Sliding limbus-conjunctival flaps for minimizing the pterygium recurrence: a prospective tertiary care institute study

Objective: To describe the surgical technique and long-term outcomes of sliding limbus-conjunctival flaps to treat primary pterygium. Methods: Our single-center, single-surgeon-based, prospective study (part of the postgraduate thesis) included primary pterygium patients. We included the larger pterygium in bilateral cases for our research. All patients underwent pterygium excision and reconstruction by sliding limbus-conjunctival flaps technique to minimize the recurrence rates. Similar surgical steps and drugs were used for all the enrolled patients. Two ophthalmologists (SS and MK) evaluated all cases for blinding purposes. A minimum follow-up of 12 months was ensured in all cases. Results: Fifty eyes of 50 patients underwent the sliding limbus-conjunctival flaps surgery at a mean age of 50.40 ± 15.05 years. There were 27 (54%) males and 23 (46%) females with nasal pterygium (100%), having an average horizontal size of 2.96 mm. A "with the rule" astigmatism was seen in 44 (88%) eyes with a horizontal keratometry value of 42.00 ± 2.83, which increased significantly to 42.23 ± 2.02 (p>0.05) after surgery. The visual acuity was improved by 1 Snellen's line in 21 cases, 2 lines in 4 cases, and by 3 lines in 1 case. No change in visual acuity was seen in 24 cases. The early minor postoperative complications were self-resolving. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, the recurrence was found in 2 patients (4%), one in the 3rd and the other in the 9th month. Conclusion: The sliding limbus-conjunctival flaps technique is a simple, safe, and efficient procedure for primary pterygium cases. Pterygium surgery positively affects the visual acuity and keratometry values in most patients, making it a cosmetic and functional ophthalmic surgical procedure.

Long-term analysis of an unconventional way of doing double-head pterygium excision

AIM:

The aim of the study is to describe an unconventional technique of vertically split conjunctival autograft (CAG) for primary double-head pterygium and its long-term outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This was a retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series of 95 eyes of 95 patients, who underwent vertical, split CAG surgery without maintaining limbus–limbus orientation for primary double-head pterygium from January 2013 to January 2017. All patients were reviewed for recurrence in their follow-up period.

RESULTS:

The mean follow-up was 14.12 ± 9.42 months. The baseline characteristics included 44 males and 51 females, with a mean age of 56.24 ± 10.03 years. The only significant complication was recurrence rate of 2.10% (2 eyes out of 95). The most common secondary outcome was graft edema (36.84%, 35 eyes out of 95), which resolved without any intervention. The other outcomes such as graft retraction (12.63%), Tenon's granuloma (1.05%), and subconjunctival hemorrhage (34.73%) were also recorded.

CONCLUSION:

Unconventional vertical split CAG without maintaining limbus–limbus orientation has convincing results in treating double-head pterygium with lower recurrence rate.

Concomitant use of conjunctival tissue graft from the pterygium itself without rotation in pterygium surgery: A full circle in conjunctival autografting

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to describe a modified technique of using conjunctival tissue from the pterygium itself without any rotation of graft for the primary pterygium in eyes with glaucoma filtering bleb, glaucoma suspects, and in primary double-head pterygium using fibrin glue.

Methods:

In this retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series, 98 eyes of 98 patients with primary pterygium operated between July 2011 to July 2016 were included. They underwent this technique from the pterygium tissue itself. There was no rotation of this graft, and it was adhered to the bare scleral defect with fibrin glue. Histopathological analysis of pterygium tissue was done to look for morphology and thickness of this thin conjunctival tissue obtained from pterygium tissue itself. The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate. Other outcome measures studied was graft retraction and graft edema.

Results:

The mean age was 52 ± 10.04 years. Mean follow-up was 14 ± 8.24 months. The only significant complication was recurrence rate of 4.08% (4 eyes out of 98). The most come secondary outcome was graft edema, 52.04% (51 eyes out of 98) which resolved without any intervention. Other outcome such as graft retraction, 32.65% was also recorded.

Conclusion:

Conjunctival tissue from the pterygium tissue itself without actual rotation appears to be a successful technique with lower recurrence rate for treating primary pterygium in eyes with glaucoma filtering bleb, glaucoma suspects, and in primary double-head pterygium.

Conjunctival autograft in pterygium treatment

Pterygium is characterized by the thickening of the bulbar conjunctiva and the invasion of the cornea from the sclerocorneal limbus to the central portion of the cornea. Pterygium produces corneal deformation, which extends toward the central portion of the cornea. The visual disorders depend on the corneal extent. The treatment goal is the removal of the corneal and conjunctival portion of the pterygium and the coverage of the resulting conjunctival defect. The association of the pterygium surgical excision was assessed with conjunctival autograft. For this purpose, a retrospective study was performed on 68 patients and was extended over 7 years (2009-2015). Patients with recurrent pterygium were excluded. The time for corneal re-epithelization and for the pain and photophobia disappearance was followed. The incidence of recurrence was also observed. Pain levels were assessed by using a 10-point visual analog linear scale (VAS). The mean time for ocular pain and photophobia disappearance was of 48 hours. The mean pain score was 3.38 at 24 hours after surgery. Corneal re-epithelialization was achieved in 60 hours after surgery. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients. It was concluded that pterygium surgical excision with conjunctival autograft is effective in pterygium surgery.

Clinical analysis of risk factors contributing to recurrence of pterygium after excision and graft surgery

AIM

To find the risk factors related to the reproliferation of the pterygial tissue after excision and graft surgery.

METHODS

Charts of 130 eyes of 130 patients who had pterygial excision from March 2006 to April 2011 were reviewed. Preoperative pterygium morphology, surgical methods, and adjunctive treatments were statistically analyzed for their relationship with recurrence.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, recurrence was observed in 20 eyes (15.4%). None of the preoperative morphologic features were affected the rate of the recurrence. However, an age < 40y [P =0.085, odds ratio (OR) 3.609, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.838-15.540] and amniotic membrane graft instead of conjunctival autograft (P =0.002, OR 9.093, 95% CI 2.316-35.698) were statistically significant risk factors for recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) (P=0.072, OR 0.298, 95% CI 0.080-1.115) decreased the rate of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Younger age is a risk factor for reproliferation of pterygial tissue after excision and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) are less effective in preventing recurrence of pterygium after excision based on the comparison between conjunctival autograft and AMT. Intraoperative MMC application and conjunctival autograft reduce recurrence.

Young patient's age determines pterygium recurrence after surgery

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether demographic or pterygium characteristics or limbal stem cell deficiency determine pterygium recurrence after surgery.

PURPOSE

To determine whether the demographic, pterygium characteristics, or limbal stem cell deficiency determine pterygium recurrence after excision.

METHODS

Of 190 patients operated and followed-up for 6 months, 101 and 89 underwent free conjunctival autotransplant (CAT) or limbal conjunctival autotransplant (LCAT) respectively. The age, gender, occupation, grade of pterygium extent and degree of fleshiness, and laterality were compared between recurrent and no recurrent pterygia. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the predictors of pterygium recurrence. Recurrence rates after surgery were compared between CAT and LCAT.

RESULTS

The age range of the 190 patients was 22-65 years, mean ±SD 46.4 ±10.8 years. Pterygium recurred in 52 (27.4%). Thirty-nine (75%) of 52 patients with pterygia that recurred were aged <50 years (young) vs. 72 (52%) of 138 young patients with no recurrence; odds ratio (OR) = 1.54; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.70-3.36; p = 0.28. Thirty-one (60%) of 52 participants with post-surgical recurrent pterygia had large pre-operative pterygium (grade ≥3) vs. 130 (94%) of 138 patients with large pterygia that did not recur; OR = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.04-0.28; p <0.001. Of 101 patients undergoing CAT, 29 (28.7%) experienced recurrence vs. 23 (25.8%) of 89 undergoing LCAT; p = 0.66.

CONCLUSIONS

Young age seems to be associated with pterygium recurrence after excision followed by conjunctival graft. Large pterygia were protective.