Video Ocular Counter-Roll (vOCR): Otolith-Ocular Function and Compensatory Effect of the Neck Following Vestibular Loss

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of recovery following vestibular loss has been limited by the lack of bedside measures in clinical settings. Here, we used the video ocular counter-roll (vOCR) test to study otolith-ocular function and compensatory effect of neck proprioception in patients at different stages of vestibular loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

Fifty-six subjects were recruited including patients with acute (9 ± 2 days [mean ± standard error of mean]), subacute (61 ± 11 days), and chronic (1009 ± 266 days) unilateral loss of vestibular function, as well as a group of healthy controls. We used a video-oculography method based on tracking the iris for vOCR measurement. To examine the effect of neck inputs, vOCR was recorded during two simple tilt maneuvers in all subjects while seated: 30° head-on-body tilt and 30° head-and-body tilt.

RESULTS

The vOCR responses evolved at different stages following vestibular loss with improvement of the gains in the chronic stage. The deficit was more pronounced when the whole body was tilted (acute: 0.08 ± 0.01, subacute: 0.11 ± 0.01, chronic: 0.13 ± 0.02, healthy control: 0.18 ± 0.01), and the gain of vOCR improved when the head was tilted on the body (acute: 0.11 ± 0.01, subacute: 0.14 ± 0.01, chronic: 0.13 ± 0.02, healthy control: 0.17 ± 0.01). The time course of vOCR response was affected as well with reduced amplitude and slower response in the acute stage of vestibular loss.

CONCLUSION

The vOCR test can be valuable as a clinical marker to measure vestibular recovery and compensatory effect of neck proprioception in patients at different stages following loss of vestibular function.

No handedness effect on spatial orientation or ocular counter-roll during lateral head tilts

Although vestibular inputs are bilaterally represented within the cerebral hemispheres, the higher level vestibular functions exhibit hemispheric asymmetries. Previous studies have suggested that such asymmetries are associated with handedness. Here, we studied the impact of handedness (i.e., hemispheric lateralization) on spatial orientation using a subjective visual vertical (SVV) task. We tested 22 right‐handed and 22 left‐handed subjects in upright position, during prolonged lateral head tilts of 20° (~15 min), and after the head returned to upright position. The corresponding changes in torsional eye position were measured simultaneously using video‐oculography. During lateral head tilts, both right‐ and left‐handers had initial SVV biases in the opposite direction of the head tilt (right‐handers: left tilt 3.0 ± 1.3°, right tilt −4.7 ± 1.5°; left‐handers: left tilt 3.4 ± 1.1°, right tilt −4.1 ± 1.0°). The SVV subsequently drifted in the direction of the head tilt, and there was an aftereffect in the same direction when the head was brought back upright. The ocular torsion initially changed in the opposite direction of the head tilt (right‐handers: left tilt 3.8 ± 0.4°, right tilt −3.8 ± 0.4°; left‐handers: left tilt 4.2 ± 0.5°, right tilt −4.5 ± 0.5°), and there were also drift and aftereffect in the same direction as the head tilt. The changes in upright perception and ocular torsion did not differ between right‐ and left‐handers. These findings show no functional laterality, neither in the higher level neural mechanisms that maintain spatial orientation, nor in the lower level mechanisms that generate the ocular torsion response during lateral head tilt.

The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR): a clinical test to detect loss of otolith-ocular function

CONCLUSION

vOCR can detect loss of otolith-ocular function without specifying the side of vestibular loss. Since vOCR is measured with a simple head tilt maneuver, it can be potentially used as a bedside clinical test in combination with video head impulse test.

OBJECTIVE

Video-oculography (VOG) goggles are being integrated into the bedside assessment of patients with vestibular disorders. Lacking, however, is a method to evaluate otolith function. This study validated a VOG test for loss of otolith function.

METHODS

VOG was used to measure ocular counter-roll (vOCR) in 12 healthy controls, 14 patients with unilateral vestibular loss (UVL), and six patients with bilateral vestibular loss (BVL) with a static lateral head tilt of 30°. The results were compared with vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP), a widely-used laboratory test of otolith function.

RESULTS

The average vOCR for healthy controls (4.6°) was significantly different from UVL (2.7°) and BVL (1.6°) patients (p < 0.0001). The vOCR and VEMP measurements were correlated across subjects, especially the click and tap oVEMPs (click oVEMP R = 0.45, tap oVEMP R = 0.51; p < 0.0003). The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that vOCR and VEMPs detected loss of otolith function equally well. The best threshold for vOCR to detect vestibular loss was at 3°. The vOCR values from the side of vestibular loss and the healthy side were not different in UVL patients (2.53° vs 2.8°; p = 0.59).