effort is used by individuals and groups to judge distance: the greater the anticipated effort the greater the perceived distance. Anticipated motor effort can also be used to understand cultural differences. People with interdependent self- construals interact almost exclusively with in-group members, and hence there is little opportunity to tune their sensorimotor systems for interaction with out-group members. The result is that interactions with out-group members are expected to be difficult and out-group members are perceived as literally more distant. In two experiments we show (a) interdependent Americans, compared to independent Americans, see American confederates (in-group) as closer; (b) interdependent Arabs, compared to independent Arabs, perceive Arab confederates (in- group) as closer, whereas interdependent Americans perceive Arab confederates (out-group) as farther. These results demonstrate how the same embodied mechanism can seamlessly contribute to explanations at the cognitive, social, and cultural levels.