Parkinson's Disease: Are PINK1 Activators Inching Closer to the Clinic?

The activation of PINK1 by small molecules has emerged as a promising strategy in treating Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent progress in this area has raised excitement around PINK1 activators as PD treatments, and herein we offer insight into these developments and their potential to deliver much needed novel PD treatments.

MFN2 retrotranslocation boosts mitophagy by uncoupling mitochondria from the ER

Mitochondrial damage triggers mitochondrial quality control pathways, which act to ensure the health of the mitochondrial network. The turnover of damaged mitochondria by mitophagy is initiated by the Parkinson disease-linked genes PRKN and PINK1, and we recently investigated the role that interorganellar contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) play in this pathway. In this punctum, we summarize our findings that show that the ER-OMM tether MFN2 acts as a suppressor of mitophagy through its ability to link the OMM to the ER, potentially limiting the accessibility of other ubiquitination substrates to PINK1 and PRKN. PINK1, PRKN and the AAA-ATPase VCP disrupt contact between mitochondria and the ER via MFN2 ubiquitination, retrotranslocation and turnover from the mitochondrial membrane. Our study provides insight into the role of OMM remodeling in mitophagy.

Genome-wide CRISPR screen for PARKIN regulators reveals transcriptional repression as a determinant of mitophagy

In mitophagy, damaged mitochondria are targeted for disposal by the autophagy machinery. PARKIN promotes signaling of mitochondrial damage to the autophagy machinery for engagement, and PARKIN mutations cause Parkinson’s disease, possibly because damaged mitochondria accumulate in neurons. Because regulation of PARKIN abundance and the impact on signaling are poorly understood, we performed a genetic screen to identify PARKIN abundance regulators. Both positive and negative regulators were identified and will help us to further understand mitophagy and Parkinson’s disease. We show that some of the identified genes negatively regulate PARKIN gene expression, which impacts signaling of mitochondrial damage in mitophagy. This link between transcriptional repression and mitophagy is also apparent in neurons in culture, bearing implications for disease.

PARKIN, an E3 ligase mutated in familial Parkinson’s disease, promotes mitophagy by ubiquitinating mitochondrial proteins for efficient engagement of the autophagy machinery. Specifically, PARKIN-synthesized ubiquitin chains represent targets for the PINK1 kinase generating phosphoS65-ubiquitin (pUb), which constitutes the mitophagy signal. Physiological regulation of PARKIN abundance, however, and the impact on pUb accumulation are poorly understood. Using cells designed to discover physiological regulators of PARKIN abundance, we performed a pooled genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen. Testing identified genes individually resulted in a list of 53 positive and negative regulators. A transcriptional repressor network including THAP11 was identified and negatively regulates endogenous PARKIN abundance. RNAseq analysis revealed the PARKIN-encoding locus as a prime THAP11 target, and THAP11 CRISPR knockout in multiple cell types enhanced pUb accumulation. Thus, our work demonstrates the critical role of PARKIN abundance, identifies regulating genes, and reveals a link between transcriptional repression and mitophagy, which is also apparent in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons, a disease-relevant cell type.

When Worlds Collide-Mechanisms at the Interface between Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination

Phosphorylation and ubiquitination are pervasive post-translational modifications that impact all processes inside eukaryotic cells. The role of each modification has been studied for decades, and functional interplay between the two has long been demonstrated and even more widely postulated. However, our understanding of the molecular features that allow phosphorylation to control protein ubiquitination and ubiquitin to control phosphorylation has only recently begun to build. Here, we review examples of regulation between ubiquitination and phosphorylation, aiming to describe mechanisms at the molecular level. In general, these examples illustrate phosphorylation as a versatile switch throughout ubiquitination pathways, and ubiquitination primarily impacting kinase signalling in a more emphatic manner through scaffolding or degradation. Examples of regulation between these two processes are likely to grow even further as advances in molecular biology, proteomics, and computation allow a system-level understanding of signalling. Many new cases could involve similar principles to those described here, but the extensive co-regulation of these two systems leaves no doubt that they still have many surprises in store.