Efgartigimod restores muscle function in a humanized mouse model of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy

OBJECTIVE

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNMs) are severe forms of myositis often associated with pathogenic anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) autoantibodies (aAbs). Efgartigimod is an engineered human IgG1 Fc fragment that antagonizes the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), thereby preventing recycling and promoting lysosomal degradation of IgG, including aAbs. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of IgG reduction by efgartigimod in a humanized murine model of IMNM.

METHODS

Disease was induced in C5-deficient (C5def) or Rag2-deficient (Rag2-/-) mice receiving co-injections of anti-HMGCR+ IgG from an IMNM patient and human complement. C5def mice were treated in a preventive setting with s.c. injections of efgartigimod and Rag2-/- mice in a curative setting after disease was induced by anti-HMGCR+ IgG injections. Anti-HMGCR aAbs levels were monitored in mouse serum and muscle tissue. Histological analysis was performed on muscle sections. Muscle force was assessed by grip test or measurement of gastrocnemius strength upon electrostimulation.

RESULTS

Administration of efgartigimod rapidly reduced total IgG levels, including the level of pathogenic anti-HMGCR aAbs, in both serum (P < 0.0001) and muscle (P < 0.001). In the preventive setting, efgartigimod prevented myofibre necrosis (P < 0.05), thus precluding loss of muscle strength (P < 0.05). In the therapeutic setting, efgartigimod prevented further necrosis and allowed muscle fibre regeneration (P < 0.05). Hence, muscle strength returned to normal (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Efgartigimod reduces circulating IgG levels, including pathogenic anti-HMGCR+ IgG aAbs, in a humanized mouse model of IMNM, preventing further necrosis and allowing muscle fibre regeneration. These results support investigating the therapeutic efficacy of efgartigimod through a clinical trial in IMNM patients.

Intravenous immunoglobulins as first-line treatment in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

We explored efficacy and safety of IVIg as first-line treatment in patients with an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated phase 2 open-label study, we included 20 adults with a newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, and a disease duration of less than 9 months. Patients with IBM and prior use of immunosuppressants were excluded. The standard treatment regimen consisted of IVIg (Privigen) monotherapy for 9 weeks: a loading dose (2 g/kg body weight) and two subsequent maintenance doses (1 g/kg body weight) with a 3-week interval. The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least moderate improvement on the 2016 ACR/EULAR Total Improvement Score. Secondary outcomes included time to improvement, the number of patients requiring rescue medication and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

We included patients with DM (n = 9), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (n = 6), non-specific myositis/overlap myositis (n = 4) and anti-synthetase syndrome (n = 1). One patient was excluded from analyses because of minimal weakness resulting in a ceiling effect. Eight patients (8/19 = 42.0%; Clopper-Pearson 95% CI: 19.6, 64.6) had at least moderate improvement by 9 weeks. Of these, six reached improvement by 3 weeks. Seven patients required rescue medication due to insufficient efficacy and prematurely ended the study. Three serious adverse events occurred, of which one was pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

First-line IVIg monotherapy led to at least moderate improvement in nearly half of patients with a fast clinical response in the majority of responders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register identifier, NTR6160.

The reliability of immunoassays to detect autoantibodies in patients with myositis is dependent on autoantibody specificity

Objectives

In order to address the reliability of commercial assays to identify myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies, we aimed to compare the results of two commercial immunoassays with the results obtained by protein immunoprecipitation.

Methods

Autoantibody status was determined using radio-labelled protein immunoprecipitation for patients referred to our laboratory for myositis autoantibody characterization. For each autoantibody of interest, the sera from 25 different patients were analysed by line blot (Euroline Myositis Antigen Profile 4, EuroImmun, Lübeck, Germany) and dot blot (D-Tek BlueDiver, Diagnostic Technology, Belrose, NSW, Australia). Sera from 134 adult healthy controls were analysed.

Results

Overall commercial assays performed reasonably well, with high agreement (Cohen’s κ >0.8). Notable exceptions were the detection of rarer anti-synthetases with κ < 0.2 and detection of anti-TIF1γ, where κ was 0.70 for the line blot and 0.31 for dot blot. Further analysis suggested that the proportion of patients with anti-TIF1γ may recognize a conformational epitope, limiting the ability of blotting-based assays that utilize denatured antigen to detect this clinically important autoantibody. A false-positive result occurred in 13.7% of samples analysed by line blot and 12.1% analysed by dot blot.

Conclusion

The assays analysed do not perform well for all myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies and overall false positives are relatively common. It is crucial that clinicians are aware of the limitations of the methods used by their local laboratory. Results must be interpreted within the clinical context and immunoprecipitation should still be considered in selected cases, such as apparently autoantibody-negative patients where anti-synthetase syndrome is suspected.

The myositis clinical phenotype associated with anti-Zo autoantibodies: a case series of nine UK patients

Objectives

It has been over 10 years since the first report of autoantibodies directed against phenylalanyl tRNA synthetase (anti-Zo) in a patient with features of the anti-synthetase syndrome. In that time no further cases have been published. Here we aim to characterize more fully the clinical phenotype of anti-Zo–associated myositis by describing the clinical features of nine patients.

Methods

Anti-Zo was identified by protein-immunoprecipitation in patients referred for extended spectrum myositis autoantibody testing at our laboratory. Results were confirmed by immunodepletion using a reference serum. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to provide detailed information of the associated clinical phenotype for all identified patients. Where possible, HLA genotype was imputed using Illumina protocols.

Results

Nine patients with anti-Zo were identified. The median age at disease onset was 51 years, and six patients were female. Seven patients had evidence of inflammatory muscle disease, seven of interstitial lung disease and six of arthritis. The reported pattern of interstitial lung disease varied with usual interstitial pneumonia, non-specific interstitial pneumonia and organizing pneumonia all described. Other features of the anti-synthetase syndrome such as RP and mechanics hands were common. HLA data was available for three patients, all of whom had at least one copy of the HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype.

Conclusion

Patients with anti-Zo presenting with features of the anti-synthetase syndrome and interstitial lung disease is a common finding. Like other myositis autoantibodies, there is likely to be a genetic association with the HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype.

An unusual flare of anti-synthetase syndrome during concurrent trastuzumab therapy given for recurrent breast cancer

We present the case of a patient with relapsing anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) that may have been triggered by monoclonal antibody trastuzumab therapy given for breast cancer. A 52-year-old female with a history of anti-Jo1-associated ASS went into remission with glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil. Her past history included invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast that was fully treated six years prior to the onset of ASS. She subsequently developed recurrent right-sided breast cancer that was treated with right mastectomy and six cycles of cyclophosphamide-docetaxel chemotherapy. She commenced adjuvant trastuzumab and letrozole therapy, and following the sixth injection of trastuzumab, she was admitted with clinical features consistent with a flare of ASS, which included swinging fever, interstitial lung disease, myositis, and possible subclinical myocarditis, despite recent treatment with cyclophosphamide. She responded to intravenous IV methylprednisolone followed by increased doses of oral glucocorticoids, and she remains stable on immunomodulatory treatment and letrozole monotherapy given for breast cancer. This report provides a concise overview of ASS along with other cases of cardiac and pulmonary diseases attributed to trastuzumab therapy reported in the medical literature.

Second-line agents in myositis: 1-year factorial trial of additional immunosuppression in patients who have partially responded to steroids

OBJECTIVE

Ciclosporin and MTX are used in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (DM and PM) when patients incompletely respond to glucocorticoids. Their effectiveness is unproved in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We evaluated their benefits in a placebo-controlled factorial RCT.

METHODS

A 56-week multicentre factorial-design double-blind placebo-controlled RCT compared steroids alone, MTX (15-25 mg weekly) plus steroids, ciclosporin (1-5 mg/kg/day) plus steroids and all three treatments. It enrolled adults with myositis (by Bohan and Peter criteria) with active disease receiving corticosteroids.

RESULTS

A total of 359 patients were screened and 58 randomized. Of the latter, 37 patients completed 12 months of treatment, 7 were lost to follow-up and 14 discontinued treatment. Patients completing 12 months of treatment showed significant improvement (P < 0.001 on paired t-tests) in manual muscle testing (14% change), walking time (22% change) and function (9% change). Intention to treat and completer analyses indicated that ciclosporin monotherapy, MTX monotherapy and ciclosporin/MTX combination therapy showed no significant treatment effects in comparison with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Neither MTX nor ciclosporin (by themselves or in combination) improved clinical features in myositis patients who had incompletely responded to glucocorticoids.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register; http://www.controlled-trials.com/; ISRCTN40085050.