High estrogen exposure may not be detrimental on endometrial receptivity in women with PCOS

The study aimed to assess the effect of high estrogen exposure and coasting on cycle outcome in women at risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Retrospective case-control study was conducted to figure out the outcomes of GnRH antagonist cycles in which women were at risk to develop OHSS. Women who underwent coasting (n = 100) were compared with a control group of women who did not undergo coasting (n = 287). Effect of endometrial estrogen exposure was determined by calculating area under curve of temporal estrogen measurements (AUCEM) through the cycle. Among 387 women with PCOS, 100 cases were required to undergo coasting to avoid OHSS. All participants reached to embryo transfer stage and clinical pregnancy rate was 44% in group with coasting whereas 39% in group without coasting (p > .05). AUCEM was a significant predictor for the cases who required coasting to avoid OHSS (AUC = 0.754, p < .001). Optimal cut off value was calculated to be 6762 with 71% sensitivity and 67% specificity. ROC analysis showed no predictive value of AUCEM for clinical pregnancy in subgroup of women with coasting (AUC = 0.496, p > .05). Consistently, ROC analysis showed no predictive value of AUCEM for clinical pregnancy in subgroup of women without coasting (AUC = 0.494, p > .05). In conclusion, neither coasting nor the high endometrial estrogen exposure was found to have detrimental effect on endometrial receptivity and cycle outcome in PCOS.

The Impact of Progesterone Level on Day Of hCG Injection in IVF Cycles on Clinical Pregnancy Rate

Background:

Premature progesterone rise (PPR) has long been implicated as contributing to implantation failure. Despite the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, subtle increases in serum progesterone (P₄) levels beyond a threshold progesterone concentration were observed on the day of trigger in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles.

Aims:

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence of PPR on the day of trigger in conventional IVF/ICSI cycles and its impact on clinical pregnancy rate.

Settings and Design:

A total of 235 patients undergoing conventional IVF/IVF–ICSI by fresh embryo transfer cycles from January 2016 to December 2016 at the infertility unit of a tertiary care hospital were prospectively analyzed.

Material and Methods:

Patients included in the study were subjected to GnRH agonist long/antagonist protocol. Ovulation induction was given with rFSH and/or HMG in both the protocols. The cutoff for defining PPR was P₄≥ 1.5 ng/ml, and an analysis of the role of P₄on clinical pregnancy rate was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences trial version 23.0 software for Windows and Primer software.

Results and Conclusion:

The overall clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 30.6%. The clinical pregnancy rate in the patients with P₄ <1.5 ng/ml was significantly higher than those with elevated levels, P₄≥ 1.5 ng/ml (33.3% vs. 12.9%; P = 0.037). Premature progesterone elevation in ART cycles is possibly associated with lower clinical pregnancy rates.

Effect of premature serum progesterone rise on embryo transfer outcomes and the role of blastocyst culture and transfer in assisted reproductive technology cycles with premature progesterone rise

OBJECTIVE

In 1991, researchers reported that a modest preovulatory increase in serum progesterone levels is associated with lower pregnancy rates and higher incidence of pregnancy loss in in vitro fertilization (IVF). We wonder whether embryo transfer (ET) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles in patients with premature progesterone rise (PPR) have a negative impact on the clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and/or live birth rates (LBRs) in our series. Consequently, will blastocyst transfer reverse the negative impact?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This noninterventional, retrospective, observational tertiary center study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2012. All fresh ET cycles with serum progesterone levels measured (n = 599) on the day of hCG administration were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sera lutenizing hormone (LH), E2, and progesterone (P) were measured and analyzed. The CPRs of cycles in patients with p ≤ 1.5 ng/mL (low) versus those with p > 1.5 ng/mL (high) were 37.04% versus 41.03% [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.728-1.920; p = 0.50). The LBRs of cycles in patients with low progesterone level versus those with PPR were 30.52% versus 34.62% (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.729-1.992; p = 0.47). No statistically significant association was detected. We further analyzed the outcomes according to different stages of ET and found that blastocyst (D5) ET significantly increase the LBRs as compared with cleavage stage (D2/D3) ET in the PPR group (44.44% versus 21.43%; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

PPR did not significantly compromise the clinical outcomes in this series. However, shifting to blastocyst transfer probably could increase the live birth in cycles with PPR.